New Ethics Violations Alleged Against Hillary Clinton

Yes they were really false. After almost three decades of investigations, are you trying to claim the fault was just a little exaggeration? NO. It's a concerted effort to throw any silly accusation they can think of and hope at least one of them can come up lucky. You are hoping the FBI investigation will finally be the one that pays off, but with your history of lies, I wouldn't count on it. She didn't put herself into any position. The right is attacking, and doing a poor job of it. Fortunately, for you, lots of brain dead right wingers don't need facts to make up their minds. Unfounded accusations are enough for you.

So you're saying she didn't have a private server?
The server didn't contain classified and other sensitive information?
She didn't destroy government property when she attempted to wipe the hard drives?
She didn't lie to congress when she said she only used one device?

Is that what you're saying?


I'm saying you haven't and can't prove any wrong doing by Hillary. Come back if and when you can.

Her just having that kind of information on a private unsecured server is a violation of law, you refuse to admit it.


Then why haven't the legal authorities charged her with that? Try again when they do.

This will be the most heavily scrutinized investigation in FBI history, they will ensure there are no questions unanswered before they release any recommendations.


So you have nothing but the hope that your accusations will be fruitful. Try again when you have something real.
 
So you're saying she didn't have a private server?
The server didn't contain classified and other sensitive information?
She didn't destroy government property when she attempted to wipe the hard drives?
She didn't lie to congress when she said she only used one device?

Is that what you're saying?


I'm saying you haven't and can't prove any wrong doing by Hillary. Come back if and when you can.

Her just having that kind of information on a private unsecured server is a violation of law, you refuse to admit it.


Then why haven't the legal authorities charged her with that? Try again when they do.

This will be the most heavily scrutinized investigation in FBI history, they will ensure there are no questions unanswered before they release any recommendations.


So you have nothing but the hope that your accusations will be fruitful. Try again when you have something real.

It's already real, I'm sorry you're in such denial, the only question is what charges will be recommended and whether the regimes DOJ will act on them.
 
Yes they were really false. After almost three decades of investigations, are you trying to claim the fault was just a little exaggeration? NO. It's a concerted effort to throw any silly accusation they can think of and hope at least one of them can come up lucky. You are hoping the FBI investigation will finally be the one that pays off, but with your history of lies, I wouldn't count on it. She didn't put herself into any position. The right is attacking, and doing a poor job of it. Fortunately, for you, lots of brain dead right wingers don't need facts to make up their minds. Unfounded accusations are enough for you.

So you're saying she didn't have a private server?
The server didn't contain classified and other sensitive information?
She didn't destroy government property when she attempted to wipe the hard drives?
She didn't lie to congress when she said she only used one device?

Is that what you're saying?


I'm saying you haven't and can't prove any wrong doing by Hillary. Come back if and when you can.

Her just having that kind of information on a private unsecured server is a violation of law, you refuse to admit it.


Then why haven't the legal authorities charged her with that? Try again when they do.

This will be the most heavily scrutinized investigation in FBI history, they will ensure there are no questions unanswered before they release any recommendations.
Does this mean you will accept she is innocent if they find no evidence of wrong doing on her part?
 
So you're saying she didn't have a private server?
The server didn't contain classified and other sensitive information?
She didn't destroy government property when she attempted to wipe the hard drives?
She didn't lie to congress when she said she only used one device?

Is that what you're saying?


I'm saying you haven't and can't prove any wrong doing by Hillary. Come back if and when you can.

Her just having that kind of information on a private unsecured server is a violation of law, you refuse to admit it.


Then why haven't the legal authorities charged her with that? Try again when they do.

This will be the most heavily scrutinized investigation in FBI history, they will ensure there are no questions unanswered before they release any recommendations.
Does this mean you will accept she is innocent if they find no evidence of wrong doing on her part?

Innocent, not in this life time, everyone knows she's guilty, the FBI is making a determination of adequate evidence to support a criminal prosecution. We know she had classified information on her unsecured system, we know she lied to a federal judge about turning over all her work related emails, we know she violated federal records keeping laws and last we know she violated her own departments policies by having sensitive but unclassified communications on an unsecured system. No, she's no where close to innocent.
 
I'm saying you haven't and can't prove any wrong doing by Hillary. Come back if and when you can.

Her just having that kind of information on a private unsecured server is a violation of law, you refuse to admit it.


Then why haven't the legal authorities charged her with that? Try again when they do.

This will be the most heavily scrutinized investigation in FBI history, they will ensure there are no questions unanswered before they release any recommendations.
Does this mean you will accept she is innocent if they find no evidence of wrong doing on her part?

