Mathematical Challenges to Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

james bond

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
9,944
Reaction score
1,144
Points
170
Did you get a brain parasite from one of your cootie filled eggs?
I just told Fort Fun Indiana above about the libs being more interested in what I had for breakfast yesterday than living their own life and living their code or core values.

Cooties are better than eating Roundup and getting cancer.
You never explained your sterile seed theory.
Or the poor chickens suffering from ammonia.
Now I'm worried.
Are u worried your penis will fall off (symbolism for becoming sterile) :laugh:?
You keep talking about penises. Are you touching yourself again?

Why don't we stick to your claims about food and leave the porn out?

You never explained your sterile seed theory. How would they harm nearby farms?
I'm trying to find out what you are concerned about, Mr. Hypocrite?

Just look at EU and what they are fighting and doing as well as Mexico. The FDA in the US has been bought out.

ETA: Your bug, Fort Fun Indiana , has it figured out as a bet by Bayer/Monsanto.
I'm trying to find out what you are concerned about

I'm concerned about your SUPER interesting theory about sterile seeds.
Why are you running away from it?

And the chickens suffering from ammonia. Very sad.
Why would you be concerned about that? Regardless, you'll continue to eat GMO foods and Roundup. I think of it is like you and the other atheists eating their religious food. Atheism is a religion.

I eat non-GMO food as it is what God commanded in the Bible. It IS SUPER INTERESTING that he said, "Then God said, 'I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food." Genesis 1:29 I'm okay with you considering non-GMO food as religious food for me and the believers.

If the farmers can show damage to their farmland, lymphoma/other cancers and sterility upon themselves and their families, then I think they'll sue. The lawyers are getting big bucks for their clients.

GMO seeds aren't SUPER interesting to me. I'm not a farmer. You said there are both sterile and non-sterile seeds, but never explained the difference. Notice that GMO has seed bearing plants and fruits per your claim, but they cannot be reused and that they need Roundup to kill the weeds that come up against the GMO plants and trees. It's a fine line, but why take chances of eating Roundup?

I can't believe this thread has continued to go on like it has :meow:.
Why would you be concerned about that?

Because your ignorant claims are hilarious!

I eat non-GMO food as it is what God commanded in the Bible.

Where did the Bible, or God, mention GMO food?

You said there are both sterile and non-sterile seeds

You mentioned sterile seeds. In post #695. In post #706, you said farmers will be upset
if sterile seeds blew onto their land. You never explained why. So.....why?

but never explained the difference.

You mentioned sterile seeds, you don't know?

Notice that GMO has seed bearing plants and fruits per your claim, but they cannot be reused

Because that would violate the contract the farmer has with the seed company.

and that they need Roundup to kill the weeds that come up against the GMO plants and trees.

Weeds aren't specific to GMO crops.
My claims are right. Yours have turned out wrong.

I quoted it in the above post. But you couldn't explain about the difference between sterile and non-sterile seeds. That's at least twice you didn't explain, so you don't know.

You don't get it. If they cannot be reused, then it may not follow what God provided for us to eat. It doesn't specifically mean God didn't provide it as food for us, but it becomes a gray area. Again, why would one want to eat cancer causing Roundup in the food? Why do the GMO farmers have to spray more and more Roundup to fight the weeds? If you are putting your health on the line, then I rather play it safe with non-GMO foods.

I'm not the ignorant one. You're suppose to know about the seeds with the farmers and could not tell me what type of seeds.

Lol, I know it violates the contract. So what did Monsanto scientists develop to make sure their GMO seeds can only be used once?

You're just avoiding the Roundup issue, instead of explaining or rebutting it. Also, you're not comparing it to less strong weed spray that non-GMO farmers use.

Anyway, none of us are going to get anything interesting from you so good bye. At least, Fort Fun Indiana brought up interesting points and was able to explain.
 
