Merchan stands firm on hush money case.

[toobfreak]

Assuming Patel is confirmed,

He will be without a doubt.

what pretense will he use for Merchan's removal?

34 false felonies.

BTW, I appreciate how honest some of you folks are about the authoritarian way the trump admin intends to act.

If Trump were authoritarian, you wouldn't still be here.

 

[Man With A Plan]

That's what a trial is for. trump's attorneys presented his side of the argument and the trial jury rejected it because the evidence shown to the grand jury was overwhelming in its proof of trump's guilt.

Of course the evidence shown to the Grand Jury was "overwhelming" in it's proof of guilt, you idiot! The only evidence that's SHOWN to a Grand Jury is evidence of guilt! The defense doesn't get to show any evidence otherwise!

 

[JohnDB]

the testimony given by ALL PARTIES have stated that Trump didn't do anything....he is not guilty.

But that's not relevant information for some reason.

 

[JohnDB]

Assuming Patel is confirmed, what pretense will he use for Merchan's removal?

BTW, I appreciate how honest some of you folks are about the authoritarian way the trump admin intends to act.

Because of his indirect ties to the Democratic Party through his daughter receiving millions of dollars....then there's the evidence and testimony he flatly has ignored of all principals in the case stating Trump is not guilty of what he is being charged with.

 

[WEATHER53]

One final zealot witch hunter desperately hanging on for the spotlight while higher authorities have already declared him in error.

 

[WEATHER53]

the testimony given by ALL PARTIES have stated that Trump didn't do anything....he is not guilty.

But that's not relevant information for some reason.

Libs think grand juries make one a convict
They merely refer it up the ladder for further investigation

 

[Rawley]

In trumpworld the difference between a kangaroo court and a legitimate one is only decisions going in trump's favor legitimizes a court's ruling.

If a grand jury votes to indict based on the evidence it must be corrupt.
If a jury votes to convict based on the evidence it must be corrupt.
If a DA tries a case based on an indictment he/she must be corrupt.
If a SC tries a case based on an indictment he/she must be corrupt.

That's trumpworld in a nutshell.

And that, in a nutshell, is why America resoundingly kicked your condescending cult and it's corrupt ideology to the curb last month.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Trumpy falsified his business records in order to hide paying off a porn star and improve his image for the 2016 election. But you knew that already.

Statute of limitations already ran-out on this business record issue.
And where your proof that Trump had an affair with woman?

Porn star: I didn't have sex with Trump

An adult film star who previously alleged an extramarital affair with Donald Trump now says in a statement the affair never happened. A lawyer for porn actress Stormy Daniels confirmed his client&#…

nypost.com

 

[kyzr]

the testimony given by ALL PARTIES have stated that Trump didn't do anything....he is not guilty.

But that's not relevant information for some reason.

The head of the FEC wasn't even allowed to testify that there was no Federal Election crime.

 

[WEATHER53]

One final zealot witch hunter desperately hanging on for the spotlight while higher authorities have already declared him in error.

He paid her which is fine so they had to pretzel twist something else into a crime which they Feel was the nature of the account it came from
Microscopic witch hunting

 

[Arlette]

Yes we knew that, the FEC said it wasn't a crime.

Is that so?

 

[WorldWatcher]

Statute of limitations already ran-out on this business record issue.

No it hadn't he was charged with felonies not misdemeanors.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

The head of the FEC wasn't even allowed to testify that there was no Federal Election crime.

Because Trump wasn't charged with Federal Election crime he was charged with New York State Falsification of business records.

The FEC official WAS allowed to testify, but only to the extend to his area of historical knowledge of federal law, his testimony on New York Business Law was restricted and the defense choose not to call him.

W

 

[JohnDB]

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

No it hadn't he was charged with felonies not misdemeanors.

WW

it will be nuked in an appeal

 

[WorldWatcher]

it will be nuked in an appeal

Still doesn't change the fact that the Statute of Limitations had not expired for the felony crimes for which the jury convicted him.

And if he does win on appeal it doesn't mean he didn't commit the crimes, it means he will get off on a technicality because he's rich.

WW

 

[WEATHER53]

Still doesn't change the fact that the Statute of Limitations had not expired for the felony crimes for which the jury convicted him.

And if he does win on appeal it doesn't mean he didn't commit the crimes, it means he will get off on a technicality because he's rich.

WW

Except all the “felonies” were from an issue that’s not illegal

 

[Contumacious]

Still doesn't change the fact that the Statute of Limitations had not expired for the felony crimes for which the jury convicted him.

And if he does win on appeal it doesn't mean he didn't commit the crimes, it means he will get off on a technicality because he's rich.

WW

No Crime, no trial, no impartial judge , no conviction

 

[WorldWatcher]

Except all the “felonies” were from an issue that’s not illegal

It is illegal in New York to falsify business records to hide or aid in another crime.

It's a felony.

(And no, the crime was not paying for an NDA.)

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

No Crime,

There was a crime.

no trial,

There was a trial.

no impartial judge ,

There judge was impartial.

no conviction

Trump was convicted by the jury.

WW