National Strike Called for Jan 23: ICE out of Minn

[citygator]

.

Anyone who spends as much time in the board as CG does, does not have a job.

.

MLK day *****. Offices are closed. I have 1/3 the posts you do. So I have 2/3rds less time to post as you… guess where I spend that 2/3rds of my time? Making money that Trump doesn’t want to tax me on.

 

[Darlo kittu]

MLK day *****. Offices are closed. I have 1/3 the posts you do. So I have 2/3rds less time to post as you… guess where I spend that 2/3rds of my time? Making money that Trump doesn’t want to tax me on.

MLK day *****. Offices are closed. I have 1/3 the posts you do. So I have 2/3rds less time to post as you… guess where I spend that 2/3rds of my time? Making money that Trump doesn’t want to tax me on.

You are a professional Ahole. You still are a blowhard like you were on another board

I damn near pity you

 

[martybegan]

Yes, there is a call for a general strike on January 23, 2026, organized by labor unions, faith leaders, and community groups to protest Immigration and Customs Enforcement actions, with calls for people to stay home from work, school, and shopping. While centered in Minnesota, there are appeals for workers across the U.S. to support this action to demand the removal of ICE from the state.

Key Details:

• Date: January 23, 2026.
• Location: Primarily Minneapolis, Minnesota, with broader calls for national participation.
• Organizers: Various unions (like ATU Local 1005, SEIU Local 26) and community/faith groups.
• Reason: In response to ICE actions and the death of Renee Nicole Good, demanding ICE removal from Minnesota.
• Action: A "no work, no school, no shopping" day to show solidarity and protest.

View attachment 1207434

ICE Out: January 23 General Strike Brewing in Minnesota

Donald Trump’s assault on the rule of law and simple humanity in Minnesota has prompted a call for a general strike on Friday, January 23. Numerous labor unions, human rights advocates, and o…

dakotafreepress.com

Nice job of them doing in on a Friday, when many people work from home so they can claim inflated numbers.

 

[eagle7-31]

It's a statement. It's not about helping ot hurting it's about making a point, showing solidarity and determination.

No its shows the looney left does not want immigration laws enforced.

 

[citygator]

No its shows the looney left does not want immigration laws enforced.

It shows progressives want laws enforced legally. Grabbing brown people from work to demand papers isnt legal. Shooting unarmed women isnt legal. 100% of people know she wasnt trying to kill anyone. Death and destruction are all Trump deals in. i suspect that is all he will respond to if this keeps escalating on his part.

 

[Darlo kittu]

It shows progressives want laws enforced legally. Grabbing brown people from work to demand papers isnt legal. Shooting unarmed women isnt legal. 100% of people know she wasnt trying to kill anyone. Death and destruction are all Trump deals in. i suspect that is all he will respond to if this keeps escalating on his part.

So why not have the liberal sacuary cities repeal their laws shielding illegals and gave local authorities work with ICE?

ICE can pick up illegals who have detainees, existing deportation orders, who have been found guilty of crimes in another country?

ICE would not be in the neighborhoods just as things are in red states

 

[citygator]

So why not have the liberal sacuary cities repeal their laws shielding illegals and gave local authorities work with ICE?

ICE can pick up illegals who have detainees, existing deportation orders, who have been found guilty of crimes in another country?

ICE would not be in the neighborhoods just as things are in red states

Enforcing immigration misdemeanors isnt a state function AND has been found as unconstitutional detention without a warrant resulting in up to $150,000 PER VIOLATION.

• Miranda-Olivares v. Clackamas County (2014) — Federal court ruled that holding someone past their release time based solely on an ICE detainer violates the Fourth Amendment because detainers are not judicial warrants.
• Lunn v. Commonwealth (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2017) — State’s highest court held that Massachusetts law provides no authority for state or local officers to detain someone based only on an ICE detainer.
• Morales v. Chadbourne (2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, 2016) — Federal appellate court ruled ICE detainers are requests, not commands, and that detaining someone without probable cause violates the Constitution; resulted in a settlement after a wrongful detention.
• Galarza v. Szalczyk (3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, 2014) — Court ruled local governments can be held liable for honoring ICE detainers without warrants; detainers are voluntary and not mandatory.

