More than 90 Muslims, nearly all Democrats, running for public office across the U.S.

[longknife]

Oh Jesus...you fucking clowns and your crusade references. WTF do you think the CRUSADES were a reaction to? Hmmm? Do you think it was a reaction to the hoards of Muslims slaying, raping and enslaving people or force converting them across the known world?
Do you understand the sheer numbers that were murdered in the forst 500 years of Islam? Do you understand the sheer scope of the Islamic slave trade over the centuries?
Crusades..'thumbs vag' Crusades....muh crusades.

Are you trying to say European Christians didn't suit up and trek off to the Holy Lands? Or were you thinking Christians had given up slavery at that point? Maybe you were thinking the Inquisition wasn't going on at the same time. Or maybe you're just the Zombie Fucking Apocalypse.

Nope...if you weren't so GD dim I might not have to paint by numbers for you. They suited up and traveled thousands of miles on horseback BECAUSE the Muslim hoards had sacked the holy land and were oppressing Christians. They didn't just do it...cause.
You shitlibs should grow a GD brain....but muh crusades!!! muh Inquisition!

Sweet Jesus! You're the teabilly fuckstick who is pretending European Christians weren't the aggressors in the Crusades. If they had stayed home, the Crusades wouldn't have happened.

But the Christians! Spin that.

Who sacked the Holy City and killed thousands of Christians? Who drafted the Pact of Umar? Who were the first oppressors of Christians? Who enslaved and put Christians and Jews under dhimmi status and collected jizya?
GFY.

Hmmm well lets see- the noble Crusaders sacked the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire- Constantinople- directly leading to its fall to Islamic forces about 100 years later.

Who were the first oppressors of the Christians? Romans.

Who sacked the Holy City? Romans.

Who enslaved Christians and Jews- Romans.

Lets see now- who all sacked Jerusalum?
Rome did
The Crusaders did- who killed almost all of the Muslims and Jews.

 

[JoeB131]

Why do you Islamococksuckers always bring up the Crusades? You don't have a better excuse for slaughter of innocents TODAY?

Okay... in the Okay, between the Gulf war and the Iraq War we've killed 1.5 million Iraqis... Probably more than were killed in all the Crusades.

Most of them weren't bothering us.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Representing Minorities Defending The Politically Intolerant "

* Those Defending Others About Whose Motivation They Know Nothing About *

Okay... in the Okay, between the Gulf war and the Iraq War we've killed 1.5 million Iraqis... Probably more than were killed in all the Crusades.
Most of them weren't bothering us.

The errand bushy boy was coaxed to attack saddam by the terrorist saudis who despise secular government and fund its demise world wide by trying to normalize fictional ishmaelism that includes a slush fund for propaganda that should make one wonder this , if the volume of its representation is as evident when they are only 1% of the population , imagine how arrogant and obtrusive it would be should they acquire greater political representation through numerical representation .

The sunni and shia conflicts have raged since Abbasid Revolution - Wikipedia and the basic end to imperialism through conquest nearly ended at the end of the twentieth century .

Apparently , an element the left simply does not get is that fictional ishmaelism is based within unrelenting aggression with pretenses that might makes rite , because non believers do not have a protector and do not call for peace while superior , that is surmised from surah 47 , which mu ham mad named after himself .

surah 47:4 So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if God had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of God - never will He waste their deeds.

47:11 That is because God is the protector of those who have believed and because the disbelievers have no protector.

47:35 So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and God is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds.

Persecution of Hindus - Wikipedia

 

[Syriusly]

Are you trying to say European Christians didn't suit up and trek off to the Holy Lands? Or were you thinking Christians had given up slavery at that point? Maybe you were thinking the Inquisition wasn't going on at the same time. Or maybe you're just the Zombie Fucking Apocalypse.

Nope...if you weren't so GD dim I might not have to paint by numbers for you. They suited up and traveled thousands of miles on horseback BECAUSE the Muslim hoards had sacked the holy land and were oppressing Christians. They didn't just do it...cause.
You shitlibs should grow a GD brain....but muh crusades!!! muh Inquisition!

