Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NoCutting credit card interest rates from 90% to 45%
Socialism?
I dont know of any of them being against all regulations,,So now you're going to explain to your fellow right wing wack jobs on here how you are for regulating businesses. You now have the floor to do so.
What wont they do for him?
because that would be a price control, not a usury law.Why not just cap gas at $2?
Gas everyone needs. Low interest credit cards isn’t a need. It’s a want. Why not cap gas at $2?why should he??
Both proposals are socialism. In the past Dems have proposed similar legislation and repubs were against. Dems seriously opposed citizens united. Now Trump is proposing caps on credit rates as is Hawley. Hawley is proposing walking back citizens united. I support both proposals. With Trump and Hawley on these two issues. Don't care which side of the isle proposals good legislation. Trump and Hawley would get support on the other side of the isle on those two issues. I hope their own side of the isle would help but not sure. Imagine that. Bipartisan legislation. That would be a blast from the past.Oh goody, what Trump wants to do is socialism, but what Harris wants is not...how fricken brilliant of you, moron.
You just have to pay it off every month... I use amer ex and I have an amazon prime card for amazon purchases which I also pay off every month....
exactly,, CCs only result in the rich getting richer,,Gas everyone needs. Low interest credit cards isn’t a need. It’s a want. Why not cap gas at $2?
Sneak peak answer: Cuz it would cause gas shortages. Guess what capping interest will do? Credit shortage. Guess what happens in credit shortages? Recession. Massive recession.
Still like his proposal?
Well you had the opportunity to explain how you are for regulating businesses but I guess you dont have the guts to do it on here in front of your fellow right wing wack jobs.I dont know of any of them being against all regulations,,
please advise??
Credit cards serve a purpose(s).exactly,, CCs only result in the rich getting richer,,
price controls result in cross market destruction that hurts everyone in the end,,
They certainly do, there is nothing wrong with borrowing money, so long as you pay it back. For example, we have record high credit card debt in this country today, people were forced to borrow money to survive though Harris and Xiden's inflationary policies.Credit cards serve a purpose(s).
Think hard. I promise it will not hurt.WTF are you going on about?![]()
the only hypocrisy I see right now is yours protecting and defending large corporations,,Well you had the opportunity to explain how you are for regulating businesses but I guess you dont have the guts to do it on here in front of your fellow right wing wack jobs.
yeah to make the bankers rich and poor people poorer,,Credit cards serve a purpose(s).
Both proposals are socialism. In the past Dems have proposed similar legislation and repubs were against. Dems seriously opposed citizens united. Now Trump is proposing caps on credit rates as is Hawley. Hawley is proposing walking back citizens united. I support both proposals. With Trump and Hawley on these two issues. Don't care which side of the isle proposals good legislation. Trump and Hawley would get support on the other side of the isle on those two issues. I hope their own side of the isle would help but not sure. Imagine that. Bipartisan legislation. That would be a blast from the past.
No that isnt correct. Credit cards do serve a purpose. Then again, people like you have often created the need for credit cards, such as to cover emergency medical costs that private insurance won't cover.yeah to make the bankers rich and poor people poorer,,
its science so you may not understand it,,
yes it is correct,,No that isnt correct. Credit cards do serve a purpose. Then again, people like you have often created the need for credit cards, such as to cover emergency medical costs that private insurance won't cover.
Credit cards serve a purpose. And yes, they should be regulated. And so should many other businesses. It's just that credit cards directly effect you that you agree there should be regulations. Other regulations that you can't see any direct consequence, eh not so much. Even though they do affect your life. Now please continue with your speech about how you believe in regulating businesses.the only hypocrisy I see right now is yours protecting and defending large corporations,,