Moscow Show Trials- Not Workin'....

[irosie91]

Wait.....I read your post a meaning that the fact that only Republicans were arrested meant guilty.

I now see a very different meaning, one with which I agree.....

Moron was clearly a misstatement, and I heartfully retract it.



BTW.....it's well past time for you to retract your claim that I want people to starve to death.
Just sayin'...

BACK AT YOU-----you did claim that nobody in
the USA ever starved to death. I have seem mal-
nutrition in the USA and am VERY AWARE of intense and deadly malnutrition in the USA in the past and
even some, in pathological social conditions--in the
present times.
I am a very strong advocate of "food-stamps" which
persons LIKE YOU seem to deride as marxism. I also
support public sidewalks and sewers----another example of SOCIALISM. ------social security was not
invented by STALIN. It is not clear to me why ---in
some areas-----all kids get free lunch. IMO---the program constitutes very negative social conditioning

 

[jc456]

BACK AT YOU-----you did claim that nobody in
the USA ever starved to death. I have seem mal-
nutrition in the USA and am VERY AWARE of intense and deadly malnutrition in the USA in the past and
even some, in pathological social conditions--in the
present times.
I am a very strong advocate of "food-stamps" which
persons LIKE YOU seem to deride as marxism. I also
support public sidewalks and sewers----another example of SOCIALISM. ------social security was not
invented by STALIN. It is not clear to me why ---in
some areas-----all kids get free lunch. IMO---the program constitutes very negative social conditioning

people who are malnutritioned are their own worst enemy. There is plenty of food available without food stamps, food panties is one, and the government should stay out of the way. If I take your position wrongly excuse me ahead of time, but to offer someone the same option for food that hard working people sweat and expire over shouldn't be the intent of any program. You don't want to work and instead pop out babies, eat what's available, charity options were always there until government stuck its nose in. BTW, these people sell their food stamps, and I know that is not the intent of the program. If you don't see that the

It is not our job to coddle poor people, it's their job to find a way out of poverty. The miscalculation by some is that somehow poor people can't save themselves. such nonsense. It's a demofk's con job. Like telling blacks they are oppressed.

 

[PoliticalChic]

BACK AT YOU-----you did claim that nobody in
the USA ever starved to death. I have seem mal-
nutrition in the USA and am VERY AWARE of intense and deadly malnutrition in the USA in the past and
even some, in pathological social conditions--in the
present times.
I am a very strong advocate of "food-stamps" which
persons LIKE YOU seem to deride as marxism. I also
support public sidewalks and sewers----another example of SOCIALISM. ------social security was not
invented by STALIN. It is not clear to me why ---in
some areas-----all kids get free lunch. IMO---the program constitutes very negative social conditioning

Starvation was never a problem in America.

Never.

 

[PoliticalChic]

My posts always get under her scales.

 

[irosie91]

Starvation was never a problem in America.

Never.

yes it was-----depending, of course, on WHAT YOU CALL STARVATION. For me----lack of sufficient
nutrition based on economics IS STARVATION. Of
course you could argue that the Kulaks and Irish
did not actually experience starvation-----if you want
to be really stupid. Pellagra in the early 20th century USA was not a sickness----often leading to death--- of THE WEALTHY.

 

[jc456]

yes it was-----depending, of course, on WHAT YOU CALL STARVATION. For me----lack of sufficient
nutrition based on economics IS STARVATION. Of
course you could argue that the Kulaks and Irish
did not actually experience starvation-----if you want
to be really stupid. Pellagra in the early 20th century USA was not a sickness----often leading to death--- of THE WEALTHY.

where? Do you have a link to those who starved?

 

[PoliticalChic]

yes it was-----depending, of course, on WHAT YOU CALL STARVATION. For me----lack of sufficient
nutrition based on economics IS STARVATION. Of
course you could argue that the Kulaks and Irish
did not actually experience starvation-----if you want
to be really stupid. Pellagra in the early 20th century USA was not a sickness----often leading to death--- of THE WEALTHY.

You're a dunce.

I'll have to keep educating you....but you have my permission to remain stupid.

