When the working poor got more from the government than they paid in taxes the Democrat Party dominated the United States.Why??? That seems indecent to expect people not to pay taxes
Taxes are what we pay to live in a civil societ
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When the working poor got more from the government than they paid in taxes the Democrat Party dominated the United States.Why??? That seems indecent to expect people not to pay taxes
Taxes are what we pay to live in a civil societ
True the dem oarty is all about creating a dependent classWhen the working poor got more from the government than they paid in taxes the Democrat Party dominated the United States.
The working poor are dependent on their employers. Everything the government does to help them reduces that dependency and increases their freedom.True the dem oarty is all about creating a dependent class
Sure employees are dependent on their employers. With that said, you can find other work, and if not happy should try toThe working poor are dependent on their employers. Everything the government does to help them reduces that dependency and increases their freedom.
The Democrats and the government can only succeed at that if they improve the lives of low wage employees.Dems want to make people dependent on Govt. That’s what tyrants do
Actually the opposite. If peoples lives improve they become independentThe Democrats and the government can only succeed at that if they improve the lives of low wage employees.
Well, the part that, at the end of it, will be a light at the end of the tunnel.Correct, he didn't directly say it, he just agreed with whomever said it, or as you surmise, some of it.
(And there is no "some" of it that is good.)
Your opinion.Lame response
It DOESN’T sound “right” at all
It sounds like disaster
This economy propped up with debt (generating asset bubbles) and artificially suppressed wages (as a result of illegal immigration). Markets will tumble. But when the storm passes and everyone realizes we are on sounder footing, there will be a rapid recovery to a healthier, sustainable economy.
You think the US is on a sustainable path? How much longer do you think we can live on debt?That? That sounds like a horribly painful economic collapse, at least 5 to 10 years to bring manufacturing or A/I to make things in the USA, and a dim future with much higher interest rates, much less in tax revenue and Bankruptcy....lowers our credit ratings, makes our country a poor country to invest in, the collapse of the dollar.....
Nothing nice for us.
Burn the village to save it?Your opinion.
Tell me, what’s wrong with this statement? I mean really. Sounds like the person is trying to say that, we’ve been riding a dangerous coaster for awhile, and someone needs to get us off this impending crash lane, and while it might hurt in the interim, the end result will be better.
Hell, I wish musk HAD said that because that’s some pretty sound reasoning there. I agree with it myself ..
So you want to whine, cry, and piss your pants over the rich not paying their fare share, but you can’t tell us what fare share would make you happy?I will let the voters decide those issues. During the 1950's the top tax rate never got below 88% and was usually higher.
The 1950's are what Trump's followers are thinking about when they respond too the logan, "Make America Great Again."
Fair share?I would impose massive taxes on the rich and spread the wealth around. That is how Roosevelt ended the Great Depression and got reelected three times.

Link?A lot of these so called "deadbeats" work harder than a lot of rich people.
How is that fair, moron?No. The fair share for the working poor is no taxes at all.
Consider the terms "leisure class" and "working class."Link?
Thanks for proving the only thing your Dimtard party has to offer is stealing from the productive in order to give to the lazy.When the working poor got more from the government than they paid in taxes the Democrat Party dominated the United States.
So you have no link to back up your lies.Consider the terms "leisure class" and "working class."

Fairness is subjective, not objective. I think it is unfair that the working poor are paid so little.How is that fair, moron?
A lot of these so called "productive" people do no work at all and live off of interest, rent, and dividends. I have known people who worked well over 40 hours a week at unpleasant labor, and were still poor.Thanks for proving the only thing your Dimtard party has to offer is stealing from the productive in order to give to the lazy.
I have you pegged as a college freshman just getting indoctrinated.A lot of these so called "productive" people do no work at all and live off of interest, rent, and dividends. I have known people who worked well over 40 hours a week at unpleasant labor, and were still poor.