Innocent, not in this life time, everyone knows she's guilty, the FBI is making a determination of adequate evidence to support a criminal prosecution. We know she had classified information on her unsecured system, we know she lied to a federal judge about turning over all her work related emails, we know she violated federal records keeping laws and last we know she violated her own departments policies by having sensitive but unclassified communications on an unsecured system. No, she's no where close to innocent.
Holyfuckingshit! :cuckoo:

So even if the FBI finds no wrong doing on her part, which you said would be a thorough investigation, you're still not gonna believe them. :eusa_doh:

According to morons like you, there isn't a need for an investigation.
thumbsup.gif
 
gee, a conservative 'watchdog' group has found something to bitch about.

surely by now you realize it's more about the accusation than the merits of the charge

Actually it's about evidence found in her emails, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?

Hitlery using her position as SOS paving the way for her son in law to make money??

Color me shocked.
 
How is someone who has not held public office since 2012 guilty of ethics violations in 2015?
 
How is someone who has not held public office since 2012 guilty of ethics violations in 2015?
Even worse.... now she's guilty even if the department investigating determines she did nothing wrong. That won't matter, she's still guilty. :eusa_doh:
 
You can't be prosecuted for incompetence. To bad. Loads in Govt. wouldn't survive.

The gross negligence and incompetence of her State Department got four good men killed.

If you can't see that and depend on an investigation to form your opinions then there is no hope for you at all.

Oh and if you thought any investigation was going to find fault with the State Department then your a bigger fool than I thought you were.
 
I'm saying you haven't and can't prove any wrong doing by Hillary. Come back if and when you can.

Her just having that kind of information on a private unsecured server is a violation of law, you refuse to admit it.


Then why haven't the legal authorities charged her with that? Try again when they do.

This will be the most heavily scrutinized investigation in FBI history, they will ensure there are no questions unanswered before they release any recommendations.
Does this mean you will accept she is innocent if they find no evidence of wrong doing on her part?

Innocent, not in this life time, everyone knows she's guilty, the FBI is making a determination of adequate evidence to support a criminal prosecution. We know she had classified information on her unsecured system, we know she lied to a federal judge about turning over all her work related emails, we know she violated federal records keeping laws and last we know she violated her own departments policies by having sensitive but unclassified communications on an unsecured system. No, she's no where close to innocent.


So you won't accept the FBI determination if they say she did nothing wrong?
 
Her just having that kind of information on a private unsecured server is a violation of law, you refuse to admit it.


Then why haven't the legal authorities charged her with that? Try again when they do.

This will be the most heavily scrutinized investigation in FBI history, they will ensure there are no questions unanswered before they release any recommendations.
Does this mean you will accept she is innocent if they find no evidence of wrong doing on her part?

Innocent, not in this life time, everyone knows she's guilty, the FBI is making a determination of adequate evidence to support a criminal prosecution. We know she had classified information on her unsecured system, we know she lied to a federal judge about turning over all her work related emails, we know she violated federal records keeping laws and last we know she violated her own departments policies by having sensitive but unclassified communications on an unsecured system. No, she's no where close to innocent.


So you won't accept the FBI determination if they say she did nothing wrong?
The FBI cannot determine that Hillary did nothing wrong when she so obviously did and has admitted it. They can only determine the extent of her compromising the country's security.

Whether you can bring yourself to acknowledge it or not, the Beast has seriously damaged herself. And no, it is not a vast right-wing conspiracy.
 
You can't be prosecuted for incompetence. To bad. Loads in Govt. wouldn't survive.

The gross negligence and incompetence of her State Department got four good men killed.

If you can't see that and depend on an investigation to form your opinions then there is no hope for you at all.

Oh and if you thought any investigation was going to find fault with the State Department then your a bigger fool than I thought you were.
Idiot... we're talking about the investigation into her purported misuse of email. No one died over that so your hopes are already dashed.
 
Then why haven't the legal authorities charged her with that? Try again when they do.

This will be the most heavily scrutinized investigation in FBI history, they will ensure there are no questions unanswered before they release any recommendations.
Does this mean you will accept she is innocent if they find no evidence of wrong doing on her part?

Innocent, not in this life time, everyone knows she's guilty, the FBI is making a determination of adequate evidence to support a criminal prosecution. We know she had classified information on her unsecured system, we know she lied to a federal judge about turning over all her work related emails, we know she violated federal records keeping laws and last we know she violated her own departments policies by having sensitive but unclassified communications on an unsecured system. No, she's no where close to innocent.


