NATO and EU states ‘considering sending troops to Ukraine'

[Burgermeister]

More drumbeats from NATO, this time the prime minister of NATO country Slovakia gives us a heads up. Macron's comments follow. Now we have two leaders of NATO countries talking about ground troops in Ukraine.

The prime minister of Slovakia has claimed that Nato and EU member states are preparing to deploy troops to Ukraine.

Robert Fico, a pro-Russia populist, offered no details of how Western soldiers could be sent to assist Ukraine, and commentators said he was probably just trying to stir up trouble.

He was speaking ahead of a hastily-arranged meeting of European leaders in Paris because of what his advisers say is an escalation in Russian aggression over the past few weeks.

The meeting implies that “a number of Nato and EU member states are considering that they will send their troops to Ukraine on a bilateral basis”, Mr Fico told a televised briefing following a meeting of Slovakia’s security council.

“I cannot say for what purpose and what they should be doing there,” he said, adding that Slovakia, a member of the EU and Nato, would not be sending soldiers to Ukraine.

And Macron -

Following the meeting, Mr Macron announced that a new coalition would be created to supply Ukraine with longer-range missiles and munitions, adding that not even the sending of Western ground troops to fight the Russian invasion should be ruled out.

“There is no consensus today to send ground troops... but nothing should be excluded. We will do whatever it takes to ensure that Russia cannot win this war,” Mr Macron said after the meeting in Paris.

He said the new coalition would be set up to supply “missiles and bombs of medium and long range” to Ukraine and added: “We are convinced that the defeat of Russia is indispensable to security and stability in Europe.”

Nato and EU states 'considering sending troops to Ukraine' says Slovakian PM

The prime minister of Slovakia has claimed that Nato and EU member states are preparing to deploy troops to Ukraine.

www.telegraph.co.uk

 

[Manonthestreet]

If they do they need to be booted from NATO

 

[Bleipriester]

I warned that they will use their own people as final ammunition delivery.

 

[Thunderbird]

These idiots are going to start WW III and kill hundreds of millions.

Boot out the Biden administration before it’s too late!

 

[Bleipriester]

Russia: War with Nato is inevitable if Nato deploys troops to Ukraine

"Kremlin warns of consequences of sending NATO troops to Ukraine​

In this case, a direct conflict between the alliance and the Russian Federation is inevitable, Dmitry Peskov said

Moscow. February 27. INTERFAX.RU - The appearance of NATO troops on the territory of Ukraine will lead to a direct conflict with the Russian Federation and an escalation of the situation, said the press secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov.

"In this case, it is necessary to talk not about the probability, but about the inevitability (of the conflict). That's how we assess it," Peskov told reporters, answering the question of what are the risks of escalation and direct conflict with NATO in the event of the appearance of the alliance's military on the territory of Ukraine.

They should also assess these countries and be aware of this, wonder whether this meets their interests, as well as the interests of the citizens of their countries," he stressed.

Peskov also noted that the discussion by Western countries of the possibility of sending their military to Ukraine is a new element.

"In general, the very fact of discussing the possibility of sending some contingents of NATO countries to Ukraine is, of course, very important, a new element. All other elements in the speeches of the French president have already been voiced in one way or another, we have already taken them all into account," Peskov told reporters, commenting on the statement of French President Emmanuel Macron, who said that Paris would do everything to prevent Russia from winning the conflict, and announced that Western countries were discussing the possibility of sending troops to Ukraine.

Peskov noted that Moscow is well aware of Macron's position "regarding the need to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia."

"We drew attention to the fact that the topic of sending the military to Ukraine was indeed discussed, we also noted that there is a very rich palette of opinions on this matter, there is really no consensus. A number of countries participating in this event, which took place in Paris, maintain a fairly sober assessment of the potential dangers of such an action and the potential danger of being directly involved in a hot conflict, involving them on the battlefield," the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation said."

Кремль предупредил о последствиях отправки военных НАТО на Украину

В этом случае прямой конфликт между альянсом и РФ неизбежен, заявил Дмитрий Песков

www.interfax.ru

 

[DGS49]

The historical pattern is that the Good Guys (mainly the U.S.) start to deploy troops in "advisory" roles long before that initiative is acknowledged in public. Then, after a few Americans (or whatever) are killed in battle, "we" acknowledge their presence and escalate our involvement.

