Mankeeping

Enlightening careers? That’s a joke. More like being manipulated by their feminist “sisters” into undertaking a lifestyle that will leave most of them lonely, depressed and likely suicidal by their mid to late thirties, and regretting their choices for the rest of their lives
Oh please, that's statistically untrue. The only thing I could imagine one regretting is not becoming actualized as opposed to having unneeded children and becoming a wage slave.

America is a feminist country. Women in this country can read, write, pursue careers, and have rights and freedoms under the law. And we're better because of it.

That woman is a rock. She’s the strongest and most amazing woman I’ve ever met. She holds her biological family together amidst the chaos it’s embroiled in on a daily basis. She’s the one thing that’s kept me marginally sane the last 13+ years and probably saved my life at least twice.

Please insult her again, to my face. Then we’ll have some real fun.
If she settled for someone who has the regressive views that you do, that's not encouraging. I assume that some women are just conditioned by society to tolerate regressive views and don't know or care what's good for them, and that's something we want to do away with. Idiocy is shared by both sexes, apparently.
 
Last edited:
bUT he is. you just lied, as part of a ploy to control the discussion.

You want to put heavy restictions on us, your enemies, while your allies like midnight fm have free reign to spew their hate and lies during these "discussions".

How do you feel about lefties like midnight fm, using violence to supress conservative speech on college campuses?



No, it doesn't. It implies that they are young and inexperienced and that they need information from people that have been though the having a family process, to make informed decisions.

You AGAIN, want to limit the discussion, to the point that it is people like you, lecturing everyone as to what they should know and what they should think.







I've explained my accusations in detail at every turn. YOu are just playing dumb so that you can lie.





Is there? I think lefties like you and midnight fm, would celebrate people who said something like that. It would be a great example to push your view on young women.




I've mentioned dating as part of the process several times. YOu are imagining shit now and trying to make an issue of...nothing.






Not really. Because I think they are making that decision because they are being lied to, by people like you. MOSTLY.

So, I'm not upset, or anything, I just see a problem easily fixed by giving people true information to outweigh your lies.

No personal angst on my part at all.
It's true that men, as individuals and as a group, generally speaking aren't doing well in society.


There are reasons for that. That imo, need to be addressed.

And yes, it does reduced the pool of "Good partners".


Let's consider what makes a "Good partner".

Consider this.

Feminists, have demanded economic equality for women, to the point that women is anything, have economic ADVANTAGE,

yet most women want a mate that makes MORE MONEY then them.


This a fundemental flaw in the mindset of modern women. It sets most of them up for failure.

It is not the only flaw on their part.
Cmon, man. This thread immediately devolved into blaming feminism.

I think there's a bunch of men in society that are struggling with the idea that women don't need them like they used to. They don't need them for financial stability and they decided they don't need to have a kids and a family.

I think women really want a guy that has their shit together and guys are not doing a great job at having their shit together. Guys who have their shit together tend to have reliable incomes, goals and aspirations, interests outside their relationship, emotional stability and friends.

Guys are upset that women don't want to date them, so instead of getting their shit together they're just trying to tell women that they have to date them anyway because they'll regret not having kids, even if it means having a shitty partner.
 
intentionally promoted through various techniques to try and quell the population numbers

Their plan is doomed to failure.

Flights to The Philippines are cheaper than ever.

IMG_5658.webp
 
Cmon, man. This thread immediately devolved into blaming feminism.

I think there's a bunch of men in society that are struggling with the idea that women don't need them like they used to. They don't need them for financial stability and they decided they don't need to have a kids and a family.

I think women really want a guy that has their shit together and guys are not doing a great job at having their shit together. Guys who have their shit together tend to have reliable incomes, goals and aspirations, interests outside their relationship, emotional stability and friends.

Guys are upset that women don't want to date them, so instead of getting their shit together they're just trying to tell women that they have to date them anyway because they'll regret not having kids, even if it means having a shitty partner.
I don't think the men here are trying to persuade women to date themselves. They all seem to be married, family men, who are concerned about the way society is going, and they are trying to give advice to young women in general.
 
