Michigan SOS Issues Unconstitutional Polling Decree

[busybee01]

Michigan has a rino legislature but is ruled by an unholy trinity of Democrat women working to steal the election for the far left.

Michigan has never had a problem with voter intimidation, particularly with guns.

But out of the blue, recently, again without the legislature, the SOS issued an UNCONSTITUTIONAL EDICT that no one may open carry within 100 feet of a polling place.

She did this without consulting anyone, including law enforcement.

Now why do you suppose a Democrat, who has been slapped down so many times before, would put out another unconstitutional decree? The answer should be obvious

Hint: she is daring "gun nuts" to defy her order

Michigan police chiefs' leader: Open carry ban at polling places not based in law

The director of the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police says order by Secretary of State is unenforceable

www.google.com

It is common sense given the dangerous times we live in. We have had the FBI break up a attempted kidnapping. 2 of them were in the Michigan legislative chambers brandishing weapons. Animals like you need to be dealt with. Why does anyone need to openly carry a weapon? If they can't enforce it then they should quit. I am getting tired of these people who seem to think they can decide which laws they want to enforce. The idea that a state cannot keep a polling place safe proactively is ridiculous.

 

[busybee01]

Michigan has a rino legislature but is ruled by an unholy trinity of Democrat women working to steal the election for the far left.

Michigan has never had a problem with voter intimidation, particularly with guns.

But out of the blue, recently, again without the legislature, the SOS issued an UNCONSTITUTIONAL EDICT that no one may open carry within 100 feet of a polling place.

She did this without consulting anyone, including law enforcement.

Now why do you suppose a Democrat, who has been slapped down so many times before, would put out another unconstitutional decree? The answer should be obvious

Hint: she is daring "gun nuts" to defy her order

Michigan police chiefs' leader: Open carry ban at polling places not based in law

The director of the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police says order by Secretary of State is unenforceable

www.google.com

Think it worse than that----

Dems are throwing the election into complete and utter chaos so no winner can be named. Neither will be awarded the 270 electoral votes----so Pelosi by Us law will then become leader on Jan. 20, 2021 because a new president can not be named without the electoral votes. Preventing voters from carrying weapons---allows BLM antifa BLACK PANTHERS to attack voters preventing them from being shot without fear of being shot-----------nullifying the election.

Vote early in person.....

I KNOW some gun "nut" or 10 will open carry just to challenge this.

The Scriptures say we need to be wise as serpents but harmless as doves.

The unholy trinity WANTS them to so when Michigan goes to Trump, THEY CAN SAY Biden voters were intimidated, and challenge the results in court. That's what most of us believe.

Even if a 2nd Amendment type DOESNT show up with a gun, you can bet some DEMOCRAT will just so they can use this.

My hubby is from the UP of Michigan orginally-----I know plenty of gun toting Michiganites---think many, especially given their hate of the dem governor in all of Michigan now, are going to ignore the decree---------and I suspect that the libs will send out their brown shirts to attack---I expect riots/stabbings/shootings on election night. I hope not but ......

You people are the fascist pigs that need to be dealt with. Anyone who does then they should be arrested. It is time to deal with lawless thugs like you. The fact they hate the Governor is the exact reason why such a ban should be enforced.

 

[Lysistrata]

This rule is just plain common sense.

There is no reason for anyone to carry a weapon within 100 feet of a polling place. None.

If you are such a lily-livered, hysterical coward that you think that you have to carry a weapon with you, lock it in your car when you go near a polling place. Presumably you have a leather gun case with a padlock on it.

I remember when Americans were not nuts.

 

[Beef_Supreme]

Michigan has a rino legislature but is ruled by an unholy trinity of Democrat women working to steal the election for the far left.

Michigan has never had a problem with voter intimidation, particularly with guns.

But out of the blue, recently, again without the legislature, the SOS issued an UNCONSTITUTIONAL EDICT that no one may open carry within 100 feet of a polling place.

She did this without consulting anyone, including law enforcement.

Now why do you suppose a Democrat, who has been slapped down so many times before, would put out another unconstitutional decree? The answer should be obvious

Hint: she is daring "gun nuts" to defy her order

Michigan police chiefs' leader: Open carry ban at polling places not based in law

The director of the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police says order by Secretary of State is unenforceable

www.google.com

Do you ever bitch about the violation of the 4th amendment which occurs on a regular basis by state and fed on asset forfeiture or do you only care about the second and ignore the rest?