The Myth of Starving Americans​

According to the Census Bureau, 96% of parents classified as poor said their children were never hungry.​

In a report published last September by the Heritage Foundation, researchers Robert Rector and Rachel Sheffield asked that very question. They found that, according to Census Bureau data for 2009 (the most recent year statistics are available), of the almost 50 million Americans classified as poor, 96% of the parents said their children were never hungry. Eighty-three percent of poor families reported having enough food to eat, and 82% of poor adults said they were never hungry at any time in 2009 due to a lack of food or money."

Warren Kozak: The Myth of the Starving Americans

In The Wall Street Journal, Warren Kozak writes that according to the Census Bureau, 96% of parents classified as poor in the United States said their children were never hungry.

www.wsj.com

"As a group, America's poor are far from being chronically undernourished. The average consumption of protein, vitamins, and minerals is virtually the same for poor and middle-class children and, in most cases, is well above recommended norms.

Poor children actually consume more meat than do higher-income children and have average protein intakes 100 percent above recommended levels. Most poor children today are, in fact, supernourished and grow up to be, on average, one inch taller and 10 pounds heavier than the GIs who stormed the beaches of Normandy in World War II."
How Poor Are America's Poor? Examining the "Plague" of Poverty in America


Must be all that starvation....




It is one more of the propaganda of the Democrats, and stupid people keep falling for it.

Raise your paw.

 

[BlindBoo]

There's no "investigation".....it's the corrupt attempt sink the chance that the candidate the totalitarian.....your party.....fears more than any in history....Trump.....will not run again.



Any violence Jan 6 was by Democrat agents.



Democratic elected officials told their voters to commit arson, assaults, domestic terrorism for a year before the stolen election.



Democrats committed over 12 thousand such riots at their party's behest.



And during the show trial, they forbid any defense that would have refuted their lies.



Then Democrat DAs, Judges and prosecutors declined to punish them.



Jan 6 is the pretense designed to hide the above.



They simply copied earlier totalitarian....Nazis- Reichstag Fire and Bolshevik's Moscow Show Trials.


And you've been tasked with pretending to believe any of their lies.....and you answered "Yes, Sir!!!!"

​

​

​

​

"GOP rep takes victory lap after Capitol Police debunk Liz Cheney, Jan 6 committee claim​

Less than a week into its heavily hyped televised hearings, the House select committee on the events of January 6, 2021, is reeling after the big primetime rollout was a ratings bomb and now, one of the sinister conspiracy theories put forth by star member Liz Cheney has been exposed as a completely dishonest piece of narrative engineering to implicate GOP lawmakers in a plot to overthrow the government.

On Tuesday, Capitol Police Chief J. Thomas Manger shot down the false claim by Cheney and committee chairman Bennie Thompson that Rep. Barry Loudermilk personally led a group of rioters on a January 5 reconnaissance walk-through of the Capitol complex — an accusation that has been vehemently denied by the Georgia Republican — a major blow to the efforts of the kangaroo court which is off to a rough start."

GOP rep takes victory lap after Capitol Police debunk Liz Cheney, Jan 6 committee claim

Capitol Police shot down a wild conspiracy from J6 committee members Liz Cheney and Bennie Thompson about a GOP-led recon mission.

www.bizpacreview.com

The panel released the video as it renewed calls for the GOP lawmaker, Georgia Rep. Barry Loudermilk, to speak to the committee about the tour. Loudermilk has so far declined the interview and denied any wrongdoing, and the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police said in a letter to Republicans this week that after reviewing surveillance video, “we do not consider any of the activities we observed as suspicious.”

Still, the committee says it has questions. In addition to the surveillance video, the footage released by the panel also includes video of an unidentified man walking toward the Capitol on Jan. 6 holding a flagpole that appears to have a sharpened end, which he says is “for a certain person.” The committee says the man in the video is one of the tour participants who was taking photos inside the Capitol the day before.

Later footage shows the man near the Capitol and making apparent threats toward Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and New York Reps. Jerrold Nadler and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

“They’re coming in, coming in like white on rice for Pelosi, Nadler, even you, AOC,” the man says in the video released by the committee. “We’re coming to take you out and pull you out by your hairs. … When I get done with you, you’re going to need a shine on top of that bald head.”

The panel did not say whether he got into the Capitol or whether he has faced any charges.

