Moscow Show Trials- Not Workin'....

[PoliticalChic]

There's no "investigation".....it's the corrupt attempt sink the chance that the candidate the totalitarian.....your party.....fears more than any in history....Trump.....will not run again.



Any violence Jan 6 was by Democrat agents.



Democratic elected officials told their voters to commit arson, assaults, domestic terrorism for a year before the stolen election.



Democrats committed over 12 thousand such riots at their party's behest.



And during the show trial, they forbid any defense that would have refuted their lies.



Then Democrat DAs, Judges and prosecutors declined to punish them.



Jan 6 is the pretense designed to hide the above.



They simply copied earlier totalitarian....Nazis- Reichstag Fire and Bolshevik's Moscow Show Trials.


And you've been tasked with pretending to believe any of their lies.....and you answered "Yes, Sir!!!!"

​

​

​

​

"GOP rep takes victory lap after Capitol Police debunk Liz Cheney, Jan 6 committee claim​

Less than a week into its heavily hyped televised hearings, the House select committee on the events of January 6, 2021, is reeling after the big primetime rollout was a ratings bomb and now, one of the sinister conspiracy theories put forth by star member Liz Cheney has been exposed as a completely dishonest piece of narrative engineering to implicate GOP lawmakers in a plot to overthrow the government.

On Tuesday, Capitol Police Chief J. Thomas Manger shot down the false claim by Cheney and committee chairman Bennie Thompson that Rep. Barry Loudermilk personally led a group of rioters on a January 5 reconnaissance walk-through of the Capitol complex — an accusation that has been vehemently denied by the Georgia Republican — a major blow to the efforts of the kangaroo court which is off to a rough start."

GOP rep takes victory lap after Capitol Police debunk Liz Cheney, Jan 6 committee claim

Capitol Police shot down a wild conspiracy from J6 committee members Liz Cheney and Bennie Thompson about a GOP-led recon mission.

www.bizpacreview.com

 

[Dragonlady]

There's no "investigation".....it's the corrupt attempt sink the chance that the candidate the totalitarian.....your party.....fears more than any in history....Trump.....will not run again.



Any violence Jan 6 was by Democrat agents.



Democratic elected officials told their voters to commit arson, assaults, domestic terrorism for a year before the stolen election.



Democrats committed over 12 thousand such riots at their party's behest.



And during the show trial, they forbid any defense that would have refuted their lies.



Then Democrat DAs, Judges and prosecutors declined to punish them.



Jan 6 is the pretense designed to hide the above.



They simply copied earlier totalitarian....Nazis- Reichstag Fire and Bolshevik's Moscow Show Trials.


And you've been tasked with pretending to believe any of their lies.....and you answered "Yes, Sir!!!!"

​

​

​

​

"GOP rep takes victory lap after Capitol Police debunk Liz Cheney, Jan 6 committee claim​

Less than a week into its heavily hyped televised hearings, the House select committee on the events of January 6, 2021, is reeling after the big primetime rollout was a ratings bomb and now, one of the sinister conspiracy theories put forth by star member Liz Cheney has been exposed as a completely dishonest piece of narrative engineering to implicate GOP lawmakers in a plot to overthrow the government.

On Tuesday, Capitol Police Chief J. Thomas Manger shot down the false claim by Cheney and committee chairman Bennie Thompson that Rep. Barry Loudermilk personally led a group of rioters on a January 5 reconnaissance walk-through of the Capitol complex — an accusation that has been vehemently denied by the Georgia Republican — a major blow to the efforts of the kangaroo court which is off to a rough start."

GOP rep takes victory lap after Capitol Police debunk Liz Cheney, Jan 6 committee claim

Capitol Police shot down a wild conspiracy from J6 committee members Liz Cheney and Bennie Thompson about a GOP-led recon mission.

www.bizpacreview.com

Do you have any real sources or just Russian propaganda?????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Do you have any real sources or just Russian propaganda?????

Let's use you as a "source"....even though you are an inhabitant of the totalitarian prison camp, Canada, famous for gencide and no liberty......

...still....I'll let you answer the question:


Why do you suppose the ‘Jan6 Committee’ wouldn’t allow any pro-Trump members to sit in?

Doesn’t that mean that everything they are claiming is easily refuted???

Could there be any other reason?




Ready when you are, Reptile.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

No matter how many times they get caught lying, their loyal progbots always believe them & allow get away with it.

It's almost like lefty minions cannot tell the truth from absolute BS after listening to so many lies for so many years...