Asset forfeiture laws are a disgrace and should be struck down.

 

[Beef_Supreme]

Michigan has a rino legislature but is ruled by an unholy trinity of Democrat women working to steal the election for the far left.

Michigan has never had a problem with voter intimidation, particularly with guns.

But out of the blue, recently, again without the legislature, the SOS issued an UNCONSTITUTIONAL EDICT that no one may open carry within 100 feet of a polling place.

She did this without consulting anyone, including law enforcement.

Now why do you suppose a Democrat, who has been slapped down so many times before, would put out another unconstitutional decree? The answer should be obvious

Hint: she is daring "gun nuts" to defy her order

Michigan police chiefs' leader: Open carry ban at polling places not based in law

The director of the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police says order by Secretary of State is unenforceable

www.google.com

It is common sense given the dangerous times we live in. We have had the FBI break up a attempted kidnapping. 2 of them were in the Michigan legislative chambers brandishing weapons. Animals like you need to be dealt with. Why does anyone need to openly carry a weapon? If they can't enforce it then they should quit. I am getting tired of these people who seem to think they can decide which laws they want to enforce. The idea that a state cannot keep a polling place safe proactively is ridiculous.

Why does anyone need?
I must have missed that in the Bill of Needs.
Oh wait, it’s the bill of rights, not needs.
If you don’t see a problem with the government dictating your rights based on whatever those in power believe you need, you have serious problems.
Why do you need to be able to say what you want in a phone? Why don you need to post what you feel like on the internet? Do you need to say that?
Why do you need the size house you have? Why do you need that type of car?
And on and on.
Carrying a gun isn’t a crime. You aren’t hurting anyone. Shooting someone without cause is a crime.
If I really need to spell this out for you, you really need to step back and evaluate your beliefs.

 

[Beef_Supreme]

This rule is just plain common sense.

There is no reason for anyone to carry a weapon within 100 feet of a polling place. None.

If you are such a lily-livered, hysterical coward that you think that you have to carry a weapon with you, lock it in your car when you go near a polling place. Presumably you have a leather gun case with a padlock on it.

I remember when Americans were not nuts.

Interesting. So according to you, you don’t need to have your gun on you near a polling place. Is there some magical spell that has been cast that grants protection around polling places? Tell me, where else don’t I need to carry a gun?
Perhaps you have some insight into the future you can share with everyone. Let people know exactly where they will be safe, and where they will be in danger.
Who needs firearms for personal protection, and police when we have you around? You can just let us know where to go that we will be safe.

 

[freyasman]

Michigan has a rino legislature but is ruled by an unholy trinity of Democrat women working to steal the election for the far left.

Michigan has never had a problem with voter intimidation, particularly with guns.

But out of the blue, recently, again without the legislature, the SOS issued an UNCONSTITUTIONAL EDICT that no one may open carry within 100 feet of a polling place.

She did this without consulting anyone, including law enforcement.

Now why do you suppose a Democrat, who has been slapped down so many times before, would put out another unconstitutional decree? The answer should be obvious

Hint: she is daring "gun nuts" to defy her order

Michigan police chiefs' leader: Open carry ban at polling places not based in law

The director of the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police says order by Secretary of State is unenforceable

www.google.com

It is common sense given the dangerous times we live in. We have had the FBI break up a attempted kidnapping. 2 of them were in the Michigan legislative chambers brandishing weapons. Animals like you need to be dealt with. Why does anyone need to openly carry a weapon? If they can't enforce it then they should quit. I am getting tired of these people who seem to think they can decide which laws they want to enforce. The idea that a state cannot keep a polling place safe proactively is ridiculous.

So you hate free people, is what you're saying?




Got it.

 

[freyasman]

Michigan has a rino legislature but is ruled by an unholy trinity of Democrat women working to steal the election for the far left.

Michigan has never had a problem with voter intimidation, particularly with guns.

But out of the blue, recently, again without the legislature, the SOS issued an UNCONSTITUTIONAL EDICT that no one may open carry within 100 feet of a polling place.

She did this without consulting anyone, including law enforcement.

