Montana to Vote on Referendum That Protects Infants Who Survive Abortions

[JustAGuy1]

A pro-life referendum takes center stage in Montana as state residents are set to decide whether to give additional legal protections to babies who survive abortions.

Montana LR-131, also known as the Born-Alive Infant Protection Act, says that infants born alive after an abortion are legal persons and that healthcare providers must take “necessary actions to preserve the life of a born-alive infant.” These “necessary actions” include “the right to appropriate and reasonable medical care and treatment.”

If a medical provider fails to give adequate medical care to a baby who survived an abortion, they could face up to 20 years in jail and a $50,000 fine.

The referendum defines “born-alive” as “the complete expulsion or extraction from the mother of a human infant, at any stage of development, who, after expulsion or extraction, breathes, has a beating heart, or has definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, induced abortion, or another method.”

Montana to Vote on Referendum That Protects Infants Who Survive Abortions | The Star News Network

thestarnewsnetwork.com

Good for Montana!!

 

[notmyfault2020]

A pro-life referendum takes center stage in Montana as state residents are set to decide whether to give additional legal protections to babies who survive abortions.

Montana LR-131, also known as the Born-Alive Infant Protection Act, says that infants born alive after an abortion are legal persons and that healthcare providers must take “necessary actions to preserve the life of a born-alive infant.” These “necessary actions” include “the right to appropriate and reasonable medical care and treatment.”

If a medical provider fails to give adequate medical care to a baby who survived an abortion, they could face up to 20 years in jail and a $50,000 fine.

The referendum defines “born-alive” as “the complete expulsion or extraction from the mother of a human infant, at any stage of development, who, after expulsion or extraction, breathes, has a beating heart, or has definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, induced abortion, or another method.”

Montana to Vote on Referendum That Protects Infants Who Survive Abortions | The Star News Network

thestarnewsnetwork.com

Good for Montana!!

wow

I hope all the other states follow MTs lead

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

A pro-life referendum takes center stage in Montana as state residents are set to decide whether to give additional legal protections to babies who survive abortions.

Montana LR-131, also known as the Born-Alive Infant Protection Act, says that infants born alive after an abortion are legal persons and that healthcare providers must take “necessary actions to preserve the life of a born-alive infant.” These “necessary actions” include “the right to appropriate and reasonable medical care and treatment.”

If a medical provider fails to give adequate medical care to a baby who survived an abortion, they could face up to 20 years in jail and a $50,000 fine.

The referendum defines “born-alive” as “the complete expulsion or extraction from the mother of a human infant, at any stage of development, who, after expulsion or extraction, breathes, has a beating heart, or has definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, induced abortion, or another method.”

Montana to Vote on Referendum That Protects Infants Who Survive Abortions | The Star News Network

thestarnewsnetwork.com

Good for Montana!!

GOOD FOR MONTANA!!!!!!! They still have some pride and humanity!

 

[bodecea]

A pro-life referendum takes center stage in Montana as state residents are set to decide whether to give additional legal protections to babies who survive abortions.

Montana LR-131, also known as the Born-Alive Infant Protection Act, says that infants born alive after an abortion are legal persons and that healthcare providers must take “necessary actions to preserve the life of a born-alive infant.” These “necessary actions” include “the right to appropriate and reasonable medical care and treatment.”

If a medical provider fails to give adequate medical care to a baby who survived an abortion, they could face up to 20 years in jail and a $50,000 fine.

The referendum defines “born-alive” as “the complete expulsion or extraction from the mother of a human infant, at any stage of development, who, after expulsion or extraction, breathes, has a beating heart, or has definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, induced abortion, or another method.”

Montana to Vote on Referendum That Protects Infants Who Survive Abortions | The Star News Network

thestarnewsnetwork.com

Good for Montana!!

How often does that happen?

 

[Concerned American]

A pro-life referendum takes center stage in Montana as state residents are set to decide whether to give additional legal protections to babies who survive abortions.

Montana LR-131, also known as the Born-Alive Infant Protection Act, says that infants born alive after an abortion are legal persons and that healthcare providers must take “necessary actions to preserve the life of a born-alive infant.” These “necessary actions” include “the right to appropriate and reasonable medical care and treatment.”

If a medical provider fails to give adequate medical care to a baby who survived an abortion, they could face up to 20 years in jail and a $50,000 fine.

The referendum defines “born-alive” as “the complete expulsion or extraction from the mother of a human infant, at any stage of development, who, after expulsion or extraction, breathes, has a beating heart, or has definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, induced abortion, or another method.”

Montana to Vote on Referendum That Protects Infants Who Survive Abortions | The Star News Network

thestarnewsnetwork.com

Good for Montana!!

Do they have anything in place to prevent the Dr. from killing the baby in vitro?

 

[martybegan]

How often does that happen?

How often is an abortion needed late in pregnancy that States like NY and CA feel the need to protect?

 

[candycorn]

Inflation is out of control (allegedly) and this is the most important thing the state leaders in Montana can think of to address?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

How often is an abortion needed late in pregnancy that States like NY and CA feel the need to protect?

If there is such a thing as a justified abortion, like genetic anomalies, it's going to be apparent early in the pregnancy.

Killing unborn children is their religion.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Inflation is out of control (allegedly) and this is the most important thing the state leaders in Montana can think of to address?

Perhaps they can consider more than one thing at the same time. Once abortion went from removing a few cells to the homicide of children this starts happening.

 

[martybegan]

If there is such a thing as a justified abortion, like genetic anomalies, it's going to be apparent early in the pregnancy.

Killing unborn children is their religion.

Some may appear late, but then the question is are they making the fetus non viable, or just disabled after birth. And how disabled?

When it comes to disabilities like Downs, any advocates of aborting make me think of Eugenics.