Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What's funny is your failure to grasp the limitations of scientific inquiry. That's the very reason logic and mathematics, for example, precede and have primacy over science.That’s pretty darn funny. You unwittingly defined your gods as supernatural entities.
"some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature".
Give us a song and dance, now.
The Theory of Evolution is, because you missed it, a scientific theory as is the Theory of Gravity, for one example. The Theory of Evolution is based on the evidence supporting the theory.God created each plant and animal perfectly ... nature won't take it's course and blemish that which is created perfectly ... only Man can corrupt what God sets in motion ... the OP is trying to blend the two philosophical arguments into a single cohesive theory, which is just blind ... evolution isn't philosophy ...
The hypothesis of evodelusion is solely predicated on the metaphysical presupposition of naturalism. It's a self-imposed fantasy.
Beyond the ramifications of the first principles of your not understanding the methods of science, you apparently believe that willful ignorance precedes and has primacy over ant attempt at learning the subject matter.What's funny is your failure to grasp the limitations of scientific inquiry. That's the very reason logic and mathematics, for example, precede and have primacy over science.That’s pretty darn funny. You unwittingly defined your gods as supernatural entities.
"some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature".
Give us a song and dance, now.
Winning!
Of course it is. Ringtone has nothing but theatrics and appeals to emotion at his disposal. The ontological folly in his one-trick bag can be used to argue literally anything, including its opposite conclusions. Ringtone clearly fell victim to this same pomp and circumstance, probably as an impressionable child, and so does not recognize it for the dog and pony show that it is.I never did see any math in this thread challenging evolution. So in that sense, this thread is just another fraud, one that typifies the threads started by the OP of this complete mess.
I never did see any math in this thread challenging evolution. So in that sense, this thread is just another fraud, one that typifies the threads started by the OP of this complete mess.
The Theory of Evolution is, because you missed it, a scientific theory as is the Theory of Gravity, for one example. The Theory of Evolution is based on the evidence supporting the theory.
The term “theory” in the science realm has specific connotations. Your madrassah has done you a disservice by allowing you to post in a forum and related to a subject you have no knowledge of.
As I was saying...Winning!
While you may be impressed by a clown show of Disco’tute charlatans in a silly YouTube video, why would you presume that others would share your gullibility?I never did see any math in this thread challenging evolution. So in that sense, this thread is just another fraud, one that typifies the threads started by the OP of this complete mess.
See video in OP. Note how the evodelusionary calculi of population genetics itself falsifies evodelusion. It's a real hoot!
Still winning!
I’ll have to take the above to mean you’re hopelessly befuddled, not able to offer a coherent comment and have no aversion to humiliating yourself in front of others on a public message board.The Theory of Evolution is, because you missed it, a scientific theory as is the Theory of Gravity, for one example. The Theory of Evolution is based on the evidence supporting the theory.
The term “theory” in the science realm has specific connotations. Your madrassah has done you a disservice by allowing you to post in a forum and related to a subject you have no knowledge of.
When we are laid out on stainless steel beneath florescent lights,
When our sightless eyes are closed by busy fingers,
When they have numbered and tagged our toes—
Numbered and tagged them all!—
Who shall pluck out the tufts of hair sprouting from our fleshy ears?
While you may be impressed by a clown show of Disco’tute charlatans in a silly YouTube video, why would you presume that others would share your gullibility?
As usual, we’re left with the religious extremist fraudulently inventing thread titles and then being reduced to spamming his own thread with juvenile nonsense
I’ll have to take the above to mean you’re hopelessly befuddled, not able to offer a coherent comment and have no aversion to humiliating yourself in front of others on a public message board.
Still predictable.... dime a dozen...Still winning!
What are you winning?I’ll have to take the above to mean you’re hopelessly befuddled, not able to offer a coherent comment and have no aversion to humiliating yourself in front of others on a public message board.
A chorus of crickets roll their eyes
And dance beneath the cloudy skies.
Still winning!
What are you winning?
A thread that promotes a fraud, a thread in which you can’t respond to challenges to your appeals to supernaturalism and you waste time and bandwidth with pointless spam.
Your behavior is buffoonish.
I can only give you a 3/10 for mindless spam, juvenile behavior and yet another failed attempt at your Benny Hinn impression.What are you winning?
A thread that promotes a fraud, a thread in which you can’t respond to challenges to your appeals to supernaturalism and you waste time and bandwidth with pointless spam.
Your behavior is buffoonish.
We have aimlessly wandered down tedious streets beneath a grieving sky—
Without hope, without respite, without another single sign
of life appearing anywhere in sight,Except a gang of looney crickets dancing jigs throughout the night.
Oh, I wish the mermaids would sing to me.
I wish the mermaids would sing. . . .
I can only give you a 3/10 for mindless spam, juvenile behavior and yet another failed attempt at your Benny Hinn impression.
How about a little song and dance?
Naturalism is not a religion.I can only give you a 3/10 for mindless spam, juvenile behavior and yet another failed attempt at your Benny Hinn impression.
How about a little song and dance?
Still no argument/proof of you religion naturalism, eh?
Still winning!
It has always amazed me how people who profess to believe in God look at the world, obviously a work of God (should he exist), and and choose not to believe their own eyes because of their logic or theology.
It always amazes me how evodelusionists fail to grasp the fact that their interpretation of the empirical evidence is predicated on nothing more than their metaphysical presupposition of naturalism.