Now why do you suppose a Democrat, who has been slapped down so many times before, would put out another unconstitutional decree? The answer should be obvious

Hint: she is daring "gun nuts" to defy her order

Michigan police chiefs' leader: Open carry ban at polling places not based in law

The director of the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police says order by Secretary of State is unenforceable

www.google.com

Think it worse than that----

Dems are throwing the election into complete and utter chaos so no winner can be named. Neither will be awarded the 270 electoral votes----so Pelosi by Us law will then become leader on Jan. 20, 2021 because a new president can not be named without the electoral votes. Preventing voters from carrying weapons---allows BLM antifa BLACK PANTHERS to attack voters preventing them from being shot without fear of being shot-----------nullifying the election.

Vote early in person.....

I KNOW some gun "nut" or 10 will open carry just to challenge this.

The Scriptures say we need to be wise as serpents but harmless as doves.

The unholy trinity WANTS them to so when Michigan goes to Trump, THEY CAN SAY Biden voters were intimidated, and challenge the results in court. That's what most of us believe.

Even if a 2nd Amendment type DOESNT show up with a gun, you can bet some DEMOCRAT will just so they can use this.

My hubby is from the UP of Michigan orginally-----I know plenty of gun toting Michiganites---think many, especially given their hate of the dem governor in all of Michigan now, are going to ignore the decree---------and I suspect that the libs will send out their brown shirts to attack---I expect riots/stabbings/shootings on election night. I hope not but ......

You people are the fascist pigs that need to be dealt with. Anyone who does then they should be arrested. It is time to deal with lawless thugs like you. The fact they hate the Governor is the exact reason why such a ban should be enforced.

Except not really.

 

[freyasman]

This rule is just plain common sense.

There is no reason for anyone to carry a weapon within 100 feet of a polling place. None.

If you are such a lily-livered, hysterical coward that you think that you have to carry a weapon with you, lock it in your car when you go near a polling place. Presumably you have a leather gun case with a padlock on it.

I remember when Americans were not nuts.

Every single person who has ever objected to me being armed, did so because they had iIl intent.

So what is it that you want to do to these people that their being armed prevents you from doing?

 

[WEATHER53]

Polling places are gun free and protected by the well intended

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Michigan has a rino legislature but is ruled by an unholy trinity of Democrat women working to steal the election for the far left.

Michigan has never had a problem with voter intimidation, particularly with guns.

But out of the blue, recently, again without the legislature, the SOS issued an UNCONSTITUTIONAL EDICT that no one may open carry within 100 feet of a polling place.

She did this without consulting anyone, including law enforcement.

Now why do you suppose a Democrat, who has been slapped down so many times before, would put out another unconstitutional decree? The answer should be obvious

Hint: she is daring "gun nuts" to defy her order

Michigan police chiefs' leader: Open carry ban at polling places not based in law

The director of the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police says order by Secretary of State is unenforceable

www.google.com

Think it worse than that----

Dems are throwing the election into complete and utter chaos so no winner can be named. Neither will be awarded the 270 electoral votes----so Pelosi by Us law will then become leader on Jan. 20, 2021 because a new president can not be named without the electoral votes. Preventing voters from carrying weapons---allows BLM antifa BLACK PANTHERS to attack voters preventing the thugs from being shot ----------nullifying the election.

Vote early in person.....

That ain't the way it works. If the electors haven't cast their votes by the deadline to do so, it goes to the House of Representatives. Each state gets one vote, and the delegation of Reps from each state shall decide the vote for their state. Under no circumstances would Pelosi be sworn in as POTUS based on delayed election results.

 

[Moonglow]

Michigan has a rino legislature but is ruled by an unholy trinity of Democrat women working to steal the election for the far left.

Michigan has never had a problem with voter intimidation, particularly with guns.

But out of the blue, recently, again without the legislature, the SOS issued an UNCONSTITUTIONAL EDICT that no one may open carry within 100 feet of a polling place.

She did this without consulting anyone, including law enforcement.

Now why do you suppose a Democrat, who has been slapped down so many times before, would put out another unconstitutional decree? The answer should be obvious

Hint: she is daring "gun nuts" to defy her order

Michigan police chiefs' leader: Open carry ban at polling places not based in law

The director of the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police says order by Secretary of State is unenforceable

www.google.com

Do you ever bitch about the violation of the 4th amendment which occurs on a regular basis by state and fed on asset forfeiture or do you only care about the second and ignore the rest?

Asset forfeiture laws are a disgrace and should be struck down.

They have been by the federal supreme court and state supreme courts yet the LEO's and jurisprudence branch continue to violate them.

 

[Lysistrata]

This rule is just plain common sense.

There is no reason for anyone to carry a weapon within 100 feet of a polling place. None.

