My Three Global Warming Fraud Websites

I began assembling these at least ten years ago and cannot begin to keep up with the avalanche of evidence against the Global Warming Fraud. If you have something HUGE and you can't find it in any of these, please post it here and PM me so I can pile on more.... as if it were needed.



http://Ecohypocrites.blogspot.com

Across America and around the world, sanctimonious pretenders of environmental piety tell everyone else to cut back, stop burning that evil fossil fuel, and save the earth. Then they slap each other on the back and do as they please, not as they preach. Take Al Gore, please. Or Barack Obama. Or United Nations bureaucrats. Or Arnold Schwarzenegger. As governor of California, he signed Executive Order S-03-5, which mandates an 80% reduction in greenhouse gases based on 1990 usage. Has he or any of these other eco-hypocrites cut back their own "carbon footprint" by 80%? Not remotely.

Here is a current schedule of some of the seminars run by eco-hypocrites around the world. Instead of videoconferencing, and practicing what they preach, they fly all over the place, no doubt largely at public expense, to wine and dine and shake hands and congratulate each other on how wonderful they all are.
Environment events | Conal Conference Alerts Topic Listing

Related image



Image result for environmental hypocrites



richard-branson-meme




http://EnvironmentalistHypocrisy.blogspot.com













World leaders and organizations continue to enact legislation requiring citizens to cut carbon dioxide emissions 80% within the not too distant future, as a result of hysterical claims by biased researchers whose hands are deep into the pockets of government grants funding their work. Imminent doom and gloom is relentlessly predicted if we don't "do something now"!

The odd thing is that these pretend environmentalists don't practice what they preach to everyone else. Barack Obama flies Air Force One to Hawaii every Christmas, at profound public expense and carbon footprinting. He flew Air Force One to Ohio one Earth Day to plant a single tree in a kind of faux paean to the environment. Obama could have appeared on close-captioned television. He might have videoconferenced, but no, he had to appear in person, this Anointed One, to hear his fawning audience clap and cheer.

Al Gore flies around the world in his private jet, attracting many tens of thousands of adoring fans, who together burn hundreds of thousands of gallons of fuel, to hear him repeat himself, yet again.

Rick Steves panders to scores of millions of travelers, ending every "evocative" program with the admonition to "keep on traveling." This is ecohypocrisy at its worst, since he's always preaching the human-caused climate change narrative. But then again, Rick is a far left-wing extremist, who never hesitates to remind his fawning audience about "right-wing fascism" when in fact the fascists were left-wing socialists. The very name of the Nazi Party was the National Socialists. "We find different truths to be self-evident and God-given." - Rick Steves The devil could not have put it better than that.

United Nations bigwigs fly around the world, proselytizing the horrors of global warming, recently renamed to climate change, since things have not been getting nearly as warm as their models have predicted. The liberal media turn a blind eye to these hypocritical actions of their fellow liberals. It's disgraceful of all of them. Disgraceful. It is disgraceful for the preachers of global warming to do exactly the opposite of what they demand of the rest of us. It is disgraceful of the media to ignore their hypocrisy. It is disgraceful for all those claiming to be saviors of the environment not to expose the widespread hypocrisy of their ideological brethren.

Numerous magazines feature articles in support of global warming / climate change. I just read the May 2015 issue of Smithsonian magazine. It is exactly like all the previous issues, that is, completely hypocritical.



Page 2 and 3 present an advertisement encouraging readers to burn, baby, burn. Fly or drive to the Mississippi River and ride a fossil-fuel powered paddlewheel boat with American Cruise Lines.
(Price not published)



The hypocrisy continues Page 7 invites Smithsonian readers to burn enough fuel to travel to Washington, D.C. for the May 15-17th The FUTURE IS HERE FESTIVAL.

Smithsonian could have sold CD roms of the festival. Smithsonian might have broadcast it live on television, or even on a webinair. But how much more absolutely fabulous it is to travel to D.C. and meet other wealthy hypocrites, who preach environmentalism while practicing anti-conservation on a grand scale.



