Millions to Lose votes

[12icer]

I uh, don't think Rump was running.
But I see they picked up ten points in a district they hadn't held since the 1970s.

Whatever, I'm just here to fix the weasel math. That got done.

According to your beloved mainstream lying liberal full of shit media it WAS a referendum ON TRUMP. That is how they were prepared to spin it if the republican won, That Trump had lost the support of the people who voted for him. So as usual and as with your goofball math idea, you are WRONG!!!!!.

 

[12icer]

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

And the GOP spent $33 million doing it!

What idiot told you that? OH I see you mean the total spent on all of the Republican candidates through the primary by their promoters. All we are interested in is the 8 million spent for the WINNER since there was 31 million spent on the loser. Oh and you analysis is just like gun grabbers, flawed in theory, and also in structure.

 

[yiostheoy]

Everybody is wondering if Trump has had any effect on the GOP base yet ?!

Too early to tell.

If Trump gets impeached soon and Pence takes over and does a good job then the GOP could be better off not worse off.

Anything can still happen either way for the GOP.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Poor Obamacare Pajama Boy...

 

[12icer]

Trump leaving especially by impeachment is a Pipe dream because there has to be a reason and there is NONE even dimshitscum are afraid to try fabricating something or really bypassing constitutional authority to try it with NO reason because they know all hell will fall on them like a plague , ANY Republican who even hints at impeaching Trump will be gone in the next round, or sooner.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze

In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.

This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.

That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes

That is little bang for your buck

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

Dems spent $31 million for a "referendum on Trump" and failed.

I uh, don't think Rump was running.
But I see they picked up ten points in a district they hadn't held since the 1970s.

Whatever, I'm just here to fix the weasel math. That got done.

80% of the polling had the conservative democrat ahead. Liberals everywhere claimed this election was a referendum on Trump. They shouted it from the rooftops when they thought they were going to win. Take it like a man and stop whining.

Pogo always takes it; but not like a man.

 

[francoHFW]

I don't give a **** what it means for political parties. I just came to correct dishonest math.
Just like the last thread where I corrected the definition of a couple of words and you melted into a babbling puddle going "but ... but.... Fabian! But... Jesuits! But... but.... butt-stains on underwear of life!"

You seem to be severely afflicted with ADHD.

Oh, it matters a great deal to you. Leftards spent MILLIONS more than their opponent and still lost.........I simply asked a question. Oh, and believe me on this, you take an ass-whipping all the time which explains as to why you are so butt-hurt.

Hope this helps!!!!

I don't even LIVE IN Georgia, butthead. But I do know me some history and therefore what "carpetbagger" means and doesn't mean.

Same thing here. I saw numbers, smelled bullshit, and fixed it. Done.

But the outcome of elections matters to leftards a great deal regardless of which state they live in because it is perceived as a gauge or pulse on how the electorate is thinking, no? BTW, The term "carpetbagger" can have different definitions to many people. Introducing ideas from a diametrically opposed region into another fits that bill. The fact remains is that leftards sent money from all over the U.S to fund jesuit trained fabian socialist Ossoff's campaign...no?

Wrong, Buttons. Again, I don't live in Georgia at all, let alone that district. I have my own district with my own congresscritter, and that's all I have a say about. Matter of fact, the same applies to you in Dullass Texas or Florida or wherever you claim to live this week.

And on the other point, no you don't get to invent your own language and pass it off as if it's English. Once again, just like a disctrict you don't live in, you're trying to dictate new meanings for a word you don't own. A term that you didn't even bring up in the first place

Yer quite a hands-on little fascist, huh Bugger Boi?

AGAIN....any election matters to leftards and I made that very clear. Me? A fascist? No, that would be the leftard clown posse and their butthurt snowflakes we know as "antifa" that are trying to prevent anyone from saying something that they don't agree with. Get it now????

A tiny number of punk kids in Berkeley blown out of all proportion for the dupes...ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. And Milo the Nazi pervert. Fascism is RW, always has been. No matter the brand new GOP BS...

 

[Pogo]

I don't give a **** what it means for political parties. I just came to correct dishonest math.
Just like the last thread where I corrected the definition of a couple of words and you melted into a babbling puddle going "but ... but.... Fabian! But... Jesuits! But... but.... butt-stains on underwear of life!"

You seem to be severely afflicted with ADHD.

Oh, it matters a great deal to you. Leftards spent MILLIONS more than their opponent and still lost.........I simply asked a question. Oh, and believe me on this, you take an ass-whipping all the time which explains as to why you are so butt-hurt.

Hope this helps!!!!

I don't even LIVE IN Georgia, butthead. But I do know me some history and therefore what "carpetbagger" means and doesn't mean.

Same thing here. I saw numbers, smelled bullshit, and fixed it. Done.