If you are such a lily-livered, hysterical coward that you think that you have to carry a weapon with you, lock it in your car when you go near a polling place. Presumably you have a leather gun case with a padlock on it.

I remember when Americans were not nuts.

Interesting. So according to you, you don’t need to have your gun on you near a polling place. Is there some magical spell that has been cast that grants protection around polling places? Tell me, where else don’t I need to carry a gun?
Perhaps you have some insight into the future you can share with everyone. Let people know exactly where they will be safe, and where they will be in danger.
Who needs firearms for personal protection, and police when we have you around? You can just let us know where to go that we will be safe.

Most people don't walk around in public with guns. Tell us what it is exactly that you are afraid of and why you are such a coward. It's the cowards WITH guns who make our public places unsafe. This is the only time in my entire life that we've seen these these little bearded bitch-boys running around in cammies with large penis-extenders showing off that they never grew up and never had parents fit to raise them. Those in my family who owned guns had locked leather cases for them.

Grow up.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

You people are the fascist pigs that need to be dealt with. Anyone who does then they should be arrested. It is time to deal with lawless thugs like you. The fact they hate the Governor is the exact reason why such a ban should be enforced

By your "logic" anyone who speaks ill of the president should not be allowed to own a gun

 

[Beef_Supreme]

Michigan has a rino legislature but is ruled by an unholy trinity of Democrat women working to steal the election for the far left.

Michigan has never had a problem with voter intimidation, particularly with guns.

But out of the blue, recently, again without the legislature, the SOS issued an UNCONSTITUTIONAL EDICT that no one may open carry within 100 feet of a polling place.

She did this without consulting anyone, including law enforcement.

Now why do you suppose a Democrat, who has been slapped down so many times before, would put out another unconstitutional decree? The answer should be obvious

Hint: she is daring "gun nuts" to defy her order

Michigan police chiefs' leader: Open carry ban at polling places not based in law

The director of the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police says order by Secretary of State is unenforceable

www.google.com

Do you ever bitch about the violation of the 4th amendment which occurs on a regular basis by state and fed on asset forfeiture or do you only care about the second and ignore the rest?

Asset forfeiture laws are a disgrace and should be struck down.

They have been by the federal supreme court and state supreme courts yet the LEO's and jurisprudence branch continue to violate them.

I agree.
Asset forfeiture laws are nothing but state sanctioned theft.
I am completely and utterly opposed to this BS.
I believe it’s a blatant abuse of power.

 

[Beef_Supreme]

This rule is just plain common sense.

There is no reason for anyone to carry a weapon within 100 feet of a polling place. None.

If you are such a lily-livered, hysterical coward that you think that you have to carry a weapon with you, lock it in your car when you go near a polling place. Presumably you have a leather gun case with a padlock on it.

I remember when Americans were not nuts.

Interesting. So according to you, you don’t need to have your gun on you near a polling place. Is there some magical spell that has been cast that grants protection around polling places? Tell me, where else don’t I need to carry a gun?
Perhaps you have some insight into the future you can share with everyone. Let people know exactly where they will be safe, and where they will be in danger.
Who needs firearms for personal protection, and police when we have you around? You can just let us know where to go that we will be safe.

Most people don't walk around in public with guns. Tell us what it is exactly that you are afraid of and why you are such a coward. It's the cowards WITH guns who make our public places unsafe. This is the only time in my entire life that we've seen these these little bearded bitch-boys running around in cammies with large penis-extenders showing off that they never grew up and never had parents fit to raise them. Those in my family who owned guns had locked leather cases for them.

Grow up.

Lol.
The old “you have a small penis” routine when it comes to guns.
Where donyou live exactly? The north east? I’d understand your nanny state mentality coming from those areas.
I’ll try and have a civil discussion with you about this.
People such as myself carry firearms because I believe it is my personal responsibility to provide for my safety as well as my family’s. I don’t have an armed security detail. I also don’t have a cop in my back pocket at all times. If you believe it is the governments responsibility to provide for your personal protection, good luck with that. I think there are tens of thousands (if not more) assaults, ratings, armed robbery, kidnappings, and murders each year that demonstrate that approach doesn’t work.
Police are law enforcement, and generally arrive after the crime has been committed. Their presence also prevents crime in society on the whole. But as demonstrated by the sheer volume of crimes that exist, they don’t protect you personally.

It is your God given right to protect yourself and your family. As such, firearms are a constitutionally recognized tool to do such. If you choose to go without, that’s on you. I hope you’re never put in the position where you need one.