Jan. 6 panel releases video of Capitol tour led by Georgia's Loudermilk before attack - WABE

The House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection released video on Wednesday of a Capitol tour led by a Republican lawmaker the day before the attack, showing participants taking […]

www.wabe.org

 

[PoliticalChic]

The panel released the video as it renewed calls for the GOP lawmaker, Georgia Rep. Barry Loudermilk, to speak to the committee about the tour. Loudermilk has so far declined the interview and denied any wrongdoing, and the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police said in a letter to Republicans this week that after reviewing surveillance video, “we do not consider any of the activities we observed as suspicious.”

Still, the committee says it has questions. In addition to the surveillance video, the footage released by the panel also includes video of an unidentified man walking toward the Capitol on Jan. 6 holding a flagpole that appears to have a sharpened end, which he says is “for a certain person.” The committee says the man in the video is one of the tour participants who was taking photos inside the Capitol the day before.

Later footage shows the man near the Capitol and making apparent threats toward Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and New York Reps. Jerrold Nadler and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

“They’re coming in, coming in like white on rice for Pelosi, Nadler, even you, AOC,” the man says in the video released by the committee. “We’re coming to take you out and pull you out by your hairs. … When I get done with you, you’re going to need a shine on top of that bald head.”

The panel did not say whether he got into the Capitol or whether he has faced any charges.

Jan. 6 panel releases video of Capitol tour led by Georgia's Loudermilk before attack - WABE

The House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection released video on Wednesday of a Capitol tour led by a Republican lawmaker the day before the attack, showing participants taking […]

www.wabe.org

I need an update:


You wrote this:

I am often wrong and am more than willing to admit my mistakes.



I wrote:

Let's check: did you make a mistake voting for Biden?



You responded:

Nope.

No Price Too High​

Awe poor thing. Queef out some more boot licking insults to prologue your lies with and you'll get more of the same. Central to that idea is how much government aims to steal from those who earn it: What if you find that based on Federal taxes, state taxes, local taxes, sales tax...
www.usmessageboard.com
post 5




Still?
I just want to be certain you didn't import any IQ points.

 

[irosie91]

where? Do you have a link to those who starved?

In the world or the USA? Do you have a profession
of any kind? Is your entire profession, assuming
you have one-------on GOOGLE?

You're a dunce.

I'll have to keep educating you....but you have my permission to remain stupid.

The Myth of Starving Americans​

According to the Census Bureau, 96% of parents classified as poor said their children were never hungry.​

In a report published last September by the Heritage Foundation, researchers Robert Rector and Rachel Sheffield asked that very question. They found that, according to Census Bureau data for 2009 (the most recent year statistics are available), of the almost 50 million Americans classified as poor, 96% of the parents said their children were never hungry. Eighty-three percent of poor families reported having enough food to eat, and 82% of poor adults said they were never hungry at any time in 2009 due to a lack of food or money."

Warren Kozak: The Myth of the Starving Americans

In The Wall Street Journal, Warren Kozak writes that according to the Census Bureau, 96% of parents classified as poor in the United States said their children were never hungry.

www.wsj.com

"As a group, America's poor are far from being chronically undernourished. The average consumption of protein, vitamins, and minerals is virtually the same for poor and middle-class children and, in most cases, is well above recommended norms.

Poor children actually consume more meat than do higher-income children and have average protein intakes 100 percent above recommended levels. Most poor children today are, in fact, supernourished and grow up to be, on average, one inch taller and 10 pounds heavier than the GIs who stormed the beaches of Normandy in World War II."
How Poor Are America's Poor? Examining the "Plague" of Poverty in America


Must be all that starvation....




It is one more of the propaganda of the Democrats, and stupid people keep falling for it.

Raise your paw.

Historically----your current stats are meaningless and in CONTEMPORARY TIMES-----almost meaningless. "POOR" determined how? by written responses to polls? <<<<that's a huge
problem in your experiment design. Remember your assertion-----"STARVATION HAS NEVER BEEN
A PROBLEM IN THE USA" can you define your
parameters of "never" ?

 

[Sunsettommy]

Stop wallowing in horseshit and enlighten yourself.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”​

Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.

www.justsecurity.org

​

It is a bit of a mug’s game at this point to fight over whether what either Mueller or the Intelligence Committee found constitutes collusion and, if so, in what sense. The question turns almost entirely on what one means by the term “collusion”—a word without any precise meaning in the context of campaign engagement with foreign actors interfering with an election.

So rather than engaging over whether the Intelligence Committee found collusion, we decided to read the document with a focus on identifying precisely what the committee found about the engagement over a long period of time between Trump and his campaign and Russian government or intelligence actors and their cut-outs.

