Mike Pence violated 18 US code Section 4

Yes. I know. The judge was wrong. Wouldn’t be the first time a judge has been wrong.

Your typically empty reliance on the fallacy of an “appeal to authority” fails (as fallacies generally do). But you won’t understand that, either.
 
Recap:

Retarded Bwk basically plagiarizes the article and uses the words of some lawyer’s fanciful thinking to justify his own claims.

BWK is such a massive tool, that when he is asked by at least two people to state “what crime,” he can’t distinguish between the crime of failing to report a felony on the one hand and the alleged underlying felony on the other hand.

Pence did say that Trump tried to ask him to deny certification of the election. Newsflash for retarded BWK. The ask is not a crime.

So, there was no underlying “felony” to report.

Bwk is all broken now because he still can’t make the distinctions.
The lawyer is a federal prosecutor who understands the code. You don't.

The crime violated by Pence reflects the code. Grade shool level toadie here.

Pence knew Trump asked to deny certification, and when the attack started, Pence should have called it out. He didn't have the balls.

Again for the learning impaired, the crime is the inaction.
 
Yes. I know. The judge was wrong. Wouldn’t be the first time a judge has been wrong.

Your typically empty reliance on the fallacy of an “appeal to authority” fails (as fallacies generally do). But you won’t understand that, either.
🤪:laughing0301::auiqs.jpg::rofl::abgg2q.jpg::aargh::bang3: And you know bettter than the judge. Damn boy, you are a treat.
 
Nobody sees any such thing. You merely make another empty claim devoid of factual support. You’re quite retarded.
Who is nobody, you? :laughing0301: WTF does it say asshole. Can you fucking read?
 
Nobody sees any such thing. You merely make another empty claim devoid of factual support. You’re quite retarded.
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three .. For those who need assistance with critical thinking here. Trump wrote a book people, acknowledging he knew about Trumps crimes on January 6th, and he did and said nothing. It is a felony, and at minimum, a violation of his oath. It's so easy a cave man can understand it. You are too gd stupid.

How did Pence know Trump was committing a crime? Because Trump tried to get him to decertify the election, and when Pence didn't do it, Trump called out his redneck terrorists to attack. End of story. What a fucking clown.
 
The lawyer is a federal prosecutor who understands the code.
Then he should probably analyze it correctly.
You don't.

Actually, I do. You bought his partisan MSLSD hackery and think you’re enlightened. You’re not. You’re retarded.
The crime violated by Pence reflects the code.
Crimes don’t reflect codes, you gibbering chimp. Crimes aren’t violated, either. Crimes are committed. Laws are violated. But not in this case. There was nothing illegal in Trump seeking to have his VP refuse to certify.
Grade shool level toadie here.
You’re a special ed short bud window licking retard. School is spelled with a “c.”
Pence knew Trump asked to deny certification,
Pence did know what Trump asked. So what?
and when the attack started, Pence should have called it out. He didn't have the balls.
There was an attack of sorts on 1/6. Not an insurrection. And it had nothing to do with what Trump had requested of Pence. Again, the mere request is not a crime, you stubbornly ignorant retard.
Again for the learning impaired, the crime is the inaction.

And again, failure to report a felony would be the crime. But there was no felony to report.

You’re a retard. What are ya gonna do now? Bleed on me?
 
🤪:laughing0301::auiqs.jpg::rofl::abgg2q.jpg::aargh::bang3: And you know bettter than the judge. Damn boy, you are a treat.
I realize that retards of your dangerously low intellectual prowess won’t be able to follow along. But there was once a judge who wrote a famous decision. His name was Justice Brown. His opinion was the majority opinion of the court in the case called:

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).​


That idiot opinion declared the legal doctrine that our Constitution permitted the concept of “separate but equal.”

Now, because a “Justice of our Supreme Court” wrote it, your reliance on fallacy would have us all just meekly accept that idiotic legal determination.

Thankfully, society is smarter than you. That’s not hard. My dog is smarter than you.

But because the rest of us aren’t so easily misled by fallacies as you are, prior SCOTUS decisions can occasionally get reconsidered. In the much later case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, the Plessy v. Ferguson got roundly rejected.

Your appeal to authority is just as persuasive as Justice Brown’s legal thinking in Plessy. That is: dead wrong.


If it hasn’t gotten mentioned much, I must make amends by re-stating this tragic fact. You, kid, are tragically retarded.
 
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three ... Pence knew and should have known a felony was in progress.
what felony???
 

Forum List

Back
Top