C'mon Charlie Brown, Lucy will really hold the ball for you this time

 

[irosie91]

sheeeesh ----an easy dissertation-----check party
affiliations of each of the Jan 6 arrestees ----would
that be legal? (I am a registered democrat----but I
do not do riots------I have seen too many---in my
time-----so long ago----riots were for ANTI-CAPITALISTS and ANTI-RACE stuff

 

[Mac1958]

"Show trial". I guess the Trumpsters are being told this is a trial. No surprise, I guess.

They say it's all fake news, so I'm sure there's nothing to worry about. Yawn.

 

[berg80]

There's no "investigation"

Actually, there is.......and has been for some time. But since it is revealing things that make you experience cognitive dissonance given all the unmitigated, steaming piles of horseshit in your head you're compelled to disparage it. It's either that or accept you've been colossally duped, and we know you aren't going there. Cuz it would mean the tens of thousands of posts you've written over the years are worthless, hyperbolic tripe.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Do you have any real sources or just Russian propaganda?????

".... Russian propaganda?"

Amazing how stupid Democrat supporters are.....the party has given up that fake "Russia Russia Russia".....but some morons keep parroting old propaganda lies





"... any real sources..."
Any violence Jan 6 was by Democrat agents.
Democratic elected officials told their voters to commit arson, assaults, domestic terrorism for a year before the stolen election.

Sure.....first, Democrats have always been the violent ones....Historic review: every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.

Second, Democrat elected officials told their morons to riot, and they did.....over 12 thousand riots.



Third.....violence at the Capitol was by Democrats:
“VIDEO: Suspicious Black-Clad ‘Operatives’ Were First Ones Up Capitol Building Stairs On 1/6

A new video exposed by Gateway Pundit shows suspicous black-clad figures on the steps of the Capitol building on 1/6.” VIDEO: Suspicious Black-Clad 'Operatives' Were First Ones Up Capitol Building Stairs On 1/6






‘Leftist Antifa Among Mob Storming US Capitol’



– Facial recognition experts and backers of American President Donald J. Trump said members of the hardline leftist Antifa movement infiltrated protestors who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday.



Several witnesses and reports monitored by Worthy News suggested radical leftist vandals broke into the building housing the U.S. Congress while most Trump supporters were loud but peaceful.” https://www.worthynews.com/55452-leftist-antifa-among-mob-storming-us-capitol



There is no disputing that the Democrats have had far more practice at riots than the Right.



Biden voters are well practiced.





. “No one can point to any statement from President Trump calling upon his supporters to storm the Capitol, much less to stage a coup against the U.S. government, but it doesn’t matter anymore. The establishment media and the social media giants are insisting that he incited the attack on the Capitol and was trying to install himself as a dictator by means of a guy with a buffalo horn hat and some other dopes and wingnuts, and if you don’t believe it, you’re a racist, bigoted, MAGA-hat-wearing fascist who deserves to be silenced along with the president, and soon will be. But it’s clear who the real fascists are, and they are exploiting their Reichstag Fire moment to the fullest.” The Left Is Enjoying Its Reichstag Fire Moment







“Video Reveals Trump Supporters Tried to Stop the Violence
Violence by Antifa on the south side where Trump supporters were told to March to. Supporters stopped the breakage but he started again later. MSM keeps saying it’s Trump http://supporters.it’s not.

Video Reveals Trump Supporters Tried to Stop the Violence | Conservative Insider

conservativeinsider.org

“BLM instigator of Capitol riots, John Earle Sullivan, arrested



The Utah Black Lives Matter "activist" has been bragging about his involvement in instigating the Capitol riots. Now, he's been arrested.



The deadly riots at the Capitol last week that have sparked Big Tech cancelations and prompted another impeachment of President Trump were instigated in part by Black Lives Matter and Antifa “activists,” according to multiple media reports. One of the highest profile suspects, John Earle Sullivan from Utah, has been arrested.”



This story will be buried by mainstream media and suppressed by Big Tech. The arrest of John Earle Sullivan, a known Black Lives Matter leader and provocateur, belies the accepted narrative that Trump-supporters alone caused the riots.” BLM instigator of Capitol riots, John Earle Sullivan, arrested





“James, brother of accused leftist provocateur John Sullivan, claims 226 Antifa members started Capitol riots

John Sullivan was arrested yesterday in connection with instigating the Capitol riots on January 6th. A video of him and CNN photojournalist Jade Sacker emerged this week that shows them giddy following the murder of Trump-supporter Ashli Babbitt. Now, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani is wondering why a text message from James Sullivan was not revealed during the President’s second impeachment hearings in Congress.



