New Ethics Violations Alleged Against Hillary Clinton

[OKTexas]

Mod Edit -- Changed a word in the title and 1st line to make OP legal in Zone2. - FCT

Watchdog group says H.R. Clinton is the worst ethics violator of 2015.

A conservative watchdog group is calling for a new federal investigation into Hillary Clinton's actions during her time as secretary of state.

This time, the Democratic presidential front-runner is accused of giving special government access to an investor in a deep-sea mining company due to his ties to Clinton's son-in-law, hedge fund manager Marc Mezvinsky.

The group, the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT), filed a complaint with the U.S. Office of Government Ethics on Monday, alleging that Clinton "gave a private company special access to the State Department based upon the company's relationships with Secretary Clinton's family members and donors to the Clinton Foundation."

The complaint, first obtained by TIME, comes two weeks after one of Clinton's court-ordered email releases showed that she asked a senior State Department official to follow up on a special request from Mezvinsky, the husband of her daughter, Chelsea Clinton.

Read more at: Hillary Clinton Faces Call for New Ethics Investigation After Son-in-Law Asked for a Business Favor

Also see:
6 in 10 American Voters Do Not Trust Hillary Clinton
Plurality would be ‘embarrassed’ if she won 2016 election

6 in 10 American Voters Do Not Trust Hillary Clinton

 

[ogibillm]

gee, a conservative 'watchdog' group has found something to bitch about.

surely by now you realize it's more about the accusation than the merits of the charge

 

[OKTexas]

gee, a conservative 'watchdog' group has found something to bitch about.

surely by now you realize it's more about the accusation than the merits of the charge

Actually it's about evidence found in her emails, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

They should merge our threads. I didn't see you had already posted the story.

 

[saveliberty]

I am surprised the word ethics can be in a sentence with the words Hillary Clinton.

 

[ogibillm]

gee, a conservative 'watchdog' group has found something to bitch about.

surely by now you realize it's more about the accusation than the merits of the charge

Actually it's about evidence found in her emails, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?

you keep telling yourself that

 

[BULLDOG]

gee, a conservative 'watchdog' group has found something to bitch about.

surely by now you realize it's more about the accusation than the merits of the charge

Actually it's about evidence found in her emails, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?

You keep whining about evidence, but after all the separate investigations, there has been no evidence of wrong doing found. Why is that?

 

[OKTexas]

gee, a conservative 'watchdog' group has found something to bitch about.

surely by now you realize it's more about the accusation than the merits of the charge

Actually it's about evidence found in her emails, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?

you keep telling yourself that

No need, people are wising up to the bitch.
6 in 10 American Voters Do Not Trust Hillary Clinton
Plurality would be ‘embarrassed’ if she won 2016 election

See link in OP.

 

[ogibillm]

gee, a conservative 'watchdog' group has found something to bitch about.

surely by now you realize it's more about the accusation than the merits of the charge

Actually it's about evidence found in her emails, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?

you keep telling yourself that

No need, people are wising up to the bitch.
6 in 10 American Voters Do Not Trust Hillary Clinton
Plurality would be ‘embarrassed’ if she won 2016 election

and 'stories' like the op feed the impression. nothing will come of it, we all know that, but it's all about getting the allegation out there

 

[OKTexas]

gee, a conservative 'watchdog' group has found something to bitch about.

surely by now you realize it's more about the accusation than the merits of the charge

Actually it's about evidence found in her emails, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?

You keep whining about evidence, but after all the separate investigations, there has been no evidence of wrong doing found. Why is that?

I'm sorry you can't recognize her work product as evidence, but that's your problem, not mine. Of course with the the dear leader, the media and regressives like you providing her cover, she thinks she's invincible, don't bet on it.

 

[OKTexas]

gee, a conservative 'watchdog' group has found something to bitch about.

surely by now you realize it's more about the accusation than the merits of the charge

Actually it's about evidence found in her emails, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?

you keep telling yourself that

No need, people are wising up to the bitch.
6 in 10 American Voters Do Not Trust Hillary Clinton
Plurality would be ‘embarrassed’ if she won 2016 election

and 'stories' like the op feed the impression. nothing will come of it, we all know that, but it's all about getting the allegation out there

She better pray she wins, a new administration won't let her slide like the current criminal regime is.

 

[ogibillm]

gee, a conservative 'watchdog' group has found something to bitch about.

surely by now you realize it's more about the accusation than the merits of the charge

Actually it's about evidence found in her emails, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?

you keep telling yourself that

No need, people are wising up to the bitch.
6 in 10 American Voters Do Not Trust Hillary Clinton
Plurality would be ‘embarrassed’ if she won 2016 election

and 'stories' like the op feed the impression. nothing will come of it, we all know that, but it's all about getting the allegation out there

She better pray she wins, a new administration won't let her slide like the current criminal regime is.

that's it, it's all a conspiracy.

does your nose hurt from being lead around by that brass ring?

 

[BULLDOG]

The right is becoming more and more like an ex-mother-in-law. More dumb ass unfounded accusations every day.

gee, a conservative 'watchdog' group has found something to bitch about.

surely by now you realize it's more about the accusation than the merits of the charge

Actually it's about evidence found in her emails, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?

You keep whining about evidence, but after all the separate investigations, there has been no evidence of wrong doing found. Why is that?

I'm sorry you can't recognize her work product as evidence, but that's your problem, not mine. Of course with the the dear leader, the media and regressives like you providing her cover, she thinks she's invincible, don't bet on it.

Obviously, the republican led investigations didn't recognize her work product as evidence of wrong doing. Is Trey Goudy in the bag for Hillary too?