Any statement that such an action would be tantamount to the Good Guys "starting WWIII" is not only false, but incredibly so. Russia is the aggressor, and any blame would rest solely on its shoulders.

I ain't no military strategist, but it would seem that the next move on "our" side would be to equip Ukraine with game-changing weapons, whatever those would be. Or encourage Ukraine to go ahead and strike at strategic targets in Russia, promising to assist seriously if Russia escalates.

 

[luiza]

Both of these guys are obvious Deep State and will be delighted to maintain Project Chaos pressures .
But ignored by non Gullibles .

Ironically there have been and still are a huge number of NATO personnel fighting for the pUkeys .
By simply re - registering NATO servicemen as working for private contractors . So called Mercenaries .

And the pUkeys have still been smashed to pieces .

Now the vaunted Abram tanks are being pulverised . despite oodles of advance PR bull Shit from US idiots .

 

[Thunderbird]

The historical pattern is that the Good Guys (mainly the U.S.) start to deploy troops in "advisory" roles long before that initiative is acknowledged in public. Then, after a few Americans (or whatever) are killed in battle, "we" acknowledge their presence and escalate our involvement.

Any statement that such an action would be tantamount to the Good Guys "starting WWIII" is not only false, but incredibly so. Russia is the aggressor, and any blame would rest solely on its shoulders.

I ain't no military strategist, but it would seem that the next move on "our" side would be to equip Ukraine with game-changing weapons, whatever those would be. Or encourage Ukraine to go ahead and strike at strategic targets in Russia, promising to assist seriously if Russia escalates.

It’s dopes like you who will keep escalating the conflict until European/American civilization is a smoking ruin.

Do you think an ever-encroaching powerful hostile military alliance might be considered an aggressor rather than the “Good Guys”?

 

[Polishprince]

This would have never happened if Sleepy Joe hadn't seized power in American in 2021.

President Trump was opposed to war, and would have opposed the USSR and Ukraine engaging in this and America wouldn't have been involved . Neither would have NATO.

 

[22lcidw]

The historical pattern is that the Good Guys (mainly the U.S.) start to deploy troops in "advisory" roles long before that initiative is acknowledged in public. Then, after a few Americans (or whatever) are killed in battle, "we" acknowledge their presence and escalate our involvement.

Any statement that such an action would be tantamount to the Good Guys "starting WWIII" is not only false, but incredibly so. Russia is the aggressor, and any blame would rest solely on its shoulders.

I ain't no military strategist, but it would seem that the next move on "our" side would be to equip Ukraine with game-changing weapons, whatever those would be. Or encourage Ukraine to go ahead and strike at strategic targets in Russia, promising to assist seriously if Russia escalates.

Russia has given us many warnings on potential nuclear conflict. What see now are the globalist factions going for the jugular of Russia. When we could have gotten closer ties, we estranged them somewhat since the Soviet Union fell. Unlike us, they are used to suffering.

 

[Lesh]

A pro-Russia asshole makes a claim and you turds run with it

Bullshit

 

[Thunderbird]

A pro-Russia asshole makes a claim and you turds run with it

Bullshit

Don’t you think we should make some effort to avert WW III?

That lunatic Zelensky seems eager to see the missiles fly.

War in Ukraine: Zelensky slams Nato over rejection of no-fly zone

Zelensky said Nato has given Russia "a green light" to continue bombing Ukrainian towns and cities.

www.bbc.com

 

[luiza]

I ain't no military strastrategist, but it would seem that the next move on "our" side would be to equip Ukraine with game-changing weapons, whatever those would be. Or encourage Ukraine to go ahead and strike at strategic targets in Russia, promising to assist seriously if Russia escalates.

You have not got any .
Patriot , Bradley and now Abram tanks are sub standard versus the top guys and the F16s will be rubbed out very quickly . -----short range capacity with added glaring weaknesses versus Hyper Sonic missiles . Utter carnage .

 

[Ringo]

If the U.S. really thought Putin was some kind of deranged, evil, madman they wouldn't be doing any of this, because I'm pretty sure they're aware of the fact that Russia has the most nuclear weapons in the world.

You see how they don't mess around too much with North Korea.

 

[Burgermeister]