According to the text, James Sullivan makes a very bold claim: “I’m currently working with the FBI to expose and place total blame on John and the 226 members of antifa that instigated the Capitol ‘riot’ I was able to get my agent out of trouble along with three other uthan’s.”



…every day brings more evidence that Antifa and other left-wing “activists” incited the crowd to commit crimes. Videos of Antifa members secretly embedded with the Trump-supporters appear to reinforce these claims.



This all jibes with the credible conspiracy theory that Democrats or other interested parties planned this “false flag” attack in order to push for impeachment.” James, brother of accused leftist provocateur John Sullivan, claims 226 Antifa members started Capitol riots







“Verified twitter user Amuse breaks everything down in further detail in a series of tweets.



"To make this clear. CNN was embedded with BLM/Antifa pretending to be Trump supporters taping them incite a riot. This is freaking huge. If CNN is allowed to maintain its press access anywhere in DC there needs to be a serious overhaul of our entire system," he tweeted.



Here's another one, who showed up with furs, and also got himself arrested. According to the New York Post:



Aaron Mostofsky was busted Tuesday at his brother’s house in Brooklyn by federal agents on multiple charges, including theft of government property for allegedly stealing a police riot shield and bulletproof vest, the source said.



Mostofsky, who is the son of Shlomo Mostofsky, a Supreme Court judge and a prominent figure in the Orthodox Jewish community, was photographed with both items.



Video circulating on Twitter following Mostofsky’s arrest shows FBI agents swarming the home and carting out what appeared to be the fur pelts and walking stick he had on him during the insurrection.



His politics? According to this report, registered Democrat.”

Rush to judgment on Trump? Multiple leftists arrested for Capitol riot



And Zero Hedge.

 

[PoliticalChic]

sheeeesh ----an easy dissertation-----check party
affiliations of each of the Jan 6 arrestees ----would
that be legal? (I am a registered democrat----but I
do not do riots------I have seen too many---in my
time-----so long ago----riots were for ANTI-CAPITALISTS and ANTI-RACE stuff

They only arrested Republicans, you moron.


It's been that way for a decade.....open your eyes.


And punishment only directed at Republicans, the Right.

"...arrested so far and charged...." by a corrupt and Democrat-linked law agency.
.....they only target Republicans for punishments....
General Flynn

Roger Stone

Scooter Libby

Papadopolous, Page, .......Trump

Dinesh D'souza.....

Any charges or investigations of Julie Swetnick ???? Blasey Ford????Kevin Clinesmith?????


How about this:
Clapper lied when asked, under oath, by Senator Ron Wyden (Oregon-Democrat) " On March 12, at a hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Wyden asked Clapper: “Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?” Clapper responded: “No, sir.” When Wyden followed up by asking, “It does not?” Clapper said: “Not wittingly. There are cases where they could, inadvertently perhaps, collect—but not wittingly.” Clapper did not specify at the time that he was referring to e-mail." James Clapper's Tip for Avoiding Lies: Don't Do Talking Points | emptywheel

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Show trial". I guess the Trumpsters are being told this is a trial. No surprise, I guess.

They say it's all fake news, so I'm sure there's nothing to worry about. Yawn.

I remember you....you're the gormless idiot who believes thought crimes should be punished.....right out of Orwell's 1984.


What a good little Nazi.

 

[berg80]

".... Russian propaganda?"

Amazing how stupid Democrat supporters are.....the party has given up that fake "Russia Russia Russia".

Stop wallowing in horseshit and enlighten yourself.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”​

Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.

www.justsecurity.org

​

It is a bit of a mug’s game at this point to fight over whether what either Mueller or the Intelligence Committee found constitutes collusion and, if so, in what sense. The question turns almost entirely on what one means by the term “collusion”—a word without any precise meaning in the context of campaign engagement with foreign actors interfering with an election.

So rather than engaging over whether the Intelligence Committee found collusion, we decided to read the document with a focus on identifying precisely what the committee found about the engagement over a long period of time between Trump and his campaign and Russian government or intelligence actors and their cut-outs.

Whether one describes this activity as collusion or not, there’s a lot of it: The report describes hundreds of actions by Trump, his campaign, and his associates in the run-up to the 2016 election that involve some degree of participation by Trump or his associates in Russian activity. In this post—which we are generating serially as we read through the document—we attempt to summarize, precisely and comprehensively, what the eight Republicans on the committee, along with their seven Democratic colleagues, report that the president, members of his campaign and his associates actually did.