Sweet Jesus! You're the teabilly fuckstick who is pretending European Christians weren't the aggressors in the Crusades. If they had stayed home, the Crusades wouldn't have happened.

But the Christians! Spin that.

Who sacked the Holy City and killed thousands of Christians? Who drafted the Pact of Umar? Who were the first oppressors of Christians? Who enslaved and put Christians and Jews under dhimmi status and collected jizya?
GFY.

Hmmm well lets see- the noble Crusaders sacked the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire- Constantinople- directly leading to its fall to Islamic forces about 100 years later.

Who were the first oppressors of the Christians? Romans.

Who sacked the Holy City? Romans.

Who enslaved Christians and Jews- Romans.

Lets see now- who all sacked Jerusalum?
Rome did
The Crusaders did- who killed almost all of the Muslims and Jews.

Lame describes this bigoted thread.

 

[sparky]

Okay... in the Okay, between the Gulf war and the Iraq War we've killed 1.5 million Iraqis... Probably more than were killed in all the Crusades.

At least we can say the crusades had an end game goal.....

~S~

 

[Syriusly]

Hmmm well lets see- the noble Crusaders sacked the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire- Constantinople- directly leading to its fall to Islamic forces about 100 years later.

Who were the first oppressors of the Christians? Romans.

Who sacked the Holy City? Romans.

Who enslaved Christians and Jews- Romans.

I knew the second I phrased it that way that SOME idiot would intentionally misconstrue. Common sense should have dictated that Islam did not exist until 6 centuries AFTER Christianities' formation...however, common sense is uncommon.

As I stated previously, Islam conquered through the scimitar.

"The jihad slave system included contingents of both sexes delivered annually in conformity with the treaties of submission by sovereigns who were tributaries of the caliph. When Amr conquered Tripoli (Libya) in 643, he forced the Jewish and Christian Berbers to give their wives and children as slaves to the Arab army as part of their jizya [tax on non-Muslims]."
Slavery, Christianity, and Islam | Robert Spencer

From inception Muslims enslaved and killed Christians and Jews.

And Christians have been killing Jews for a 1,000 years. And Muslims too.

Oh and so very many others.

There were the Northern Crusades- where the peaceloving Christians went and forceably converted the Scandinavian and other Northern pagans to Christianity.

There was the 30 years war- when Christian killed Christians in warfare very similar to the Sunni/Sufi conflict- of course killing lots of Jews along the way.

There was the conquest of the Americas- all done in the name of Christianity.

The most Christians can possibly brag about is that of the millions killed in the name of religion- its possible that Christians killed a few million less than Muslims.

But none of that has anything to do with 90 Americans- who happen to be Muslims- deciding to run for office in the United States- something that is enshrined in our very Constitution- that no religious test will be placed for any office- and that all Americans- not just the favored flavor- have freedom of religion.

I have no problem with attacking America's enemies- and that includes any who support violence in the name of Extremist Islam.

But no one has condemned these 90 men and women for supporting violence.

Just for exercising their freedom of religion.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Selling Lies Of Tolerance "

* Ignoring Nonsense Inferring From Overt Words And History *

I have no problem with attacking America's enemies- and that includes any who support violence in the name of Extremist Islam. But no one has condemned these 90 men and women for supporting violence. Just for exercising their freedom of religion.

The only way they can escape condemnation is to renounce that qurayshism applies anywhere other than in hejaz .

And, until they do reject fictional ishmaelism , they do not deserve to be extended an opportunity for citizenship that is determined apatheistically and based upon a formal evaluation of their creed which violates non aggression principles .

The violent edicts of the fictional ishmaelism ideology cannot be extricated from its doctrine .

Consider those asserting that violence had forthwith been expunged from fictional ishmaelism , thereby formally acknowledging the violent edicts while abrogating them , they are otherwise deemed heretics and are persecuted - namely the Ahmadiyya - Wikipedia .

