Trump can end fraudulent birthright citizenship bestowed on illegals offspring

[johnwk]

.
Note that the Wong Kim Ark ruling based birthright citizenship on the status of his parents when born, who were lawfully domiciled in the United States. Our current statutory wording for lawfully domiciled is lawful permanent residence (LPR) SOURCE

And, as expressed under existing statutory law see: A. General Requirements for Acquisition of Citizenship at Birth
In general, a person born outside of the United States may acquire citizenship at birth if all of the following requirements are met at the time of the person’s birth:

The person is a child[2] of a U.S. citizen parent(s);

The U.S. citizen parent meets certain residence or physical presence requirements in the United States or an outlying possession before the person’s birth in accordance with the applicable provision;[3] and

The person meets all other applicable requirements under either INA 301 or INA 309.

.
Considering the current recognition of birthright citizenship granted to the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national is nothing more than unwritten “policy”, President Trump has a number of options to put an end to birthright citizenship being recognized for the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born on American soil. See: Here’s how Pres. Trump can end Birthright Citizenship…

YES! Trump can end fraudulent birthright citizenship being bestowed on the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals.

JWK

“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." - Joseph Story

 

[MarathonMike]

Birthright citizenship was clearly intended to insure the rights of slave offspring, not illegal aliens. Trump MUST END this madness.

 

[crossbody]

birthright citizenship is not a fraud.

 

[johnwk]

birthright citizenship is not a fraud.

Being bestowed on the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals certainly is a fraud. And it is now leading to American citizens being turned into taxed slaves to finance the economic and social needs of these invaders.

I’m curious if you see the Chinese birth tourism industry as a threat to the general welfare of the United States and her CITIZENS. See: The New Face of Birth Tourism: Chinese Nationals, American Surrogates, and Birthright Citizenship

 

[ZestolPastilevsky]

While I agree, the fact is that there are top dollar lawyers anywhere who can spin any piece of law to mean whatever they want it to mean, to the point that it's almost pointless to argue about such matters.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Being bestowed on the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals certainly is a fraud. And it is now leading to American citizens being turned into taxed slaves to finance the economic and social needs of these invaders.

I’m curious if you see the Chinese birth tourism industry as a threat to the general welfare of the United States and her CITIZENS. See: The New Face of Birth Tourism: Chinese Nationals, American Surrogates, and Birthright Citizenship

$200,000,000 of uncompensated medical care, just at ONE hospital system.

This is why going to the doctor is so freaking expensive, and your medical insurance is probably not worth a crap. While you are denied services, because hospitals have to charge so much that insurance companies don't want to pay for it.

 

[MarathonMike]

birthright citizenship is not a fraud.

It most certainly is a fraud. The INTENT of the 14th Amendment was obvious. Democrats have TWISTED the wording of the 14th Amendment to create birthright citizenship for illegal aliens entering the country.

 

[MarathonMike]

$200,000,000 of uncompensated medical care, just at ONE hospital system.

This is why going to the doctor is so freaking expensive, and your medical insurance is probably not worth a crap. While you are denied services, because hospitals have to charge so much that insurance companies don't want to pay for it.

Anchor premature babies often cost much more than $200K in medical care.

 

[crossbody]

Being bestowed on the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals certainly is a fraud. And it is now leading to American citizens being turned into taxed slaves to finance the economic and social needs of these invaders.