As for openly carrying firearms,personally I’m not a fan of open carry. I don’t want anyone with ill intent seeing my weapon and getting any stupid ideas. I also know the sight of a weapon also sends some people (such as yourself, I’m betting) into a panic.
Since you’re calling people cowards, I think that piss your pants when seeing a weapon is pretty cowardly. I don’t want to deal with It. However, the visible carrying of weapons should not be restricted. Aside from your feels, is there some reason you are opposed to it? You like to cite the men open carrying long guns at the capital as your reference. Care to show me where any of those people attacked anyone, shot anyone, committed a crime in any way?
You can’t, because they didn’t. Instead they chose to make a political statement, did so peacefully, and left.
Gun control statistics and crime statistics clearly show that restricting firearms, banning xyz, etc has a negative impact on the crime rate. To argue otherwise either shows ignorance of the subject or dishonesty.
So since statistics completely goes against your position, is it safe to say your gun positions are all about feels? Or are you just unaware of the statistics?
In addition, what part of “shall not be infringed” is hard for you to understand?

 

[Lysistrata]

This rule is just plain common sense.

There is no reason for anyone to carry a weapon within 100 feet of a polling place. None.

If you are such a lily-livered, hysterical coward that you think that you have to carry a weapon with you, lock it in your car when you go near a polling place. Presumably you have a leather gun case with a padlock on it.

I remember when Americans were not nuts.

Interesting. So according to you, you don’t need to have your gun on you near a polling place. Is there some magical spell that has been cast that grants protection around polling places? Tell me, where else don’t I need to carry a gun?
Perhaps you have some insight into the future you can share with everyone. Let people know exactly where they will be safe, and where they will be in danger.
Who needs firearms for personal protection, and police when we have you around? You can just let us know where to go that we will be safe.

Most people don't walk around in public with guns. Tell us what it is exactly that you are afraid of and why you are such a coward. It's the cowards WITH guns who make our public places unsafe. This is the only time in my entire life that we've seen these these little bearded bitch-boys running around in cammies with large penis-extenders showing off that they never grew up and never had parents fit to raise them. Those in my family who owned guns had locked leather cases for them.

Grow up.

Lol.
The old “you have a small penis” routine when it comes to guns.
Where donyou live exactly? The north east? I’d understand your nanny state mentality coming from those areas.
I’ll try and have a civil discussion with you about this.
People such as myself carry firearms because I believe it is my personal responsibility to provide for my safety as well as my family’s. I don’t have an armed security detail. I also don’t have a cop in my back pocket at all times. If you believe it is the governments responsibility to provide for your personal protection, good luck with that. I think there are tens of thousands (if not more) assaults, ratings, armed robbery, kidnappings, and murders each year that demonstrate that approach doesn’t work.
Police are law enforcement, and generally arrive after the crime has been committed. Their presence also prevents crime in society on the whole. But as demonstrated by the sheer volume of crimes that exist, they don’t protect you personally.

It is your God given right to protect yourself and your family. As such, firearms are a constitutionally recognized tool to do such. If you choose to go without, that’s on you. I hope you’re never put in the position where you need one.

As for openly carrying firearms,personally I’m not a fan of open carry. I don’t want anyone with ill intent seeing my weapon and getting any stupid ideas. I also know the sight of a weapon also sends some people (such as yourself, I’m betting) into a panic.
Since you’re calling people cowards, I think that piss your pants when seeing a weapon is pretty cowardly. I don’t want to deal with It. However, the visible carrying of weapons should not be restricted. Aside from your feels, is there some reason you are opposed to it? You like to cite the men open carrying long guns at the capital as your reference. Care to show me where any of those people attacked anyone, shot anyone, committed a crime in any way?
You can’t, because they didn’t. Instead they chose to make a political statement, did so peacefully, and left.
Gun control statistics and crime statistics clearly show that restricting firearms, banning xyz, etc has a negative impact on the crime rate. To argue otherwise either shows ignorance of the subject or dishonesty.
So since statistics completely goes against your position, is it safe to say your gun positions are all about feels? Or are you just unaware of the statistics?
In addition, what part of “shall not be infringed” is hard for you to understand?

I'm from Jersey. I've lived in DC, and the DC suburbs in Maryland and Virginia. Was close enough for my bathroom to shake when the plane hit the Pentagon.

What high-crime area do you live in that you are so scared, little man?

