Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I.E., exactly what we should expect to find, when digging into hominin fossils from a long time ago. Species with intermediary traits between our ape ancestors and us.It is you who are making claims but not showing any photos of these supposed skeletons.
What about this fossil discovery. I suppose you will say this is real also?
"The . . . fossils were found over several years and included a mandible and set of teeth, parts of a human-like skull and a canine tooth. There were also rudimentary stone tools, a carved slab of bone and fragments of fossils from Pleistocene- or Pliocene-era mammals, De Groote told Live Science.
"The fossils had the same dark reddish-brown color as the surrounding Pleistocene or Pliocene gravel pits in which they were uncovered. The mandible resembled an ape's, while the skull appeared human, and the canine tooth could have belonged to either species."
That seems just as convincing.
Are you convinced?
But how strong is that kind of evidence? A mandible (that's a "jawbone") that resembles an ape's, with a skull that resembles a human and a canine tooth that could be either. That kind of evidence seems more like guesswork, don't you think?I.E., exactly what we should expect to find, when digging into hominin fossils from a long time ago. Species with intermediary traits between our ape ancestors and us.
Literally every single shred of evidence we have ever found supports this.
On one hand, it suggests the designer gods are really incompetent designers.But how strong is that kind of evidence? A mandible (that's a "jawbone") that resembles an ape's, with a skull that resembles a human and a canine tooth that could be either. That kind of evidence seems more like guesswork, don't you think?
How so?On one hand, it suggests the designer gods are really incompetent designers.
As strong as evidence can be, when it is what we find every single time. All in the same chronological order, in every part of the animal and plant kingdom.But how strong is that kind of evidence?
Wow, Fort Fun Indiana and Hollie!As strong as evidence can be, when it is what we find every single time. All in the same chronological order, in every part of the animal and plant kingdom.
Put that together with all of the mutual supportive evidence from every field of science, and the picture is very clear
Where you seem to be stuck is thinking humans are special little boys and girls of gods. Humans are animals and evolved from earlier species just as every other animal did. You also seem to think there is any real debate over this. There isn't. You are literally 150 years behind the world of intelligent humans.
www.livescience.com
Haha, what a desperate attempt. Yes, the two of us and the entire Global scientific community are all still stuck in a hoax from 110 years ago. Dude, you are embarrassing yourself.Wow, Fort Fun Indiana and Hollie!
You two may have a great scientific/historical distinction. The last two people in history to fall for the Piltdown Man Hoax of 1912.
Here is where I got that description of the fake missing link:
Piltdown Man: Infamous Fake Fossil
The Piltdown Man, claimed to be a "missing link," was one of the most successful and consequential hoaxes in scientific history.
In 1912, a British amateur archeologist named Charles Dawson wrote to London's Natural History Museum claiming to have discovered the missing evolutionary link between apes and humans in a fossil he had dug up in Piltdown, Sussex. This was the beginning of the Piltdown Man hoax, one of the most successful and consequential hoaxes in scientific history. Dawson's Piltdown Man was conclusively established as a hoax in 1953, after decades of leading scientists down the wrong path of evolutionary study.
The Piltdown Man was a collection of "fossils" assumed to be from the same Pleistocene- or Pliocene-era early human, according to Isabelle De Groote, a professor at the Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology at Liverpool John Moores University and author of the 2016 article "New genetic and morphological evidence suggests a single hoaxes created ‘Piltdown Man.'"
The Piltdown Man fossils were found over several years and included a mandible and set of teeth, parts of a human-like skull and a canine tooth. There were also rudimentary stone tools, a carved slab of bone and fragments of fossils from Pleistocene- or Pliocene-era mammals, De Groote told Live Science.
. . .
In reality, the jawbones and tooth came from an orangutan and the skulls from medieval human bones, De Groote said.
For more than a century, the identity of the creator of the fake fossils was unknown, but De Groote's study, published in August 2016 by Royal Society Open Science, determined that Dawson was the most likely sole forger.