It is a, not THE basic foundation principle of our nation, that our rights are GOD GIVEN.
The rights were instituted by laws by the framers. It doesn't matter what the "source" of the rights is.

That you wish to say that the GOVERNMENT gave us our rights, is you being an anti-American leftard.
It does. If you lived in North Korea, you could scream all you want to that they're violating your "God-given rights", but it would make no difference.

Rights require government in order to be enforcement.


The "average person" as a whole, massively does more to shape our culture than those that have power adn influence.
You're wrong, plain and simple.

Millions of people are affected by the rights and freedoms which were instituted into law. No one knows or cares about "Joe Schmoe".


That was a retarded thing to say, by which you dodged teh point of my example.

Irrelevant and moot to the discussion.

Allowing millions from shitty third world cultures to flood our commuity, to become a larger and larger portion of our cultural fusion,

is a bad thing. Only a liar would claim it was agood thing.
It is a good thing. We can cull our Neo-Nazi population and replace them with immigrants who offer something of value.

Mass migration is a policy. YOu know it is a bad policy for America and Americans.

But you support it anyways.

So you talk shit attacking the idea of having a real discussion on the issue.

You are a bad faith actor.
America is a nation of immigrants. Opposing immigration is anti-American.

The American Dream is that your children will have it better than you.

What you just posted was a retarded lie.

What is "actualize yourself"? Cause in context it looks like nothing but shit talk.
The American dream is one of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Becoming breeding stock is often a burden to that.

Nazis are an irrelevant fringe adn you are just a hatefilled liar.

Maga is winning now, and looks to be winning more in the future.


Unless you leftards turn shit around FAST, maga could very well become the new normal.

And you know it. All your shit talk is just shit talk.
"MAGA" will be gone in 3 years, and no one will remember or care.

No laws or significant changes to our immigration policy are being put into place, and many more qualified individuals that yourself will continue to immigrate here.

So accept your obsolescence and die off already. The future doesn't need you.
 
The rights were instituted by laws by the framers. It doesn't matter what the "source" of the rights is.


It does. If you lived in North Korea, you could scream all you want to that they're violating your "God-given rights", but it would make no difference.

Rights require government in order to be enforcement.



You're wrong, plain and simple.

Millions of people are affected by the rights and freedoms which were instituted into law. No one knows or cares about "Joe Schmoe".



It is a good thing. We can cull our Neo-Nazi population and replace them with immigrants who offer something of value.


America is a nation of immigrants. Opposing immigration is anti-American.
How does it feel to be inferior to white men?
 
If she settled for someone who has the regressive views that you do, that's not encouraging. I assume that some women are just conditioned by society to tolerate regressive views and don't know or care what's good for them, and that's something we want to do away with
What will probably infuriate you even more is that she approached me, knowing that I wouldn’t have anything to do with a career woman. I got her off Medicaid, and Medicare, and SSDI. She (and much other any) now rely on me for their very survival on a daily basis.
 
What will probably infuriate you even more is that she approached me, knowing that I wouldn’t have anything to do with a career woman.
More like a career woman wouldn't have anything to do with you. But that's a given. You're a dinosaur.

I got her off Medicaid, and Medicare, and SSDI. She (and much other any) now rely on me for their very survival on a daily basis.
Right, so since you have nothing of value to offer the future, you need someone unnecessarily dependent on you, so that it makes you feel needed and relevant, when in reality you aren't particularly important.

Not sure why someone would want to waste their time being a provider for someone else when they don't have to, and would be better off improving themselves. I haven't for any of the women I've been with, since most of them were pretty self-sufficient. I guess I'm not that insecure and useless. We don't want relationships that are based on unnecessary, forced dependency.
 
Last edited:
More like a career woman wouldn't have anything to do with you. But that's a given. You're a dinosaur.