 

[Hafar1014]

75% of all US GDP is produced in Blue Counties that voted for Harris. Production happens when liberals work, nothing happens when conservatives collect the majority of welfare in red states.

Here is a breakdown of the largest groups on welfare, specifically regarding SNAP (food stamps), which is one of the largest federal assistance programs:

• By Race/Ethnicity (SNAP - 2023):
  • White: ~35-37%
  • Black/African American: ~26%
  • Hispanic: ~16%
  • Asian: ~3-4%
  • Native American: ~1-2%
  • Note: ~17% of participants' race was unknown.

Blacks are 13% of the population and 26% of welfare making them the highest rate on welfare. They live in democrat cities.
Election by counties

I dont think you have your facts right

 

[Darlo kittu]

Enforcing immigration misdemeanors isnt a state function AND has been found as unconstitutional detention without a warrant resulting in up to $150,000 PER VIOLATION.

• Miranda-Olivares v. Clackamas County (2014) — Federal court ruled that holding someone past their release time based solely on an ICE detainer violates the Fourth Amendment because detainers are not judicial warrants.
• Lunn v. Commonwealth (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2017) — State’s highest court held that Massachusetts law provides no authority for state or local officers to detain someone based only on an ICE detainer.
• Morales v. Chadbourne (2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, 2016) — Federal appellate court ruled ICE detainers are requests, not commands, and that detaining someone without probable cause violates the Constitution; resulted in a settlement after a wrongful detention.
• Galarza v. Szalczyk (3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, 2014) — Court ruled local governments can be held liable for honoring ICE detainers without warrants; detainers are voluntary and not mandatory.

Still a liar.

Enforcing immigration misdemeanors isnt a state function AND has been found as unconstitutional detention without a warrant resulting in up to $150,000 PER VIOLATION.

• Miranda-Olivares v. Clackamas County (2014) — Federal court ruled that holding someone past their release time based solely on an ICE detainer violates the Fourth Amendment because detainers are not judicial warrants.
• Lunn v. Commonwealth (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2017) — State’s highest court held that Massachusetts law provides no authority for state or local officers to detain someone based only on an ICE detainer.
• Morales v. Chadbourne (2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, 2016) — Federal appellate court ruled ICE detainers are requests, not commands, and that detaining someone without probable cause violates the Constitution; resulted in a settlement after a wrongful detention.
• Galarza v. Szalczyk (3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, 2014) — Court ruled local governments can be held liable for honoring ICE detainers without warrants; detainers are voluntary and not mandatory.

Still a liar and a piss poor liar

If there is no crime here OAA why are Dems protecting the illegals with sacuary city laws?

Yiu nothing about alot of things and a little about nothing

 

[SweetSue92]

Yes, there is a call for a general strike on January 23, 2026, organized by labor unions, faith leaders, and community groups to protest Immigration and Customs Enforcement actions, with calls for people to stay home from work, school, and shopping. While centered in Minnesota, there are appeals for workers across the U.S. to support this action to demand the removal of ICE from the state.

Key Details:

• Date: January 23, 2026.
• Location: Primarily Minneapolis, Minnesota, with broader calls for national participation.
• Organizers: Various unions (like ATU Local 1005, SEIU Local 26) and community/faith groups.
• Reason: In response to ICE actions and the death of Renee Nicole Good, demanding ICE removal from Minnesota.
• Action: A "no work, no school, no shopping" day to show solidarity and protest.

View attachment 1207434

ICE Out: January 23 General Strike Brewing in Minnesota

Donald Trump’s assault on the rule of law and simple humanity in Minnesota has prompted a call for a general strike on Friday, January 23. Numerous labor unions, human rights advocates, and o…

dakotafreepress.com

Oh.

Are people supposed to stay out of church so insane agitators can bust in, chant their stupidity, terrify children and then cry about "free speech"?

Won't you tell us?

 

[Darlo kittu]

Oh.

