leftwinger
Diamond Member
More. Yes. It keeps trickling out as we knew it happens all over if Stain if Stain. They accept any ballots that arrive. This one got arrested AFTER damage done.//
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dumb OX.Did you guys ever take all of your “proof” to a court where it could actually do you some good?
Most of these in videos are in a court setting with people testifying.Did you guys ever take all of your “proof” to a court where it could actually do you some good?
So no more bitching about stolen elections in the future then?Dumb OX.
The Supreme Court handed a crushing blow to the radical left’s ballot-harvesting machine on Wednesday.
In a stunning 7-2 decision, the High Court ruled that Republican Congressman Mike Bost (R-IL) has the legal standing to challenge Illinois’s unconstitutional law that allows mail-in ballots to be counted up to 14 days after Election Day.
This ruling reverses the Seventh Circuit and sends the case back to the lower court—where Illinois’ late-ballot scheme will now be evaluated on the merits
This is the game-changer we have been waiting for.
For years, Democrats and their media allies have relied on “late-arriving ballots” to shift the results of elections days or even weeks after the polls close. We all remember what happened in 2020. We remember the “pauses” and the late-night spikes.
But now, the Supreme Court has finally opened the floodgates for Republicans to sue to stop it.
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, made it clear: candidates have a “personal stake” in the rules governing their elections. This destroys the liberal argument that Republicans can’t sue unless they can prove a specific fraudulent ballot cost them the race.
Most of these in videos are in a court setting with people testifying.
Ignoring reality? Bought the propaganda did ya?So no more bitching about stolen elections in the future then?
That would be refreshing. You've been boring the shit out of us for 5 years now.
Evidentiary hearings.Hmmm...
Is anyone cross examining them?
Just put that guy on ignore, he's an idiot.Evidentiary hearings.
No help from the good guys. It just continues on and on. 21 states lost forever. Stain ye popular vote with 10s of millions bogus votes on the left coast, NE coast, upper Midwest cheese Stain.
Gardner backed a New Hampshire voter ID law that passed in 2011, despite warnings that it would decrease voter turnout. He said New Hampshire’s voter turnout in the following...
I've been dumping a lot of posts on election fraud in this thread
Check it out...... it's quite staggering what is being uncovered. Games on. Don't make me work too much and miss it. Twatter is blowing up with ICE, MINN, worthless R, election fraud, crime rate. I bring what I can. So Many dont read it or see it unless you are an elite poster or start threads like MacStain does. Thank you for reading some of my posts. I just look for a spot that isn't 10000 ]posts deep.
The left has come up with some of the most absurd excuses in the world not to have clean, proper elections. From racists stuff like "black people don't have ID and can't figure out how to get it" to "there is no voter fraud anyway", to "it will discourage voting". All of it has been proven to be a lie.
When a Democrat in New Hampshire supported voter laws, voter turnout was better than the national average.
Gardner backed a New Hampshire voter ID law that passed in 2011, despite warnings that it would decrease voter turnout. He said New Hampshire’s voter turnout in the following...
I've been dumping a lot of posts on election fraud in this thread
Check it out...... it's quite staggering what is being uncovered.
The left has come up with some of the most absurd excuses in the world not to have clean, proper elections. From racists stuff like "black people don't have ID and can't figure out how to get it" to "there is no voter fraud anyway", to "it will discourage voting". All of it has been proven to be a lie.
When a Democrat in New Hampshire supported voter laws, voter turnout was better than the national average.
Gardner backed a New Hampshire voter ID law that passed in 2011, despite warnings that it would decrease voter turnout. He said New Hampshire’s voter turnout in the following...
I know..... that's why I started dropping them in one place.So many. All over the boards. I was using here because I can search for it. GA, just like A but worse in Fulton county. Yes they use chocolate cities knowing mealy mouthed "R" wont touch it.