KissMy
Free Breast Exam
Pay sick people to stay home. Let healthy people work & play. Everyone in close contact indoors wear mask, wash hands & it will continue to drive down the Covid spread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Missouri has a Republican governor, Short Bus.Whenever a church or a beauty salon or a synagogue or just about any other place of worship or small business "reopens" against DEMOCRAT politician orders
Hope all exposed are okRed State Imbeciles, who don’t care about anyone else.
Missouri hair stylist exposed more than 90 people to coronavirus
A hair stylist in Missouri exposed 91 people to coronavirus by going into work for eight days despite showing symptoms for the illness.
The stylist, who was not identified, had contact with 84 customers and seven of her Great Clips coworkers, according to Clay Goddard, director of the Springfield-Greene County Health Department. The stylist worked May 12 through Wednesday and tested positive for COVID-19, but the worker’s current condition is unclear.
The hair stylist worked while sick,” he said. “I’m gong to be honest with you: We can’t have many more of these.”
Missouri hair stylist exposed more than 90 people to coronavirus
A hair stylist in Missouri exposed 91 people to coronavirus by going into work for eight days despite showing symptoms for the illness. The stylist, who was not identified, had contact with 84 cust…www.nydailynews.com
It very clearly states she was symptomatic and went to work anyway.I agree that the hairdresser should have definitely stayed home if she was symptomatic but I don't recall the link saying anything other than she tested positive. What do you do if you are in your 60's or 70's and don't test positive until the state authorities force you to share facilities with infected patients? Bend over and kiss your ass goodbye?She was symptomatic. That means she was sick.What if you aren't sick? The hairdresser babe apparently wasn't aware that she tested positive. My guess is that the media's account that "her condition is unclear" is because she shows no symptoms. Before the crazy left gets all outraged by the possibility that a hairdresser might have unintentionally infected 80 customers they have to reconcile the fact that the governor of NY intentionally infected about 40,000 of the most vulnerable people in society when he ordered nursing homes to accept knowingly infected patients.That's why they have telling folks "if you're sick, stay home".The "worker's" current condition is unclear? Why is it unclear? The hairdresser was just trying to make a living and unaware that she tested positive. How do you reconcile the governor of NY being responsible for the deaths of upward of 40,000 nursing home patients by forcing them to accept knowingly infected patients?
Criminally careless in my opinion.
This is why they say "stay at home if you are sick" and not "stay at home if you have covid19".It very clearly states she was symptomatic and went to work anyway.I agree that the hairdresser should have definitely stayed home if she was symptomatic but I don't recall the link saying anything other than she tested positive. What do you do if you are in your 60's or 70's and don't test positive until the state authorities force you to share facilities with infected patients? Bend over and kiss your ass goodbye?She was symptomatic. That means she was sick.What if you aren't sick? The hairdresser babe apparently wasn't aware that she tested positive. My guess is that the media's account that "her condition is unclear" is because she shows no symptoms. Before the crazy left gets all outraged by the possibility that a hairdresser might have unintentionally infected 80 customers they have to reconcile the fact that the governor of NY intentionally infected about 40,000 of the most vulnerable people in society when he ordered nursing homes to accept knowingly infected patients.That's why they have telling folks "if you're sick, stay home".The "worker's" current condition is unclear? Why is it unclear? The hairdresser was just trying to make a living and unaware that she tested positive. How do you reconcile the governor of NY being responsible for the deaths of upward of 40,000 nursing home patients by forcing them to accept knowingly infected patients?
Criminally careless in my opinion.
COVID symptoms are so generic they are basically useless.
I’m ambivalent.Hope all exposed are okRed State Imbeciles, who don’t care about anyone else.
Missouri hair stylist exposed more than 90 people to coronavirus
A hair stylist in Missouri exposed 91 people to coronavirus by going into work for eight days despite showing symptoms for the illness.
The stylist, who was not identified, had contact with 84 customers and seven of her Great Clips coworkers, according to Clay Goddard, director of the Springfield-Greene County Health Department. The stylist worked May 12 through Wednesday and tested positive for COVID-19, but the worker’s current condition is unclear.
The hair stylist worked while sick,” he said. “I’m gong to be honest with you: We can’t have many more of these.”
Missouri hair stylist exposed more than 90 people to coronavirus
A hair stylist in Missouri exposed 91 people to coronavirus by going into work for eight days despite showing symptoms for the illness. The stylist, who was not identified, had contact with 84 cust…www.nydailynews.com
It very clearly states she was symptomatic and went to work anyway.I agree that the hairdresser should have definitely stayed home if she was symptomatic but I don't recall the link saying anything other than she tested positive. What do you do if you are in your 60's or 70's and don't test positive until the state authorities force you to share facilities with infected patients? Bend over and kiss your ass goodbye?She was symptomatic. That means she was sick.What if you aren't sick? The hairdresser babe apparently wasn't aware that she tested positive. My guess is that the media's account that "her condition is unclear" is because she shows no symptoms. Before the crazy left gets all outraged by the possibility that a hairdresser might have unintentionally infected 80 customers they have to reconcile the fact that the governor of NY intentionally infected about 40,000 of the most vulnerable people in society when he ordered nursing homes to accept knowingly infected patients.That's why they have telling folks "if you're sick, stay home".The "worker's" current condition is unclear? Why is it unclear? The hairdresser was just trying to make a living and unaware that she tested positive. How do you reconcile the governor of NY being responsible for the deaths of upward of 40,000 nursing home patients by forcing them to accept knowingly infected patients?