Whether one describes this activity as collusion or not, there’s a lot of it: The report describes hundreds of actions by Trump, his campaign, and his associates in the run-up to the 2016 election that involve some degree of participation by Trump or his associates in Russian activity. In this post—which we are generating serially as we read through the document—we attempt to summarize, precisely and comprehensively, what the eight Republicans on the committee, along with their seven Democratic colleagues, report that the president, members of his campaign and his associates actually did.

A Collusion Reading Diary: What Did the Senate Intelligence Committee Find?​

Our summary of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s final report on Russian interference in the 2016 election.

www.lawfareblog.com

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map​

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

Mueller never posted any prosecution decisions, heck he specifically states in Section one that Trump and his campaign associates didn't do anything illegal.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Mueller never posted any prosecution decisions, heck he specifically states in Section one that Trump and his campaign associates didn't do anything illegal.

"The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election," Barr wrote in a letter to leaders of the House and Senate judiciary committees on Sunday afternoon.That was despite "multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign," he wrote. Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion, But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction



“ The report further explains that a primary consideration for the Special Counsel's investigation was whether any Americans – including individuals associated with the Trump campaign – joined the Russian conspiracies to influence the election, which would be a federal crime. The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. As the report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” As noted above, the Special Counsel did not find that any U.S. person or Trump campaign official or associate conspired or knowingly coordinated with the IRA in its efforts, although the Special Counsel brought criminal charges against a number of Russian nationals and entities in connection with these activities.” Read Attorney General William Barr’s Summary of the Mueller Report (Published 2019)



“Mueller's investigation found no evidence of illegal or criminal coordination between Trump or the Trump campaign and Russia in 2016.” Durham says CIA found data alleging Trump-Russia connection not 'technically plausible,' was 'user created'



“The Washington Post corrects, removes parts of two stories regarding the Steele dossier…Other stories that made the same assertion were corrected as well.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...c9b770-43d5-11ec-a88e-2aa4632af69b_story.html

 

[PoliticalChic]

In the world or the USA? Do you have a profession
of any kind? Is your entire profession, assuming
you have one-------on GOOGLE?

Historically----your current stats are meaningless and in CONTEMPORARY TIMES-----almost meaningless. "POOR" determined how? by written responses to polls? <<<<that's a huge
problem in your experiment design. Remember your assertion-----"STARVATION HAS NEVER BEEN
A PROBLEM IN THE USA" can you define your
parameters of "never" ?'

I already told you you have my permission to remain stupid......what more do you want.


Yesterday I provided this:


No one died of starvation in this country......EVER.....until Democrat inflation.....OK, no one but your grandfather.




According to my quick reading of the Life and death during the Great Depression by José A. Tapia Granadosa and Ana V. Diez Roux, the only noticeable increase of mortality was suicide, with a noticeable decline of mortality in every other category.

It's interesting that this paper was written in 2009, before the (shall we say) sensationalist Russian claim of 7 million deaths.

According also to Michael Mosley, life expectancy actually rose through the Great Depression. In his Horizon programme Eat, Fast and Live Longer he claims

From 1929 to 1933, in the darkest years of the great depression when people were eating far less, life expectancy increased by 6 years.

seeing as the US diet was far higher than starvation standards before the GD, even a serious reduction would have been unlikely to induce starvation level conditions in the majority of the population. And with enough food available overall, and the US always having had a very active local charity network, it's quite likely there would have been help for at least the majority of those who could not afford to feed themselves. In fact for quite a few people a somewhat leaner diet may well have contributed to the increased life expectancy. –

They include a table that shows trends in death rates per 100,000 population. Starvation does not appear on the list, nor does it rate a mention in the article. The researchers do acknowledge that malnutrition led to decreased health during the Depression, but not to increased mortality. Malnutrition was a widespread problem, starvation was not.





Importantly, this study shows that economic crisis does not guarantee a mortality crisis, but instead reinforces the notion that what crucially matters is how governments respond and whether protective social and public health policies are in place both during and in advance of economic shocks

---

Sources: David Stuckler, Christopher Meissner, Price Fishback, Sanjay Basu, Martin McKee. 2011. "Banking crises and mortality during the Great Depression: evidence from US urban populations, 1929-1937." Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. (link)

Price Fishback, Michael Haines, and Shawn Kantor. 2005. "Births, Deaths, and New Deal Relief During the Great Depression."

