Michele Bachmann: Gay community wants to let adults "prey on little children sexually

[mal]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-f...old-harvey-milk-fucking-15-year-old-boys.html

^There it is... Finally.



peace...

 

[bodecea]

You must grow tired of trying to justify your disgusting perverted lifestyle

Wait...I'm not the alcoholic...am I.

Dunno, are you? Either way thats irrelevant since you liberals have defined that a disease. Umless you consider cancer, an actual disease, a lifestyle. ..

Just a quick check...was that post designed to make sense?

 

[bodecea]

Regardless of what one person thinks....the OP misses the 900lb. elephant in the room.
What is the benefit of removing consent laws, or lowering them to 14, or in some cases 16?
What specific reason is there to do this?
Answer that and you will see, maybe she isn't so crazy after all.

And yet...and yet, consent laws in this country are going up.....you see, gays are parents too and we wish our children protected from predators too.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Wait...I'm not the alcoholic...am I.

Dunno, are you? Either way thats irrelevant since you liberals have defined that a disease. Umless you consider cancer, an actual disease, a lifestyle. ..

Just a quick check...was that post designed to make sense?

Not to the logic impaired

 

[Seawytch]

No, that's what some believe (minus the hyperbole) You channel them well.



I have a "chip" regarding all religious extremists...those that use the bible to justify racism, misogyny and anti gay bigotry.

You're just arguing shades of grey. You've consistently shown an inability to process what you are told in grand fashion, the exact degree of nuts that you are I'll let you discuss with your shrink.



If you want serious debate/discussion with me, you have to stop being so nuts and respond to what I actually said rather than running around with a chip on your shoulder knocking it off yourself and saying to everyone, there, did you see what kaz did?



In fairness, I do recognize you are nuts with everyone else too, it's not just me. I'm only not willing to waste my time writing serious posts with someone who can't process what I said. I am willing to have fun though.

She's got you that bad, eh?

Yup. He likes to argue where he wants the world to be, not where it IS. He'd like gubmit out of all marriage (while being legally married) but won't take a position on whether gays should have access to the same license he has, just keeps saying nobody should get one.

 

[bodecea]

Dunno, are you? Either way uthats irrelevant since you liberals have defined that a disease. Umless you consider cancer, an actual disease, a lifestyle. ..

Just a quick check...was that post designed to make sense?

Not to the logic impaired

Aka....the sober....

 

[mal]

Just a quick check...was that post designed to make sense?

Not to the logic impaired

Aka....the sober....

Project much Kilt #1?...



peace...

 

[bodecea]

Regardless of what one person thinks....the OP misses the 900lb. elephant in the room.
What is the benefit of removing consent laws, or lowering them to 14, or in some cases 16?
What specific reason is there to do this?
Answer that and you will see, maybe she isn't so crazy after all.

Ah...the elephant in the room...that's an apt analogy.

 

[kaz]

No, that's what some believe (minus the hyperbole) You channel them well.

I have a "chip" regarding all religious extremists...those that use the bible to justify racism, misogyny and anti gay bigotry.

You're just arguing shades of grey. You've consistently shown an inability to process what you are told in grand fashion, the exact degree of nuts that you are I'll let you discuss with your shrink.

If you want serious debate/discussion with me, you have to stop being so nuts and respond to what I actually said rather than running around with a chip on your shoulder knocking it off yourself and saying to everyone, there, did you see what kaz did?

In fairness, I do recognize you are nuts with everyone else too, it's not just me. I'm only not willing to waste my time writing serious posts with someone who can't process what I said. I am willing to have fun though.

She's got you that bad, eh?

That's why I try to just stick to the Christian, Republican homophobe rhetoric, thanks for the reminder. She did draw me into another pointless post.

 

[kaz]

Yup. He likes to argue where he wants the world to be, not where it IS. He'd like gubmit out of all marriage (while being legally married) but won't take a position on whether gays should have access to the same license he has, just keeps saying nobody should get one.

You really want to be considered average and normal, LOL. Explains your constant need for validation.

Here you are, you're gay, and you're OK.



I am not average, I am not normal, and I have zero desire to be.

 

[GreenBean]

Wassa matter? Got busted and don't want to admit it? Which do you favor Kaz, different age of consent for gays and straights, same age of consent? Sex only for procreation?

I see, you put the egg timer on and it's my responsibility to answer before it runs out. More of your crap.

I answered the question the OP asked, where would Bachmann get such an idea. I don't perscribe to the liberal theory that facts are introduced or ignored based on the position being argued. It was a factual answer.

However I am curious also....so you think it was acceptable for the UK to have a different age limit for gays than they did for heteros?

Heterosexual activity is a normal productive and healthy Human Drive.
Homosexual activity is an abnormal counter-productive and unhealthy sub human perversion. No amount of propaganda can ever change that .

The logic behind the differring ages of consent - I would compare to allowiing a minor to drink and drug it up unrestricted - forcing a young or man or woman time to mature a bit further [hopefully] before the law will comdone persons with mental issues [homosexuals] the opportunity to descend into the bowels of homosexual debauchery. ... Got it ?

 

[UllysesS.Archer]

Yes, the objective of gays is to strike at the pillars of society to join them in their moral depravity. That is why gay sex is an abomination in the 10 commandments and Jesus spoke against it so fervently and frequently. Murder is almost as bad as homosexual fornication.