So you won't accept the FBI determination if they say she did nothing wrong?
The FBI cannot determine that Hillary did nothing wrong when she so obviously did and has admitted it. They can only determine the extent of her compromising the country's security.

Whether you can bring yourself to acknowledge it or not, the Beast has seriously damaged herself. And no, it is not a vast right-wing conspiracy.


You right wingers really need to make up your minds. There have been lots of right wing threads hopefully claiming the FBI is going to get her. There are no facts to support that claim, but that never stopped the right before.
 
You can't be prosecuted for incompetence. To bad. Loads in Govt. wouldn't survive.

The gross negligence and incompetence of her State Department got four good men killed.

If you can't see that and depend on an investigation to form your opinions then there is no hope for you at all.

Oh and if you thought any investigation was going to find fault with the State Department then your a bigger fool than I thought you were.
Idiot... we're talking about the investigation into her purported misuse of email. No one died over that so your hopes are already dashed.

Oh so you don't have a problem with a SOS that doesn't know the meaning of the word CLASSIFIED??

Of course you don't.
 
You can't be prosecuted for incompetence. To bad. Loads in Govt. wouldn't survive.

The gross negligence and incompetence of her State Department got four good men killed.

If you can't see that and depend on an investigation to form your opinions then there is no hope for you at all.

Oh and if you thought any investigation was going to find fault with the State Department then your a bigger fool than I thought you were.
Idiot... we're talking about the investigation into her purported misuse of email. No one died over that so your hopes are already dashed.

Oh so you don't have a problem with a SOS that doesn't know the meaning of the word CLASSIFIED??

Of course you don't.
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. You were talking about Benghazi while everyone else was talking about email.

:cuckoo:
 
You can't be prosecuted for incompetence. To bad. Loads in Govt. wouldn't survive.

The gross negligence and incompetence of her State Department got four good men killed.

If you can't see that and depend on an investigation to form your opinions then there is no hope for you at all.

Oh and if you thought any investigation was going to find fault with the State Department then your a bigger fool than I thought you were.
Idiot... we're talking about the investigation into her purported misuse of email. No one died over that so your hopes are already dashed.

Oh so you don't have a problem with a SOS that doesn't know the meaning of the word CLASSIFIED??

Of course you don't.
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. You were talking about Benghazi while everyone else was talking about email.

:cuckoo:

You don't know what your fucking talking about.

Benghazi or E-mails Hitlery is incompetent. She proves it with her handling of Benghazi and the fact she doesn't seem to know what CLASSIFIED means.

Make excuses all you want but incompetent is incompetent.
 
Her just having that kind of information on a private unsecured server is a violation of law, you refuse to admit it.


Then why haven't the legal authorities charged her with that? Try again when they do.

This will be the most heavily scrutinized investigation in FBI history, they will ensure there are no questions unanswered before they release any recommendations.
Does this mean you will accept she is innocent if they find no evidence of wrong doing on her part?

Innocent, not in this life time, everyone knows she's guilty, the FBI is making a determination of adequate evidence to support a criminal prosecution. We know she had classified information on her unsecured system, we know she lied to a federal judge about turning over all her work related emails, we know she violated federal records keeping laws and last we know she violated her own departments policies by having sensitive but unclassified communications on an unsecured system. No, she's no where close to innocent.
Holyfuckingshit! :cuckoo:

So even if the FBI finds no wrong doing on her part, which you said would be a thorough investigation, you're still not gonna believe them. :eusa_doh:

According to morons like you, there isn't a need for an investigation.
thumbsup.gif

I see you didn't dispute any of the facts I stated, like I said earlier they only thing the FBI needs to determine is the level of criminal culpability and to lay out the evidence to sustain a prosecution.
 
You can't be prosecuted for incompetence. To bad. Loads in Govt. wouldn't survive.

The gross negligence and incompetence of her State Department got four good men killed.

If you can't see that and depend on an investigation to form your opinions then there is no hope for you at all.

Oh and if you thought any investigation was going to find fault with the State Department then your a bigger fool than I thought you were.
Idiot... we're talking about the investigation into her purported misuse of email. No one died over that so your hopes are already dashed.

Oh so you don't have a problem with a SOS that doesn't know the meaning of the word CLASSIFIED??

Of course you don't.
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. You were talking about Benghazi while everyone else was talking about email.

:cuckoo:

You don't know what your fucking talking about.

Benghazi or E-mails Hitlery is incompetent. She proves it with her handling of Benghazi and the fact she doesn't seem to know what CLASSIFIED means.

Make excuses all you want but incompetent is incompetent.
Spits the forum rightard who confused Benghazi with Hillary's email. :eusa_doh:
 

Forum List

Back
Top