Last edited:

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
65,627
Reaction score
13,603
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
Did you get a brain parasite from one of your cootie filled eggs?
I just told Fort Fun Indiana above about the libs being more interested in what I had for breakfast yesterday than living their own life and living their code or core values.

Cooties are better than eating Roundup and getting cancer.
You never explained your sterile seed theory.
Or the poor chickens suffering from ammonia.
Now I'm worried.
Are u worried your penis will fall off (symbolism for becoming sterile) :laugh:?
You keep talking about penises. Are you touching yourself again?

Why don't we stick to your claims about food and leave the porn out?

You never explained your sterile seed theory. How would they harm nearby farms?
I'm trying to find out what you are concerned about, Mr. Hypocrite?

Just look at EU and what they are fighting and doing as well as Mexico. The FDA in the US has been bought out.

ETA: Your bug, Fort Fun Indiana , has it figured out as a bet by Bayer/Monsanto.
I'm trying to find out what you are concerned about

I'm concerned about your SUPER interesting theory about sterile seeds.
Why are you running away from it?

And the chickens suffering from ammonia. Very sad.
Why would you be concerned about that? Regardless, you'll continue to eat GMO foods and Roundup. I think of it is like you and the other atheists eating their religious food. Atheism is a religion.

I eat non-GMO food as it is what God commanded in the Bible. It IS SUPER INTERESTING that he said, "Then God said, 'I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food." Genesis 1:29 I'm okay with you considering non-GMO food as religious food for me and the believers.

If the farmers can show damage to their farmland, lymphoma/other cancers and sterility upon themselves and their families, then I think they'll sue. The lawyers are getting big bucks for their clients.

GMO seeds aren't SUPER interesting to me. I'm not a farmer. You said there are both sterile and non-sterile seeds, but never explained the difference. Notice that GMO has seed bearing plants and fruits per your claim, but they cannot be reused and that they need Roundup to kill the weeds that come up against the GMO plants and trees. It's a fine line, but why take chances of eating Roundup?

I can't believe this thread has continued to go on like it has :meow:.
Why would you be concerned about that?

Because your ignorant claims are hilarious!

I eat non-GMO food as it is what God commanded in the Bible.

Where did the Bible, or God, mention GMO food?

You said there are both sterile and non-sterile seeds

You mentioned sterile seeds. In post #695. In post #706, you said farmers will be upset
if sterile seeds blew onto their land. You never explained why. So.....why?

but never explained the difference.

You mentioned sterile seeds, you don't know?

Notice that GMO has seed bearing plants and fruits per your claim, but they cannot be reused

Because that would violate the contract the farmer has with the seed company.

and that they need Roundup to kill the weeds that come up against the GMO plants and trees.

Weeds aren't specific to GMO crops.
My claims are right. Yours have turned out wrong.

I quoted it in the above post. But you couldn't explain about the difference between sterile and non-sterile seeds. That's at least twice you didn't explain, so you don't know.

You don't get it. If they cannot be reused, then it may not follow what God provided for us to eat. It doesn't specifically mean God didn't provide it as food for us, but it becomes a gray area. Again, why would one want to eat cancer causing Roundup in the food? Why do the GMO farmers have to spray more and more Roundup to fight the weeds? If you are putting your health on the line, then I rather play it safe with non-GMO foods.

I'm not the ignorant one. You're suppose to know about the seeds with the farmers and could not tell me what type of seeds.

Lol, I know it violates the contract. So what did Monsanto scientists develop to make sure their GMO seeds can only be used once?

You're just avoiding the Roundup issue, instead of explaining or rebutting it. Also, you're not comparing it to less strong weed spray that non-GMO farmers use.

Anyway, none of us are going to get anything interesting from you so good bye. At least, Fort Fun Indiana brought up interesting points and was able to explain.
My claims are right.

You claimed sterile seeds blowing into a nearby field are a problem. How?

But you couldn't explain about the difference between sterile and non-sterile seeds.