Oh but the Smithsonian hypocrisy is just getting warmed up. Page 13:


"YOU REALLY CAN HAVE IT ALL"

The Smithsonian Collection by Smithsonian Journeys
Regent Seven Seas Cruises
(Prices not shown here either)

Page 15

"SEE THE WORLD YOUR WAY"
From Africa to Asia, Australia to South America - we take you beyond the expected travel experience.. Audley Travel
(Prices not shown)

Page 19

"Request your Free Catalog and Book Your Trip Today!"

(Picture of the Eiffel Tower is shown, but no prices.)

Page 88 & 89

"Maine Windjammer Cruises"

Page 93

"ADVENTURE TO GO!"
Sea Eagle inflatable kayak


(Drive out into the wilderness and have lots of fun. Global warming can wait a generation. Or so.)

Page 98 & 99

"Caravan Guided Vacations Since 1952"
$1095 to $1395 for 8 to 10 days

(Burning fuel and "poisoning the air" all the way)

____________________________________

http://TheGlobalWarmingFraud.wordpress.com

The Global Warming Fraud

Posted on April 5, 2012
“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”- Max Planck, Nobel Laureate in Physics
October 2021

It would be helpful if the media covered all sides of the climate issue.
September 2021
The UN Admits That The Paris Climate Deal Was A Fraud

The UN Admits That The Paris Climate Deal Was A Fraudinvestors.com
____________________
January 2021 Hanoi John Kerry has been appointed Climate Czar by Traitor Joe Briben.
Hanoi John Kerry created 365,967 pounds (166 metric tons) of carbon dioxide in 2020 just by flying his private personal jet. You sheep who follow and revere Hanoi John Kerry, ride your bicycles. Take the bus. Kerry travels in ultimate luxury while preaching something else to you.


October 10, 2006 Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech by Al Gore
So today, we dumped another 70 million tons of global-warming pollution into the thin shell of atmosphere surrounding our planet, as if it were an open sewer. And tomorrow, we will dump a slightly larger amount, with the cumulative concentrations now trapping more and more heat from the sun.
[Note: Carbon dioxide is NOT pollution. You exhale it with every breath and it promotes faster plant growth, as a fertilizer.]
//
We are what is wrong, and we must make it right.
[Says the guy who flies around in a private jet and takes limousines everywhere.]
Last September 21, as the Northern Hemisphere tilted away from the sun, scientists reported with unprecedented distress that the North Polar ice cap is “falling off a cliff.” One study estimated that it could be completely gone during summer in less than 22 years. Another new study, to be presented by U.S. Navy researchers later this week, warns it could happen in as little as 7 years.
[Like so many other failed predictions, this one never happened.]
__________________________________
Hry, Mr Chem Engineer. The same guy who doesn't understand the periodic table. Are you still, pretending you’re smarter then every university in the world. Gee, they know what a periodic table represents…..YOU DON’T even know high school chemistry ! Wtf should we believe this fraudulent post ?
 
The founders of our government and authors of our Constitution never intended the government to regulate commercial flight. They never intended the government to explore space and other planets. They never intended the government to regulate hazardous material in the workplace. They never intended the government to maintain and distribute retirement funds for America's elderly. They never intended the government to fund medical research. The government does a thousand things the founders never intended them to do. Fortunately, the founders crafted a Constitution that has the flexibility and adaptability to handle the unforeseen. The founders DID intend that the government, as it's most important duty, work always towards the common welfare of the American people. These days, that includes working to stave off catastrophic global warming.

ZERO evidence of catastrophic global warming is evident except in warmist/alarmists addled brains from ingesting too many useless models.
 
ZERO evidence of catastrophic global warming is evident except in warmist/alarmists addled brains from ingesting too many useless models.
As I've put out three times already this morning, "The Physical Science Basis" from the IPCC's fifth or sixth Assessment Reports, both available at www.ipcc.ch, clearly and exhaustively lays out the scientific evidence for anthropogenic global warming and the threat it presents to human infrastructure, agriculture and life on this planet.
 
