Many are saying the Chiefs dynasty is done .. I disagree !

[todd down under]

So define dynasty in the NFL

Marketing to attract suckers.

 

[todd down under]

The Yanks won 9/14 World Series from the late 40s to the early 60s. Even that is not a "dynasty," and yet winning a super bowl 3/5 years is a dynasty to some people. lol

 

[todd down under]

You'll be surprised that there is a formula to determine if you have a dynasty or not:

What Makes An NFL Dynasty?

In terms of gratuitous overuse in the American sports vocabulary, “dynasty” is a word right up there with “Greatest Of All-Time” and “dominant.”So when

sportshistorynetwork.com

Dominance Level = (Championship wins + (championship losses x 0.5)) ÷ years

If the “Dominance Level” is greater than 0.5, the team might be fairly called a dynasty. This equation is nearly the mathematical expression of the definition of “baseball dynasty” put forth in Post-Dispatch. True dynasties should be rare.

So with the simple formula, we get the following professional football teams qualifying for the title of “dynasty”:

• 1921-24 Canton/Cleveland Bulldogs, 0.750 Domination Level
• 1927-32 Green Bay Packers, 0.666 DL
• 1936-39 Green Bay Packers, 0.625 DL
• 1940-46 Chicago Bears, 0.642 DL
• 1951-57 Cleveland Browns, 0.642 DL
• 1964-67 Green Bay Packers, 0.750 DL
• 1971-74 Miami Dolphins, 0.625 DL
• 1974-1979 Pittsburgh Steelers, 0.666 DL
• 1993-1996 Dallas Cowboys, 0.750 DL
• 2000-2003 New England Patriots, 0.750 DL
• 2014-2018 New England Patriots, 0.700 DL
• 2019-2022 Kansas City Chiefs, 0.625 DL

So now a team that loses the title game is called a "dynasty." lol Sucker fans fall for the dumbest marketing.

 

[todd down under]

There a wrestling team in Vermont that has won the state title 34 years in a row.

And here winning two in a row is a "dynasty" to fans with ADHD. lol

 

[citygator]

So now a team that loses the title game is called a "dynasty." lol Sucker fans fall for the dumbest marketing.

I don’t think that is how the formula works. You have to win or else your number is negative.

 

[todd down under]

I don’t think that is how the formula works. You have to win or else your number is negative.

"formula"

too funny

 

[LA RAM FAN]

nobody's ever one three in a row ! only 8 teams have won back to backs .. and the Chiefs are one of them .. 3 SB wins in 5 yrs is a dynasty !

well said,some people seem to be dense about that fact,
i think their dynasty has come to an end now though with that loss to the eagles going o and 2.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The Yanks won 9/14 World Series from the late 40s to the early 60s. Even that is not a "dynasty," and yet winning a super bowl 3/5 years is a dynasty to some people. lol

uhh you are the only one on the planet who thinks the yankees are not a dynasty. oh and the cowboys are considered a dynasty of the 90's winning 3 of 4 superbowls in four years so pretty clear cut the chiefs are a dynasty winning back to back superbowls is considered a dynasty..LOL that dynasty looks like it is coming to an end though that i will admit.

 

[Blaster]

Travis Kelce stopped playing good football after he met Taylor Swift.

 

[citygator]

Travis Kelce stopped playing good football after he met Taylor Swift.

Guess he should have met her 10 years ago at the beginning of his career and not the end.

 

[Blaster]

 

[yidnar]

well said,some people seem to be dense about that fact,
i think their dynasty has come to an end now though with that loss to the eagles going o and 2.

I wouldn't say that just yet .. making no excuses but the Chiefs have several very key players still out and they lost the game by only 3 points .. Kelce dropping an easy catch in the end zone is a rare thing .. game could have went either way .. they looked evenly matched with the Eagles even with all the key players they were missing ! translation .. they looked much much better than they did last week and will be playing much better once some key players that have been absent are back on the field ! that being said anything could happen .. but don't count them out yet !

 

[LA RAM FAN]

I wouldn't say that just yet .. making no excuses but the Chiefs have several very key players still out and they lost the game by only 3 points .. Kelce dropping an easy catch in the end zone is a rare thing .. game could have went either way .. they looked evenly matched with the Eagles even with all the key players they were missing ! translation .. they looked much much better than they did last week and will be playing much better once some key players that have been absent are back on the field ! that being said anything could happen .. but don't count them out yet !

I figure they should win next week against the giants,you would think they would at least win that game,if they can do that and win the next one against the ravens,their season will be saved,they cannot afford to go 1 and 3 or that will doom their season as even a playoff team.

yeah when i think about it,thats pretty impressive they went toe to toe with them and it was a close game and not a blowout as i expected,to do that under those circumstances missing key starters in the receiving corps,is pretty impressive. they should have won that game,their two star players kelce and mahomes blew it for them,kelce of course dropping that pass and mahomes missed a wide open reciever ovwer throwing him with no pressure on him at all.if he does not do that and completes it that is one more toucdown they score the fact he was wide open with nobody near him,he easily goes in for a touchdown.

