my calculations of what? I made no claim. I owe you nothing. 120 PPM of CO2 is bad, been bad since I registered in 2013, still waiting on how warm that CO2 really is. Seems you deflected because you are too stupid to answer AOC's concern where we must spend 100 Trillion to fix that 120 PPM
I did indeed. The question is for you. It wasn't a question to get a question from you as an answer. So come simp, how warm is that 120 AOC is stating will create armageddon?
Hey, thanks for playing, I knew you didn't have an answer.
climatechangedispatch.com
Skooks, Here's a guy discussing economics but it's what he said about climate that stands out, you know, all that additional warming? hahhahahaahahahahaahahahaha
Remarks by CEO Amin H. Nasser at Schlumberger Digital Forum 2022
The three strategic pillars of a more secure & more sustainable energy future.www.aramco.com
After two summers lost to Covid, I hope everyone has enjoyed a well-earned break with family and friends. This week, however, autumn begins, and the global energy crisis promises a colder, harder winter, particularly in Europe.
This guy says colder, harder winter, you better go straighten his ass out, your climatologists should go ban him from speaking.
The answer you seek is in this graphing of CO2's logarithmic loss. It is well established science that you all seem to ignore... Why do you do that? The reason you do that is because the potential warming, we have actually seen is less than half of what was expected TO BE INDUCED BY CO2 alone. This simple, yet verifiable, fact in empirically observed evidence shows the atmosphere is acting as a dampener. And that disproves the CO2 driver theory of AGW.
For every doubling of the gas, its ability to act decreases by half. But you knew that, Didn't ya Todd?
For every doubling of the gas, its ability to act decreases by half. But you knew that, Didn't ya Todd?
Consensus Science? You mean like "Everybody knows that the earth is flat and it is the center of the universe." And "There are more than two genders?" Is that consensus science?
They're not talking about it but they are sneaking legislation as riders to other bills like inflation reduction.And how appropriate is this Photobucket Classic???
For many, many years, the Al Gore's of the world have thrown bomb after bomb about the warming world and the inevitable catastrophy!!! To no effect.Which is exactly why nobody in Washington DC is talking about climate change!! Nobody. Because none of the constituents give a rats ass except the internet hysterical OCD k00ks!!!
Ask me.......how much am I laughing?
It is a logarithmic loss by empirical evidence. You need to revisit the definition of the term logarithmic.
study.com
It is a logarithmic loss by empirical evidence. You need to revisit the definition of the term logarithmic.
Logarithmic Differentiation | Rules, Steps & Examples | Study.com
Understand what logarithmic differentiation means. Learn how to do logarithmic differentiation. Discover the rules and steps of differentiation and...