Are people supposed to stay out of church so insane agitators can bust in, chant their stupidity, terrify children and then cry about "free speech"?

Won't you tell us?

The punk is guilty of a possible felony. Denying people their right to exercise freedom of religion

Libs are in need of adult supervision 24/7

 

[citygator]

Still a liar.

Still a liar and a piss poor liar

If there is no crime here OAA why are Dems protecting the illegals with sacuary city laws?

Yiu nothing about alot of things and a little about nothingView attachment 1208325

I explained it to you and I listed the court cases that penalize violating 4th amendment rights without a warrant. You have not responded to my definitive proof.

Calling a civil immigration violation a “crime” to imply violent criminality is legally lazy and morally dishonest.

Unauthorized entry is a misdemeanor.

What’s dishonest is pretending that this is what people mean when politicians claim they’re “going after rapists and murderers.”

A first-time §1325 violation is a minor offense, almost never prosecuted criminally, usually handled as a civil immigration matter, and rarely results in jail time.

In reality, enforcement sweeps overwhelmingly target workers—landscapers, construction laborers, food service, patrons at the gas station—not violent offenders.

Calling that a public-safety crackdown is a rhetorical bait-and-switch.

 

[Darlo kittu]

I explained it to you and I listed the court cases that penalize violating 4th amendment rights without a warrant. You have not responded to my definitive proof.

Calling a civil immigration violation a “crime” to imply violent criminality is legally lazy and morally dishonest.

Unauthorized entry is a misdemeanor.

What’s dishonest is pretending that this is what people mean when politicians claim they’re “going after rapists and murderers.”

A first-time §1325 violation is a minor offense, almost never prosecuted criminally, usually handled as a civil immigration matter, and rarely results in jail time.

In reality, enforcement sweeps overwhelmingly target workers—landscapers, construction laborers, food service, patrons at the gas station—not violent offenders.

Calling that a public-safety crackdown is a rhetorical bait-and-switch.

And you are a liar

You are still the same as you were.in the other board

ICE is enforcing existing immigration laws passed by your precious DEMOCRATS

Please big shot get in the face of an ICE agent and quote your "laws" and interfere with them

Please

 

[citygator]

And you are a liar

You are still the same as you were.in the other board

ICE is enforcing existing immigration laws passed by your precious DEMOCRATS

Please big shot get in the face of an ICE agent and quote your "laws" and interfere with them

Please

I have no idea who you are from any other board.

You continue to be mad and call me names while I post links and examples to back up my position. You came at me for sanctuary cities. I showed you that states are losing lawsuits holding people for only a detainer. You haven’t answered that. i suspect that is because it is news to you and you have no answer. That’s ok to admit you aren’t informed. Just read up more.

 

[Darlo kittu]

It is clear the moonbat lefties want this vermin on the streets out of pure hatred of Trump

 

[SweetSue92]

You are a professional Ahole. You still are a blowhard like you were on another board

I damn near pity you

Don't worry. "Pride goes before destruction; a haughty spirit before a fall."--Proverbs 16:18

God hates it when people brag about how well off they are while not caring who doesn't get theirs.

 

[Darlo kittu]

Don't worry. "Pride goes before destruction; a haughty spirit before a fall."--Proverbs 16:18

God hates it when people brag about how well off they are while not caring who doesn't get theirs.

Wuth CityOCA all he dies is brag but has nothing to back it up with

 

[Meister]

I said nothing about government offices.

That was you.

They should do the "National Strike" on a Sunday so they could
pad the numbers.
just a thought

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

MLK day *****. Offices are closed. I have 1/3 the posts you do. So I have 2/3rds less time to post as you… guess where I spend that 2/3rds of my time? Making money that Trump doesn’t want to tax me on.

.

Every day is MLK day?

No.






.

 

[Bitterhook]

It's a statement. It's not about helping ot hurting it's about making a point, showing solidarity and determination.

At least they aren't encouraging folks to throw themselves off a cliff or in front of moving vehicles, so that's a plus.
Most likely because the Union cannot collect dues from dead people.