You said sterile seeds are a problem. You don't know what a sterile seed even is? LOL!

If they cannot be reused, then it may not follow what God provided for us to eat.

GMO seeds can't be reused?

Why do the GMO farmers have to spray more and more Roundup to fight the weeds?

Some weeds become resistant. It's an evolutionary thing, you wouldn't understand.

So what did Monsanto scientists develop to make sure their GMO seeds can only be used once?

They didn't. What makes you think they did?

Anyway, none of us are going to get anything interesting from you so good bye.

Run away. Again. Durr.
 

james bond

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
9,944
Reaction score
1,144
Points
170
Did you get a brain parasite from one of your cootie filled eggs?
I just told Fort Fun Indiana above about the libs being more interested in what I had for breakfast yesterday than living their own life and living their code or core values.

Cooties are better than eating Roundup and getting cancer.
You never explained your sterile seed theory.
Or the poor chickens suffering from ammonia.
Now I'm worried.
Are u worried your penis will fall off (symbolism for becoming sterile) :laugh:?
You keep talking about penises. Are you touching yourself again?

Why don't we stick to your claims about food and leave the porn out?

You never explained your sterile seed theory. How would they harm nearby farms?
I'm trying to find out what you are concerned about, Mr. Hypocrite?

Just look at EU and what they are fighting and doing as well as Mexico. The FDA in the US has been bought out.

ETA: Your bug, Fort Fun Indiana , has it figured out as a bet by Bayer/Monsanto.
I'm trying to find out what you are concerned about

I'm concerned about your SUPER interesting theory about sterile seeds.
Why are you running away from it?

And the chickens suffering from ammonia. Very sad.
Why would you be concerned about that? Regardless, you'll continue to eat GMO foods and Roundup. I think of it is like you and the other atheists eating their religious food. Atheism is a religion.

I eat non-GMO food as it is what God commanded in the Bible. It IS SUPER INTERESTING that he said, "Then God said, 'I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food." Genesis 1:29 I'm okay with you considering non-GMO food as religious food for me and the believers.

If the farmers can show damage to their farmland, lymphoma/other cancers and sterility upon themselves and their families, then I think they'll sue. The lawyers are getting big bucks for their clients.

GMO seeds aren't SUPER interesting to me. I'm not a farmer. You said there are both sterile and non-sterile seeds, but never explained the difference. Notice that GMO has seed bearing plants and fruits per your claim, but they cannot be reused and that they need Roundup to kill the weeds that come up against the GMO plants and trees. It's a fine line, but why take chances of eating Roundup?

I can't believe this thread has continued to go on like it has :meow:.
Why would you be concerned about that?

Because your ignorant claims are hilarious!

I eat non-GMO food as it is what God commanded in the Bible.

Where did the Bible, or God, mention GMO food?

You said there are both sterile and non-sterile seeds

You mentioned sterile seeds. In post #695. In post #706, you said farmers will be upset
if sterile seeds blew onto their land. You never explained why. So.....why?

but never explained the difference.

You mentioned sterile seeds, you don't know?

Notice that GMO has seed bearing plants and fruits per your claim, but they cannot be reused

Because that would violate the contract the farmer has with the seed company.

and that they need Roundup to kill the weeds that come up against the GMO plants and trees.

Weeds aren't specific to GMO crops.
My claims are right. Yours have turned out wrong.

I quoted it in the above post. But you couldn't explain about the difference between sterile and non-sterile seeds. That's at least twice you didn't explain, so you don't know.

You don't get it. If they cannot be reused, then it may not follow what God provided for us to eat. It doesn't specifically mean God didn't provide it as food for us, but it becomes a gray area. Again, why would one want to eat cancer causing Roundup in the food? Why do the GMO farmers have to spray more and more Roundup to fight the weeds? If you are putting your health on the line, then I rather play it safe with non-GMO foods.

