..This Reagan appointed judge has an opinion about J6....

Chillicothe

Platinum Member
Feb 14, 2021
10,171
6,527
938
In the newsfeeds yesterday and this morning there is plenty of coverage of the prepared statement U.S. District Court judge read to the court at the time of sentencing another J6 attacker. Clearly, the judge had thought long and hard about his opinion, and his wording. It was, after all, a "prepared statement". Judges don't do that unless they have something they want to get off their chest. To set the record straight.

Personally, for me and my avatar, well......we both agree that we need more of our judiciary to come out and articulate their perspective on that terrible day for America, January 6th, 2021. We know many of them share Judge Lamberth's views, as we see it come through with the pretty stiff and damning sentences they've handed down to what I call the "J6 Jackasses".

It is welcome ...and needed.....pushback on the attempts to re-write our history by Don Trump, by his enablers, and his MAGA supporters. Hopefully, Judge Lamberth's published views will begin to right-the-ship on what really happened in that horrific attack on our uniformed police, our elected Representatives, our 'People's House - the Capitol, and upon the United States of America and our Constitution.

Here is one of the coverages this morning:


"US District Judge Royce Lamberth — whom conservative icon Ronald Reagan appointed to the federal bench in 1987 — gave an ominous warning Thursday about the threat historical revisionism surrounding the January 6 insurrection poses to democracy.

According to NBC News, Judge Lamberth read from a prepared statement during a resentencing hearing for a January 6 defendant that he was "shocked" by comments made by some elected officials (whom he did not name) that dismissed or downplayed the violent siege of the US Capitol in 2021. He further elaborated that those "preposterous" comments about the Capitol riot "could presage further danger to our country."

"The Court is accustomed to defendants who refuse to accept that they did anything wrong. But in my thirty-seven years on the bench, I cannot recall a time when such meritless justifications of criminal activity have gone mainstream," Lambert said.

"I have been dismayed to see distortions and outright falsehoods seep into the public consciousness," he continued. "I have been shocked to watch some public figures try to rewrite history, claiming rioters behaved 'in an orderly fashion' like ordinary tourists, or martyrizing convicted January 6 defendants as 'political prisoners' or even, incredibly, 'hostages.'"

Former President Donald Trump has referred to his supporters who ransacked the US Capitol and assaulted police officers as "hostages," which is also a term used by Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-New York), who chairs the House Republican Conference. NBC News' Ryan J. Reilly reported that Lamberth's comments about insurrectionists behaving "in an orderly fashion" is a reference to Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Georgia), who likened Trump supporters who broke into the US Capitol and chanted "hang Mike Pence" to tourists. The Republican National Committee even passed a resolution a year after the attack calling the deadly riot that killed five police officers and injured hundreds of others "legitimate political discourse."

-------------------------------------------------------------


'Normalizing' the J6 behavior; 'mainstreaming' the idea that it was legitimate political discourse.....is clearly, as the judge articulates a danger to America and our way of life. No responsible American patriot can be proud of what we all saw on TV that terrible day for America.
So good on this judge and the other magistrates who have been brining the hammer down in their sentencing decisions. And good on the DOJ for their commitment to hunt down the hundreds who remain unidentified (for now) and undicted and un-arrested. May the statute of limitations on their criminal behavior be a long one. And may those yet unarrested perps be living a life of fear. Fear that that big black SUV is gonna pull into their driveway and FBI agents emerge ......with handcuffs.


ps....and may those same perps be fearful of the dedicated, tenacious, and committed efforts of the amateur hobbyists who work under the Sedition Hunter's umbrella.
 
Oh boy!...The babblings of more controlled opposition!

giphy.gif
 
"I remember when I used to respect a judge's opinion automatically. Man was I dumb. MAGA"
-------------------------------------------------------

The above statement seems somewhat oblique. Can we presume poster Wamose is referencing Judge Lamberth's opinion from the OP?

If so, if that is what Wamose is alluding to....well, why?
Why doesn't Wamose respect Lamberth's view?
Is there any aspect that Wamose specifically disagrees with?
If so, what is it?
And can Wamose offer an alternative view?

And a little bit beside those requests, may I inquire of Wamose: Do you think other judges who are adjudicating these J6 attack cases should share their opinion in a statement read in court for the record?