 

[OKTexas]

The right is becoming more and more like an ex-mother-in-law. More dumb ass unfounded accusations every day.

gee, a conservative 'watchdog' group has found something to bitch about.

surely by now you realize it's more about the accusation than the merits of the charge

Actually it's about evidence found in her emails, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?

You keep whining about evidence, but after all the separate investigations, there has been no evidence of wrong doing found. Why is that?

I'm sorry you can't recognize her work product as evidence, but that's your problem, not mine. Of course with the the dear leader, the media and regressives like you providing her cover, she thinks she's invincible, don't bet on it.

Obviously, the republican led investigations didn't recognize her work product as evidence of wrong doing. Is Trey Goudy in the bag for Hillary too?

That's the problem with you regressives, you think because she is of the hook for one deed it exonerates her for all, it doesn't work that way. That's the great thing about the hildabeast, she's the gift that keeps on giving. We'll soon discover if she's actually as far above the law as she thinks she is.

 

[mudwhistle]

Actually it's about evidence found in her emails, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?

you keep telling yourself that

No need, people are wising up to the bitch.
6 in 10 American Voters Do Not Trust Hillary Clinton
Plurality would be ‘embarrassed’ if she won 2016 election

and 'stories' like the op feed the impression. nothing will come of it, we all know that, but it's all about getting the allegation out there

She better pray she wins, a new administration won't let her slide like the current criminal regime is.

that's it, it's all a conspiracy.

does your nose hurt from being lead around by that brass ring?

Does your's?

 

[BULLDOG]

The right is becoming more and more like an ex-mother-in-law. More dumb ass unfounded accusations every day.

gee, a conservative 'watchdog' group has found something to bitch about.

surely by now you realize it's more about the accusation than the merits of the charge

Actually it's about evidence found in her emails, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?

You keep whining about evidence, but after all the separate investigations, there has been no evidence of wrong doing found. Why is that?

I'm sorry you can't recognize her work product as evidence, but that's your problem, not mine. Of course with the the dear leader, the media and regressives like you providing her cover, she thinks she's invincible, don't bet on it.

Obviously, the republican led investigations didn't recognize her work product as evidence of wrong doing. Is Trey Goudy in the bag for Hillary too?

That's the problem with you regressives, you think because she is of the hook for one deed it exonerates her for all, it doesn't work that way. That's the great thing about the hildabeast, she's the gift that keeps on giving. We'll soon discover if she's actually as far above the law as she thinks she is.

You could be right if she was off the hook for only one accusation, or only a dozen, or only a hundred. The right has been throwing literally thousands of accusations at her for almost three decades, and not one has stuck except in the minds of the accusers and their crazy followers. There is a pattern of false accusations being proven to be false. Read "The Little Boy Who Cried Wolf"

 

[OKTexas]

The right is becoming more and more like an ex-mother-in-law. More dumb ass unfounded accusations every day.

Actually it's about evidence found in her emails, but let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?

You keep whining about evidence, but after all the separate investigations, there has been no evidence of wrong doing found. Why is that?

I'm sorry you can't recognize her work product as evidence, but that's your problem, not mine. Of course with the the dear leader, the media and regressives like you providing her cover, she thinks she's invincible, don't bet on it.

Obviously, the republican led investigations didn't recognize her work product as evidence of wrong doing. Is Trey Goudy in the bag for Hillary too?

That's the problem with you regressives, you think because she is of the hook for one deed it exonerates her for all, it doesn't work that way. That's the great thing about the hildabeast, she's the gift that keeps on giving. We'll soon discover if she's actually as far above the law as she thinks she is.

You could be right if she was off the hook for only one accusation, or only a dozen, or only a hundred. The right has been throwing literally thousands of accusations at her for almost three decades, and not one has stuck except in the minds of the accusers and their crazy followers. There is a pattern of false accusations being proven to be false. Read "The Little Boy Who Cried Wolf"

Actually your problem is you don't know the difference between criminality and ethics. An act may not rise to the level of criminality but that doesn't make it ethical.

 

[BULLDOG]

The right is becoming more and more like an ex-mother-in-law. More dumb ass unfounded accusations every day.

You keep whining about evidence, but after all the separate investigations, there has been no evidence of wrong doing found. Why is that?

I'm sorry you can't recognize her work product as evidence, but that's your problem, not mine. Of course with the the dear leader, the media and regressives like you providing her cover, she thinks she's invincible, don't bet on it.

Obviously, the republican led investigations didn't recognize her work product as evidence of wrong doing. Is Trey Goudy in the bag for Hillary too?

That's the problem with you regressives, you think because she is of the hook for one deed it exonerates her for all, it doesn't work that way. That's the great thing about the hildabeast, she's the gift that keeps on giving. We'll soon discover if she's actually as far above the law as she thinks she is.

You could be right if she was off the hook for only one accusation, or only a dozen, or only a hundred. The right has been throwing literally thousands of accusations at her for almost three decades, and not one has stuck except in the minds of the accusers and their crazy followers. There is a pattern of false accusations being proven to be false. Read "The Little Boy Who Cried Wolf"

Actually your problem is you don't know the difference between criminality and ethics. An act may not rise to the level of criminality but that doesn't make it ethical.

True,but the accusations are always of supposedly criminal actions. Only after those claims are proven false do you try to save face by claiming some moral deficit. It's morally wrong to make so many false accusations.

 

[paulitician]

Hillary and more corruption? YA KIDDIN??!

 

[The Rabbi]

I am surprised the word ethics can be in a sentence with the words Hillary Clinton.

ONly if it also includes the words "violate" or "no"