I'm not the ignorant one. You're suppose to know about the seeds with the farmers and could not tell me what type of seeds.

Lol, I know it violates the contract. So what did Monsanto scientists develop to make sure their GMO seeds can only be used once?

You're just avoiding the Roundup issue, instead of explaining or rebutting it. Also, you're not comparing it to less strong weed spray that non-GMO farmers use.

Anyway, none of us are going to get anything interesting from you so good bye. At least, Fort Fun Indiana brought up interesting points and was able to explain.
My claims are right.

You claimed sterile seeds blowing into a nearby field are a problem. How?

But you couldn't explain about the difference between sterile and non-sterile seeds.

You said sterile seeds are a problem. You don't know what a sterile seed even is? LOL!

If they cannot be reused, then it may not follow what God provided for us to eat.

GMO seeds can't be reused?

Why do the GMO farmers have to spray more and more Roundup to fight the weeds?

Some weeds become resistant. It's an evolutionary thing, you wouldn't understand.

So what did Monsanto scientists develop to make sure their GMO seeds can only be used once?

They didn't. What makes you think they did?

Anyway, none of us are going to get anything interesting from you so good bye.

Run away. Again. Durr.
You're still on your GMO non-sterile vs sterile seeds rant. Tell us about Roundup, foo. Why is Mexico wanting to ban a specific GMO seed and Roundup? Why are the EU banning certain types of seeds? What are they banning? What is the difference between sterile and non-sterile seed (for the third time since it is so important to you)? You're supposed to be the knowledgeable guy here on GMO seeds and farmers, but are asking me the questions. That proves you haven't evolved as a person at all.

I'm the guy in favor of non-GMO foods and organic farming, but God said plants and fruits that provided seeds were okay to eat. I admitted GMO foods were safe (think the sterile seeds are BAD tho and doesn't fit what God said we could eat). However, personally, I don't want to eat the Roundup. Perhaps every homeowner is familiar with Roundup b/c of using it before. Do you still use Roundup? We have a lot of weeds in the local area this spring due to the rain and the winds.

Good bye and good riddance. I'll get the last word in on this :laugh:.
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
65,627
Reaction score
13,603
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
You're still on your GMO non-sterile vs sterile seeds rant.
Still running away from your claim? DURR.

What is the difference between sterile and non-sterile seed (for the third time since it is so important to you)?

It's not important to me....at all.
Except as an example of your ignorance.
 

james bond

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
9,944
Reaction score
1,144
Points
170
You're still on your GMO non-sterile vs sterile seeds rant.
Still running away from your claim? DURR.

What is the difference between sterile and non-sterile seed (for the third time since it is so important to you)?

It's not important to me....at all.
Except as an example of your ignorance.
As usual, you do not answer the question of the differences between the sterile and non-sterile seed.

This the fourth time I'm explaining it. You're like Ringtone. The non-sterile seed and the plants and fruits that produce it are important to me. And why is that? You should know by now.

I'm going to assume you do not know the differences since the differences are not important at all. That's proof of YOUR ignorance. You're the one who said there are sterile and non-sterile seeds, but could not answer what are the differences :laugh::laugh::laugh:.

A friend of mine read your posts. Are you sure there are sterile seeds? He explained it to me and thinks you are wrong haha.
 
OP
Ringtone

Ringtone

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2019
Messages
3,047
Reaction score
918
Points
210
As usual, you do not answer the question of the differences between the sterile and non-sterile seed.

This the fourth time I'm explaining it. You're like Ringtone. The non-sterile seed and the plants and fruits that produce it are important to me. And why is that? You should know by now.

I'm going to assume you do not know the differences since the differences are not important at all. That's proof of YOUR ignorance. You're the one who said there are sterile and non-sterile seeds, but could not answer what are the differences :laugh::laugh::laugh:.

A friend of mine read your posts. Are you sure there are sterile seeds? He explained it to me and thinks you are wrong haha.
Hey, James, I see that you're up to you lying-ass dogishness again.

