Modern warfare might be more humane

[frigidweirdo]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

 

[theHawk]

People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

Wow, you finally said something intelligent.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Sounds more like humans are already enslaved by their computers after reading the OP

*****SMILE*****

 

[xband]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

 

[xband]

Fuzzy logic evolved into neuron logic aka AI. Give the neuron logic, shock therapy.

 

[Dayton3]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

Starvation is just about the worst way to die. It is arguably as bad as radiation poisoning. How is that "more humane".

 

[Blues Man]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

reminds of the Star Trek episode where computers fought wars and the people who were deemed to be casualties would report for execution

A Taste of Armageddon (episode)

On a diplomatic mission, the crew visit a planet that is waging a destructive war fought solely by computer simulation, but the casualties, including the crew of the USS Enterprise, are supposed to be real. The USS Enterprise is en route to star cluster NGC 321 to open diplomatic relations with...

memory-alpha.fandom.com

 

[Dayton3]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

reminds of the Star Trek episode where computers fought wars and the people who were deemed to be casualties would report for execution

A Taste of Armageddon (episode)

On a diplomatic mission, the crew visit a planet that is waging a destructive war fought solely by computer simulation, but the casualties, including the crew of the USS Enterprise, are supposed to be real. The USS Enterprise is en route to star cluster NGC 321 to open diplomatic relations with...

memory-alpha.fandom.com

Remember what Kirk told them at the end? You've had it so clean and civilized that you've had no reason to end it.

Kirk later told Spock that the people of Eminar VII had been killing 2-3 million people a year in their war. A real attack would've killed about as many people and ended their ability to keep fighting.

 

[frigidweirdo]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

Starvation is just about the worst way to die. It is arguably as bad as radiation poisoning. How is that "more humane".

Well, the warfare is more humane. What comes after might not be.

 

[Dayton3]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

Starvation is just about the worst way to die. It is arguably as bad as radiation poisoning. How is that "more humane".

Well, the warfare is more humane. What comes after might not be.

How is the "warfare" more humane?

 

[frigidweirdo]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

Starvation is just about the worst way to die. It is arguably as bad as radiation poisoning. How is that "more humane".

Well, the warfare is more humane. What comes after might not be.

How is the "warfare" more humane?

Because you don't send people off to die. Only technology will get killed.

Whether there's famine etc, well, all wars have that, WW2 was a massive stretch for Europe, rationing lasted years after WW2. You might not be able to stop that from happening. But perhaps wars will end up with no dead people at the end of it.

 

[Dayton3]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

Starvation is just about the worst way to die. It is arguably as bad as radiation poisoning. How is that "more humane".

Well, the warfare is more humane. What comes after might not be.

How is the "warfare" more humane?

Because you don't send people off to die. Only technology will get killed.

Whether there's famine etc, well, all wars have that, WW2 was a massive stretch for Europe, rationing lasted years after WW2. You might not be able to stop that from happening. But perhaps wars will end up with no dead people at the end of it.

Those unmanned weapons platforms use REAL weapons against REAL people. So it isn't "only technology" that will get killed.

Wars end with "no dead people at the end of it?!"

Get real. If you don't kill people you can't win wars.

 

[frigidweirdo]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

Starvation is just about the worst way to die. It is arguably as bad as radiation poisoning. How is that "more humane".

Well, the warfare is more humane. What comes after might not be.

How is the "warfare" more humane?

Because you don't send people off to die. Only technology will get killed.

Whether there's famine etc, well, all wars have that, WW2 was a massive stretch for Europe, rationing lasted years after WW2. You might not be able to stop that from happening. But perhaps wars will end up with no dead people at the end of it.

Those unmanned weapons platforms use REAL weapons against REAL people. So it isn't "only technology" that will get killed.

Wars end with "no dead people at the end of it?!"

Get real. If you don't kill people you can't win wars.

I'm talking about the future. Not now. And I'm talking possible scenarios.