Facts are the ahmadiyya bent is just another ploy to gain superiority by normalizing deception to increase numerical representation , while their lies of peaceful intentions are all too easily dispatched by doctrine and shed by future demagogues of megalomaniac fools .

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Lame describes this bigoted thread.

Child, are you somehow suffering from the delusion that saying the same stupid thing over and over makes it so?

An ideology is either a product of personal choice, in which case it should be subject to criticism, or it isn't, in which case that fact, alone, should render it suspect.

You are very stupid and very ignorant, and so are unable to understand this basic notion. There are no other ideologies towards which you act with this same level of deferential stupidity, and so yours is a product of simple conditioning. Your equally stupid little peeps have trained you to support this one ideology as being above repute, and so you all use the term "bigot" to describe all those who reject this anti-humanist, extremely illiberal ideology.

 

[Syriusly]

Lame describes this bigoted thread.

Child, are you somehow suffering from the delusion that saying the same stupid thing over and over makes it so?.

Little girl- no matter how you try to defend religious bigotry- it is still religious bigotry.

Different faiths- same bigotry.

 

[Syriusly]

American Jews know something of religious bigotry

Anti-Muslim Bigotry

ADL's Role in Fighting Anti-Muslim Bigotry
ADL plays a leading role in exposing and combating anti-Muslim bigotry. As levels of anti-Muslim bigotry continue to surface in a variety of public forms and fora, ADL has produced reports and resources on several groups and individuals whose public campaigns have both sheltered and fueled such bigotry.

The threat of the infiltration of Sharia, or Islamic law, into the American court system is one of the more pernicious conspiracy theories to gain traction in our country in recent years. The notion that Islam is insidiously making inroads in the United States through the application of religious law is seeping into the mainstream, with even some presidential candidates voicing fears about the supposed threat of Sharia to our way of life and several states are considering or having already passed bills that would prohibit the application of Sharia law. ADL's work on countering anti-Muslim bigotry has extended to actively oppose anti-Sharia laws introduced around the country.

 

[Syriusly]

As I said- Jews know something about religious bigotry

B’nai B’rith International Condemns Trump’s Proposed Bar On Muslims Entering The U.S.

B’nai B’rith International condemns presidential candidate Donald Trump’s proposal to ban all Muslims from entering the United States. On Dec. 7 his campaign released a statement announcing that he “is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.”
This course of action goes against our nation’s core values, which include tolerance, religious freedom and a rejection of discrimination based on faith.
Singling out an entire religious community for diminished rights amounts to bigotry, and it should not be accepted. As Jews, we cannot forget our own experience of being stereotyped and targeted. America and the international community face very pressing security challenges posed by Islamist extremism and terrorism, but the answer does not lie in blanket discrimination.

 

[Syriusly]

American Catholics know something about religious intollerance in America

Resisting Islamophobia is the Catholic thing to do

As defined by Georgetown University’s Bridge Initiative, Islamophobia is “prejudice towards or discrimination against Muslims due to their religion, or perceived religious, national, or ethnic identity associated with Islam.” The phobia of Islamophobia is indicative of the problem: It is an irrational prejudice or discrimination against Muslims.

Islamophobia is a tragic reality of our age, is well documented, and is not merely the hateful and isolated acts of individuals. Nathan Lean writes in The Islamophobia Industry: How the Right Manufactures Fear of Muslims (Pluto Press) that Islamophobia is well funded and well organized.

Catholics should be concerned about any form of prejudice and discrimination against any people. Islamophobia, like other forms of bigotry, is not simply a matter of hate speech. Islamophobia breeds hatred and violence against Muslims and their place of worship. Catholics should reject Islamophobia along with other phobias and “isms” of our day, including racism, sexism, ageism, anti-Semitism, xenophobia (prejudice against foreigners), and homophobia.