So when you read a boundlessly large, indeterminate number of things or a boundlessly large, indeterminate amount of something, does the mathematical concept of an actual infinite pop into existence inside your mind at all? Perhaps the problem here is episodic amnesia or Alzheimer's disease. It pops into your mind when you read the concept's definition . . . and, then, immediately pops out of your mind. Very curious, seemingly magical. Maybe your dyslexic. No, wait. It's a concept, so that wouldn't explain the problem.

Rather, you're a lying-ass dog of a whore.

Did you ask Jesus to forgive you yet?
 

harmonica

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
37,497
Reaction score
13,672
Points
1,560

The essence of the evolutionary hypothesis is that the entirety of biological history is necessarily an unbroken chain of natural cause-and-effect speciation entailing a common ancestry over geological time. The hypothesis is actually predicated on the metaphysical presupposition of naturalism, which, of course, is not subject to scientific falsification.

The evolutionist begs the question; that is to say, he assumes his conclusionhis interpretation of the available evidencein his metaphysical premise. His conclusion does not axiomatically follow from the empirical evidence; it axiomatically follows from his premise. While some scientists of the evolutionary hypothesis grasp this reality, the typical laymen does not. The apriority of his belief flies right over his head.

Hocus Pocus

We do not and cannot actually observe the speciation of a common ancestry. All the pertinent evidence really shows is that species of generally increasing complexity have appeared and that some have gone extinct over geological time. This in no way, shape or form precludes the potentiality that biological history is actually a series of creative events—entailing a speciation of a genetically limited range of adaptive radiation per the mechanisms of genetic mutation, gene flow, genetic drift and natural selection—ultimately predicated on a shared and systematically altered genetic motif of common design over geological time.
at least it's a theory and not ''god did it''
HAHAHAHAHAHAHH
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
65,627
Reaction score
13,603
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
You're still on your GMO non-sterile vs sterile seeds rant.
Still running away from your claim? DURR.

What is the difference between sterile and non-sterile seed (for the third time since it is so important to you)?

It's not important to me....at all.
Except as an example of your ignorance.
As usual, you do not answer the question of the differences between the sterile and non-sterile seed.

This the fourth time I'm explaining it. You're like Ringtone. The non-sterile seed and the plants and fruits that produce it are important to me. And why is that? You should know by now.

I'm going to assume you do not know the differences since the differences are not important at all. That's proof of YOUR ignorance. You're the one who said there are sterile and non-sterile seeds, but could not answer what are the differences :laugh::laugh::laugh:.

A friend of mine read your posts. Are you sure there are sterile seeds? He explained it to me and thinks you are wrong haha.
As usual, you do not answer the question of the differences between the sterile and non-sterile seed.

As usual, you brought it up, you don't know?

Will this stop your whining?

Sterile Seed means any plant, plant part, plant cell, plant tissue or plant seed that has been researched, created, identified, developed or modified so as to not produce viable offspring seeds.

You're the one who said there are sterile and non-sterile seeds,


You brought up sterile seeds, you did it not knowing there were sterile seeds? Weird.

A friend of mine read your posts. Are you sure there are sterile seeds? He explained it to me and thinks you are wrong haha.

You brought up sterile seeds, but your friend says there are no sterile seeds? Weird.
 

james bond

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
9,944
Reaction score
1,144
Points
170
You're still on your GMO non-sterile vs sterile seeds rant.
Still running away from your claim? DURR.

What is the difference between sterile and non-sterile seed (for the third time since it is so important to you)?

It's not important to me....at all.
Except as an example of your ignorance.
As usual, you do not answer the question of the differences between the sterile and non-sterile seed.

This the fourth time I'm explaining it. You're like Ringtone. The non-sterile seed and the plants and fruits that produce it are important to me. And why is that? You should know by now.