Right, so since you have nothing of value to offer the future, you need someone unnecessarily dependent on you, so that it makes you feel needed and relevant, when in reality you aren't particularly important.
You fed trash are always putting a negative spin on things. Why can't you look at it positively? He saved a woman from having to be on welfare. That makes him a kind, generous man. He also has a job that can support at least two people. That's a good thing, too. But of course, you would never admit to these things, because he's white. You feds would rather drink rocket coolant than admit that white men might have some good qualities.
 
There is no point. It's simply baseless rhetoric.
No it isn't. Read it again, it went way over your head. I'd clue you in but it gets tiresome educating the purposeful ignorant.
 
No it isn't. Read it again, it went way over your head. I'd clue you in but it gets tiresome educating the purposeful ignorant.
There is no point, because:

The conspiracy theory about attempts to "quell" the population numbers is false

Lower population is a good thing anyway
 
There is no point, because:

The conspiracy theory about attempts to "quell" the population numbers is false

Lower population is a good thing anyway
The population is below replacement, American women tired of so-called 'mankeeping' are the ones who will be replaced.

1753827321618.webp

You had no clue did you?
 
15th post
Cmon, man. This thread immediately devolved into blaming feminism.

Here yuo are again, trying to have as a premise, that your side is not to blame.

This is representave of the way lefties work today. You want to be able to lecture people to push your ideas, while attacking anyone that speaks out against your ideas.


I think there's a bunch of men in society that are struggling with the idea that women don't need them like they used to. They don't need them for financial stability and they decided they don't need to have a kids and a family.

Yes. That is your opinion on the matter. IMO, you are wrong. .Women still mostly want children and it is bad ideas from feminists that are sabotaging them. And though them society.


I think women really want a guy that has their shit together and guys are not doing a great job at having their shit together. Guys who have their shit together tend to have reliable incomes, goals and aspirations, interests outside their relationship, emotional stability and friends.

Here you want to just blame men. You have made this assertion many times already. YOu've done nothing other than repeating it alot and attacking the idea that the other side should be allowed to have any input.


Guys are upset that women don't want to date them, so instead of getting their shit together they're just trying to tell women that they have to date them anyway because they'll regret not having kids, even if it means having a shitty partner.

OR, you could look at what I have ACTUALY said, which is that the decline in dating and fertility, is a crisis for men AND women and that bad ideas, many from feminism, are the cause adn we need to think about what we really WANT, and how to get from here to there,


and have a real policy debate about that.


And not just blame men.
 
The rights were instituted by laws by the framers. It doesn't matter what the "source" of the rights is.

It matters tremendously what we consider teh source of our rights.

IF the government GIVES us our rights, then the government can take them away.

YOu, being a leftard, like that idea.

Me being a real American, hates that idea and am quite willing to fight you over it.



It does. If you lived in North Korea, you could scream all you want to that they're violating your "God-given rights", but it would make no difference.

Rights require government in order to be enforcement.

It would make a tremendous difference because if north korea was inhabited by AMERICANS, and the government tried that shit, we would kill them.


You're wrong, plain and simple.

Millions of people are affected by the rights and freedoms which were instituted into law. No one knows or cares about "Joe Schmoe".

YOur pretense of being too retarded to know what a culture is, is too dumb to be discussed.

So, piss off leftard.


It is a good thing. We can cull our Neo-Nazi population and replace them with immigrants who offer something of value.
Oh, the lack of self awareness of the modern leftard.

To accuse others of being "nazis" while he gloats at the idea of "CULLING" the a population that is a political problem for him.


What a blind fool. A very hateful blind fool.


America is a nation of immigrants. Opposing immigration is anti-American.

America is a nation of AMERICANS. Who you hate. And thus want to "CULL" and replace with shitty third worlders.


ANd to that end, you are here trying to convince American women to not have children.


That this would lead to millions of women and man failing to have families and alll the heart ache and pain that would cause,

you don't care, because you are a soulless leftard.
 
Back
Top Bottom