New York Times Admits Unvaxxed People Have ‘Lower Rates of Infection And Hospitalization’ Of COVID-19 Than The Vaxxed.

Theowl32

Diamond Member
Dec 8, 2013
23,454
18,328
2,415
New York Times Admits Unvaxxed People Have ‘Lower Rates of Infection And Hospitalization’ Of COVID-19 Than The Vaxxed.

by Natalie Winters



January 27, 2022

The New York Times has finally accepted
that individuals unvaccinated against COVID-19 who previously contracted the virus had “lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone.”

A January 19th update posted to the outlet’s COVID-19 live blog explains how unvaccinated individuals who previously contracted the virus “had lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone”:

During the week beginning May 30, 2021, vaccinated people who had not experienced Covid had the lowest risk of coronavirus infection and hospitalization, followed by unvaccinated people who had been previously diagnosed with Covid.

By the week beginning Oct. 3, however, vaccinated people with a prior diagnosis fared best against the Delta variant. Unvaccinated people with a history of Covid also had lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone.

“The data are consistent with trends observed in international studies, the researchers said,” added The New York Times.

The outlet attempts to explain the disparity in vaccinated and unvaccinated people contracting COVID-19 by attributing it to the “waning of vaccine-derived immunity.”

“A recent study of employees at the Cleveland Clinic suggested that while vaccination does not add much benefit to a prior bout for the first many months, it may offer better protection against symptomatic illness over the long term than does immunity from a previous infection,” reasons the outlet.


Of course this article by the NY Times has been taken down. Don't worry folks. The vaccines work against the disease and all variants of the disease except against those carrying the disease and all variants. Including the STEALTH VARIANTS THAT CANNOT BE DETECTED.

The globalists have to be having a laugh at the sheer stupidity of the auto compliant.
 
New York Times Admits Unvaxxed People Have ‘Lower Rates of Infection And Hospitalization’ Of COVID-19 Than The Vaxxed.

by Natalie Winters



January 27, 2022

The New York Times has finally accepted
that individuals unvaccinated against COVID-19 who previously contracted the virus had “lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone.”

A January 19th update posted to the outlet’s COVID-19 live blog explains how unvaccinated individuals who previously contracted the virus “had lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone”:

During the week beginning May 30, 2021, vaccinated people who had not experienced Covid had the lowest risk of coronavirus infection and hospitalization, followed by unvaccinated people who had been previously diagnosed with Covid.

By the week beginning Oct. 3, however, vaccinated people with a prior diagnosis fared best against the Delta variant. Unvaccinated people with a history of Covid also had lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone.

“The data are consistent with trends observed in international studies, the researchers said,” added The New York Times.

The outlet attempts to explain the disparity in vaccinated and unvaccinated people contracting COVID-19 by attributing it to the “waning of vaccine-derived immunity.”

“A recent study of employees at the Cleveland Clinic suggested that while vaccination does not add much benefit to a prior bout for the first many months, it may offer better protection against symptomatic illness over the long term than does immunity from a previous infection,” reasons the outlet.


Of course this article by the NY Times has been taken down. Don't worry folks. The vaccines work against the disease and all variants of the disease except against those carrying the disease and all variants. Including the STEALTH VARIANTS THAT CANNOT BE DETECTED.

The globalists have to be having a laugh at the sheer stupidity of the auto compliant.
Wow, the wheels are really falling off the Coof Hoax Express.
 
New York Times Admits Unvaxxed People Have ‘Lower Rates of Infection And Hospitalization’ Of COVID-19 Than The Vaxxed.

by Natalie Winters



January 27, 2022

The New York Times has finally accepted
that individuals unvaccinated against COVID-19 who previously contracted the virus had “lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone.”

A January 19th update posted to the outlet’s COVID-19 live blog explains how unvaccinated individuals who previously contracted the virus “had lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone”:

During the week beginning May 30, 2021, vaccinated people who had not experienced Covid had the lowest risk of coronavirus infection and hospitalization, followed by unvaccinated people who had been previously diagnosed with Covid.

By the week beginning Oct. 3, however, vaccinated people with a prior diagnosis fared best against the Delta variant. Unvaccinated people with a history of Covid also had lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone.

“The data are consistent with trends observed in international studies, the researchers said,” added The New York Times.

The outlet attempts to explain the disparity in vaccinated and unvaccinated people contracting COVID-19 by attributing it to the “waning of vaccine-derived immunity.”

“A recent study of employees at the Cleveland Clinic suggested that while vaccination does not add much benefit to a prior bout for the first many months, it may offer better protection against symptomatic illness over the long term than does immunity from a previous infection,” reasons the outlet.


Of course this article by the NY Times has been taken down. Don't worry folks. The vaccines work against the disease and all variants of the disease except against those carrying the disease and all variants. Including the STEALTH VARIANTS THAT CANNOT BE DETECTED.

The globalists have to be having a laugh at the sheer stupidity of the auto compliant.
The link to the NY Times piece has NOTHING to do with this alt-right rag's disinformation.
Natalie Winters and The Cleveland Clinic. Hell, where are America's Frontline Doctors??..one of them is going to be
Florida's Surgeon General...you just can't make this shit up! :auiqs.jpg:
 
Nobody in the world could have fucked up our COVID response any worse than Fauci, vaccine salesman of the year for 2021. That man killed a lot of people and continues to do so by preventing the use of ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine and the monoclonals. Any one of us could be his next victim. The man belongs in jail.
 