I'm going to assume you do not know the differences since the differences are not important at all. That's proof of YOUR ignorance. You're the one who said there are sterile and non-sterile seeds, but could not answer what are the differences :laugh::laugh::laugh:.

A friend of mine read your posts. Are you sure there are sterile seeds? He explained it to me and thinks you are wrong haha.
As usual, you do not answer the question of the differences between the sterile and non-sterile seed.

As usual, you brought it up, you don't know?

Will this stop your whining?

Sterile Seed means any plant, plant part, plant cell, plant tissue or plant seed that has been researched, created, identified, developed or modified so as to not produce viable offspring seeds.

You're the one who said there are sterile and non-sterile seeds,

You brought up sterile seeds, you did it not knowing there were sterile seeds? Weird.

A friend of mine read your posts. Are you sure there are sterile seeds? He explained it to me and thinks you are wrong haha.

You brought up sterile seeds, but your friend says there are no sterile seeds? Weird.
I brought up the seeds that blew into other farmers lands. Why didn't you just say the sterile seeds don't exist? The farmed sterile salmon exist and you agreed about being against their escape. Part of it was Monsanto wanting technology fees from those farmers instead of it damaging their lands. What if the sterile seeds blew over into the other farmers land and mixed with their seeds? That would've been a separate danger and would hurt the farmers if their seeds became sterile, too.

My friend pointed out the technology exists, but Bayer/Monsanto didn't market the seeds. Did they test the seeds? Did they know of the results to the environment? It would've benefited them in selling more Roundup since they would be Roundup Ready plantings. It's easy to see that Monsanto would've profited greatly from this.
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
65,627
Reaction score
13,603
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
You're still on your GMO non-sterile vs sterile seeds rant.
Still running away from your claim? DURR.

What is the difference between sterile and non-sterile seed (for the third time since it is so important to you)?

It's not important to me....at all.
Except as an example of your ignorance.
As usual, you do not answer the question of the differences between the sterile and non-sterile seed.

This the fourth time I'm explaining it. You're like Ringtone. The non-sterile seed and the plants and fruits that produce it are important to me. And why is that? You should know by now.

I'm going to assume you do not know the differences since the differences are not important at all. That's proof of YOUR ignorance. You're the one who said there are sterile and non-sterile seeds, but could not answer what are the differences :laugh::laugh::laugh:.

A friend of mine read your posts. Are you sure there are sterile seeds? He explained it to me and thinks you are wrong haha.
As usual, you do not answer the question of the differences between the sterile and non-sterile seed.

As usual, you brought it up, you don't know?

Will this stop your whining?

Sterile Seed means any plant, plant part, plant cell, plant tissue or plant seed that has been researched, created, identified, developed or modified so as to not produce viable offspring seeds.

You're the one who said there are sterile and non-sterile seeds,

You brought up sterile seeds, you did it not knowing there were sterile seeds? Weird.

A friend of mine read your posts. Are you sure there are sterile seeds? He explained it to me and thinks you are wrong haha.

You brought up sterile seeds, but your friend says there are no sterile seeds? Weird.
I brought up the seeds that blew into other farmers lands. Why didn't you just say the sterile seeds don't exist? The farmed sterile salmon exist and you agreed about being against their escape. Part of it was Monsanto wanting technology fees from those farmers instead of it damaging their lands. What if the sterile seeds blew over into the other farmers land and mixed with their seeds? That would've been a separate danger and would hurt the farmers if their seeds became sterile, too.

My friend pointed out the technology exists, but Bayer/Monsanto didn't market the seeds. Did they test the seeds? Did they know of the results to the environment? It would've benefited them in selling more Roundup since they would be Roundup Ready plantings. It's easy to see that Monsanto would've profited greatly from this.
I brought up the seeds that blew into other farmers lands.

I know. You said when sterile seeds do that, it causes a problem.
And than you ran away, instead of explaining why.

The farmed sterile salmon exist and you agreed about being against their escape.