Are you a closet liberal? Because you don't read the Bible much, to think you know something about It.

And a statement like murder is ALMOST as bad as homosexual acts is just ridiculous.

Makes me wonder if you aren't a closet liberal, perhaps one planted by wytch and bodecea, to make the duck dynasty stars look brilliant.

My post is not serious. Seawytch thinks that's what Christians think, she has a big chip on her shoulder. I don't take her seriously. I'm mocking Seawytch, not Christians.

OH, ok, that explains it. I just mostly ignore wytch, she thinks with a hive mind, whatever the hive says, is what she thinks, so pretty much useless.

 

[UllysesS.Archer]

No I didn't get it backwards - just typed it backwards sometimes my fingers go faster than my brain [That's your Cue Billy P - come up with a smart ass comment]

As for the rest of your post - a very basic answer would be "Common Sense" however - I lack the time at the moment to fully address it - ill get back to ya . Ciao

There is a plethora of evidence and reason to believe pedophiles choose victims based on access more than anything else. This is one reason why victims are often family members of friends of the pedophiles. Common sense is on my side, and you have no argument to refute it.

That family member or friend componentis huge...so much so that they are the first suspects in molestation cases...particularly males.

It is huge, especially if a friend is gay, they should be the first suspect, since 1 in 3 pedophiles is homosexual, and they have a much greater rate of being child molesters than heterosexuals do.

 

[kaz]

The logic behind the differring ages of consent - I would compare to allowiing a minor to drink and drug it up unrestricted - forcing a young or man or woman time to mature a bit further [hopefully] before the law will comdone persons with mental issues [homosexuals] the opportunity to descend into the bowels of homosexual debauchery. ... Got it ?

No one who is gay at 16 is going to be suddenly straight at 18. And they aren't going to respect that heteros can have sex and the can't. Do you not see the down side of teaching people to not respect the law because the law is not worthy of respect?

If you oppose people being gay, you need to do it through private means and not public backed by the force of government making people's choices for them. The consequence of what you propose is all negative.

 

[UllysesS.Archer]

How about Harvey Milk , a drug distributor and predator of young boys - should he be tried posthumously ??

Feel free to file charges.

Wow.. Considering you Lied about the ages of Robertson and his Wife you sure seem to not care that Milk Preyed on 15 year olds when he was 33.



peace...

That's because it was a 15 year old boy, and bodecea could care less about boy's being molested, even though many of those boys grow up to become pedophiles themselves, according to the specialists, some even become rapists, wonder if she ever thought about that. Wait, bodecea and thought, what an oxymoron that is.

 

[kaz]

[It is huge, especially if a friend is gay, they should be the first suspect, since 1 in 3 pedophiles is homosexual, and they have a much greater rate of being child molesters than heterosexuals do.

You're making a massive causal relationship assumption there which has been in no way established

 

[ShackledNation]

I see, you put the egg timer on and it's my responsibility to answer before it runs out. More of your crap.

I answered the question the OP asked, where would Bachmann get such an idea. I don't perscribe to the liberal theory that facts are introduced or ignored based on the position being argued. It was a factual answer.

However I am curious also....so you think it was acceptable for the UK to have a different age limit for gays than they did for heteros?

Homosexual activity is an abnormal counter-productive and unhealthy sub human perversion.

Nope, and there is no valid reason to believe that.

 

[bodecea]

There is a plethora of evidence and reason to believe pedophiles choose victims based on access more than anything else. This is one reason why victims are often family members of friends of the pedophiles. Common sense is on my side, and you have no argument to refute it.

That family member or friend componentis huge...so much so that they are the first suspects in molestation cases...particularly males.

It is huge, especially if a friend is gay, they should be the first suspect, since 1 in 3 pedophiles is homosexual, and they have a much greater rate of being child molesters than heterosexuals do.

Nope...fathers...brothers...uncles....crime of opportunity....and quite often married and looking quite "respectable".

 

[UllysesS.Archer]

[It is huge, especially if a friend is gay, they should be the first suspect, since 1 in 3 pedophiles is homosexual, and they have a much greater rate of being child molesters than heterosexuals do.

You're making a massive causal relationship assumption there which has been in no way established

1 in 3 molestations are by homosexuals, less than 1 in 20 people are homosexual

2 in 3 molestations are by heterosexuals, more than 19 in 20 people are heterosexual.

See the imbalance there?

 

[kaz]

[It is huge, especially if a friend is gay, they should be the first suspect, since 1 in 3 pedophiles is homosexual, and they have a much greater rate of being child molesters than heterosexuals do.

You're making a massive causal relationship assumption there which has been in no way established

1 in 3 molestations are by homosexuals, less than 1 in 20 people are homosexual

2 in 3 molestations are by heterosexuals, more than 19 in 20 people are heterosexual.

See the imbalance there?

I didn't say I disputed your statistic, I said you were making a huge assumption about a causal relationship.

Children look a lot more a like than adults. A pedophile who molests boys and girls would certainly be "homosexual." However, that does not mean they have sex with gay men and it would certainly not be that gay men who have sex with gay men are any more likely to be pedophile.

I am not arguing that is the case either, I am just saying factual data can be very misleading reading regarding causal relationships. Just so you know, I was a math major and also a six sigma blackbelt. Six sigma is a data driven business process quality program.