A Collusion Reading Diary: What Did the Senate Intelligence Committee Find?​

Our summary of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s final report on Russian interference in the 2016 election.

www.lawfareblog.com

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map​

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

 

[jc456]

Let's use you as a "source"....even though you are an inhabitant of the totalitarian prison camp, Canada, famous for gencide and no liberty......

...still....I'll let you answer the question:


Why do you suppose the ‘Jan6 Committee’ wouldn’t allow any pro-Trump members to sit in?

Doesn’t that mean that everything they are claiming is easily refuted???

Could there be any other reason?




Ready when you are, Reptile.

looks like the canadian reptilian is gone.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Actually, there is.......and has been for some time. But since it is revealing things that make you experience cognitive dissonance given all the unmitigated, steaming piles of horseshit in your head you're compelled to disparage it. It's either that or accept you've been colossally duped, and we know you aren't going there. Cuz it would mean the tens of thousands of posts you've written over the years are worthless, hyperbolic tripe.

OK, OK.....stop begging: I'll teach you the history that the Democrats are using and government school hid from you:



I suppose it is a lack of creativity, not just honesty, that your sort simply copies their forebears.


First, they took a page from earlier socialists, the National Socialist German Worker's Party, who burned down their capitol and said the other side did it....

The True Story of the Reichstag Fire and the Nazi Rise to ...​

https://www.smithsonianmag.com › history › true-story...
— Where there's smoke, there's fire, and where there's fire, conspiracy theories are sure to follow. At least, that's what happened in Germany on ...


The exact story of Jan6....





And their other cousins.....who tried political enemies on fake charges.

Great Purge​

Soviet history
Print Cite Share Feedback

Alternate titles: purge trials
By The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica • Edit History

---

Joseph Stalin
See all media
Date: August 1936 - March 13, 1938Location: Moscow RussiaKey People: Lev Kamenev Karl Radek Aleksey Ivanovich Rykov Leon Trotsky Genrikh Grigoryevich Yagoda...(Show more)
See all related content →
Summary

Read a brief summary of this topic​

Great Purge, also called purge trials, three widely publicized show trials and a series of closed, unpublicized trials held in the Soviet Union during the late 1930s, in which many prominent Old Bolsheviks were found guilty of treason and executed or imprisoned. All the evidence presented in court was derived from preliminary examinations of the defendants and from their confessions. It was subsequently established that the accused were innocent, that the cases were fabricated by the secret police (NKVD), and that the confessions were made under pressure of intensive torture and intimidation.
The trials successfully eliminated the major real and potential political rivals and critics of Joseph Stalin. The trials were the public aspect of the widespread purge that sent millions of alleged “enemies of the people” to prison camps in the 1930s.

READ MORE ....






Luckily they both had ooodles of brain dead adherents.....you know.....like you.





Have you ever read any history???????


Have you ever read a book???



Book: a written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers.

He was thinking of you.





BTW.....who'd you vote for?

 

[Oddball]

......things that make you experience cognitive dissonance given all the unmitigated, steaming piles of horseshit in your head .......... it. It's either that or accept you've been colossally duped, and we know you aren't going there. Cuz it would mean the tens of thousands of posts you've written over the years are worthless, hyperbolic tripe.

 

[jc456]

Stop wallowing in horseshit and enlighten yourself.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”​

Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.

www.justsecurity.org

​

It is a bit of a mug’s game at this point to fight over whether what either Mueller or the Intelligence Committee found constitutes collusion and, if so, in what sense. The question turns almost entirely on what one means by the term “collusion”—a word without any precise meaning in the context of campaign engagement with foreign actors interfering with an election.

So rather than engaging over whether the Intelligence Committee found collusion, we decided to read the document with a focus on identifying precisely what the committee found about the engagement over a long period of time between Trump and his campaign and Russian government or intelligence actors and their cut-outs.

Whether one describes this activity as collusion or not, there’s a lot of it: The report describes hundreds of actions by Trump, his campaign, and his associates in the run-up to the 2016 election that involve some degree of participation by Trump or his associates in Russian activity. In this post—which we are generating serially as we read through the document—we attempt to summarize, precisely and comprehensively, what the eight Republicans on the committee, along with their seven Democratic colleagues, report that the president, members of his campaign and his associates actually did.

A Collusion Reading Diary: What Did the Senate Intelligence Committee Find?​

Our summary of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s final report on Russian interference in the 2016 election.

www.lawfareblog.com

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map​

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

but yet, using russian agents the dems presented......