Why are you using a fake news site to report on a real news site?

alt-right rag's disinformation.

This Natalie Winters chick doesn't know what the fuck she's talking about.


This is info from the US gub'mit DOD......is it 'fake' also?????
1643568476707.jpeg



~S~
 
New York Times Admits Unvaxxed People Have ‘Lower Rates of Infection And Hospitalization’ Of COVID-19 Than The Vaxxed.

by Natalie Winters



January 27, 2022

The New York Times has finally accepted
that individuals unvaccinated against COVID-19 who previously contracted the virus had “lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone.”

A January 19th update posted to the outlet’s COVID-19 live blog explains how unvaccinated individuals who previously contracted the virus “had lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone”:

During the week beginning May 30, 2021, vaccinated people who had not experienced Covid had the lowest risk of coronavirus infection and hospitalization, followed by unvaccinated people who had been previously diagnosed with Covid.

By the week beginning Oct. 3, however, vaccinated people with a prior diagnosis fared best against the Delta variant. Unvaccinated people with a history of Covid also had lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone.

“The data are consistent with trends observed in international studies, the researchers said,” added The New York Times.

The outlet attempts to explain the disparity in vaccinated and unvaccinated people contracting COVID-19 by attributing it to the “waning of vaccine-derived immunity.”

“A recent study of employees at the Cleveland Clinic suggested that while vaccination does not add much benefit to a prior bout for the first many months, it may offer better protection against symptomatic illness over the long term than does immunity from a previous infection,” reasons the outlet.


Of course this article by the NY Times has been taken down. Don't worry folks. The vaccines work against the disease and all variants of the disease except against those carrying the disease and all variants. Including the STEALTH VARIANTS THAT CANNOT BE DETECTED.

The globalists have to be having a laugh at the sheer stupidity of the auto compliant.

New York Times Admits Unvaxxed People Have ‘Lower Rates of Infection And Hospitalization’ Of COVID-19 Than The Vaxxed.

by Natalie Winters



January 27, 2022

The New York Times has finally accepted
that individuals unvaccinated against COVID-19 who previously contracted the virus had “lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone.”

A January 19th update posted to the outlet’s COVID-19 live blog explains how unvaccinated individuals who previously contracted the virus “had lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone”:

During the week beginning May 30, 2021, vaccinated people who had not experienced Covid had the lowest risk of coronavirus infection and hospitalization, followed by unvaccinated people who had been previously diagnosed with Covid.

By the week beginning Oct. 3, however, vaccinated people with a prior diagnosis fared best against the Delta variant. Unvaccinated people with a history of Covid also had lower rates of infection and hospitalization than those protected by vaccines alone.

“The data are consistent with trends observed in international studies, the researchers said,” added The New York Times.

The outlet attempts to explain the disparity in vaccinated and unvaccinated people contracting COVID-19 by attributing it to the “waning of vaccine-derived immunity.”

“A recent study of employees at the Cleveland Clinic suggested that while vaccination does not add much benefit to a prior bout for the first many months, it may offer better protection against symptomatic illness over the long term than does immunity from a previous infection,” reasons the outlet.


Of course this article by the NY Times has been taken down. Don't worry folks. The vaccines work against the disease and all variants of the disease except against those carrying the disease and all variants. Including the STEALTH VARIANTS THAT CANNOT BE DETECTED.

The globalists have to be having a laugh at the sheer stupidity of the auto compliant.
Conclusions

Both previous infection and vaccination provide substantial protection against COVID-19. Vaccination of previously infected individuals does not provide additional protection against COVID-19 for several months, but after that provides significant protection at least against symptomatic COVID-19.


From the National Pulse
“A recent study of employees at the Cleveland Clinic suggested that while vaccination does not add much benefit to a prior bout for the first many months, it may offer better protection against symptomatic illness over the long term than does immunity from a previous infection,” reasons the outlet.

----------------------------------------------
Notice any difference, that why we have the booster.
 
Conclusions

Both previous infection and vaccination provide substantial protection against COVID-19. Vaccination of previously infected individuals does not provide additional protection against COVID-19 for several months, but after that provides significant protection at least against symptomatic COVID-19.


From the National Pulse
“A recent study of employees at the Cleveland Clinic suggested that while vaccination does not add much benefit to a prior bout for the first many months, it may offer better protection against symptomatic illness over the long term than does immunity from a previous infection,” reasons the outlet.

----------------------------------------------
Notice any difference, that why we have the booster.
Sounds like you need another booster shot.
 
The Covid Gestapo has created a whole new playbook on how to deploy MISINFORMATION. The WHO, CDC, Fauci, Biden, Liberal TV and Social Media have conspired to push Big Pharma vaccines and mock cheap effective treatments. The result has been two years of jam packed hospitals and hundreds of thousands of needless deaths worldwide.
11 years from out own government,

Ivermectin, ‘Wonder drug’ from Japan: the human use perspective​

There are few drugs that can seriously lay claim to the title of ‘Wonder drug’, penicillin and aspirin being two that have perhaps had greatest beneficial impact on the health and wellbeing of Mankind. But ivermectin can also be considered alongside those worthy contenders, based on its versatility, safety and the beneficial impact that it has had, and continues to have, worldwide..................................................
 

Forum List

Back
Top