Farmed salmon are a problem, but they aren't sterile, or they wouldn't be a problem when they escape.

Part of it was Monsanto wanting technology fees from those farmers instead of it damaging their lands.

Monsanto doesn't want a fee for the sterile seeds you claim are a problem.

What if the sterile seeds blew over into the other farmers land and mixed with their seeds? That would've been a separate danger and would hurt the farmers if their seeds became sterile, too.

You should just admit you didn't know what you were talking about and stop digging.

It would've benefited them in selling more Roundup since they would be Roundup Ready plantings.

Ummm.....they've been selling Roundup Ready seeds for a long time.
 

james bond

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
9,944
Reaction score
1,144
Points
170
You're still on your GMO non-sterile vs sterile seeds rant.
Still running away from your claim? DURR.

What is the difference between sterile and non-sterile seed (for the third time since it is so important to you)?

It's not important to me....at all.
Except as an example of your ignorance.
As usual, you do not answer the question of the differences between the sterile and non-sterile seed.

This the fourth time I'm explaining it. You're like Ringtone. The non-sterile seed and the plants and fruits that produce it are important to me. And why is that? You should know by now.

I'm going to assume you do not know the differences since the differences are not important at all. That's proof of YOUR ignorance. You're the one who said there are sterile and non-sterile seeds, but could not answer what are the differences :laugh::laugh::laugh:.

A friend of mine read your posts. Are you sure there are sterile seeds? He explained it to me and thinks you are wrong haha.
As usual, you do not answer the question of the differences between the sterile and non-sterile seed.

As usual, you brought it up, you don't know?

Will this stop your whining?

Sterile Seed means any plant, plant part, plant cell, plant tissue or plant seed that has been researched, created, identified, developed or modified so as to not produce viable offspring seeds.

You're the one who said there are sterile and non-sterile seeds,

You brought up sterile seeds, you did it not knowing there were sterile seeds? Weird.

A friend of mine read your posts. Are you sure there are sterile seeds? He explained it to me and thinks you are wrong haha.

You brought up sterile seeds, but your friend says there are no sterile seeds? Weird.
I brought up the seeds that blew into other farmers lands. Why didn't you just say the sterile seeds don't exist? The farmed sterile salmon exist and you agreed about being against their escape. Part of it was Monsanto wanting technology fees from those farmers instead of it damaging their lands. What if the sterile seeds blew over into the other farmers land and mixed with their seeds? That would've been a separate danger and would hurt the farmers if their seeds became sterile, too.

My friend pointed out the technology exists, but Bayer/Monsanto didn't market the seeds. Did they test the seeds? Did they know of the results to the environment? It would've benefited them in selling more Roundup since they would be Roundup Ready plantings. It's easy to see that Monsanto would've profited greatly from this.
I brought up the seeds that blew into other farmers lands.

I know. You said when sterile seeds do that, it causes a problem.
And than you ran away, instead of explaining why.

The farmed sterile salmon exist and you agreed about being against their escape.

Farmed salmon are a problem, but they aren't sterile, or they wouldn't be a problem when they escape.

Part of it was Monsanto wanting technology fees from those farmers instead of it damaging their lands.

Monsanto doesn't want a fee for the sterile seeds you claim are a problem.

What if the sterile seeds blew over into the other farmers land and mixed with their seeds? That would've been a separate danger and would hurt the farmers if their seeds became sterile, too.

You should just admit you didn't know what you were talking about and stop digging.

It would've benefited them in selling more Roundup since they would be Roundup Ready plantings.

Ummm.....they've been selling Roundup Ready seeds for a long time.
First, why don't you answer my question:

Why didn't you just say the sterile seeds don't exist?

Anyway, I'm tired of you not explaining your claims such as farmed salmon.

On second thought, forget it. I don't care about your statements on this anymore.
 