Like other forms of prejudice and discrimination, Islamophobia violates a foundational principle of Catholic theology and anthropology: Humanity is created in the image and likeness of God (Gen. 1:27).

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

Hmmm well lets see- the noble Crusaders sacked the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire- Constantinople- directly leading to its fall to Islamic forces about 100 years later.

Who were the first oppressors of the Christians? Romans.

Who sacked the Holy City? Romans.

Who enslaved Christians and Jews- Romans.

I knew the second I phrased it that way that SOME idiot would intentionally misconstrue. Common sense should have dictated that Islam did not exist until 6 centuries AFTER Christianities' formation...however, common sense is uncommon.

As I stated previously, Islam conquered through the scimitar.

"The jihad slave system included contingents of both sexes delivered annually in conformity with the treaties of submission by sovereigns who were tributaries of the caliph. When Amr conquered Tripoli (Libya) in 643, he forced the Jewish and Christian Berbers to give their wives and children as slaves to the Arab army as part of their jizya [tax on non-Muslims]."
Slavery, Christianity, and Islam | Robert Spencer

From inception Muslims enslaved and killed Christians and Jews.

And Christians have been killing Jews for a 1,000 years. And Muslims too.

Oh and so very many others.

There were the Northern Crusades- where the peaceloving Christians went and forceably converted the Scandinavian and other Northern pagans to Christianity.

There was the 30 years war- when Christian killed Christians in warfare very similar to the Sunni/Sufi conflict- of course killing lots of Jews along the way.

There was the conquest of the Americas- all done in the name of Christianity.

The most Christians can possibly brag about is that of the millions killed in the name of religion- its possible that Christians killed a few million less than Muslims.

But none of that has anything to do with 90 Americans- who happen to be Muslims- deciding to run for office in the United States- something that is enshrined in our very Constitution- that no religious test will be placed for any office- and that all Americans- not just the favored flavor- have freedom of religion.

I have no problem with attacking America's enemies- and that includes any who support violence in the name of Extremist Islam.

But no one has condemned these 90 men and women for supporting violence.

Just for exercising their freedom of religion.

Oh Jesus...go drink bleach.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Worshiping The Lofted Anus "


* Breaking Down The Idiom *

#I_SLAM_A_PHOBIA implies that fictional ishmaelism is the paranoia and delusion invoked from surah 9 to instigate illegitimate aggression for over 1400 years to defend hejaz when it was not ever under duress .


* Megalomania For Rites *

Surah 9 was written 113th out of 114 in chronology and within it one has two options to remain free from being subject to war and violent attack whenever the fictional ishmaelism adherent is superior according to surah 47:35 : either convert and pay the zakat or surrender and pay the jizyah as dhimmi ( a dim wit , a protected ignoramus ) , as per surah 9:29 .

**** What would one suppose to happen to any other group in the us that outright proclaimed polytheists to be unclean and outright kill them en mass ? ****

9:5. And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakāh, let them [go] on their
way. Indeed, God is Forgiving and Merciful.

9:28. O you who have believed, indeed the polytheists are unclean, so let them not approach al-Masjid al-Harām after this, their [final] year. And if you fear privation, God will enrich you from His bounty if He wills. Indeed, God is Knowing and Wise.

9:29. Fight those who do not believe in God or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what God and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth [i.e., Islām] from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.

9:33 It is He who has sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth to manifest it over all religion, although they who associate others with God dislike it.

**** The reason there is not any protests about violent extremists is because of how mu ham mad castigated those who would not kill for him . Not all of them will kill , but they facilitate those who do , without reservation that brigandage is expected .***

9:73. O Prophet, fight against the disbelievers and the hypocrites and be harsh upon them. And their refuge is Hell, and wretched is the destination.

9:83. If God should return you to a faction of them [after the expedition] and then they ask your permission to go out [to battle], say, “You will not go out with me, ever, and you will never fight with me an enemy. Indeed, you were satisfied with sitting [at home] the first time, so sit [now] with those who stay behind.”