I am no longer interested in you battle to save face.....


...get lost.

 

[BlindBoo]

I need an update:


You wrote this:

Poor Stinky. Loudermilk should follow Hillary Clinton's example and testify, under oath.

 

[Sunsettommy]

"The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election," Barr wrote in a letter to leaders of the House and Senate judiciary committees on Sunday afternoon.That was despite "multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign," he wrote. Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion, But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction



“ The report further explains that a primary consideration for the Special Counsel's investigation was whether any Americans – including individuals associated with the Trump campaign – joined the Russian conspiracies to influence the election, which would be a federal crime. The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. As the report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” As noted above, the Special Counsel did not find that any U.S. person or Trump campaign official or associate conspired or knowingly coordinated with the IRA in its efforts, although the Special Counsel brought criminal charges against a number of Russian nationals and entities in connection with these activities.” Read Attorney General William Barr’s Summary of the Mueller Report (Published 2019)



“Mueller's investigation found no evidence of illegal or criminal coordination between Trump or the Trump campaign and Russia in 2016.” Durham says CIA found data alleging Trump-Russia connection not 'technically plausible,' was 'user created'



“The Washington Post corrects, removes parts of two stories regarding the Steele dossier…Other stories that made the same assertion were corrected as well.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...c9b770-43d5-11ec-a88e-2aa4632af69b_story.html

Last year I posted the actual statements from the Mueller report section one exonerating Trump and his campaign associates, leftists in the forum opposed it with their usual lies.

 

[irosie91]

I already told you you have my permission to remain stupid......what more do you want.


Yesterday I provided this:


No one died of starvation in this country......EVER.....until Democrat inflation.....OK, no one but your grandfather.




According to my quick reading of the Life and death during the Great Depression by José A. Tapia Granadosa and Ana V. Diez Roux, the only noticeable increase of mortality was suicide, with a noticeable decline of mortality in every other category.

It's interesting that this paper was written in 2009, before the (shall we say) sensationalist Russian claim of 7 million deaths.

According also to Michael Mosley, life expectancy actually rose through the Great Depression. In his Horizon programme Eat, Fast and Live Longer he claims

From 1929 to 1933, in the darkest years of the great depression when people were eating far less, life expectancy increased by 6 years.

seeing as the US diet was far higher than starvation standards before the GD, even a serious reduction would have been unlikely to induce starvation level conditions in the majority of the population. And with enough food available overall, and the US always having had a very active local charity network, it's quite likely there would have been help for at least the majority of those who could not afford to feed themselves. In fact for quite a few people a somewhat leaner diet may well have contributed to the increased life expectancy. –

They include a table that shows trends in death rates per 100,000 population. Starvation does not appear on the list, nor does it rate a mention in the article. The researchers do acknowledge that malnutrition led to decreased health during the Depression, but not to increased mortality. Malnutrition was a widespread problem, starvation was not.





Importantly, this study shows that economic crisis does not guarantee a mortality crisis, but instead reinforces the notion that what crucially matters is how governments respond and whether protective social and public health policies are in place both during and in advance of economic shocks

---

Sources: David Stuckler, Christopher Meissner, Price Fishback, Sanjay Basu, Martin McKee. 2011. "Banking crises and mortality during the Great Depression: evidence from US urban populations, 1929-1937." Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. (link)

Price Fishback, Michael Haines, and Shawn Kantor. 2005. "Births, Deaths, and New Deal Relief During the Great Depression."

I am no longer interested in you battle to save face.....


...get lost.

the studies you present are manifestations of
INTEREST GROUPS-----not science. ---risible---
I support fasting and now for a study of the impoverished masses of the dust bowl----how DAMNED HEALTHY THEY WERE------oh BTW---
PELLAGRA IS A MYTH. for an addendum---lets
make note of the fantastically healthy population of the slums of Calcutta (uhm---Kolkata) and lucky ducky OLIVER TWIST-----greedy little pig WANTED
MORE........ for the record -----people actually
DIE as a result of the much vaunted ATKINS DIET.
KETOSIS MAY BE A HIGH_----but not conducive to
good health (keep it quiet-----there are ketosis
radicals in the peanut gallery)