If so, why?
Or why not?
 

Fake News
13 minutes ago

Orangecat

--------------------------------------------------------------------------


I noted that good poster OC has termed the OP as "fake news".

Why?
What is "fake"?
Does OCat think my avatar made up a story?
Or does he think Judge Lamberth did NOT state what the reportage said he said?
If OC thinks that, well why?

Does he have an alternative view of Lamberth's alleged remarks that is different?
If Lamberth did, indeed, state it, and if the reportage is accurate about what he said....well, what would be fake with that?

In short, poster Orange Cat.....this is Adult Swim, where responsible mature posters are able and willing to explain their contributions here.

So, you alleged Lamberth's remarks are fake.....or, you alleged my avatar's remarks are fake.
Whichever it is .... it is then incumbent upon you to be willing and able to articulate to the forum your considered perspective in a respectful and mature manner.

So, saddle up my friend. Show us.
 
"US District Judge Royce Lamberth — whom conservative icon Ronald Reagan appointed to the federal bench in 1987 — gave an ominous warning Thursday about the threat historical revisionism surrounding the January 6 insurrection poses to democracy.
Ironic, this "unbiased" (LOL) post quotes the news outlet using the term "insurrection" There was no insurrection. A spontaneous riot does not an insurrection make.
 
What is "fake"?
There was no insurrection. You and NBC are the revisionists. The judge doesn't call it an insurrection anywhere in his remarks. That was added by the biased news outlet. Using a dishonest source is either naive or planned. I'll opt for the latter. Please show a modicum of objectivity when you post if you wish to be taken seriously.
 
"....the news outlet using the term "insurrection" There was no insurrection. A spontaneous riot does not an insurrection make."
----------------------------------------------------------
Ummm, not quite.
The attack on our elected Representatives was NOT spontaneous. There is plenty of credible reportage illustrating it was not.

  • From Don Trump's call to come to DC...an "be wild";
  • to the conspiracy to keep the secret that an order from the Ellipse podium for an illegal march would occur;
  • to the communications between various bad actors and armed groups that clearly stated their intent to breach the police lines, the Capitol and "stop-the-steal"of the Constitutionally mandated 'peaceful-transfer-of-power'.
  • All of that demonstrates the intent of bad actors, of unpatriotic Americans bent on defying our laws and our Constitution, even if it meant savagely beating uniformed federal police officers to do it
  • Even if it meant defecating and urinating in the 'People's House', our Capitol.

Here, ConAmerican, here's a link (posted previously)....a link that may offer just one aspect of the seditious behavior contemplated, and executed.



 
There was no insurrection. You and NBC are the revisionists. The judge doesn't call it an insurrection anywhere in his remarks. That was added by the biased news outlet. Using a dishonest source is either naive or planned. I'll opt for the latter. Please show a modicum of objectivity when you post if you wish to be taken seriously.
He thinks that excess verbosity can paper over the fact that he's just another run-of-the-mill lying shitlib hack.
 
----------------------------------------------------------
Ummm, not quite.
The attack on our elected Representatives was NOT spontaneous. There is plenty of credible reportage illustrating it was not.


  • From Don Trump's call to come to DC...an "be wild";
  • to the conspiracy to keep the secret that an order from the Ellipse podium for an illegal march would occur;
  • to the communications between various bad actors and armed groups that clearly stated their intent to breach the police lines, the Capitol and "stop-the-steal"of the Constitutionally mandated 'peaceful-transfer-of-power'.
  • All of that demonstrates the intent of bad actors, of unpatriotic Americans bent on defying our laws and our Constitution, even if it meant savagely beating uniformed federal police officers to do it
  • Even if it meant defecating and urinating in the 'People's House', our Capitol.

Here, ConAmerican, here's a link (posted previously)....a link that may offer just one aspect of the seditious behavior contemplated, and executed.


CalledXpertNotCool.jpg
 
"He thinks that excess verbosity can......"

Well, poster Oddball, there is likely an argument to be made that your concerns over 'excess verbosity' may really be a trait of a short attention span. Meaning, yours.

Now, I am not saying my avatar would make the case that your avatar has limited attention and retention.

