Maybe THIS Is Why Liberals Are Freaked Out Over Latest USSC Decision

[easyt65]

As Democrats continue to threaten USSC Justices, call for intimidation and violence against them, and incite assassination attempts against the Justices...

As liberal extremist domestic terrorists continue to attack and bomb churches, family centers, and pro-life group's ...

As Garland refuses to enforce US law to protect the USSC Justices...

Suddenly the USSC 'shoots down' attempted liberal restrictions on Concealed Cary Weapons....

...and Violent leftists suddenly realize that more of the American people they have been threatening, attacking, and bombing could be armed, carrying concealed weapons to protect themselves....

...amazing continuing their lawless, violent tantrums more dangerous.


I opined a year or so ago that the left would not slow down/ stop its assault on Conservatives / others when it does not get its way UNTIL Conservative with a CCP and / or a legal weapon defended themselves from such an attack and ended up shooting some leftist thug or domestic terrorist.

Enter Kyle Rittenhouse. Leftists attacked him, chased him, hit him with a skateboard, and when he felt his life was threatened, that he may lose his life, he shot and killed 1 attacker and wounded another.

Leftists went berserk- how DARE he defend himself?! How could he be allowed to do that?!

Biden, Garland, and the DOJ are setting the proverbial table for it to happen again.

Garland's job is to enforce the rule of law / US law, and he's refusing to do so. He is protecting Vientiane liberals and leftist domestic terrorists who have perpetrated over 2 dozen domestic terrorist bombings.

Instead of making it plain to these criminals this is not tolerated he is facilitating it.

So when the USSC finally gets around to releasing the decision and criminal leftist animals take to the streets to engage in 'mostly peaceful protests', I don't want to hear one damn word from the board Leftists when a legally armed Conservative shoots and kills some leftist thug or domestic terrorist in self-defense or the defense of their business / property.

Lack of law results in vigilanteism / the mandatory need for one to protect themselves....

This is on Garland.

And thanks to the USSC's recent decision, picking the 'right' target (an unarmed one) for violent Leftists just got a little harder.

BREAKING: Supreme Court Issues Landmark Ruling Solidifying Gun Rights

pjmedia.com

 

[Rambunctious]

The 2nd amendment is not there to protect hunting... its there to keep a tyrannical government in check... the same kind of government that is in NY today saying they won't obey this ruling...

 

[BULLDOG]

The courts are 1/3 of our government. Gun nuts demand access to military style weapons because it is important for our government to be afraid of the people. Your logic demands the Supremes be afraid, doesn't it?

 

[BULLDOG]

The 2nd amendment is not there to protect hunting... its there to keep a tyrannical government in check... the same kind of government that is in NY today saying they won't obey this ruling...

You never know when you might have to try another insurrection, right?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Your logic demands the Supremes be afraid, doesn't it?

No, but yours does.

"Rule the way we want or we will riot, attack crisis pregnancy centers, picket your homes, doxx your kids, and try to assassinate you"

That's. Peak. You.

 

[easyt65]

The 2nd amendment is not there to protect hunting... its there to keep a tyrannical government in check... the same kind of government that is in NY today saying they won't obey this ruling...

No argument there...

 

[1srelluc]

The courts are 1/3 of our government. Gun nuts demand access to military style weapons because it is important for our government to be afraid of the people. Your logic demands the Supremes be afraid, doesn't it?

The .gov should always be conscious of the people that employ them.....You can take "conscious" anyway you want.

 

[scruffy]

View attachment 661441

As Democrats continue to threaten USSC Justices, call for intimidation and violence against them, and incite assassination attempts against the Justices...

As liberal extremist domestic terrorists continue to attack and bomb churches, family centers, and pro-life group's ...

As Garland refuses to enforce US law to protect the USSC Justices...

Suddenly the USSC 'shoots down' attempted liberal restrictions on Concealed Cary Weapons....

...and Violent leftists suddenly realize that more of the American people they have been threatening, attacking, and bombing could be armed, carrying concealed weapons to protect themselves....

...amazing continuing their lawless, violent tantrums more dangerous.


I opined a year or so ago that the left would not slow down/ stop its assault on Conservatives / others when it does not get its way UNTIL Conservative with a CCP and / or a legal weapon defended themselves from such an attack and ended up shooting some leftist thug or domestic terrorist.

Enter Kyle Rittenhouse. Leftists attacked him, chased him, hit him with a skateboard, and when he felt his life was threatened, that he may lose his life, he shot and killed 1 attacker and wounded another.

Leftists went berserk- how DARE he defend himself?! How could he be allowed to do that?!

Biden, Garland, and the DOJ are setting the proverbial table for it to happen again.

Garland's job is to enforce the rule of law / US law, and he's refusing to do so. He is protecting Vientiane liberals and leftist domestic terrorists who have perpetrated over 2 dozen domestic terrorist bombings.

Instead of making it plain to these criminals this is not tolerated he is facilitating it.

