Microsoft threatens to shut down Gab after anti semitic post by user

[dblack]

??? You really know nothing about me. But, please, enjoy your fantasies.

I know you used to be a libertarian, but contracted one of the worst cases of TDS ever seen. Now your rage controls you and you happily jettison liberty for your lust to "get Trump."

Prove it. Find the quotes.

 

[Mac1958]

And Mac1958's regressive right will oppose the regressive left as much as possible. see #60

You don't even have the balls to tag me when you talk about me.

And speaking of that: Come on Jake, man up, just this once.
.

 

[dblack]

Some can’t comprehend the meaning of PRIVATE COMPANIES.

If you were talking about the government, you would have a point.

Like cake baking...eh?

The role reversal is rather revealing, isn't it?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Because PRIVATE COMPANIES can decide who they will and will not serve?

Since when?

Different rules for the Masters of the Universe, the Silicone Valley Oligarchs.

You can't expect the left to live by the laws they impose on peasants, can you?

 

[Astrostar]

Microsoft Threatens to Shut Down Gab After Anti-Semitic Posts by User


Some can't comprehend the meaning

of FIRST THEY CAME FOR ALEX JONES THEN THEY CAME FOR

View attachment 209692
‘First They Came for Alex Jones’: Ted Cruz’s Crusade Against Facebook Reaches New Extreme

And now they try coming after GAB!! It won't be just google leftist goon squads.
NOT many may know who or what GAB is but it is twitter like site that is trying to become the next twitter without being leftist assholes banning someone for everything and anything they say.

Just like on here the Losers on the left try getting people who DONT' ACT/think like IDIOTS AS THEY DO BANNED, and as one TWAT on here mentioned in writing " THEY START THINGS" to get people kicked off she knows who the fk she is too.

Good points! And, we are working our asses off to get the shit stain Trump banned!!!

 

[Coyote]

Some can’t comprehend the meaning of PRIVATE COMPANIES.

If you were talking about the government, you would have a point.

Like cake baking...eh?

Not really for several reasons. There are local anti discrimination laws in the area where the baker was. The baker violated them and the case went through the courts ending in a very narrow ruling that indicated extreme bias by one of those involved in prosecution.

In the case of these social media companies, what law are they violating?
Is there any law stating they most host every view?
Are they allowed to drop people who violate their openly stated Terms of Service?

A better example is this. Can a baker be forced to create a Nazi themed pro- holocaust cake? No.

 

[Coyote]

MS does not have to give anyone a platform.

End of story.

Because PRIVATE COMPANIES can decide who they will and will not serve?

No. Because they can decide what messages they choose to host and it is clearly stated in the TOS you agree to when you sign up.

 

[MindWars]

Microsoft Threatens to Shut Down Gab After Anti-Semitic Posts by User


Some can't comprehend the meaning

of FIRST THEY CAME FOR ALEX JONES THEN THEY CAME FOR

View attachment 209692
‘First They Came for Alex Jones’: Ted Cruz’s Crusade Against Facebook Reaches New Extreme

And now they try coming after GAB!! It won't be just google leftist goon squads.
NOT many may know who or what GAB is but it is twitter like site that is trying to become the next twitter without being leftist assholes banning someone for everything and anything they say.

Just like on here the Losers on the left try getting people who DONT' ACT/think like IDIOTS AS THEY DO BANNED, and as one TWAT on here mentioned in writing " THEY START THINGS" to get people kicked off she knows who the fk she is too.

Good points! And, we are working our asses off to get the shit stain Trump banned!!!

and we are gonna laugh our asses off when they come for you and they are stupid fk.

 

[Coyote]

We cannot be a nation of double standards.

Either we have liberty, or public accommodation laws. But if we chose to have government decide who we do business with, then that applies to the left as well as the right.

NOt really.

You can't deny people service for who they are.
You can deny them service for what they do.

this isn't complicated.

That is essentially what it boils down to.

 

[MindWars]

MS does not have to give anyone a platform.

End of story.

Because PRIVATE COMPANIES can decide who they will and will not serve?

No. Because they can decide what messages they choose to host and it is clearly stated in the TOS you agree to when you sign up.

So when they choose you because you aren't BLACK enough, , or they choose you because you don't hate whites enough, or they choose you because . KNOW HOW SNITCHES ARE HATED, WELLL BROWN SHIRT ANTIFA MINDED TRUMP HATING FK ARE THE FIRST ONES THEY'RE COMING FOR...........

Just like Hitler he shot his ass kissers first LMFAO you know those brown shirts........

