Not if you believe evolution is a gradual process we don't.But you just said, "most", so we agree.Stasis dominates the history of most fossil species.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not if you believe evolution is a gradual process we don't.But you just said, "most", so we agree.Stasis dominates the history of most fossil species.
I don't see how speciation could be any other way.I would be shocked to see or hear any scientist make this claim. One?I don't believe so. All it takes is one generation
A duplicated gene isn't new information?
What if the original gene now mutates? Is that new information?
Oops, both genes mutate, new information yet?
Do new genes allow new functions?
By the way, the above should read:
On the classical model of gene duplication: new information?! Are you sure? Don't you mean adaptively new/enhanced functions?
You beat me to my edit.
A duplicated gene isn't new information?
No. It's a duplicate of the preexisting information in the original.
What if the original gene now mutates? Is that new information?
Mutations entail a loss of information. Most mutations are deleterious or neutral, but some are adaptive.
Oops, both genes mutate, new information yet?
Ditto * two!
Do new genes allow new functions?
Yes! Especially those of the duplication-degeneration-complementation (DDC) model in terms of frequency in adaptability and in preservation.
Mutations entail a loss of information.
You said that before.....but you still haven't posted any proof.
Oops, both genes mutate, loss of old information, addition of new information, right?
Mutations entail a loss of preexisting information,
It happens fairly rapidly from the filtering of the genetic information that already exists and we can observe it.
Obviously. What was filtered out to create nylonase?
Hahahhaha. If I was an atheist, then I'd have to question abiogenesis as something people thought happen like spontaneous generation,
So if you wer an atheist, what magic would you propose for abiogenesis?
It happens fairly rapidly from the filtering of the genetic information that already exists and we can observe it.
Obviously. What was filtered out to create nylonase?
Oh, welcome back. Have you evolved in S&T haha?
In this case, it wasn't what was filtered out but in the design with plasmids. It is further evidence for God.
Not if you believe evolution is a gradual process we don't.But you just said, "most", so we agree.Stasis dominates the history of most fossil species.
Mutations entail a loss of preexisting information,
And, usually, the creation of new information.
but mutations of duplicate genes can give rise to new/enhanced functions,
So, a mutation can be a gain of information.
ID’iot creationer math tends to be a bit of a variant of real math.Shocking!
Eighteen pages into a creationer’s thread about Darwinism and math, yet, no math.
Once again, the math is presented in the video. Shocking!
Mutations entail a loss of preexisting information,
And, usually, the creation of new information.
but mutations of duplicate genes can give rise to new/enhanced functions,
So, a mutation can be a gain of information.
By the way, the above should read:
On the classical model of gene duplication: new information?! Are you sure? Don't you mean adaptively new/enhanced functions?
You beat me to my edit.
A duplicated gene isn't new information?
No. It's a duplicate of the preexisting information in the original.
What if the original gene now mutates? Is that new information?
Mutations entail a loss of information. Most mutations are deleterious or neutral, but some are adaptive.
Oops, both genes mutate, new information yet?
Ditto * two!
Do new genes allow new functions?
Yes! Especially those of the duplication-degeneration-complementation (DDC) model in terms of frequency in adaptability and in preservation . .. eventually,, though most of those enhance the same function of the original gene in a more complex pathway.
What math information is a part of gene mutation?Mutations entail a loss of preexisting information,
And, usually, the creation of new information.
but mutations of duplicate genes can give rise to new/enhanced functions,
So, a mutation can be a gain of information.
Well, it depends on what you mean by new information, and that's where I have been trying to drive this discourse.
Mutations entail a loss of preexisting information,
And, usually, the creation of new information.
but mutations of duplicate genes can give rise to new/enhanced functions,
So, a mutation can be a gain of information.
Well, it depends on what you mean by new information, and that's where I have been trying to drive this discourse.
I believe it is at times and so do you.Not if you believe evolution is a gradual process we don't.But you just said, "most", so we agree.Stasis dominates the history of most fossil species.
That doesn't seem to be what the fossil record suggests. Gradual evolution is seldom seen in the fossil record.
The point I am making is that the fossil record does not support the commonly held belief that evolution is a gradual process.I believe it is at times and so do you.Not if you believe evolution is a gradual process we don't.But you just said, "most", so we agree.Stasis dominates the history of most fossil species.