My position on guns, particularly on assault weapons, has nothing to do with "feels." I have no way of judging the sanity of someone who would prance around in public with an assault weapon trying to intimidate people and/or trying to fool people into thinking that s/he is military, but there is cause to doubt it due to their monkey behavior. No one knows who is going to commit a crime until a crime is committed. Please note the asshole who raided the pizza parlor on Connecticut Ave. Please note the asshole who came from out of state to kill people in Kenosha. Some of these bitches in the Michigan state house were prancing around with long guns screaming, unmasked into the cops' faces. They fuck up like that in Richmond, too. A guy whom I was talking to at the supermarket two days ago told me that most of these bitches are from southern Virginia, which appears to be quite a zoo for the uncivilized.

The 2nd Amendment applies only to those in the National Guard.

Don't try to portray yourself to the public as having some sort of legitimate authority because you don't have any.

 

[Beef_Supreme]

This rule is just plain common sense.

There is no reason for anyone to carry a weapon within 100 feet of a polling place. None.

If you are such a lily-livered, hysterical coward that you think that you have to carry a weapon with you, lock it in your car when you go near a polling place. Presumably you have a leather gun case with a padlock on it.

I remember when Americans were not nuts.

Interesting. So according to you, you don’t need to have your gun on you near a polling place. Is there some magical spell that has been cast that grants protection around polling places? Tell me, where else don’t I need to carry a gun?
Perhaps you have some insight into the future you can share with everyone. Let people know exactly where they will be safe, and where they will be in danger.
Who needs firearms for personal protection, and police when we have you around? You can just let us know where to go that we will be safe.

Most people don't walk around in public with guns. Tell us what it is exactly that you are afraid of and why you are such a coward. It's the cowards WITH guns who make our public places unsafe. This is the only time in my entire life that we've seen these these little bearded bitch-boys running around in cammies with large penis-extenders showing off that they never grew up and never had parents fit to raise them. Those in my family who owned guns had locked leather cases for them.

Grow up.

Lol.
The old “you have a small penis” routine when it comes to guns.
Where donyou live exactly? The north east? I’d understand your nanny state mentality coming from those areas.
I’ll try and have a civil discussion with you about this.
People such as myself carry firearms because I believe it is my personal responsibility to provide for my safety as well as my family’s. I don’t have an armed security detail. I also don’t have a cop in my back pocket at all times. If you believe it is the governments responsibility to provide for your personal protection, good luck with that. I think there are tens of thousands (if not more) assaults, ratings, armed robbery, kidnappings, and murders each year that demonstrate that approach doesn’t work.
Police are law enforcement, and generally arrive after the crime has been committed. Their presence also prevents crime in society on the whole. But as demonstrated by the sheer volume of crimes that exist, they don’t protect you personally.

It is your God given right to protect yourself and your family. As such, firearms are a constitutionally recognized tool to do such. If you choose to go without, that’s on you. I hope you’re never put in the position where you need one.

As for openly carrying firearms,personally I’m not a fan of open carry. I don’t want anyone with ill intent seeing my weapon and getting any stupid ideas. I also know the sight of a weapon also sends some people (such as yourself, I’m betting) into a panic.
Since you’re calling people cowards, I think that piss your pants when seeing a weapon is pretty cowardly. I don’t want to deal with It. However, the visible carrying of weapons should not be restricted. Aside from your feels, is there some reason you are opposed to it? You like to cite the men open carrying long guns at the capital as your reference. Care to show me where any of those people attacked anyone, shot anyone, committed a crime in any way?
You can’t, because they didn’t. Instead they chose to make a political statement, did so peacefully, and left.
Gun control statistics and crime statistics clearly show that restricting firearms, banning xyz, etc has a negative impact on the crime rate. To argue otherwise either shows ignorance of the subject or dishonesty.
So since statistics completely goes against your position, is it safe to say your gun positions are all about feels? Or are you just unaware of the statistics?
In addition, what part of “shall not be infringed” is hard for you to understand?

I'm from Jersey. I've lived in DC, and the DC suburbs in Maryland and Virginia. Was close enough for my bathroom to shake when the plane hit the Pentagon.

What high-crime area do you live in that you are so scared, little man?