HERE'S ANOTHER NEWS FLASH FOR STUPID PHUKCERS..


CHINA IS AND WILL OWN YOU BITCHES........... OBAMA GAVE OUR INTERNET AWAY A.HOLES.

 

[dblack]

Some can’t comprehend the meaning of PRIVATE COMPANIES.

If you were talking about the government, you would have a point.

Like cake baking...eh?

Not really for several reasons. There are local anti discrimination laws in the area where the baker was. The baker violated them and the case went through the courts ending in a very narrow ruling that indicated extreme bias by one of those involved in prosecution.

In the case of these social media companies, what law are they violating?
Is there any law stating they most host every view?
Are they allowed to drop people who violate their openly stated Terms of Service?

A better example is this. Can a baker be forced to create a Nazi themed pro- holocaust cake? No.

It's different when we do it.

 

[MindWars]

Microsoft Threatens to Shut Down Gab After Anti-Semitic Posts by User


Some can't comprehend the meaning

of FIRST THEY CAME FOR ALEX JONES THEN THEY CAME FOR

View attachment 209692
‘First They Came for Alex Jones’: Ted Cruz’s Crusade Against Facebook Reaches New Extreme

And now they try coming after GAB!! It won't be just google leftist goon squads.
NOT many may know who or what GAB is but it is twitter like site that is trying to become the next twitter without being leftist assholes banning someone for everything and anything they say.

Just like on here the Losers on the left try getting people who DONT' ACT/think like IDIOTS AS THEY DO BANNED, and as one TWAT on here mentioned in writing " THEY START THINGS" to get people kicked off she knows who the fk she is too.

Good points! And, we are working our asses off to get the shit stain Trump banned!!!

Whatcha gonna do when they come for you.................... First they came for Alex Jones and I said nothing then they came for me bahahhaah you sutpid phuken pos losers think you are all so big and bad and everyone of you pathetic kunts end up getting your stuck smart mouth losers end up getting beat down RUFIO style moron ....Your all WEAK..


But we won’t make the Internet fairer or safer by pushing platforms into ever more aggressive efforts to police online speech. When social media platforms adopt heavy-handed moderation policies, the unintended consequences can be hard to predict. For example, Twitter’s policies on sexual material have resulted in posts on sexual health and condoms being taken down. YouTube’s bans on violent content have resulted in journalism on the Syrian war being pulled from the site. It can be tempting to attempt to “fix” certain attitudes and behaviors online by placing increased restrictions on users’ speech, but in practice, web platforms have had more success at silencing innocent people than at making online communities healthier.

Platform Censorship Won't Fix the Internet


most moronc can't comprhend "equal" because slefish pricks are just like you


YOU HAVE SPOKE LIKE A TRUE FACIST BITCH
NOW ALL YOU PUKES HAVE TO DO IS OPEN CONCENTRATION CAMPS FOR PEOPLE WHO SPEAK WHAT YOU POS C..TS DON'T LIKE.

AWW PUSSIES CAN'T STAND BALANCE THEY LIKE CONTROL .

 

[Coyote]

Microsoft Threatens to Shut Down Gab After Anti-Semitic Posts by User


Some can't comprehend the meaning

of FIRST THEY CAME FOR ALEX JONES THEN THEY CAME FOR

View attachment 209692
‘First They Came for Alex Jones’: Ted Cruz’s Crusade Against Facebook Reaches New Extreme

And now they try coming after GAB!! It won't be just google leftist goon squads.
NOT many may know who or what GAB is but it is twitter like site that is trying to become the next twitter without being leftist assholes banning someone for everything and anything they say.

Just like on here the Losers on the left try getting people who DONT' ACT/think like IDIOTS AS THEY DO BANNED, and as one TWAT on here mentioned in writing " THEY START THINGS" to get people kicked off she knows who the fk she is too.

Good points! And, we are working our asses off to get the shit stain Trump banned!!!

Whatcha gonna do when they come for you.................... First they came for Alex Jones and I said nothing then they came for me bahahhaah you sutpid phuken pos losers think you are all so big and bad and everyone of you pathetic kunts end up getting your stuck smart mouth losers end up getting beat down RUFIO style moron ....Your all WEAK..


But we won’t make the Internet fairer or safer by pushing platforms into ever more aggressive efforts to police online speech. When social media platforms adopt heavy-handed moderation policies, the unintended consequences can be hard to predict. For example, Twitter’s policies on sexual material have resulted in posts on sexual health and condoms being taken down. YouTube’s bans on violent content have resulted in journalism on the Syrian war being pulled from the site. It can be tempting to attempt to “fix” certain attitudes and behaviors online by placing increased restrictions on users’ speech, but in practice, web platforms have had more success at silencing innocent people than at making online communities healthier.

