NBC News Video of Police Officer SHOOTING Ashley Babbit on Jan. 6th

I'm curious, Kondor. Let's say Officer Byrd doesn't shoot Babbitt? What happens at that point? The House Chamber has now been evacuated. If the protesters break through that doorway and then through the next doorway...what exactly is it that they're going to do? What is going to be any different than what took place in the Senate Chamber? They're there to stop the certification process and they've succeeded. What happens next? What happened in the Senate Chamber?
What happens? Ashes comes through that window followed by a flood of other MAGArats and that barricade is breached like all the previous ones.

There was still Reps in that Chamber and Byrd had no way of knowing whether it was empty or not.

His job was to hold that barricade and he did.
 
Get the fuck outta here.

Any other policeman … yells stop and if the movement is not immediately stopped… he fires
Byrd doesn't yell ANYTHING, Lesh! Don't you grasp that? If you don't yell "Stop" you can't pull the trigger on someone! That's basic Police proceedure yet Byrd does just that!
 
What happens? Ashes comes through that window followed by a flood of other MAGArats and that barricade is breached like all the previous ones.

There was still Reps in that Chamber and Byrd had no way of knowing whether it was empty or not.

His job was to hold that barricade and he did.
Look at the time line, Lesh! As Byrd is shooting Babbitt the last of the House members are being escorted out of the House Chamber and those protesters still have to break through the barricade where Byrd is hiding and through yet another set of doors. That chamber is going to be emptied of Reps LONG before those protesters get there!
 
If your claim is that Byrd fired because he didn't know if the Chamber was empty then why hasn't there been an investigation into why Capital Police bungled this entire situation so badly? Why on earth is one of their officers opening fire to "protect" something that isn't there?
 
Look at the time line, Lesh! As Byrd is shooting Babbitt the last of the House members are being escorted out of the House Chamber and those protesters still have to break through the barricade where Byrd is hiding and through yet another set of doors. That chamber is going to be emptied of Reps LONG before those protesters get there!
From what I saw there were still Reps in the Chamber.

Your contention is that the SECOND the last Rep leaves the Chamber Byrd can abandon his post.

It doesn’t work that way and you know it.

He holds his post until he’s told that the Chamber is clear and all Reps are safely away.

You’re failing badly here junior. This had been looked at by Congress and the CP and they say YOU are full of shit
 
Last edited:
If your claim is that Byrd fired because he didn't know if the Chamber was empty then why hasn't there been an investigation into why Capital Police bungled this entire situation so badly? Why on earth is one of their officers opening fire to "protect" something that isn't there?
Now you’re just babbling. I guess when nothing you say holds up that’s all you have left
 
What happens? Ashes comes through that window followed by a flood of other MAGArats and that barricade is breached like all the previous ones.

There was still Reps in that Chamber and Byrd had no way of knowing whether it was empty or not.

His job was to hold that barricade and he did.
So let me see if I understand your reasoning here, Lesh! Byrd HAS to shoot Babbitt because his "job" is to hold that barricade to protect the House members? Is that what you're claiming?
 
I'm curious, Kondor. Let's say Officer Byrd doesn't shoot Babbitt? What happens at that point? The House Chamber has now been evacuated. If the protesters break through that doorway and then through the next doorway...what exactly is it that they're going to do? What is going to be any different than what took place in the Senate Chamber? They're there to stop the certification process and they've succeeded. What happens next? What happened in the Senate Chamber?
There is zero point in playing "What If?" at this juncture.

US Capitol Police were not given the gift of Future Sight in order to judge whether the Outcome would prove deadly or innocent or anything in-between.

What they DID see was a hyper-violent mob storming the Capitol and threatening the lives of the Senate President and House Speaker and many others.

The fact that the MAGA trailer-trash who broke through had no clue what to do next - Big Surprise there - does not factor into a defense at the barricades.

It was a Righteous Shoot.
 
So explain to me why the Police officers standing in front of the doorway leave if it's the job of the Police to hold that barricade until all of the Reps are long gone? Explain why what looks like a half dozen Police in SWAT gear are just a few feet away in the stairwell when Babbitt gets shot if the Police are tasking with "holding" that barricade until the Reps are gone? Or is it just "Magic Michael Byrd" that is tasked with holding the barricade and everyone else was taking a coffee break?
 
So let me see if I understand your reasoning here, Lesh! Byrd HAS to shoot Babbitt because his "job" is to hold that barricade to protect the House members? Is that what you're claiming?
That is essentially correct. What nonsense are you going to try now?
 