9:84. And do not pray [the funeral prayer, O Muhammad], over any of them who has died - ever - or stand at his grave. Indeed, they disbelieved in God and His Messenger and died while they were defiantly disobedient.

*** September 11 2001 according to the militant manifesto of the qurayn - no such directive to kill or be killed in the gospel - fyi ***

9:111. Indeed, God has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of God, so they kill and are killed. [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur’ān. And who is truer to his covenant than God? So rejoice in your transaction which you have contracted. And it is that which is the great attainment.

*** Brigandage And Perpetual Hostilities ***

9:122. And it is not for the believers to go forth [to battle] all at once. For there should separate from every division of them a group [remaining] to obtain understanding in the religion and warn [i.e., advise] their people when they return to them that they might be cautious.

9:123. O you who have believed, fight those adjacent to you of the disbelievers and let them find in you harshness. And know that God is with the righteous.

 

[Syriusly]

Examples of this thread- but from earlier decades:

 

[Syriusly]

Another example of this same thread- from another era

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Sycophants Hoping To Sell Allusions Of Aesop Shepherd Boy Calling Wolf "

* Alliances Against Individual Liberty *

Hisbah - Wikipedia

Hisbah (Arabic: حسبة‎‎ ḥisbah) is an Islamic doctrine which means "accountability".[1] Hisbah is the divinely-sanctioned duty of the ruler (government) to intervene and coercively "enjoining good and forbidding wrong" in order to keep everything in order according to sharia (Islamic law).[2] The doctrine is based on an expression from the Quran (الأمر بالمَعْرُوف والنَهي عن المُنْكَر).[1][3][page needed] Some Salafists suggest that it is the sacred duty of all Muslims, not just rulers.[2]

A claim of religious exception does not exist that entitles individuals to threaten or to commit illegitimate aggression against the self ownership or self determination of others .

Individuals subject to such threats or actions are entitled to self defense that includes exclusion of the illegitimate aggressors .

The qurayn directives which violate non aggression principles to implement the religious polity of fictional ishmaelism cannot be extricated and , while not all adherents attest a commitment to terrorist acts , all adherents are accessories to the facilitation of its incidence .

Numbers translate into votes and public policy , such that lauding democracy for tyranny by majority - hisbah , while rejecting individual liberty and non aggression principles is illegitimate .


* Not A Faith About Not Killing - A Faith About Supremacy Even If By Killing *

Part of surah 2 describes ramadan , where they are directed to fight those who fight them but only for that month as otherwise surah 9 and its supremacist hate speech militant manifesto to convert by illegitimate aggression whenever they are superior prevails .

So why would any celebrate eid al-fitr , an end to a temporary armistice ?

Read as mu ham mad foments his flock and encourages them to violence .

2:194. [Fighting in] the sacred month is for [aggression committed in] the sacred month, and for [all] violations is legal retribution. So whoever has assaulted you, then assault him in the same way that he has assaulted you. And fear God and know that God is with those who fear Him.

2:216. Fighting has been enjoined upon you while it is hateful to you. But perhaps you hate a thing and it is good for you; and perhaps you love a thing and it is bad for you. And God knows, while you know not.

2:217. They ask you about the sacred month - about fighting therein. Say, “Fighting therein is great [sin], but averting [people] from the way of God and disbelief in Him and [preventing access to] al-Masjid al-Harām and the expulsion of its people therefrom are greater [evil] in the sight of God. And fitnah is greater than killing.” And they will continue to fight you until they turn you back from your religion if they are able. And whoever of you reverts from his religion [to disbelief] and dies while he is a disbeliever - for those, their deeds have become worthless in this world and the Hereafter, and those are the companions of the Fire; they will abide therein eternally.

2:278 O you who have believed, fear God and give up what remains [due to you] of interest, if you should be believers.

2:279 And if you do not, then be informed of a war [against you] from God and His Messenger. But if you repent, you may have your principal - [thus] you do no wrong, nor are you wronged.

