Merchan stands firm on hush money case.

Nothing to prove, he tried and convicted......34-Times
Convicted in a Kangaroo Court means nothing, those 34 felonies will be overturned based on the LAW.
However, after the instructions became public, I wrote a column that I thought the case was nearly un-winnable, even for those of us who previously saw a chance for a hung jury. Clarence Darrow would likely have lost with those instructions after the errors in the case by Judge Juan Merchan.
 
You forgot about the grand jury and the trial jury. Both found the evidence convincing.
With illegal instructions by Merchan
However, after the instructions became public, I wrote a column that I thought the case was nearly un-winnable, even for those of us who previously saw a chance for a hung jury. Clarence Darrow would likely have lost with those instructions after the errors in the case by Judge Juan Merchan.
 
He gets to appeal the kangaroo court's lawfare.
In trumpworld the difference between a kangaroo court and a legitimate one is only decisions going in trump's favor legitimizes a court's ruling.

If a grand jury votes to indict based on the evidence it must be corrupt.
If a jury votes to convict based on the evidence it must be corrupt.
If a DA tries a case based on an indictment he/she must be corrupt.
If a SC tries a case based on an indictment he/she must be corrupt.

That's trumpworld in a nutshell.
 
In trumpworld the difference between a kangaroo court and a legitimate one is only decisions going in trump's favor legitimizes a court's ruling.

If a grand jury votes to indict based on the evidence it must be corrupt.
If a jury votes to convict based on the evidence it must be corrupt.
If a DA tries a case based on an indictment he/she must be corrupt.
If a SC tries a case based on an indictment he/she must be corrupt.

That's trumpworld in a nutshell.
The American People have overwhelming REJECTED your fucking SOVIET LAWFARE BULLSHIT, you pathetic asshole.
 
In trumpworld the difference between a kangaroo court and a legitimate one is only decisions going in trump's favor legitimizes a court's ruling.

If a grand jury votes to indict based on the evidence it must be corrupt.
If a jury votes to convict based on the evidence it must be corrupt.
If a DA tries a case based on an indictment he/she must be corrupt.
If a SC tries a case based on an indictment he/she must be corrupt.

That's trumpworld in a nutshell.

The taint of the Democrats' lawfare has stained the NY legal system for all time.
 
Technically, as far as a conviction goes, there is none. So there is nothing to appeal.

if he were so inclined, then suppose he could demand that the court do its job and set a sentencing date. Then, after sentencing, he can finally file an appeal.

I’m not sure this is in his best interest.
the whole mess is designed so that Democrats can lie to everyone that Trump is a convicted felon.

The EJ Carroll trial was designed to give them the false talking-point that Trump is a rapist.

It doesn't matter what the truth is anymore with these scumbags.
 
In trumpworld the difference between a kangaroo court and a legitimate one is only decisions going in trump's favor legitimizes a court's ruling.
If a grand jury votes to indict based on the evidence it must be corrupt.
If a jury votes to convict based on the evidence it must be corrupt.
If a DA tries a case based on an indictment he/she must be corrupt.
If a SC tries a case based on an indictment he/she must be corrupt.
That's trumpworld in a nutshell.
Merchan ran a Kangaroo Court. His jury instructions were illegal. The 34 felonies will be overturned on appeal.
I just hope Pam Bondi can find something to indict Bragg and Merchan on, like "prosecutorial misconduct" or "election interference".
 
the whole mess is designed so that Democrats can lie to everyone that Trump is a convicted felon.

The EJ Carroll trial was designed to give them the false talking-point that Trump is a rapist.

It doesn't matter what the truth is anymore with these scumbags.

All that Democrat lying and lawfare, and Trump still won. :laughing0301:
 
The taint of the Democrats' lawfare has stained the NY legal system for all time.
That's the answer of a person who has been called out for being a member of trumpworld and has no defense.
 
All that Democrat lying and lawfare, and Trump still won. :laughing0301:
As I have acknowledged before, I didn't think some temporary economic hardship would cause people to vote for a traitor, a serial, admitted sexual abuser, a felon, a professional conman, and someone who broke the law by failing to comply with a subpoena. I was wrong.
 
Trump won the election. Trump haters are the minority.
I get the feeling you think pointing out trump won the election somehow changes the reality of what he is, what he's done, the legitimacy of the criminal cases against him, and what he's promised to do.
It doesn't. It just makes you look like an idiot.
 
I get the feeling you think pointing out trump won the election somehow changes the reality of what he is, what he's done, the legitimacy of the criminal cases against him, and what he's promised to do.
It doesn't. It just makes you look like an idiot.

These lawfare cases won't last through the appeals process.
 
In the opinion of a LAW PROFESSOR, who actually knows the LAW.
A law professor who is a shill. Whatever opinion right wing media needs he has one.
 
The judge’s ruling preserves, at least for now, the stain of Mr. Trump’s criminal conviction. And if it withstands Mr. Trump’s appeal, it will make him the first felon to serve as president.
The first president who is a convicted felon is a Republican – comes as a surprise to no one.
 
Back
Top Bottom