But the outcome of elections matters to leftards a great deal regardless of which state they live in because it is perceived as a gauge or pulse on how the electorate is thinking, no? BTW, The term "carpetbagger" can have different definitions to many people. Introducing ideas from a diametrically opposed region into another fits that bill. The fact remains is that leftards sent money from all over the U.S to fund jesuit trained fabian socialist Ossoff's campaign...no?

Wrong, Buttons. Again, I don't live in Georgia at all, let alone that district. I have my own district with my own congresscritter, and that's all I have a say about. Matter of fact, the same applies to you in Dullass Texas or Florida or wherever you claim to live this week.

And on the other point, no you don't get to invent your own language and pass it off as if it's English. Once again, just like a disctrict you don't live in, you're trying to dictate new meanings for a word you don't own. A term that you didn't even bring up in the first place

Yer quite a hands-on little fascist, huh Bugger Boi?

AGAIN....any election matters to leftards and I made that very clear. Me? A fascist? No, that would be the leftard clown posse and their butthurt snowflakes we know as "antifa" that are trying to prevent anyone from saying something that they don't agree with. Get it now????

That''s "fascist" in the sense of über-authoritarian. Get it now????????????????????????????

What Georgia 6 does in its elections is of no consequence to me --- I don't live there. It ain't my place to meddle. The difference between you and me is that I get that and you don't. That's why you're all over the board going on and on and on and on about "Jesuits" and "Butt-stains" and "Fabian", in relation to a politician who isn't even running in your district, let alone your own state. Do you not have a Congressional rep of your own?

So no, it doesn't matter to me -- I don't live there. It can't matter to me. I just came here to correct what I sniffed out as weasel math. I did that, and you're trying to obscure it because your butt hurts.

 

[JBond]

Oh, it matters a great deal to you. Leftards spent MILLIONS more than their opponent and still lost.........I simply asked a question. Oh, and believe me on this, you take an ass-whipping all the time which explains as to why you are so butt-hurt.

Hope this helps!!!!

I don't even LIVE IN Georgia, butthead. But I do know me some history and therefore what "carpetbagger" means and doesn't mean.

Same thing here. I saw numbers, smelled bullshit, and fixed it. Done.

But the outcome of elections matters to leftards a great deal regardless of which state they live in because it is perceived as a gauge or pulse on how the electorate is thinking, no? BTW, The term "carpetbagger" can have different definitions to many people. Introducing ideas from a diametrically opposed region into another fits that bill. The fact remains is that leftards sent money from all over the U.S to fund jesuit trained fabian socialist Ossoff's campaign...no?

Wrong, Buttons. Again, I don't live in Georgia at all, let alone that district. I have my own district with my own congresscritter, and that's all I have a say about. Matter of fact, the same applies to you in Dullass Texas or Florida or wherever you claim to live this week.

And on the other point, no you don't get to invent your own language and pass it off as if it's English. Once again, just like a disctrict you don't live in, you're trying to dictate new meanings for a word you don't own. A term that you didn't even bring up in the first place

Yer quite a hands-on little fascist, huh Bugger Boi?

AGAIN....any election matters to leftards and I made that very clear. Me? A fascist? No, that would be the leftard clown posse and their butthurt snowflakes we know as "antifa" that are trying to prevent anyone from saying something that they don't agree with. Get it now????

A tiny number of punk kids in Berkeley blown out of all proportion for the dupes...ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. And Milo the Nazi pervert. Fascism is RW, always has been. No matter the brand new GOP BS...

Left wing fascists have attacked people and shut down free speech. The facts are not on your side.

 

[Pogo]

One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze

In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.

This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.

That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes

That is little bang for your buck

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

You miss the point, even though not nearly as many Republicans turned out because they knew they would win, they won with a 7 percent margin.

Your math is just another pipe dream of the shithead party.

Nope, actually I hit the point right on the head.

The OP dishonestly took two numbers out of their context. Those numbers are absolutely DEFINED by their context, whch is what makes that removal dishonest.

If somebody gets, say, 124,917 votes ----- and there were a total of 125,000 votes cast --- that's near-unanimous. If however there were thirty million votes cast, that 124,917 doesn't even show up.

The OP takes absolute numbers from two vastly different bases --- 21% FEWER votes cast on the 20th --- and tried to make the point that that absolute number is a "lower" result.

It isn't. It's 0.001% fewer in an absolute number versus a base that's 21% lower. That translates to ten points higher as a proportion. And proportion is what decides the result. Always has been.

As far as "who didn't come out to vote for whatever reason", that cannot be more irrelevant to the math. Numbers literally don't give a shit about reasoning. They just add up. And what they add up to was completely misrepresented by the OP, which is why I call it "weasel math" and corrected it.

Also your math is off --- the final result was variously counted as either 3.7 or 3.8 percent. You seem to have doubled it. Wonder why.

 

[Pogo]

One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze

In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.

This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.

That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes

That is little bang for your buck

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

Dems spent $31 million for a "referendum on Trump" and failed.