As for "If you don't kill people you can't win wars." The reality is that wars will be conducted through hacking, and through economic means. If you have to build up a massive military at huge expense and then you lose it all in a battle, it's going to hurt you economically. Who needs to die?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

Sad but true

 

[Dayton3]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

Starvation is just about the worst way to die. It is arguably as bad as radiation poisoning. How is that "more humane".

Well, the warfare is more humane. What comes after might not be.

How is the "warfare" more humane?

Because you don't send people off to die. Only technology will get killed.

Whether there's famine etc, well, all wars have that, WW2 was a massive stretch for Europe, rationing lasted years after WW2. You might not be able to stop that from happening. But perhaps wars will end up with no dead people at the end of it.

Those unmanned weapons platforms use REAL weapons against REAL people. So it isn't "only technology" that will get killed.

Wars end with "no dead people at the end of it?!"

Get real. If you don't kill people you can't win wars.

I'm talking about the future. Not now. And I'm talking possible scenarios.

As for "If you don't kill people you can't win wars." The reality is that wars will be conducted through hacking, and through economic means. If you have to build up a massive military at huge expense and then you lose it all in a battle, it's going to hurt you economically. Who needs to die?

That's another myth you and others have bought into. Wars are never going to be fought by nerds at keyboards or drone operators. That is a myth promoted by the writers of half price action thrillers.

 

[Oddball]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

Elaborate distraction.

Kinetic wars are for our grandfathers.

The real wars are now being fought in cyberspace with economics, disinformation, and in the real world with pathogens.

China is kicking the worlds ass, and none of the globalist leftbat enablers of them GAF.

 

[frigidweirdo]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

Starvation is just about the worst way to die. It is arguably as bad as radiation poisoning. How is that "more humane".

Well, the warfare is more humane. What comes after might not be.

How is the "warfare" more humane?

Because you don't send people off to die. Only technology will get killed.

Whether there's famine etc, well, all wars have that, WW2 was a massive stretch for Europe, rationing lasted years after WW2. You might not be able to stop that from happening. But perhaps wars will end up with no dead people at the end of it.

Those unmanned weapons platforms use REAL weapons against REAL people. So it isn't "only technology" that will get killed.

Wars end with "no dead people at the end of it?!"

Get real. If you don't kill people you can't win wars.

I'm talking about the future. Not now. And I'm talking possible scenarios.

As for "If you don't kill people you can't win wars." The reality is that wars will be conducted through hacking, and through economic means. If you have to build up a massive military at huge expense and then you lose it all in a battle, it's going to hurt you economically. Who needs to die?

That's another myth you and others have bought into. Wars are never going to be fought by nerds at keyboards or drone operators. That is a myth promoted by the writers of half price action thrillers.

Well, they already are being fought like this.

So... I don't need myths and action thrillers. I can look at the world today.

But you keep your head in the sand.

 

[Dayton3]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

Starvation is just about the worst way to die. It is arguably as bad as radiation poisoning. How is that "more humane".

Well, the warfare is more humane. What comes after might not be.

How is the "warfare" more humane?

Because you don't send people off to die. Only technology will get killed.

Whether there's famine etc, well, all wars have that, WW2 was a massive stretch for Europe, rationing lasted years after WW2. You might not be able to stop that from happening. But perhaps wars will end up with no dead people at the end of it.

Those unmanned weapons platforms use REAL weapons against REAL people. So it isn't "only technology" that will get killed.

Wars end with "no dead people at the end of it?!"

Get real. If you don't kill people you can't win wars.

I'm talking about the future. Not now. And I'm talking possible scenarios.

As for "If you don't kill people you can't win wars." The reality is that wars will be conducted through hacking, and through economic means. If you have to build up a massive military at huge expense and then you lose it all in a battle, it's going to hurt you economically. Who needs to die?

That's another myth you and others have bought into. Wars are never going to be fought by nerds at keyboards or drone operators. That is a myth promoted by the writers of half price action thrillers.

