Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well again, only one vote was fraudulent. one vote was cast legally. a legal act during the commission of a crime doesn't suddenly become illegal.strange analogy. rather inaccurate. a more accurate analogy would be to compare a vote to a coupon for free ice cream. if someone used their coupon, and then tried to use a duplicate coupon the store would be in the right to deny them the second cone, but not to charge or confiscate the first.
and you still don't know why they are counted as having voted twice.
Not strange at all.
An otherwise legal act during the commission of a crime does not render the criminal acts acceptable.
Look, you're a democrat - you demand that election fraud is a privilege of your party, not to be infringed, I get it.
wow. now you're just being ignorant.
if i move across state lines do they confiscate my license at the border? assuming they don't (because they don't) could i not have a license for both states?
hell, let's just say i wanted to skip the whole license thing entirely and use my passport.
again, this is one of the few cases of provable voter fraud and you can't even bring yourself to admit that requiring id in this case would have prevented absolutely nothing.wow. now you're just being ignorant.
if i move across state lines do they confiscate my license at the border? assuming they don't (because they don't) could i not have a license for both states?
hell, let's just say i wanted to skip the whole license thing entirely and use my passport.
Guess your could get false ID for the bus loads of proxy voters shuttled around by the party every election too - but it would slow you down....
well again, only one vote was fraudulent.
one vote was cast legally. a legal act during the commission of a crime doesn't suddenly become illegal.
i get it. you're a republican. you're afraid brown people will vote and will grasp at any straw to try and prevent it.
again, this is one of the few cases of provable voter fraud and you can't even bring yourself to admit that requiring id in this case would have prevented absolutely nothing.
why is that?
Yet another conundrum, another schism between two ideologies, is raised: on one hand, if even one potential voter is inconvenienced by having to acquire and present proper identification in order to vote, that constitutes grounds for not even trying to implement voter verification. On the other hand, if only a relatively few votes are fraudulently cast, that's no big deal.
There's never been any evidence of anything close to significant voter fraud.
To illustrate: Let's say Virginia gained 82 of these offending votes in the 2012 election that wouldn't have been there otherwise (half of 164), and they were all votes for Obama. Obama won Virginia in the last election by 115,910 votes. This means that this would need to have happened over 1400 times to sway the election.
Your racism/bigotry noted and expected.Hmm, let's see...Democrats are against preventing voter fraud, so I wonder which party is behind this one.
Over 40,000 voters are registered in both Virginia and Maryland, group finds | Fox News
So the old bitter white christian "news" network is whipping up their bitter ignorant base without knowing any facts. What a surprise!!
you realize in all likelihood that has nothing to do with fraud?
Inefficient governmemt? Either way the arguement is a win for the right
Tell me the OP was aiming at irony/sarcasm/parody ... please
"George acknowledged that the number of voters who actually cast multiple ballots is relatively small. In the case of Maryland and Virginia, he revealed that 164 people voted in both states during the 2012 election."
And come to think on this, I've been registered to vote in CO, CA, Neb, WY and MS all with overlaps between elections. Dang, I could have voted a lot more than I did.
Obamunists swear there is ZERO fraud, so we should never check ID - you know, like we do with EVERY OTHER FUCKING THING IN LIFE.
Guess you were just lying, huh?
Gotta hand it to him for being consistent.^^^Says the guy who is known for pretending to be rightwing.
strange analogy. rather inaccurate. a more accurate analogy would be to compare a vote to a coupon for free ice cream. if someone used their coupon, and then tried to use a duplicate coupon the store would be in the right to deny them the second cone, but not to charge or confiscate the first.
and you still don't know why they are counted as having voted twice.
Not strange at all.
An otherwise legal act during the commission of a crime does not render the criminal acts acceptable.
Look, you're a democrat - you demand that election fraud is a privilege of your party, not to be infringed, I get it.
Republican U.S. House Staffers Indicted for Felony Election Fraud as GOP Fraud Epidemic Continues
Hmm, let's see...Democrats are against preventing voter fraud, so I wonder which party is behind this one.
Over 40,000 voters are registered in both Virginia and Maryland, group finds | Fox News
Hell, we all know that the reason for this "anti-ID" crap is so more dead people can vote over and over.
Hmm, let's see...Democrats are against preventing voter fraud, so I wonder which party is behind this one.
Over 40,000 voters are registered in both Virginia and Maryland, group finds | Fox News
Yet another conundrum, another schism between two ideologies, is raised: on one hand, if even one potential voter is inconvenienced by having to acquire and present proper identification in order to vote, that constitutes grounds for not even trying to implement voter verification. On the other hand, if only a relatively few votes are fraudulently cast, that's no big deal.
There's never been any evidence of anything close to significant voter fraud.
To illustrate: Let's say Virginia gained 82 of these offending votes in the 2012 election that wouldn't have been there otherwise (half of 164), and they were all votes for Obama. Obama won Virginia in the last election by 115,910 votes. This means that this would need to have happened over 1400 times to sway the election.
There's never been any evidence of anything close to significant voter fraud.
The fraud is significant enough for you crooks to go apeshit over the prospect that it might be stopped...
To illustrate: Let's say Virginia gained 82 of these offending votes in the 2012 election that wouldn't have been there otherwise (half of 164), and they were all votes for Obama. Obama won Virginia in the last election by 115,910 votes. This means that this would need to have happened over 1400 times to sway the election.
Every fraudulent vote cast is for the democrats - which is why you promote election fraud, and we fight against it.
Hmm, let's see...Democrats are against preventing voter fraud, so I wonder which party is behind this one.
Over 40,000 voters are registered in both Virginia and Maryland, group finds | Fox News
No surprise, they lie when their lips are moving...
What do you expect from thieves in the first place...
