Several Women Who Dated Graham Platner Recall ‘Unsettling’ Behavior

[Meathead]

No one ever said to "believe all of the women", you lying idiot. But thanks for proving you have no interest in protecting women at all.

We have said that you believe the women who are credible. A Republican communications specialist working for the Republican candidate accusing a Democrat candidate years after the fact, in the middle of hotly contested election campaign, with no one backing up her claims, is not a "credible witness".

You didn't even address the part where Trump and Hegseth have admitted to assaulting women. Or the part where one in four American women are sexually assaulted and/or raped in their lifetimes.

When are YOU going to address the 26 women who confirmed that Trump sexually assaulted them????? Or the woman Hegseth paid off to keep quiet????

When are American men going to be told to stop sexually assaulting women????

We got it. The belief of women is directly proportional to the liberalism of the skank and the political views of the accused. We have seen it many times.

 

[j-mac]

Dragon lady -

Many of us were startled to open The New York Times last week and find ourselves accused of hijacking and weaponizing the phrase “believe all women.”

According to journalist Susan Faludi, the phrase always has been “believe women,” and never has been associated with a demand for automatic and unquestioned belief that those who allege sexual assault are telling the truth.

The “believe all women” line, in Faludi’s telling, is a false narrative perpetuated by what she calls the right wing.

Apparently, the problems long pointed out with the premise of believing all women were, well, problems we—the “right wing”—created as a trap for an otherwise unblemished and unproblematic movement.

This was particularly shocking to me. I remember the arguments for literally believing all women without question to be so strong that I wrote an article addressing them. Bari Weiss, who hardly could be called a right-winger, also understood this as a primary message of the movement, and was so concerned about its consequences that she publicly pushed back against it.

Could our memories have been so wrong? Could we have misunderstood the basic premise of an entire social movement? Could it be that we trolled ourselves into knocking down a straw man?

No. We’re being gaslighted. And we have the receipts to prove it.

To give credit to Faludi, some feminist voices have warned that #BelieveWomen ought not to mean more than simply taking women seriously instead of immediately dismissing accusations.

But to suggest that the broader #MeToo movement did not ever meaningfully encompass a demand to believe all women, in all accusations? Now that’s just pure revisionism.

https://www.heritage.org/gender/commentary/dont-gaslight-us-believewomen

 

[Dragonlady]

When women stop lying about it, and stop trying to use it as a political tool. Just as you are here.

When women stop lying about it. That's the weakest line yet. 1 in 4 women are lying when they say they've been sexually assaulted. So why does everyone spend so much time teaching women to avoid being sexually assaulted, when there is no sexual assault and the women are all lying.

Your post makes no logical sense at all. Because some women have lied about being raped, no man should ever be convicted of rape???? Trump admits to sexually assaulting women, and you still claim all these women are lying.

No man should ever be taught he must obtain a valid consent? When do men going to be made to take responsibility for abusing women????

 

[Dragonlady]

We got it. The belief of women is directly proportional to the liberalism of the skank and the political views of the accused. We have seen it many times.

Just your use of the words "liberal" and "skank" in your post proves you have no credibility in this argument. You only believe the victims if they're accusing liberals.

You don't believe any women if they're accusing conservative men. The women who accused Donald Trump weren't "liberals". Nor was the woman who accused Hegseth of rape.

Epstein's victims weren't "liberals". They were children. And you don't believe them either.

Keep posting and proving the accuracy of your user name, Meathead. No brains in that head at all.

 

[Meathead]

Just your use of the words "liberal" and "skank" in your post proves you have no credibility in this argument. You only believe the victims if they're accusing liberals.

You don't believe any women if they're accusing conservative men. The women who accused Donald Trump weren't "liberals". Nor was the woman who accused Hegseth of rape.

Epstein's victims weren't "liberals". They were children. And you don't believe them either.

Keep posting and proving the accuracy of your user name, Meathead. No brains in that head at all.

I've little doubt the women that falsely accuse men of rape or sexual assault can accurately be described as skanks who are overwhelmingly liberal.

 

[Mick2]

So it’s just a coincidence that the woman making these claims she can’t prove also was a major Kavanaugh defender

Huh? Kavanaugh was the victim of hoax. This woman had the courage to stand up to hoaxes and speak truth