Well, they already are being fought like this.

So... I don't need myths and action thrillers. I can look at the world today.

But you keep your head in the sand.

What we're seeing today is hardly "warfare". Cyber or otherwise. Mere annoyances don't qualify as "warfare".

 

[frigidweirdo]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

Starvation is just about the worst way to die. It is arguably as bad as radiation poisoning. How is that "more humane".

Well, the warfare is more humane. What comes after might not be.

How is the "warfare" more humane?

Because you don't send people off to die. Only technology will get killed.

Whether there's famine etc, well, all wars have that, WW2 was a massive stretch for Europe, rationing lasted years after WW2. You might not be able to stop that from happening. But perhaps wars will end up with no dead people at the end of it.

Those unmanned weapons platforms use REAL weapons against REAL people. So it isn't "only technology" that will get killed.

Wars end with "no dead people at the end of it?!"

Get real. If you don't kill people you can't win wars.

I'm talking about the future. Not now. And I'm talking possible scenarios.

As for "If you don't kill people you can't win wars." The reality is that wars will be conducted through hacking, and through economic means. If you have to build up a massive military at huge expense and then you lose it all in a battle, it's going to hurt you economically. Who needs to die?

That's another myth you and others have bought into. Wars are never going to be fought by nerds at keyboards or drone operators. That is a myth promoted by the writers of half price action thrillers.

Well, they already are being fought like this.

So... I don't need myths and action thrillers. I can look at the world today.

But you keep your head in the sand.

What we're seeing today is hardly "warfare". Cyber or otherwise. Mere annoyances don't qualify as "warfare".

Let me guess, "warfare" for you is only when guys are getting sweaty and shot.

 

[Dayton3]

China says its fighter pilots are battling AI aircraft in simulated dogfights, and humans aren't the only ones learning

One experienced pilot said that as he battled the AI, it would study his moves, throwing them back at him in later rounds.

uk.news.yahoo.com

Here's an article about China using AI that learns from human pilots. It's the future. Soon AI pilots will be much better than real pilots, and it'll be a lot easier to cope with them being shot down.

What with hacking being the main form of warfare even in the present day, how many times has the US has major hacks from outside of the US? (Probably Russia and China) and with propaganda being thrown at people in the US, but China and Russia protecting themselves without having to worry about free speech getting in the way.

This is the future. People won't die in wars from combat, they'll die from starvation or be enslaved once their computer systems go down.

Starvation is just about the worst way to die. It is arguably as bad as radiation poisoning. How is that "more humane".

Well, the warfare is more humane. What comes after might not be.

How is the "warfare" more humane?

Because you don't send people off to die. Only technology will get killed.

Whether there's famine etc, well, all wars have that, WW2 was a massive stretch for Europe, rationing lasted years after WW2. You might not be able to stop that from happening. But perhaps wars will end up with no dead people at the end of it.

Those unmanned weapons platforms use REAL weapons against REAL people. So it isn't "only technology" that will get killed.

Wars end with "no dead people at the end of it?!"

Get real. If you don't kill people you can't win wars.

I'm talking about the future. Not now. And I'm talking possible scenarios.

As for "If you don't kill people you can't win wars." The reality is that wars will be conducted through hacking, and through economic means. If you have to build up a massive military at huge expense and then you lose it all in a battle, it's going to hurt you economically. Who needs to die?

That's another myth you and others have bought into. Wars are never going to be fought by nerds at keyboards or drone operators. That is a myth promoted by the writers of half price action thrillers.

Well, they already are being fought like this.

So... I don't need myths and action thrillers. I can look at the world today.

But you keep your head in the sand.

What we're seeing today is hardly "warfare". Cyber or otherwise. Mere annoyances don't qualify as "warfare".

Let me guess, "warfare" for you is only when guys are getting sweaty and shot.

Yes. What's wrong with that?