My position on guns, particularly on assault weapons, has nothing to do with "feels." I have no way of judging the sanity of someone who would prance around in public with an assault weapon trying to intimidate people and/or trying to fool people into thinking that s/he is military, but there is cause to doubt it due to their monkey behavior. No one knows who is going to commit a crime until a crime is committed. Please note the asshole who raided the pizza parlor on Connecticut Ave. Please note the asshole who came from out of state to kill people in Kenosha. Some of these bitches in the Michigan state house were prancing around with long guns screaming, unmasked into the cops' faces. They fuck up like that in Richmond, too. A guy whom I was talking to at the supermarket two days ago told me that most of these bitches are from southern Virginia, which appears to be quite a zoo for the uncivilized.

The 2nd Amendment applies only to those in the National Guard.

Don't try to portray yourself to the public as having some sort of legitimate authority because you don't have any.

I tuned out when you started with the “little man”, followed by using the term “assault weapon”.
You’re a brain dead lemming, and I won’t waste my time.
And FYI... I’m far from a little man. I’d bet solid money I could crush you like a grape.

 

[Coyote]

Michigan has a rino legislature but is ruled by an unholy trinity of Democrat women working to steal the election for the far left.

Michigan has never had a problem with voter intimidation, particularly with guns.

But out of the blue, recently, again without the legislature, the SOS issued an UNCONSTITUTIONAL EDICT that no one may open carry within 100 feet of a polling place.

She did this without consulting anyone, including law enforcement.

Now why do you suppose a Democrat, who has been slapped down so many times before, would put out another unconstitutional decree? The answer should be obvious

Hint: she is daring "gun nuts" to defy her order

Michigan police chiefs' leader: Open carry ban at polling places not based in law

The director of the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police says order by Secretary of State is unenforceable

www.google.com

Given THIS, breaking into the Michigan statehouse....

and the fact that people would even think of bringing guns to the polls in these heated times...she is 100% right.

Guns don't belong at polls. If you consider THIS to be "voter intimidation"

then what do you think armed 2nd Amenders are?

 

[Beef_Supreme]

Michigan has a rino legislature but is ruled by an unholy trinity of Democrat women working to steal the election for the far left.

Michigan has never had a problem with voter intimidation, particularly with guns.

But out of the blue, recently, again without the legislature, the SOS issued an UNCONSTITUTIONAL EDICT that no one may open carry within 100 feet of a polling place.

She did this without consulting anyone, including law enforcement.

Now why do you suppose a Democrat, who has been slapped down so many times before, would put out another unconstitutional decree? The answer should be obvious

Hint: she is daring "gun nuts" to defy her order

Michigan police chiefs' leader: Open carry ban at polling places not based in law

The director of the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police says order by Secretary of State is unenforceable

www.google.com

Given THIS, breaking into the Michigan statehouse....

and the fact that people would even think of bringing guns to the polls in these heated times...she is 100% right.

Guns don't belong at polls. If you consider THIS to be "voter intimidation"

then what do you think armed 2nd Amenders are?

Going and voting, while carrying a weapon, and leaving, shouldn’t be an issue. Assuming the person isn’t standing around, verbally engaging people, etc.
Standing around the polls with a weapon, talking shit to people, is outrageous. Whether it’s done by the guy with an American flag T-shirt or the shit bird black panthers shown above.
Again, I believe it’s the actions that are at issue, not the weapon you carry.

Now don’t misunderstand my position.
I don’t believe someone should open carry to the polls. It can be visibly intimidating to people. Yes, I do think that is their personal problem, and I think shitting ones pants at the sight of a person armed is a sign of either poor psychological development or some kind of lost traumatic stress problem (the person was raped, assaulted, robbed, etc). But while I believe I do have the right to carry a weapon, I don’t visibly do so because I don’t want to cause people distress. I think it’s part of ones personal responsibility when they choose to exercise their constitutional rights, to do so responsibly and with consideration.

In this instance, Stretchin Gretchen is exceeding her authority to “order” people not to carry weapons at the polls. If she was a thoughtful, respectful leader, she should have politely asked people not to OPENLY carry weapons at the poll for the sakes of those who could be scared/frightened/intimidated etc, despite their right to do so.

So to sum it up...
I believe people have the right to carry weapons, whether concealed or openly, as spelled out clearly in our founding documents and elaborated on one the federalist papers. I also believe that being a citizen who is respectful of ones fellow citizens is important, and I personally would not OPENLY carry one of my weapons at a poll out of consideration for my fellow citizens who may be scared by this (even if I think their fear is misplaced).

Does that sound reasonable enough? I believe it’s a rather well thought out and reasoned position.