ZERO evidence of catastrophic global warming is evident except in warmist/alarmists addled brains from ingesting too many useless models.
Amazing..
..it’s a Chinese hoax. Any other made up shit out there ? People have to have a lot balls to run their mouths off disbelieving some thing that literally, every major scientific institution in the world hangs their hat on. Oh, there is no tooth fairy either.
 
As I've put out three times already this morning, "The Physical Science Basis" from the IPCC's fifth or sixth Assessment Reports, both available at www.ipcc.ch, clearly and exhaustively lays out the scientific evidence for anthropogenic global warming and the threat it presents to human infrastructure, agriculture and life on this planet.
And excludes dissenting opinions.
 
And excludes dissenting opinions.
No, it does not. Though they'd pay no attention to opinions that never passed peer review. But that you think they exclude dissent makes me suspect you've never read any of it.
 
No, it does not. Though they'd pay no attention to opinions that never passed peer review. But that you think they exclude dissent makes me suspect you've never read any of it.
Really. Can you show me one?
 
Low likelihood points frequently indicate differences of opinion. Look, they're not going to have your opinion, but there are lots of points of disagreement between real climate scientists and they are included in these documents. The IPCC is charged with assessing the scientific literature. Where there are differences in the literature, those differences are presented in the assessment.
 
Low likelihood points frequently indicate differences of opinion. Look, they're not going to have your opinion, but there are lots of points of disagreement between real climate scientists and they are included in these documents. The IPCC is charged with assessing the scientific literature. Where there are differences in the literature, those differences are presented in the assessment.
There are no dissenting opinions included in IPCC reports. None. Nada. Zip.
 
There are no dissenting opinions included in IPCC reports. None. Nada. Zip.


 


Still not seeing any dissenting opinions in their reports, bro.
 
Still not seeing any dissenting opinions in their reports, bro.
You never will because of your faulty understanding as to what constitutes a dissenting opinion. They will not be publishing ignorant nonsense.
 
You never will because of your faulty understanding as to what constitutes a dissenting opinion. They will not be publishing ignorant nonsense.
Dissenting means to disagree.

dissenting: holding or expressing opinions that are at variance with those commonly or officially held.
 
If you had read even a modest amount of any of the assessment reports you would have seen mention of differing opinions. Your blinders aren't my problem.
 
Because the carbon cycle is how CO2 re-equilibrates back down to pre-excess levels. That requires that the CO2 be absorbed by plants and fixed or absorbed in ocean water, go through the various steps of CO2+H2O reactions until the carbonate ion (CO3 2-) is available in the water for the various shell-forming or calcareous structure forming animals fix it into a solid CaCO3 structure.

These steps take more time to re-establish the lower level of CO2 than it takes for excess H2O to re-establish at a lower level.

Notice that you keep avoiding his question:

"Here's a math exercise for you ... it's typically reported that man-kind releases 40 gigatons of CO2 every year ... how much is this in atmospheric ppm? ... this value is observed as ≈ 2.5 ppm(volume)/yr at the Hawai'i gauge ... and don't forget density differences ..."

Waiting waiting.....
 
As I've put out three times already this morning, "The Physical Science Basis" from the IPCC's fifth or sixth Assessment Reports, both available at www.ipcc.ch, clearly and exhaustively lays out the scientific evidence for anthropogenic global warming and the threat it presents to human infrastructure, agriculture and life on this planet.

They offer unverifiable model not evidence you moron!

No evidence of a Climate Emergency exist which I have already shown which you completely avoided because you KNOW it is true.
 
No, it does not. Though they'd pay no attention to opinions that never passed peer review. But that you think they exclude dissent makes me suspect you've never read any of it.

Now you are just LYING your ass off since they deliberately chose people who toe the warmist/alarmist ideology.
 

Forum List

Back
Top