I’m curious if you see the Chinese birth tourism industry as a threat to the general welfare of the United States and her CITIZENS. See: The New Face of Birth Tourism: Chinese Nationals, American Surrogates, and Birthright Citizenship

where is the love?

babies born in America are Americans

 

[johnwk]

where is the love?

babies born in America are Americans

Not the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

where is the love?

babies born in America are Americans

No they're not. As you'll soon find out

Trump is THE man who can fix this loophole. This is why I voted for him

 

[Crepitus]

.
Note that the Wong Kim Ark ruling based birthright citizenship on the status of his parents when born, who were lawfully domiciled in the United States. Our current statutory wording for lawfully domiciled is lawful permanent residence (LPR) SOURCE

And, as expressed under existing statutory law see: A. General Requirements for Acquisition of Citizenship at Birth
In general, a person born outside of the United States may acquire citizenship at birth if all of the following requirements are met at the time of the person’s birth:

The person is a child[2] of a U.S. citizen parent(s);

The U.S. citizen parent meets certain residence or physical presence requirements in the United States or an outlying possession before the person’s birth in accordance with the applicable provision;[3] and

The person meets all other applicable requirements under either INA 301 or INA 309.

.
Considering the current recognition of birthright citizenship granted to the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national is nothing more than unwritten “policy”, President Trump has a number of options to put an end to birthright citizenship being recognized for the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born on American soil. See: Here’s how Pres. Trump can end Birthright Citizenship…

YES! Trump can end fraudulent birthright citizenship being bestowed on the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals.

JWK

“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." - Joseph Story

Um... What's fraudulent about birthright citizenship?

 

[1srelluc]

Birth-right citizenship should be one of the first things ended by Trump if he has the authority to do so. Congress should then codify it.

Even if he doesn't, do it anyway as it will take two years for it to get to SCOTUS so end it by EO and let the people have their voices heard by SCOTUS for two years and then see how they rule on the matter.

I'm damn sick and tired of seeing damn near every woman of birthing age coming across our border all preggers.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Um... What's fraudulent about birthright citizenship?

It wasn't the intent of the amendment. People are using it as a loophole. We're gonna close that loophole

 

[johnwk]

Um... What's fraudulent about birthright citizenship?

Um . . . did you miss the part about ending fraudulent birthright citizenship bestowed on illegals offspring?

 

[d0gbreath]

Watching Donald amend The Constitution all by himself should be a h00t!

 

[1srelluc]

Watching Donald amend The Constitution all by himself should be a h00t!

Well he'll be to do it for at least two years before SCOTUS rules.....And that's not a sure thing for the evil dems.

 

[jwoodie]

It most certainly is a fraud. The INTENT of the 14th Amendment was obvious. Democrats have TWISTED the wording of the 14th Amendment to create birthright citizenship for illegal aliens entering the country.

The wording of the 14th Amendment was lifted from the original Constitution itself, in order to remove the provision of counting 3/5 of the slave population for state representation in Congress. Unfortunately, it retained the obsolete term "persons" instead of permanent residents. The Constitution is otherwise clear that temporary residents (e.g., foreign diplomats and their families) are NOT to be considered to be legally residing in the United States.

 

[lafayette]

.
Note that the Wong Kim Ark ruling based birthright citizenship on the status of his parents when born, who were lawfully domiciled in the United States. Our current statutory wording for lawfully domiciled is lawful permanent residence (LPR) SOURCE

And, as expressed under existing statutory law see: A. General Requirements for Acquisition of Citizenship at Birth
In general, a person born outside of the United States may acquire citizenship at birth if all of the following requirements are met at the time of the person’s birth:

The person is a child[2] of a U.S. citizen parent(s);

The U.S. citizen parent meets certain residence or physical presence requirements in the United States or an outlying possession before the person’s birth in accordance with the applicable provision;[3] and

The person meets all other applicable requirements under either INA 301 or INA 309.

.
Considering the current recognition of birthright citizenship granted to the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national is nothing more than unwritten “policy”, President Trump has a number of options to put an end to birthright citizenship being recognized for the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born on American soil. See: Here’s how Pres. Trump can end Birthright Citizenship…

YES! Trump can end fraudulent birthright citizenship being bestowed on the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals.

JWK

“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." - Joseph Story

johnwk, that is so weak.

 

[d0gbreath]

Well he'll be to do it for at least two years before SCOTUS rules.....And that's not a sure thing for the evil dems.

What will SCOTUS be ruling on that will effect the 14th amendment?