Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You can't even state what the evidence would look like.You cant provide the evidence as proven by this reply.
An actual specific provable link from the two or more offspring that links directly to the original species.
No assumptions, no guesses, no breaks in the chain.
No one claims there is evidence to prove God exists.Gee, whiz. I could demand the same evidence linking God Sr. to God Jr.
Let’s see the data. “No assumptions, no guesses, no breaks in the chain”.
You have my listed proof. Provide it or admit you are full of shit. Guesses and assumptions are not proof of anything.
Nope it is a straight up request either you can show verifiable evidence that directly links 2 specific species to a single original species or you cant.RetiredGySgt ooor
Just admit there is no evidence that would convince you. Of course, then you also admit to just being a troll here for demanding evidence or even speaking of it.
But a moment of honesty would cancel that out.
So just admit it.
I can only try.Nope it is a straight up request either you can show verifiable evidence that directly links 2 specific species to a single original species or you cant.
Shocking!No one claims there is evidence to prove God exists.
What's to tell provide evidence that proves 2 distinct species are directly related to an original species.I can only try.
So, tell me what that evidence would look like, to you.
You are either going to attempt this, or you are going to pussy out.
Two choices.
You left out all but the first sentence of what I posted you FRAUD.Not evolution caused by a series of random mutations.
If you can't understand or refuse to acknowledge the difference, all further debate is pointless.
ME: False, of course, god boy.Seymour Flops said:
Without input from some form of intelligence, there is no function, because function requires intent. Intent requires intelligence.
"Maybe" there's a 300 mile high Liberace somewhere in Andromeda controlling the universe.Seymour Flops said:
The function of water running downhill is not to turn a waterwheel that generates electricity. It may well do that, but designing a wheel to harness the power of running water requires intelligent input.
Maybe - maybe - whatever intelligence designed life on Earth, also placed many strategic streams to be available when humans discovered water power. There seems an abundance of raw materials available awaiting for intelligent uses to be made of it.
Seymour Flops said:
But we know for sure that a simple machine such as a block and tackle does not occur without intelligent design. If we are honest, we know that life on Earth is far more complicated than a block and tackle, and therefore even less likely to have come about by random events.
Me: Which/Witch god?RetiredGySgt said:
You have not nor has anyone else proven the claim. As for predisposed I am a Mormon hardly what I was brought up to believe. Unlike you godless fools I prayed and God answered my prayers.
You are beotchy because not because it's that time of the month, but because you are afraid of The Wrath of God. Unfortunately, you do not understand what you are in for. Anyway, I won in the court of science against your vestigial organs argument as they have been found to have uses. Just think if you run into the situation where you need them to survive, but it's not there. It would mean The Wrath of God time.You Lying POS.
Bible/god/Bible/god IS Circular reasoning.
(for the 1000th time)
YOU LOST.. again.
It's Over.
Your answer is NOT a reply to what you posted/post Regularly: PROSELYTIZE.
You are also an Illiterate.
My reasoning was not "circular,'" however you may "disagree" you showed no circularity.
You Blithering fool.
Now you also PLAGIARIZE/HIDE (LOL) AnswersInGenesis (steal their organs)
Vestigial Organs—Evidence for Evolution?
Vestigial organs have long been one of the classic arguments used as evidence for evolution.answersingenesis.org
`
You are beotchy because not because it's that time of the month, but because you are afraid of The Wrath of God. Unfortunately, you do not understand what you are in for. Anyway, I won in the court of science against your vestigial organs argument as they have been found to have uses. Just think if you run into the situation where you need them to survive, but it's not there. It would mean The Wrath of God time.
You are also way behind the times in regards to science and vestigial organs.
You have rejected the evidence that has convinced the scientists.What's to tell provide evidence that proves 2 distinct species are directly related to an original species.
The scientists are not convinced or it would no longer be a theory, Further the supposed evidence they use has assumptions and guesses as part and parcel of their supposed evidence. Again provided definitive proof that an origin species is DIRECTLY related to 2 specific other entirely different species. It isnt hard DNA or a complete unbroken fossil record.You have rejected the evidence that has convinced the scientists.
So tell us what that evidence would look like
Haha, you can't. Because you are lying. There is no evidence that would convince you.
You could easily prove me wrong by describing what that proof would look lime.
So, do it. Or prove I am correct by dodging.
Wrong. Scientific theories always stay theories. So we can toss this nonsense out right now.scientists are not convinced or it would no longer be a theory,
You could always provide the fossil record.... Ohh wait no you cant because there is none showing any such thing.Wrong. Scientific theories always stay theories. So we can toss this nonsense out right now.
Yes, they are convinced. You lie to say otherwise. Stop lying. This is the science section, not a Trump rally.
So, let me get your horseshit straight:
You demand I provide DNA from two individuals and every individual in between, back to a common ancestor?
What an idiotic, bizarre standard. This is complete nonsense designed to be impossible. No reasonable person or scientist subscribes to this idiotic standard that you just made up out of thin air.
You did this because there is no evidence that would convince you. you are a dishonest troll who is wasting everyone's time and who would fail a sixth grade science quiz.
Are the "collective physical laws" self-aware that they are selecting?The "selector" is the collective physical laws.
Oh, I see.If you want to say some gods set those laws on purpose, be my guest. It doesn't get in the way of anything.
Why do you suppose massive objects in space form spheroids? Is that "random"? Of course not. Spheroids are "selected for" by gravity.
Why white bears in the north and brown bears in the south? Random?
Of course not. Selection.
It was provided to you. If you don't understand what was in the links, you can ask questions.What's to tell provide evidence that proves 2 distinct species are directly related to an original species.