Last edited:

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
65,627
Reaction score
13,603
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
You're still on your GMO non-sterile vs sterile seeds rant.
Still running away from your claim? DURR.

What is the difference between sterile and non-sterile seed (for the third time since it is so important to you)?

It's not important to me....at all.
Except as an example of your ignorance.
As usual, you do not answer the question of the differences between the sterile and non-sterile seed.

This the fourth time I'm explaining it. You're like Ringtone. The non-sterile seed and the plants and fruits that produce it are important to me. And why is that? You should know by now.

I'm going to assume you do not know the differences since the differences are not important at all. That's proof of YOUR ignorance. You're the one who said there are sterile and non-sterile seeds, but could not answer what are the differences :laugh::laugh::laugh:.

A friend of mine read your posts. Are you sure there are sterile seeds? He explained it to me and thinks you are wrong haha.
As usual, you do not answer the question of the differences between the sterile and non-sterile seed.

As usual, you brought it up, you don't know?

Will this stop your whining?

Sterile Seed means any plant, plant part, plant cell, plant tissue or plant seed that has been researched, created, identified, developed or modified so as to not produce viable offspring seeds.

You're the one who said there are sterile and non-sterile seeds,

You brought up sterile seeds, you did it not knowing there were sterile seeds? Weird.

A friend of mine read your posts. Are you sure there are sterile seeds? He explained it to me and thinks you are wrong haha.

You brought up sterile seeds, but your friend says there are no sterile seeds? Weird.
I brought up the seeds that blew into other farmers lands. Why didn't you just say the sterile seeds don't exist? The farmed sterile salmon exist and you agreed about being against their escape. Part of it was Monsanto wanting technology fees from those farmers instead of it damaging their lands. What if the sterile seeds blew over into the other farmers land and mixed with their seeds? That would've been a separate danger and would hurt the farmers if their seeds became sterile, too.

My friend pointed out the technology exists, but Bayer/Monsanto didn't market the seeds. Did they test the seeds? Did they know of the results to the environment? It would've benefited them in selling more Roundup since they would be Roundup Ready plantings. It's easy to see that Monsanto would've profited greatly from this.
I brought up the seeds that blew into other farmers lands.

I know. You said when sterile seeds do that, it causes a problem.
And than you ran away, instead of explaining why.

The farmed sterile salmon exist and you agreed about being against their escape.

Farmed salmon are a problem, but they aren't sterile, or they wouldn't be a problem when they escape.

Part of it was Monsanto wanting technology fees from those farmers instead of it damaging their lands.

Monsanto doesn't want a fee for the sterile seeds you claim are a problem.

What if the sterile seeds blew over into the other farmers land and mixed with their seeds? That would've been a separate danger and would hurt the farmers if their seeds became sterile, too.

You should just admit you didn't know what you were talking about and stop digging.

It would've benefited them in selling more Roundup since they would be Roundup Ready plantings.

Ummm.....they've been selling Roundup Ready seeds for a long time.
First, why don't you answer my question:

Why didn't you just say the sterile seeds don't exist?

Anyway, I'm tired of you not explaining your claims such as farmed salmon.

On second thought, forget it. I don't care about your statements on this anymore.
Why didn't you just say the sterile seeds don't exist?

Because some do exist.
But they're not from Monsanto and they have nothing to do with your silly claim.

Anyway, I'm tired of you not explaining your claims such as farmed salmon.

You're such a child.

The report goes on to point out that "inter-breeding of farm with wild salmon can result in reduced lifetime success, lowered individual fitness and decreases in production over at least two generations."

One that Got Away: The Issue of Farmed Salmon Escapes | The Fish Site
 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
48,293
Reaction score
7,117
Points
1,870
Millions and billions of years is a long time which you will come to realize watching to see if evolution happens (when I already proved that it doesn't smh).
Ah, the creationist cultist declares victory again, despite losing on the scoreboard eleventy zillion to zero. Always good for a laugh.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top