So when the USSC finally gets around to releasing the decision and criminal leftist animals take to the streets to engage in 'mostly peaceful protests', I don't want to hear one damn word from the board Leftists when a legally armed Conservative shoots and kills some leftist thug or domestic terrorist in self-defense or the defense of their business / property.

Lack of law results in vigilanteism / the mandatory need for one to protect themselves....

This is on Garland.

And thanks to the USSC's recent decision, picking the 'right' target (an unarmed one) for violent Leftists just got a little harder.

BREAKING: Supreme Court Issues Landmark Ruling Solidifying Gun Rights

pjmedia.com

A) I like this SCOTUS ruling and I'm grateful for it, but it doesn't impact me much. I defend my family whether or not the Court agrees.

B) I hope every old Asian lady in NY starts carrying, and

C) if I ever see any terrorism I'm going to make the perp's life short and miserable (not necessarily in that order). That specifically includes any threatening of children. Such will not be allowed or tolerated

 

[BULLDOG]

No, but yours does.

"Rule the way we want or we will riot, attack crisis pregnancy centers, picket your homes, doxx your kids, and try to assassinate you"

That's. Peak. You.

Your crazy is showing again.

 

[BULLDOG]

The .gov should always be conscious of the people that employ them.....You can take "conscious" anyway you want.

The often stated term is fear. The government should fear the people. Are you trying to pretend you haven't read that hundreds of times here?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Your crazy is showing again.

Once again, that's you.

Unless you condemn the rioting, the firebombing of crisis pregnancy centers, the picketing of justices' homes, the doxxing of ACB's children, or the attempted assassination of Brett Kavanaugh, the crazy is LITERALLY you.

 

[1srelluc]

The often stated term is fear. The government should fear the people. Are you trying to pretend you haven't read that hundreds of times here?

"Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty." - John Basil Barnhill (anti-socialist author)

If that is what you are referring to I've shied away from it because people always attribute it to Thomas Jefferson when in fact it was not coined till 1914 by Mr. Barnhill.

While it's no less true the fact is Jefferson never said it.

 

[pknopp]

I love the ruling. No longer will cops be able yell "gun, gun, gun" and start blasting away.

 

[BluesLegend]

Liberals are incredibly intolerant of any opinion that differs from their own. Even when backed up by the U.S. Constitution and common sense.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

View attachment 661441

As Democrats continue to threaten USSC Justices, call for intimidation and violence against them, and incite assassination attempts against the Justices...

As liberal extremist domestic terrorists continue to attack and bomb churches, family centers, and pro-life group's ...

As Garland refuses to enforce US law to protect the USSC Justices...

Suddenly the USSC 'shoots down' attempted liberal restrictions on Concealed Cary Weapons....

...and Violent leftists suddenly realize that more of the American people they have been threatening, attacking, and bombing could be armed, carrying concealed weapons to protect themselves....

...amazing continuing their lawless, violent tantrums more dangerous.


I opined a year or so ago that the left would not slow down/ stop its assault on Conservatives / others when it does not get its way UNTIL Conservative with a CCP and / or a legal weapon defended themselves from such an attack and ended up shooting some leftist thug or domestic terrorist.

Enter Kyle Rittenhouse. Leftists attacked him, chased him, hit him with a skateboard, and when he felt his life was threatened, that he may lose his life, he shot and killed 1 attacker and wounded another.

Leftists went berserk- how DARE he defend himself?! How could he be allowed to do that?!

Biden, Garland, and the DOJ are setting the proverbial table for it to happen again.

Garland's job is to enforce the rule of law / US law, and he's refusing to do so. He is protecting Vientiane liberals and leftist domestic terrorists who have perpetrated over 2 dozen domestic terrorist bombings.

Instead of making it plain to these criminals this is not tolerated he is facilitating it.

So when the USSC finally gets around to releasing the decision and criminal leftist animals take to the streets to engage in 'mostly peaceful protests', I don't want to hear one damn word from the board Leftists when a legally armed Conservative shoots and kills some leftist thug or domestic terrorist in self-defense or the defense of their business / property.

Lack of law results in vigilanteism / the mandatory need for one to protect themselves....

This is on Garland.

And thanks to the USSC's recent decision, picking the 'right' target (an unarmed one) for violent Leftists just got a little harder.

BREAKING: Supreme Court Issues Landmark Ruling Solidifying Gun Rights

pjmedia.com

Just remember when the corrupt FBI, the ones that incited the entering of the Capitol on Jan 6th, shows up at your neighbors door, send them a message that we dont want them around our neighborhood anymore.

Do as Maxine Waters had said. Maybe send a few rounds their way...

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Liberals are incredibly intolerant of any opinion that differs from their own. Even when backed up by the U.S. Constitution and common sense.

 

[1srelluc]

View attachment 661457

Damn, I hope that woman isn't a proctologist.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I love the ruling. No longer will cops be able yell "gun, gun, gun" and start blasting away.

Sounds like one of Eric Gascon's interns got loose.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Liberals are incredibly intolerant of any opinion that differs from their own. Even when backed up by the U.S. Constitution and common sense.

Replace even with especially and you’ve nailed it.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

View attachment 661457

Did ET become a trans liberal?