What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bull Ring @muhammed Why leftwing economic policies are better than rightwing

MaryL

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2011
Messages
21,041
Reaction score
11,550
Points
1,255
Location
Midwestern U.S.
You choose who goes first.
This ought to be good. OK: You got Me. Liberal policies inducing record inflationare just spiffy, record spending. Printing more money. Dems sending more money, paying people NOT to be productive, good thrifty economic plans like THAT. This never happened under Trump.
 
Last edited:

TemplarKormac

Political Atheist
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
49,579
Reaction score
12,994
Points
2,190
Location
The Land of Sanctuary
zach-galifianakis-funny-laugh.gif
 

night_son

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Messages
11,211
Reaction score
12,564
Points
2,445
Location
The Full Moon
You choose who goes first.

—You want to murder millions and millions more unborn children by ripping apart their developing bodies inside and outside their mothers' wombs, harvesting their organs and selling them for profit. Even the Greeks and Romans respected human life more than your 'side'. Your party is irrefutably the most barbaric political organization in human history.

—You want to mutilate our children by chopping off their developing body parts but only after you have brainwashed them into a state of mass hysterical psychosis make believe. This alone is justification enough to wipe every last trace of your ideology from the face of the planet.

—In an effort to further reduce growth of the human population you ceaselessly attempt to condition our children to be homosexual perverts, thus reducing (in your minds) emissions from breathing and slowing global warming. If you could get away with it, you'd simply mass murder billions of human beings outright.

In short, all of your modern political platforms, policies, tenets and ideologies are anti-human, mass suicidal and work toward the ultimate death of as many human beings as possible.
 

Muhammed

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
27,878
Reaction score
14,142
Points
1,415
Location
North Coast, USA
You choose who goes first.
Leftist economic policies cause mass poverty, starvation and even cannibalism.


Tens of millions of people died in China in the famines that followed the start of the Great Leap Forward (1958–1961), a bid by then supreme leader Mao Zedong to catch up with U.S. levels of development in just a few years. Estimates of the total range from the official 10 million figure, to at least 45 million. But more recently, reports have begun to emerge suggesting that not all of those deaths were from disease or starvation. Reports have come to light of starving people eating their friends, relatives, and even their own children.
 
OP
Billy000

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
28,118
Reaction score
8,408
Points
490
Location
Colorado
Leftist economic policies cause mass poverty, starvation and even cannibalism.


Tens of millions of people died in China in the famines that followed the start of the Great Leap Forward (1958–1961), a bid by then supreme leader Mao Zedong to catch up with U.S. levels of development in just a few years. Estimates of the total range from the official 10 million figure, to at least 45 million. But more recently, reports have begun to emerge suggesting that not all of those deaths were from disease or starvation. Reports have come to light of starving people eating their friends, relatives, and even their own children.
The intent of my focus is on American leftwing economic policies. I don’t know what China did but it isn’t related.

An example of leftwing economic policy is Obama’s stimulus package. According to the CBO:

“Through the first quarter of 2011, the stimulus created between 1.6 million and 4.6 million jobs, increased real GDP by between 1.1 and 3.1 percent, and reduced unemployment by between 0.6 and 1.8 percentage points.”

Why was this effective? It focused on demand side economics. The unemployment benefits that Americans received pumped money into the economy. People bought more shit like food and clothing. Businesses then were able to create more jobs because of this.
 

Muhammed

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
27,878
Reaction score
14,142
Points
1,415
Location
North Coast, USA
Under the Trump administration, poverty in America went to an all-time record low. Unemployment went to an all-time low since Nixon emancipated the slaves.

After all, it's easy to lower the unemployment rate by enslaving people and using them as cannon fodder. That's the traditional leftist Democrat solution to unemployment. Just kill the unemployed and reap the profits.
 
Last edited:
OP
Billy000

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
28,118
Reaction score
8,408
Points
490
Location
Colorado
Under the Trump administration, poverty in America went to an all-time record low. Unemployment went to an all-time low since Nixon emancipated the slaves.
There was already a trajectory of job growth. Trump inherited this. None of his policies can be associated with this economic growth.
 

Muhammed

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
27,878
Reaction score
14,142
Points
1,415
Location
North Coast, USA
There was already a trajectory of job growth. Trump inherited this. None of his policies can be associated with this economic growth.
You're lying again. Why do you base all of your political opinions on the stupid lies that you tell yourself?
 

Muhammed

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
27,878
Reaction score
14,142
Points
1,415
Location
North Coast, USA
Besides Libya, you cannot provide an example of a leftist government that ever benefitted anyone but the rich elites.

And Libya was an exception that proves the rule. They basically had nothing but crude oil. That was a one product economy. In that kind of situation, maybe socialist policy is better.

But Qaddafi changed that. He invested the petrodollars in massive irrigation projects that literally made the desert bloom. Libya was no longer a one product economy.

Then the Obama administration reversed it back to the days of slavery by illegally bombing the shit out of the country. :(
 
Last edited:
OP
Billy000

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
28,118
Reaction score
8,408
Points
490
Location
Colorado
You're lying again. Why do you base all of your political opinions on the stupid lies that you tell yourself?
Which part is a lie? Job growth was already happening on his first month of office.
 
OP
Billy000

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
28,118
Reaction score
8,408
Points
490
Location
Colorado
Besides Libya, you cannot provide an example of a leftist government that ever benefitted anyone but the rich elites.

And Libya was an exception that proves the rule. They basically had nothing but crude oil. That was a one product economy. In that kind of situation, maybe socialist policy is better.

But Qaddafi changed that. He invested the petrodollars in massive irrigation projects that literally made the desert bloom. Libya was no longer a one product economy.

Then the Obama administration reversed it back to the days of slavery by illegally bombing the shit out of the country. :(
The rich elites? Are you suggesting republicans don’t suck the dick of the rich elites?
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$145.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top