There is zero point in playing "What If?" at this juncture.

US Capitol Police were not given the gift of Future Sight in order to judge whether the Outcome would prove deadly or innocent or anything in-between.

What they DID see was a hyper-violent mob storming the Capitol and threatening the lives of the Senate President and House Speaker and many others.

The fact that the MAGA trailer-trash who broke through had no clue what to do next - Big Surprise there - does not factor into a defense at the barricades.
So basically the "hyper-violent" mob that broke into the Senate Chamber did nothing at all that was really violent but the protesters that were trying to break into the House Chamber WERE? Is that what you've claiming? And you make that claim AFTER they've asked the Police standing in front of the door to step aside so they won't be injured and then let them leave? What do you think would have happened if Byrd had simply stepped aside and let them proceed down that hallway to break down that last remaining door. Do you think they would have attacked HIM when they didn't the Police on the other side of the door?
 
So basically the "hyper-violent" mob that broke into the Senate Chamber did nothing at all that was really violent but the protesters that were trying to break into the House Chamber WERE? Is that what you've claiming? And you make that claim AFTER they've asked the Police standing in front of the door to step aside so they won't be injured and then let them leave? What do you think would have happened if Byrd had simply stepped aside and let they proceed down that hallway to break down that last remaining door. Do you think they would have attacked HIM when they didn't the Police on the other side of the door?
The Capitol Police were not given the gift of Future Sight.

Rioters smashing windows and doors and trapping police officers inside of revolving doors and beating them and trying to take their guns is not a 'peaceful' assembly.

This exchange has concluded.
 
So explain to me why the Police officers standing in front of the doorway leave if it's the job of the Police to hold that barricade until all of the Reps are long gone? Explain why what looks like a half dozen Police in SWAT gear are just a few feet away in the stairwell when Babbitt gets shot if the Police are tasking with "holding" that barricade until the Reps are gone? Or is it just "Magic Michael Byrd" that is tasked with holding the barricade and everyone else was taking a coffee break?
Those officers COULD HAVE started blasting that mob… but were so outnumbered and unprotected that the mob could well have taken their guns and used them on everyone.

They knew that there was a barricade behind them manned by other officers who were less vulnerable.

And essentially they were correct. One shot was all it took to scare the crap out of that mob… with a barricade still in place.

Without that barricade they could have overwhelmed police.

Fail again moron

Here’s an idea. Don’t try to violently breach a barricade protected by police. There’s a real good chance you’ll get a bullet in the face like Ashes did.
 
Last edited:
So "essentially" Byrd shot and killed Babbitt why, Lesh? Why was he the ONLY police officer that day that resorted to deadly force to protect an empty room?
You already answered your own question.

And as noted it was NOT empty and even if it had been Byrd had no way of knowing that at that time

You’re talking g in circles
 
Can ANYONE show me a protester who assaulted Police inside of the Capital building? They battled them outside forcing their way into the building but as we've seen from the video that WASN'T shown by the main stream media or the Jan. 6th Committee the Police were guilty of using tear gas and batons on protesters! Those Jan. 6th protesters were there to stop the certification...not to harm members of Congress or the Police. You can tell that by their actions once they were IN the Senate Chamber!
 
Those officers COULD HAVE started blasting that mob… but were so outnumbered and unprotected that the mob could well have taken their guns and used them on everyone.

They knew that there was a barricade behind them manned by other officers who were less vulnerable.

And essentially they were correct. One shot was all it took to scare the crap out of that mob… with a barricade still in place.

Without that barricade they could have overwhelmed police.

Fail again moron

Here’s an idea. Not try to violently breach a barricade protected by police. There’s a real good chance you’ll get a bullet in the face like Ashes did.
Interesting. So once they've "overwhelmed" the Police...broken through the barricade...broken through the next barricaded door...what then? What is it that you think THEY would have done that the protesters who were already IN the Senate Chamber didn't do?
 
Interesting. So once they've "overwhelmed" the Police...broken through the barricade...broken through the next barricaded door...what then? What is it that you think THEY would have done that the protesters who were already IN the Senate Chamber didn't do?
What are you babbling about now? These were violent attackers you idiot. They were smashing windows right on front of Byrd.
 
What is it that you think Ashli Babbitt was there to do that day that made her deserving of a bullet to the neck at point blank range? Stand around in an empty House Chamber and take selfies with the other protesters?
 

Forum List

Back
Top