But, we could be persuaded that others might make that argument. ;)
 
Well, poster Oddball, there is likely an argument to be made that your concerns over 'excess verbosity' may really be a trait of a short attention span. Meaning, yours.

Now, I am not saying my avatar would make the case that your avatar has limited attention and retention.

But, we could be persuaded that others might make that argument. ;)
I've read economic treatises that would make your pointy head explode....They were worth it because I learned useful things.

Conversely, your posts are fucking shitlib hack swill, lamely papered over with a facade of excess loquaciousness that is pretentious as hell....But the upside is that they're banal as well.
 
"fucking shitlib hack swill"

So, you too?
You too, don't believe that Judge Lamberth stated in court what the reportage stated he did?
Do you think the reportage simply made it ALL up?
If so, why do you think that?

What do you think Judge Lamberth really said, if not what has been reported?

Batter up, mi amigo.
 
So, you too?
You too, don't believe that Judge Lamberth stated in court what the reportage stated he did?
Do you think the reportage simply made it ALL up?
If so, why do you think that?

What do you think Judge Lamberth really said, if not what has been reported?

Batter up, mi amigo.
Explain the fake pipe bombs, professor.

C'mon, dazzle us.
 
In the newsfeeds yesterday and this morning there is plenty of coverage of the prepared statement U.S. District Court judge read to the court at the time of sentencing another J6 attacker. Clearly, the judge had thought long and hard about his opinion, and his wording. It was, after all, a "prepared statement". Judges don't do that unless they have something they want to get off their chest. To set the record straight.

Personally, for me and my avatar, well......we both agree that we need more of our judiciary to come out and articulate their perspective on that terrible day for America, January 6th, 2021. We know many of them share Judge Lamberth's views, as we see it come through with the pretty stiff and damning sentences they've handed down to what I call the "J6 Jackasses".

It is welcome ...and needed.....pushback on the attempts to re-write our history by Don Trump, by his enablers, and his MAGA supporters. Hopefully, Judge Lamberth's published views will begin to right-the-ship on what really happened in that horrific attack on our uniformed police, our elected Representatives, our 'People's House - the Capitol, and upon the United States of America and our Constitution.

Here is one of the coverages this morning:


"US District Judge Royce Lamberth — whom conservative icon Ronald Reagan appointed to the federal bench in 1987 — gave an ominous warning Thursday about the threat historical revisionism surrounding the January 6 insurrection poses to democracy.

According to NBC News, Judge Lamberth read from a prepared statement during a resentencing hearing for a January 6 defendant that he was "shocked" by comments made by some elected officials (whom he did not name) that dismissed or downplayed the violent siege of the US Capitol in 2021. He further elaborated that those "preposterous" comments about the Capitol riot "could presage further danger to our country."

"The Court is accustomed to defendants who refuse to accept that they did anything wrong. But in my thirty-seven years on the bench, I cannot recall a time when such meritless justifications of criminal activity have gone mainstream," Lambert said.

"I have been dismayed to see distortions and outright falsehoods seep into the public consciousness," he continued. "I have been shocked to watch some public figures try to rewrite history, claiming rioters behaved 'in an orderly fashion' like ordinary tourists, or martyrizing convicted January 6 defendants as 'political prisoners' or even, incredibly, 'hostages.'"

Former President Donald Trump has referred to his supporters who ransacked the US Capitol and assaulted police officers as "hostages," which is also a term used by Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-New York), who chairs the House Republican Conference. NBC News' Ryan J. Reilly reported that Lamberth's comments about insurrectionists behaving "in an orderly fashion" is a reference to Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Georgia), who likened Trump supporters who broke into the US Capitol and chanted "hang Mike Pence" to tourists. The Republican National Committee even passed a resolution a year after the attack calling the deadly riot that killed five police officers and injured hundreds of others "legitimate political discourse."

-------------------------------------------------------------


'Normalizing' the J6 behavior; 'mainstreaming' the idea that it was legitimate political discourse.....is clearly, as the judge articulates a danger to America and our way of life. No responsible American patriot can be proud of what we all saw on TV that terrible day for America.
So good on this judge and the other magistrates who have been brining the hammer down in their sentencing decisions. And good on the DOJ for their commitment to hunt down the hundreds who remain unidentified (for now) and undicted and un-arrested. May the statute of limitations on their criminal behavior be a long one. And may those yet unarrested perps be living a life of fear. Fear that that big black SUV is gonna pull into their driveway and FBI agents emerge ......with handcuffs.


ps....and may those same perps be fearful of the dedicated, tenacious, and committed efforts of the amateur hobbyists who work under the Sedition Hunter's umbrella.
Another judge grabbing his 15 minutes of fame. J6 was a manufactured, made for TV event by Democrat Studios.
 