Platform Censorship Won't Fix the Internet


most moronc can't comprhend "equal" because slefish pricks are just like you


YOU HAVE SPOKE LIKE A TRUE FACIST BITCH
NOW ALL YOU PUKES HAVE TO DO IS OPEN CONCENTRATION CAMPS FOR PEOPLE WHO SPEAK WHAT YOU POS C..TS DON'T LIKE.

AWW PUSSIES CAN'T STAND BALANCE THEY LIKE CONTROL .

That is just silly...

 

[Coyote]

MS does not have to give anyone a platform.

End of story.

Because PRIVATE COMPANIES can decide who they will and will not serve?

No. Because they can decide what messages they choose to host and it is clearly stated in the TOS you agree to when you sign up.

So when they choose you because you aren't BLACK enough, , or they choose you because you don't hate whites enough, or they choose you because . KNOW HOW SNITCHES ARE HATED, WELLL BROWN SHIRT ANTIFA MINDED TRUMP HATING FK ARE THE FIRST ONES THEY'RE COMING FOR...........

Just like Hitler he shot his ass kissers first LMFAO you know those brown shirts........

HERE'S ANOTHER NEWS FLASH FOR STUPID PHUKCERS..


CHINA IS AND WILL OWN YOU BITCHES........... OBAMA GAVE OUR INTERNET AWAY A.HOLES.

What are you talking about?

 

[Coyote]

Some can’t comprehend the meaning of PRIVATE COMPANIES.

If you were talking about the government, you would have a point.

Like cake baking...eh?

Not really for several reasons. There are local anti discrimination laws in the area where the baker was. The baker violated them and the case went through the courts ending in a very narrow ruling that indicated extreme bias by one of those involved in prosecution.

In the case of these social media companies, what law are they violating?
Is there any law stating they most host every view?
Are they allowed to drop people who violate their openly stated Terms of Service?

A better example is this. Can a baker be forced to create a Nazi themed pro- holocaust cake? No.

It's different when we do it.

It is the law that makes it different but feel free to overlook it.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Refuse to bake a wedding cake for queers: Conservatives cheers and Liberal jeer.

Refuse to host Alex Jones on your platform: Liberal cheers and Conservatives jeer.

Admittedly, I am rather enjoying watching all the clowns flip their positions on business and property rights when it is convenient.

The cake baker issue was not about business rights, but about religious rights.

If you can show where Facebook is claiming a violation of its religious beliefs then it might be considered similar, dude.

 

[MindWars]

MS does not have to give anyone a platform.

End of story.

Because PRIVATE COMPANIES can decide who they will and will not serve?

No. Because they can decide what messages they choose to host and it is clearly stated in the TOS you agree to when you sign up.

So when they choose you because you aren't BLACK enough, , or they choose you because you don't hate whites enough, or they choose you because . KNOW HOW SNITCHES ARE HATED, WELLL BROWN SHIRT ANTIFA MINDED TRUMP HATING FK ARE THE FIRST ONES THEY'RE COMING FOR...........

Just like Hitler he shot his ass kissers first LMFAO you know those brown shirts........

HERE'S ANOTHER NEWS FLASH FOR STUPID PHUKCERS..


CHINA IS AND WILL OWN YOU BITCHES........... OBAMA GAVE OUR INTERNET AWAY A.HOLES.

What are you talking about?

LOL

Last nights post that I just now got to this morningg..

 

[Uncensored2008]

Does Microsoft own Gab?

I know they own Skype and monitor everything one does on there. Including

getting your contacts information.

Just like Apple and the iCloud?

Bad Microsoft.

Good Apple....

 

[Uncensored2008]

??? You really know nothing about me. But, please, enjoy your fantasies.

I know you used to be a libertarian, but contracted one of the worst cases of TDS ever seen. Now your rage controls you and you happily jettison liberty for your lust to "get Trump."

Prove it. Find the quotes.

This whole thread is proof.

This last year is proof.

 

[Vastator]

Sounds like a “brother company”, looking out for its “sister company”; by trying to eliminate its direct competitor through its platform (Google).
I actually think it’s a good sign. It could mean that Twitter is starting to feel the weight of their own policy enforcement, coming to bear. So if people are turning to Gab instead; Google is trying to find an excuse to shut Gab out of its domain. Sounds like competition to me...