Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,315
- 12,899
- 2,400
I definitely agree with the OP that his 3 kook denier websites were fraudulent.
All denier websites are fraudulent. They take pride in that.
What is being denied?


Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I definitely agree with the OP that his 3 kook denier websites were fraudulent.
All denier websites are fraudulent. They take pride in that.
After just having declared a preference for hard science over political/media hype, why would you be concerned about predictions from Al Gore and John Kerry?I'm aware of the fact that world/national political leadership is USING GW as crisis to achieve goals. Most everybody realizes that. But, I'm DEPENDING on any media or political leadership to MAKE THE CASE that GW has been hyped WAAAY beyond any science that has "declared an emergency".
IN FACT, over the 30+ years I've been following this -- idjits like John Kerry/Al Gore just sound more unhinged and shrill than earlier as the EVIDENCE SHOWS -- the INITIAL catastrophic GW predictions were a mixture of hype, ignoring all other explanations, bad modeling and using WORSE case scenarios that haven't shown any empirical evidence to support them.
That the OP has sufficient knowledge or intellect to maintain a meaningful conversation on this topic.What is being denied?
![]()
![]()
Because it's a political argument not a science argument. If it were science argument dissenting opinions would be included in the IPCC reports.After just having declared a preference for hard science over political/media hype, why would you be concerned about predictions from Al Gore and John Kerry?
Great question, why do you?After just having declared a preference for hard science over political/media hype, why would you be concerned about predictions from Al Gore and John Kerry?
I'm aware of the fact that world/national political leadership is USING GW as crisis to achieve goals. Most everybody realizes that. But, I'm DEPENDING on any media or political leadership to MAKE THE CASE that GW has been hyped WAAAY beyond any science that has "declared an emergency".
What goals would that be?
I'm still waiting for Crick to explain why he doesn't have solar or drive an EV.
Thanks, but I was asking FCT.Power, control, money.
How have you missed that?
However, since he's likely to forego answering, what power, what control and what money have politicians obtained by pushing AGW?Thanks, but I was asking FCT.
However, since he's likely to forego answering, what power, what control and what money have politicians obtained by pushing AGW?
What sort of money is spent by federal, state and local governments on AGW?
Gotta be tens of billions annually. Easy.
As far as control, you've got clueless assholes deciding how much energy has to be generated from green sources, how soon all the cars sold have to be EVs, etc.
Don't tell me these things escaped your notice before I mentioned them.
Spent where? Biden's infrastructure bill "designates $50 billion for climate resilience and weatherization" but doesn't reduce GHG emissions. All that was left for the Build Back Better act.
The amount of wind and solar energy infrastructure being built is controlled by private utilities who seem to make that decision based on their bottom line. I know of no government action mandating alternative energy technology.
I'll tell you what escapes me: the money being spent or hoped to be spent on these things is not going into the pockets of any politicians. It's going to utilities and vendors to build infrastructure that will serve and benefit the public. The "control" you claim is being garnered is simply Congress making legislature as it has since 1787. And no one has garnered any additional power from any of this. You're fear mongering Todd.
Show us some green money going into the pockets of politicians.
Show us the nation, a state or county mandating the technology choices of a private utility.
Show us anyone accruing powers via green legislation that they did not previously possess.
Show us some green money going into the pockets of politicians.
Solyndra executives and shareholders made hundreds of thousands of dollars to Obama's 2008 campaign for the White House and in an apparent quid pro quo was given over 1/2 Billion Dollars in Federal loan guarantees. On top of that Department of Energy officials regulary attended Solyndra Board Meetings as the Board steered the company over a cliff into a financial abyss.
![]()
Show us the nation, a state or county mandating the technology choices of a private utility.
Many states have multiple policies in place, as shown in the map below. Several states have binding statutory requirements to reduce statewide emissions and complete a statewide inventory measuring emissions. Several Northeastern states participate in both the RGGI and TCI, addressing the two highest-emitting sectors of the U.S. economy: power and transportation. Additionally, multiple states have implemented statutory GHG reduction and reporting requirements, as well as a carbon pricing policy. While not addressed in this document, 30 states have renewable or clean electricity standards, which require that a percentage of electricity sold by utilities comes from renewable sources. Several states have recently increased their standards to require 100% renewable or zero-emissions electricity by midcentury.
Campaign contributions, not only from the industry but from the constituency who bought into this fabricated crisis.Show us some green money going into the pockets of politicians.