 

[todd down under]

uhh you are the only one on the planet who thinks the yankees are not a dynasty. oh and the cowboys are considered a dynasty of the 90's winning 3 of 4 superbowls in four years so pretty clear cut the chiefs are a dynasty winning back to back superbowls is considered a dynasty..LOL that dynasty looks like it is coming to an end though that i will admit.

lol I lived in New York. Yankee fans expect a title every year. Many of them don't even think they're a dynasty. They just wallow in self-pity more seasons than not.

Even if you consider the Yankees a dynasty, then it would be ridiculous to consider a dynasty as 3 titles in 5 years.

 

[leftwinger]

Hold the phone. Chiefs blasted BALT. They looked fast again and Tuna breath Travis Swifttey did not suck so bad.

Now its over in BALT already they say.

 

[Fiero425]

Hold the phone. Chiefs blasted BALT. They looked fast again and Tuna breath Travis Swifttey did not suck so bad.

Now its over in BALT already they say.

Balt.'s still favored to win the North for some reason! It's like Jackson gets every benefit of the doubt even w/ a record of 1-6 vs Mahomes & The Chiefs over the years! Lamar is hurt, but expected back w/i 2 or 3 games! KC looks revived w/ missing pieces who've returned! They looked quite impressive in their demolition of The Ravens!

 

[leftwinger]

Balt.'s still favored to win the North for some reason! It's like Jackson gets every benefit of the doubt even w/ a record of 1-6 vs Mahomes & The Chiefs over the years! Lamar is hurt, but expected back w/i 2 or 3 games! KC looks revived w/ missing pieces who've returned! They looked quite impressive in their demolition of The Ravens!

PITT is on the way too. CiN looks dead. CLEVE? Not with Flaco. Why do they play that statue?

 

[Fiero425]

PITT is on the way too. CiN looks dead. CLEVE? Not with Flaco. Why do they play that statue?

Flacco will always be my hero after that 2012 Div. playoff game vs Denver! That TD bomb in the waning minutes to tie, then inevitably overtake the Broncos & Payton Manning in 2 OT's was great & quite memorable!

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Hold the phone. Chiefs blasted BALT. They looked fast again and Tuna breath Travis Swifttey did not suck so bad.

Now its over in BALT already they say.

Hold on now,dont get so excited just yet,I figured the chiefs would win THIS game,the Ravens are having a bad year, just not blow Baltimore out though,now that WAS surprising.

Lets wait and see how they do against a REAL NFL team when the face the Lions in a couple of weeks.I think chiefs fans will be brought back down to earth and reality after that game that the Chiefs are not that good and they will revert to stinking up the joint again as they did against the bolts and the eagles,two REAL NFL teams that are going to be contenders.

IF they prove me wrong and win that game AND score LOTS of points as they did against the Ravens,THEN its time to get on the bandwagon.

Keep in mind i said they had to score LOTS of points to be convincing they are a real contender as in years past. I dont care if they win and its a low scoring game,they are STILL losers and cannot be taken seriously as a superbowl contnder like past years because not having an offense last year eventually caught up with them in the superbowl last year,they got exposed by the Eagles.

they can still lose this game and be taken as a serious superbowl contender as the chargers and eagles IF they score lots of points against the Lions as they did against the ravens.

IF they dont score lots of points as they need to to prove they are a serious superbowl contender,then they can mail it in this year because that will confirm my hunch their dynasty is over and they are no longer a scoring machine that no longer wins exciting shootout games anymore such as 48 to 42.

 

[leftwinger]

Hold on now,dont get so excited just yet,I figured the chiefs would win THIS game,the Ravens are having a bad year, just not blow Baltimore out though,now that WAS surprising.

Lets wait and see how they do against a REAL NFL team when the face the Lions in a couple of weeks.I think chiefs fans will be brought back down to earth and reality after that game that the Chiefs are not that good and they will revert to stinking up the joint again as they did against the bolts and the eagles,two REAL NFL teams that are going to be contenders.

IF they prove me wrong and win that game AND score LOTS of points as they did against the Ravens,THEN its time to get on the bandwagon.

Keep in mind i said they had to score LOTS of points to be convincing they are a real contender as in years past. I dont care if they win and its a low scoring game,they are STILL losers and cannot be taken seriously as a superbowl contnder like past years because not having an offense last year eventually caught up with them in the superbowl last year,they got exposed by the Eagles.

they can still lose this game and be taken as a serious superbowl contender as the chargers and eagles IF they score lots of points against the Lions as they did against the ravens.

IF they dont score lots of points as they need to to prove they are a serious superbowl contender,then they mail it in this year because that will confirm my hunch their dynasty is over and they are no longer a scoring machine that no longer wins exciting shootout games anymore such as 48 to 42.

Oh yes, DET Lions are the best offense going on right now.

Hey, You forgot to call them "The Cheats"?