‘Steele dossier’ key source on Trump was shocked at ‘fake news’: report

Veteran public relations executive Charles “Chuck” Dolan Jr. was shocked to find out that gossip he shared wound up in the FBI’s Steele dossier.

nypost.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

Stop wallowing in horseshit and enlighten yourself.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”​

Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.

www.justsecurity.org

​

It is a bit of a mug’s game at this point to fight over whether what either Mueller or the Intelligence Committee found constitutes collusion and, if so, in what sense. The question turns almost entirely on what one means by the term “collusion”—a word without any precise meaning in the context of campaign engagement with foreign actors interfering with an election.

So rather than engaging over whether the Intelligence Committee found collusion, we decided to read the document with a focus on identifying precisely what the committee found about the engagement over a long period of time between Trump and his campaign and Russian government or intelligence actors and their cut-outs.

Whether one describes this activity as collusion or not, there’s a lot of it: The report describes hundreds of actions by Trump, his campaign, and his associates in the run-up to the 2016 election that involve some degree of participation by Trump or his associates in Russian activity. In this post—which we are generating serially as we read through the document—we attempt to summarize, precisely and comprehensively, what the eight Republicans on the committee, along with their seven Democratic colleagues, report that the president, members of his campaign and his associates actually did.

A Collusion Reading Diary: What Did the Senate Intelligence Committee Find?​

Our summary of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s final report on Russian interference in the 2016 election.

www.lawfareblog.com

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map​

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

These books......same author:

 

[PoliticalChic]

looks like the canadian reptilian is gone.

My posts always get under her scales.

 

[Oddball]

Stop wallowing in horseshit and enlighten yourself.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”​

Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.

www.justsecurity.org

​

It is a bit of a mug’s game at this point to fight over whether what either Mueller or the Intelligence Committee found constitutes collusion and, if so, in what sense. The question turns almost entirely on what one means by the term “collusion”—a word without any precise meaning in the context of campaign engagement with foreign actors interfering with an election.

So rather than engaging over whether the Intelligence Committee found collusion, we decided to read the document with a focus on identifying precisely what the committee found about the engagement over a long period of time between Trump and his campaign and Russian government or intelligence actors and their cut-outs.

Whether one describes this activity as collusion or not, there’s a lot of it: The report describes hundreds of actions by Trump, his campaign, and his associates in the run-up to the 2016 election that involve some degree of participation by Trump or his associates in Russian activity. In this post—which we are generating serially as we read through the document—we attempt to summarize, precisely and comprehensively, what the eight Republicans on the committee, along with their seven Democratic colleagues, report that the president, members of his campaign and his associates actually did.

A Collusion Reading Diary: What Did the Senate Intelligence Committee Find?​

Our summary of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s final report on Russian interference in the 2016 election.

www.lawfareblog.com

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map​

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

The Mueller report.....

 

[irosie91]

They only arrested Republicans, you moron.


It's been that way for a decade.....open your eyes.


And punishment only directed at Republicans, the Right.

"...arrested so far and charged...." by a corrupt and Democrat-linked law agency.
.....they only target Republicans for punishments....
General Flynn

Roger Stone

Scooter Libby

Papadopolous, Page, .......Trump

Dinesh D'souza.....

Any charges or investigations of Julie Swetnick ???? Blasey Ford????Kevin Clinesmith?????


How about this:
Clapper lied when asked, under oath, by Senator Ron Wyden (Oregon-Democrat) " On March 12, at a hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Wyden asked Clapper: “Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?” Clapper responded: “No, sir.” When Wyden followed up by asking, “It does not?” Clapper said: “Not wittingly. There are cases where they could, inadvertently perhaps, collect—but not wittingly.” Clapper did not specify at the time that he was referring to e-mail." James Clapper's Tip for Avoiding Lies: Don't Do Talking Points | emptywheel

I am not a moron------I find it VERY SIGNFICANT
that only Republicans were arrested----in fact it strongly suggest DISCRIMINATION------much more
strongly than lots of the 'evidence' that cops mistreat blacks. As evidence it seems to reach the level of
exculpatory

 

[PoliticalChic]

I am not a moron------I find it VERY SIGNFICANT
that only Republicans were arrested----in fact it strongly suggest DISCRIMINATION------much more
strongly than lots of the 'evidence' that cops mistreat blacks. As evidence it seems to reach the level of
exculpatory

Wait.....I read your post a meaning that the fact that only Republicans were arrested meant guilty.

I now see a very different meaning, one with which I agree.....

Moron was clearly a misstatement, and I heartfully retract it.



BTW.....it's well past time for you to retract your claim that I want people to starve to death.
Just sayin'...