Bull Ring @muhammed Why leftwing economic policies are better than rightwing

You choose who goes first.
This ought to be good. OK: You got Me. Liberal policies inducing record inflationare just spiffy, record spending. Printing more money. Dems sending more money, paying people NOT to be productive, good thrifty economic plans like THAT. This never happened under Trump.
 
Last edited:
zach-galifianakis-funny-laugh.gif
 
You choose who goes first.

—You want to murder millions and millions more unborn children by ripping apart their developing bodies inside and outside their mothers' wombs, harvesting their organs and selling them for profit. Even the Greeks and Romans respected human life more than your 'side'. Your party is irrefutably the most barbaric political organization in human history.

—You want to mutilate our children by chopping off their developing body parts but only after you have brainwashed them into a state of mass hysterical psychosis make believe. This alone is justification enough to wipe every last trace of your ideology from the face of the planet.

—In an effort to further reduce growth of the human population you ceaselessly attempt to condition our children to be homosexual perverts, thus reducing (in your minds) emissions from breathing and slowing global warming. If you could get away with it, you'd simply mass murder billions of human beings outright.

In short, all of your modern political platforms, policies, tenets and ideologies are anti-human, mass suicidal and work toward the ultimate death of as many human beings as possible.
 
You choose who goes first.
Leftist economic policies cause mass poverty, starvation and even cannibalism.


Tens of millions of people died in China in the famines that followed the start of the Great Leap Forward (1958–1961), a bid by then supreme leader Mao Zedong to catch up with U.S. levels of development in just a few years. Estimates of the total range from the official 10 million figure, to at least 45 million. But more recently, reports have begun to emerge suggesting that not all of those deaths were from disease or starvation. Reports have come to light of starving people eating their friends, relatives, and even their own children.
 
Leftist economic policies cause mass poverty, starvation and even cannibalism.


Tens of millions of people died in China in the famines that followed the start of the Great Leap Forward (1958–1961), a bid by then supreme leader Mao Zedong to catch up with U.S. levels of development in just a few years. Estimates of the total range from the official 10 million figure, to at least 45 million. But more recently, reports have begun to emerge suggesting that not all of those deaths were from disease or starvation. Reports have come to light of starving people eating their friends, relatives, and even their own children.
The intent of my focus is on American leftwing economic policies. I don’t know what China did but it isn’t related.

An example of leftwing economic policy is Obama’s stimulus package. According to the CBO:

“Through the first quarter of 2011, the stimulus created between 1.6 million and 4.6 million jobs, increased real GDP by between 1.1 and 3.1 percent, and reduced unemployment by between 0.6 and 1.8 percentage points.”

Why was this effective? It focused on demand side economics. The unemployment benefits that Americans received pumped money into the economy. People bought more shit like food and clothing. Businesses then were able to create more jobs because of this.
 
Under the Trump administration, poverty in America went to an all-time record low. Unemployment went to an all-time low since Nixon emancipated the slaves.

After all, it's easy to lower the unemployment rate by enslaving people and using them as cannon fodder. That's the traditional leftist Democrat solution to unemployment. Just kill the unemployed and reap the profits.
 
Last edited:
Under the Trump administration, poverty in America went to an all-time record low. Unemployment went to an all-time low since Nixon emancipated the slaves.
There was already a trajectory of job growth. Trump inherited this. None of his policies can be associated with this economic growth.
 
Besides Libya, you cannot provide an example of a leftist government that ever benefitted anyone but the rich elites.

And Libya was an exception that proves the rule. They basically had nothing but crude oil. That was a one product economy. In that kind of situation, maybe socialist policy is better.

But Qaddafi changed that. He invested the petrodollars in massive irrigation projects that literally made the desert bloom. Libya was no longer a one product economy.

Then the Obama administration reversed it back to the days of slavery by illegally bombing the shit out of the country. :(
 
Last edited:
Besides Libya, you cannot provide an example of a leftist government that ever benefitted anyone but the rich elites.

And Libya was an exception that proves the rule. They basically had nothing but crude oil. That was a one product economy. In that kind of situation, maybe socialist policy is better.

But Qaddafi changed that. He invested the petrodollars in massive irrigation projects that literally made the desert bloom. Libya was no longer a one product economy.

Then the Obama administration reversed it back to the days of slavery by illegally bombing the shit out of the country. :(
The rich elites? Are you suggesting republicans don’t suck the dick of the rich elites?
 

Forum List

Back
Top