Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 125,906
- 90,842
- 3,635
LOLOLhaha other then the agents that interviewed saying they didn’t believe he didIncorrect. Zero evidence suggested he didn’t lie.huh? tons of evidence including the fbi agents who interviewed him show he likely didn’t lieThe general wouldn’t need protection if he hadn’t lied to the FBI.sure they do. happens all the time. Gets the record completely clean without having to waste time on an expungementLOLhe was exonerated via the evidence the muller team was hidingLOLOLyeah frankly that’s not really an issue...the Judge a liberal lackey, who was clearly trying to delay the case until after the election....abused his power. in hopes Xiden would continue the case and abuse his office going after FlynnThe motion to dismiss had not been granted by the court.hahaa yeah the folks with the law degrees are all wrong and making mistakes and you are right !You are making the same mistakes as the political crony who wrote the bullshit motion to dismiss.hahaha no no...sorry not true at all....because the call was legit. There was literally nothing about that call that he could have lied about that was material.The call was part of a larger counterintelligence investigation. Any lie about that call was material and did impact the investigation.He couldn't of lied about a material fact related to the call...because the call was legit. The call was no longer under investigation...hence why the charge about lying about it, was BS
the evidence and law are clear...the dismissal was a 100 percent right
Flynn's motion to withdraw his guilty plea had not been granted by the court.
Nothing you're claiming had been accepted by the court.
Every legal expert of note knows that
The Govt knew they had no case
Not an issue??
It's the legal status of the case. The same way you say the judge was a Liberal lackey, others say the prosecutor who filed the motion to dismiss was a Trump lackey.
And neither matters. Flynn's legal status at the time he was pardoned was as a convicted felon. His motion to withdraw his guilty plea had not been granted by the court. The prosecutor's motion to dismiss the case had not been granted by the court.
He was forgiven, not exonerated. That will never change. Certainly not by you.
The DOJ Motion to Dismiss exonerated him
Exonerated people do not need a pardon.
He was forgiven, not exonerated.
but in this case, since xiden was one of the ring leaders of the obamagate gang that planned the unprecedented assault on the new admin and targeted flynn it was needed as well to protect the general
No evidence ever produced changed that fact.
You make it sound so unfair how he was treated when it’s obvious that this all occurred as a result of his own decision to not be honest.
and even. if he did, as the DOJ motion highlighted it wasn’t a crime
he needed protection from Xiden because as the evidence showed he was targeted by the obamagate gang...which xiden was a ring leader of...even absurdly suggesting logan act violation even after the fbi said the call was legit!
The FBI’s notes from the interview confirm his statements as lies.
None of this would have happened if Flynn hadn’t lied. None. He has only himself to blame.
regardless...the burden is on the Govt to prove he did lie...they didn’t even present any evidence! they dismissed the case because they said even if he did, it wasn’t a crime!
he remains innocent and the dismissal motion fully exonerated him
No burden of proof is needed after someone pleads guilty. Where do you come up with this shit?
And no, he's not innocent. He's a convicted felon who was pardoned.
Nor was he exonerated. The motion to dismiss was never granted.