* Fictional Ishmaelism *

Surah 8:65 It is not for a prophet to have captives [of war] until he inflicts a massacre [upon God’s enemies] in the land. You [i.e., some Muslims] desire the commodities of this world, but God desires [for you] the Hereafter. And God is Exalted in Might and Wise.

Surah 8:75 - And those who believed after [the initial emigration] and emigrated and fought with you - they are of you. But those of [blood] relationship are more entitled [to inheritance] in the decree of God. Indeed, God is Knowing of all things.

Torahnism is a genetic religion for preservation of the patriarchal lineage of eponymous isaac , where the tenets , cultural traditions and city state laws ( 613 mitzvot ) , as proposed in the torah , would only apply within israel .

Qurayshism is a genetic religion for preservation of the patriarchal lineage of eponymous ishmael, where the tenets , cultural traditions and city state laws ( sharia ) , as proposed in the qurayn , would only apply within hejaz .

Any pretense that qurayshism applies outside of hejaz is debase and termed fictional ishmaelism .


* Genetic Religion *

Umayyad Caliphate - Wikipedia

The Umayyad caliphate was marked both by territorial expansion and by the administrative and cultural problems that such expansion created. Despite some notable exceptions, the Umayyads tended to favor the rights of the old Arab families, and in particular their own, over those of newly converted Muslims (mawali). Therefore, they held to a less universalist conception of Islam than did many of their rivals. As G.R. Hawting has written, "Islam was in fact regarded as the property of the conquering aristocracy."[74]

Abbasid Revolution - Wikipedia...

The Umayyad state is remembered as an Arab-centric state, being run by and for the benefit of those who were ethnically Arab though Muslim in creed.[11][30] The non-Arab Muslims resented their marginal social position and were easily drawn into Abbasid opposition to Umayyad rule.[13][14][26] Arabs dominated the bureaucracy and military, and were housed in fortresses separate from the local population outside of Arabia.[5] Even after converting to Islam, non-Arabs or Mawali could not live in these garrison cities. The non-Arabs were not allowed to work for the government nor could they hold officer positions in the Umayyad military and they still had to pay the jizya tax for non-Muslims.[30][31][32][33] Non-Muslims under Umayyad rule were subject to these same injunctions.[34] Racial intermarriage between Arabs and non Arabs was rare.[6] When it did occur, it was only allowed between an Arab man and a non-Arab woman while non-Arab men were generally not free to marry Arab women.[7]

Conversion to Islam occurred gradually. If a non-Arab wished to convert to Islam, they not only had to give up their own names but also had to remain a second-class citizen.[12][32] The non-Arab would be "adopted" by an Arab tribe,[33] though they would not actually adopt the tribe's name as that would risk pollution of perceived Arab racial purity. Rather, the non-Arab would take the last name of "freedman of al-(tribe's name)", even if they were not a slave prior to conversion. This essentially meant they were subservient to the tribe who sponsored their conversion.[12][35]

 

[BS Filter]

Now you understand why democrats protect muslims.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Now you understand why democrats protect muslims.

Yep.

Here you have a totalitarian ideology that does not believe in equal rights for women. It does not believe gay people should have any rights at all. It is fiercely opposed to the separation of religion and politics. It despises the notion of free speech, freedom of assembly, and is very aggressive in replicating itself until no other ideology is possible.

It's no wonder low IQ goons like Syriusly support it like they do.

 

[JoeB131]

Yep.

Here you have a totalitarian ideology that does not believe in equal rights for women. It does not believe gay people should have any rights at all. It is fiercely opposed to the separation of religion and politics. It despises the notion of free speech, freedom of assembly, and is very aggressive in replicating itself until no other ideology is possible.

It's no wonder low IQ goons like Syriusly support it like they do.

and you wouldn't give a fuck if they weren't standing on a shitload of oil.

"Oh, those poor women... let's save the oil. I mean the women.. yeah, the women! "