I uh, don't think Rump was running.
But I see they picked up ten points in a district they hadn't held since the 1970s.

Whatever, I'm just here to fix the weasel math. That got done.

80% of the polling had the conservative democrat ahead. Liberals everywhere claimed this election was a referendum on Trump. They shouted it from the rooftops when they thought they were going to win. Take it like a man and stop whining.

I don't give a flying shit what polls were saying or what pundits were saying. I don't even live in that district -- it's irrelevant to me. And I don't see where Rump was a candidate in it or even associated with it, so that's more noise. I just came in here to correct disingenuous weasel math, and I did that. If anyone needs to "take it like a man" it would be you and the OP.

My work was done when I came in here --- I ain't the one whining.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Chuck Todd actually spun this as "a moral victory" for the Democrats.

I hope they have many

How big is their participation trophy case?

Last I heard they were on their third addition...

 

[Pogo]

I uh, don't think Rump was running.
But I see they picked up ten points in a district they hadn't held since the 1970s.

Whatever, I'm just here to fix the weasel math. That got done.

According to your beloved mainstream lying liberal full of shit media it WAS a referendum ON TRUMP. That is how they were prepared to spin it if the republican won, That Trump had lost the support of the people who voted for him. So as usual and as with your goofball math idea, you are WRONG!!!!!.

Where are my numbers "wrong"? Go ahead, recalculate.

Again, despite these desperate attempts to deflect off to whatever "referendum on Rump" bullshit, I don't pay attention to that shit, and I don't live in the district, so it's not a referendum on bupkis. I just came to correct the math, and I did. That got done, and put to bed. And there's nothing you can do about that.

But you go ahead and recalculate my numbers there Bubbles. Demonstrate where they're off.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

If anyone needs to "take it like a man" it would be you and the OP.

My work was done when I came in here --- I ain't the one whining.

The OP is a woman, jackass.

 

[hadit]

One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze

In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.

This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.

That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes

That is little bang for your buck

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

What do you call the guy who graduated last in his medical school class?

Doctor.

IOW, the Republican is going to be writing, debating, and voting on legislation while the democrat is going to be doing...what again?

 

[Pogo]

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

And the GOP spent $33 million doing it!

What idiot told you that? OH I see you mean the total spent on all of the Republican candidates through the primary by their promoters. All we are interested in is the 8 million spent for the WINNER since there was 31 million spent on the loser. Oh and you analysis is just like gun grabbers, flawed in theory, and also in structure.

These numbers are easily looked up, for those interested in the factual rather than the spinnable.

Looks like your "8 million" leaves out the words "twenty four point" before the "eight".

I'm sure you can blame spellcheck though.

 

[dannyboys]

One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze

In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.

This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.

That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes

That is little bang for your buck

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

Yes. Every school I have been to says 124,917 is greater than 124,893.

Your attempt to spin doesn't change the math

The math doesn't need to change. It needs its context put back after you forgot it.
I covered it, you're welcome.

By the way here's a bit more math: The Republican loss of 66,493 votes is exactly 33,246.5 times the Democrats' loss. If you wanna let me know how much each one spent I can get back to you with exactly how much each spent on "losing votes".

I have my own calculator.

So, give us your analysis of how this bodes well for leftards....was the race close because of the dissatisfaction of the candidate or Trump???? Or because people crave fabian socialism ?????

For a district that is historically so red it's almost maroon, it's quite stunning. And a warning for the midterms in 2018. Trump will continue to do nothing but fail, sign useless executive orders, play golf and tweet. Even morons like you will give up.

So explain what President Trump has "continually failed" at.
Looks like BONOBO was the one who has ended up "failing".

 

[Pogo]

One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze

In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.

This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.

That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes

That is little bang for your buck

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

What do you call the guy who graduated last in his medical school class?

Doctor.

IOW, the Republican is going to be writing, debating, and voting on legislation while the democrat is going to be doing...what again?

Damned if I know. It's none of my business. I just came to fix the weasel math. That got done.

 

[whitehall]

If you look at it rationally the money spent on campaigns isn't lost, it's part of the economy. Radio and T.V. spots cost money and the printers who make the yard signs get paid. The problem is when democrats get free propaganda from the criminal conspiracy in the MSM and fake news and skewed polls are created to influence voters.

 

[Pogo]

If you look at it rationally the money spent on campaigns isn't lost, it's part of the economy. Radio and T.V. spots cost money and the printers who make the yard signs get paid. The problem is when democrats get free propaganda from the criminal conspiracy in the MSM and fake news and skewed polls are created to influence voters.

Fake news and push polls are also part of the economy, to extend that thought. When the George Bush campaign called voters and said 'would you be less likely to vote for John McCain if you knew he had fathered an illegitimate black child' ------ somebody got paid to do that. Not an occupation to be proud of obviously, but it's also 'part of the economy'.

"It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first." --- Reagan