Criminally careless in my opinion.
COVID symptoms are so generic they are basically useless.
They should send out the national guards to gather up all pets and tosses them into the incinerators.
This is why they say "stay at home if you are sick" and not "stay at home if you have covid19".It very clearly states she was symptomatic and went to work anyway.I agree that the hairdresser should have definitely stayed home if she was symptomatic but I don't recall the link saying anything other than she tested positive. What do you do if you are in your 60's or 70's and don't test positive until the state authorities force you to share facilities with infected patients? Bend over and kiss your ass goodbye?She was symptomatic. That means she was sick.What if you aren't sick? The hairdresser babe apparently wasn't aware that she tested positive. My guess is that the media's account that "her condition is unclear" is because she shows no symptoms. Before the crazy left gets all outraged by the possibility that a hairdresser might have unintentionally infected 80 customers they have to reconcile the fact that the governor of NY intentionally infected about 40,000 of the most vulnerable people in society when he ordered nursing homes to accept knowingly infected patients.That's why they have telling folks "if you're sick, stay home".The "worker's" current condition is unclear? Why is it unclear? The hairdresser was just trying to make a living and unaware that she tested positive. How do you reconcile the governor of NY being responsible for the deaths of upward of 40,000 nursing home patients by forcing them to accept knowingly infected patients?
Criminally careless in my opinion.
COVID symptoms are so generic they are basically useless.
Come on guys, it's not brain surgery. Use your heads.
They should send out the national guards to gather up all pets and tosses them into the incinerators.
Scientists and doctors have said that if your pet has the virus, then you are more than likely the one that gave it to them. If you gave it to them, then why should you kill them? Treating them makes more sense, because then you have your companion, and they are now resistant to the virus that YOU GAVE THEM.
It very clearly states she was symptomatic and went to work anyway.I agree that the hairdresser should have definitely stayed home if she was symptomatic but I don't recall the link saying anything other than she tested positive. What do you do if you are in your 60's or 70's and don't test positive until the state authorities force you to share facilities with infected patients? Bend over and kiss your ass goodbye?She was symptomatic. That means she was sick.What if you aren't sick? The hairdresser babe apparently wasn't aware that she tested positive. My guess is that the media's account that "her condition is unclear" is because she shows no symptoms. Before the crazy left gets all outraged by the possibility that a hairdresser might have unintentionally infected 80 customers they have to reconcile the fact that the governor of NY intentionally infected about 40,000 of the most vulnerable people in society when he ordered nursing homes to accept knowingly infected patients.That's why they have telling folks "if you're sick, stay home".The "worker's" current condition is unclear? Why is it unclear? The hairdresser was just trying to make a living and unaware that she tested positive. How do you reconcile the governor of NY being responsible for the deaths of upward of 40,000 nursing home patients by forcing them to accept knowingly infected patients?
Criminally careless in my opinion.
COVID symptoms are so generic they are basically useless.
Actually, they have found 2 symptoms that are common to COVID 19, but not the flu or a cold. One of them is the loss of taste and smell, the other one is that blood vessels can burst at the extremities, resulting in something that looks like little red spots on your feet and hands.
Gonna hafta call bullshit on that unless you can post up some proof.COVID patients are only contagious for 11 days after the first onset of symptoms
Well, we'll know in about 2 weeks how well starting the country back up worked. Apparently, according to this article, not very well.
And the bad thing is that those people the hairdresser exposed could now be asymptomatic and not know they were carrying the virus and pass it around to hundreds of others.
Why are you blaming the hair cutter chick and not the 90 people who had to run out and get their doo did?
It very clearly states she was symptomatic and went to work anyway.I agree that the hairdresser should have definitely stayed home if she was symptomatic but I don't recall the link saying anything other than she tested positive. What do you do if you are in your 60's or 70's and don't test positive until the state authorities force you to share facilities with infected patients? Bend over and kiss your ass goodbye?She was symptomatic. That means she was sick.What if you aren't sick? The hairdresser babe apparently wasn't aware that she tested positive. My guess is that the media's account that "her condition is unclear" is because she shows no symptoms. Before the crazy left gets all outraged by the possibility that a hairdresser might have unintentionally infected 80 customers they have to reconcile the fact that the governor of NY intentionally infected about 40,000 of the most vulnerable people in society when he ordered nursing homes to accept knowingly infected patients.That's why they have telling folks "if you're sick, stay home".The "worker's" current condition is unclear? Why is it unclear? The hairdresser was just trying to make a living and unaware that she tested positive. How do you reconcile the governor of NY being responsible for the deaths of upward of 40,000 nursing home patients by forcing them to accept knowingly infected patients?
Criminally careless in my opinion.
COVID symptoms are so generic they are basically useless.