Don't be so gullible, McFly!
Honestly, I never thought you would fall for it. Surely someone who claims to know and understand human evolution would have been aware of the Piltdown Man Hoax.Haha, what a desperate attempt. Yes, the two of us and the entire Global scientific community are all still stuck in a hoax from 110 years ago. Dude, you are embarrassing yourself.
I wasn't speaking to any specific case. You are masturbating now.Honestly, I never thought you would fall for it. Surely someone who claims to know and understand human evolution would have been aware of the Piltdown Man Hoax.
I seriously expected you to pick up on it and say something like, "an old hoax doesn't mean contemporary people would fall for it."
I guess you can't say that now . . .
So, that was a one-time thing? There have been no other evolutionary hoaxes?Piltdown was a one man show, not a community of scientists that dug and researched this for Years.
Yes a conspiracy of Atheists!
Seymour Flop the FRAUD.
NatGeo article/pic
View attachment 594072
`
Look at all their failures.How so?
Actual bones would mean nothing to you and you would say so.So, that was a one-time thing? There have been no other evolutionary hoaxes?
The above is still an illustration, not a photograph. Why are you afraid to show the actual bones?
How do you know that "H. naledi" is not yet another amalgamation hoax?
How do you know that it isn't simply a human with Microcephaly?
Yep.It was ONLY scientists in fact, that could and did out Piltdown as fake.
Are you?Actual bones would mean nothing to you and you would say so.
Are you a paleontologist?
Well, this is certainly an emotional topic for you.Piltdown was one man's find, this was dug up over years by Scores of educated people.
All lying/fraudulent?
It was ONLY scientists in fact, that could and did out Piltdown as fake.
You raging ***hole
You're just another Deluded Liar for Jesus whose been utterly beaten here.
`
It's 2022 and religious extremists are still falling for the Piltdown man hoax.Wow, Fort Fun Indiana and Hollie!
You two may have a great scientific/historical distinction. The last two people in history to fall for the Piltdown Man Hoax of 1912.
Here is where I got that description of the fake missing link:
Piltdown Man: Infamous Fake Fossil
The Piltdown Man, claimed to be a "missing link," was one of the most successful and consequential hoaxes in scientific history.
In 1912, a British amateur archeologist named Charles Dawson wrote to London's Natural History Museum claiming to have discovered the missing evolutionary link between apes and humans in a fossil he had dug up in Piltdown, Sussex. This was the beginning of the Piltdown Man hoax, one of the most successful and consequential hoaxes in scientific history. Dawson's Piltdown Man was conclusively established as a hoax in 1953, after decades of leading scientists down the wrong path of evolutionary study.
The Piltdown Man was a collection of "fossils" assumed to be from the same Pleistocene- or Pliocene-era early human, according to Isabelle De Groote, a professor at the Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology at Liverpool John Moores University and author of the 2016 article "New genetic and morphological evidence suggests a single hoaxes created ‘Piltdown Man.'"
The Piltdown Man fossils were found over several years and included a mandible and set of teeth, parts of a human-like skull and a canine tooth. There were also rudimentary stone tools, a carved slab of bone and fragments of fossils from Pleistocene- or Pliocene-era mammals, De Groote told Live Science.
. . .
In reality, the jawbones and tooth came from an orangutan and the skulls from medieval human bones, De Groote said.
For more than a century, the identity of the creator of the fake fossils was unknown, but De Groote's study, published in August 2016 by Royal Society Open Science, determined that Dawson was the most likely sole forger.
Don't be so gullible, McFly!
Maybe they are. Do you have examples?It's 2022 and religious extremists are still falling for the Piltdown man hoax.
Maybe they are. Do you have examples?
I provided two examples of Darwinians falling for it in 2022. I believe you were one of them, but there seems to be three or four of you that all use the same words, so it's hard to tell who is who.