In the newsfeeds yesterday and this morning there is plenty of coverage of the prepared statement U.S. District Court judge read to the court at the time of sentencing another J6 attacker. Clearly, the judge had thought long and hard about his opinion, and his wording. It was, after all, a "prepared statement". Judges don't do that unless they have something they want to get off their chest. To set the record straight.

Personally, for me and my avatar, well......we both agree that we need more of our judiciary to come out and articulate their perspective on that terrible day for America, January 6th, 2021. We know many of them share Judge Lamberth's views, as we see it come through with the pretty stiff and damning sentences they've handed down to what I call the "J6 Jackasses".

It is welcome ...and needed.....pushback on the attempts to re-write our history by Don Trump, by his enablers, and his MAGA supporters. Hopefully, Judge Lamberth's published views will begin to right-the-ship on what really happened in that horrific attack on our uniformed police, our elected Representatives, our 'People's House - the Capitol, and upon the United States of America and our Constitution.

Here is one of the coverages this morning:


"US District Judge Royce Lamberth — whom conservative icon Ronald Reagan appointed to the federal bench in 1987 — gave an ominous warning Thursday about the threat historical revisionism surrounding the January 6 insurrection poses to democracy.

According to NBC News, Judge Lamberth read from a prepared statement during a resentencing hearing for a January 6 defendant that he was "shocked" by comments made by some elected officials (whom he did not name) that dismissed or downplayed the violent siege of the US Capitol in 2021. He further elaborated that those "preposterous" comments about the Capitol riot "could presage further danger to our country."

"The Court is accustomed to defendants who refuse to accept that they did anything wrong. But in my thirty-seven years on the bench, I cannot recall a time when such meritless justifications of criminal activity have gone mainstream," Lambert said.

"I have been dismayed to see distortions and outright falsehoods seep into the public consciousness," he continued. "I have been shocked to watch some public figures try to rewrite history, claiming rioters behaved 'in an orderly fashion' like ordinary tourists, or martyrizing convicted January 6 defendants as 'political prisoners' or even, incredibly, 'hostages.'"

Former President Donald Trump has referred to his supporters who ransacked the US Capitol and assaulted police officers as "hostages," which is also a term used by Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-New York), who chairs the House Republican Conference. NBC News' Ryan J. Reilly reported that Lamberth's comments about insurrectionists behaving "in an orderly fashion" is a reference to Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Georgia), who likened Trump supporters who broke into the US Capitol and chanted "hang Mike Pence" to tourists. The Republican National Committee even passed a resolution a year after the attack calling the deadly riot that killed five police officers and injured hundreds of others "legitimate political discourse."

-------------------------------------------------------------


'Normalizing' the J6 behavior; 'mainstreaming' the idea that it was legitimate political discourse.....is clearly, as the judge articulates a danger to America and our way of life. No responsible American patriot can be proud of what we all saw on TV that terrible day for America.
So good on this judge and the other magistrates who have been brining the hammer down in their sentencing decisions. And good on the DOJ for their commitment to hunt down the hundreds who remain unidentified (for now) and undicted and un-arrested. May the statute of limitations on their criminal behavior be a long one. And may those yet unarrested perps be living a life of fear. Fear that that big black SUV is gonna pull into their driveway and FBI agents emerge ......with handcuffs.


ps....and may those same perps be fearful of the dedicated, tenacious, and committed efforts of the amateur hobbyists who work under the Sedition Hunter's umbrella.
The then Progressive Socialist Communists passing as Democrats controlled the Senate in 1987.
 
The then Progressive Socialist Communists passing as Democrats controlled the Senate in 1987.
There's also the intellectually fraudulent supposition that a judge appointed by Reagan has instant credibility....The guy who had the scumbag GHWB as his veep couldn't possibly get rolled on a judicial appointment here and there.
 

Forum List

Back
Top