 

[irosie91]

people who are malnutritioned are their own worst enemy. There is plenty of food available without food stamps, food panties is one, and the government should stay out of the way. If I take your position wrongly excuse me ahead of time, but to offer someone the same option for food that hard working people sweat and expire over shouldn't be the intent of any program. You don't want to work and instead pop out babies, eat what's available, charity options were always there until government stuck its nose in. BTW, these people sell their food stamps, and I know that is not the intent of the program. If you don't see that the

It is not our job to coddle poor people, it's their job to find a way out of poverty. The miscalculation by some is that somehow poor people can't save themselves. such nonsense. It's a demofk's con job. Like telling blacks they are oppressed.

If you imagine that there has been FREE FOOD all over the USA for the past 150 years-----you are very
deluded-----the FREE FOOD thing is a very current
issue and related to the COVID EPIDEMIC. People do sell food stamps ------even to the point of endangering their children in TOO MANY CASES

 

[Dragonlady]

Let's use you as a "source"....even though you are an inhabitant of the totalitarian prison camp, Canada, famous for gencide and no liberty......

...still....I'll let you answer the question:


Why do you suppose the ‘Jan6 Committee’ wouldn’t allow any pro-Trump members to sit in?

Doesn’t that mean that everything they are claiming is easily refuted???

Could there be any other reason?




Ready when you are, Reptile.

Is there some requirement that pro-Trump members of Congress be involved in every Committee? Where is it written that the people being investigated are entitled to a "voice" on the investigating Committee?

There were no nominations to the Committee who weren't subjects of the investigation. You're not seriously suggesting that those who helped Trump plan and carry out the insurrection, should have a voice on the Committee are you? You're not that stupid, or are you?

The Republican names put forward by Kevin McCarthy had already given a press conference to tell the nation that they were investigating Nancy Pelosi's role in security decisions made that day. In other words, Jim Jordan was once again, going to cover up the illegal, immoral, disturbing and disgraceful conduct of his boss. This time it wasn't the sexual abuse of young athletes Jordan was hiding, it was his own participation in the attempted coup.

It is my sincere hope Jordan ends up in prison for his crimes.

 

[Sunsettommy]

the studies you present are manifestations of
INTEREST GROUPS-----not science. ---risible---
I support fasting and now for a study of the impoverished masses of the dust bowl----how DAMNED HEALTHY THEY WERE------oh BTW---
PELLAGRA IS A MYTH. for an addendum---lets
make note of the fantastically healthy population of the slums of Calcutta (uhm---Kolkata) and lucky ducky OLIVER TWIST-----greedy little pig WANTED
MORE........ for the record -----people actually
DIE as a result of the much vaunted ATKINS DIET.
KETOSIS MAY BE A HIGH_----but not conducive to
good health (keep it quiet-----there are ketosis
radicals in the peanut gallery)

Pellagra was real and discovered to be caused by nutritional deficiency

Wikipedia

Pellagra is a disease caused by a lack of the vitamin niacin (Vitamin B3).[2] Symptoms include inflamed skin, diarrhea, dementia, and sores in the mouth.[1] Areas of the skin exposed to either sunlight or friction are typically affected first.[1] Over time affected skin may become darker, stiffen, peel, or bleed.

snip

In 1915, Dr. Joseph Goldberger, assigned to study pellagra by the Surgeon General of the United States, showed it was linked to diet by observing the outbreaks of pellagra in orphanages and mental hospitals. Goldberger noted that children between the ages of 6 and 12 (but not older or younger children at the orphanages) and patients at the mental hospitals (but not doctors or nurses) were the ones who seemed most susceptible to pellagra.[32] Goldberger theorized that a lack of meat, milk, eggs, and legumes made those particular populations susceptible to pellagra. By modifying the diet served in these institutions with "a marked increase in the fresh animal and the leguminous protein foods," Goldberger was able to show that pellagra could be prevented.[32] By 1926, Goldberger established that a diet that included these foods, or a small amount of brewer's yeast,[33] prevented pellagra.

 

[jc456]

If you imagine that there has been FREE FOOD all over the USA for the past 150 years-----you are very
deluded-----the FREE FOOD thing is a very current
issue and related to the COVID EPIDEMIC. People do sell food stamps ------even to the point of endangering their children in TOO MANY CASES

That’s not a rational response! Why?