Major prewar battles in Middle East. Americans need their AR-15 assault rifles.Who says we don't need them?!

[Richard-H]

The same side that wants to defund or disband police also wants to disarm the public. Gee, I wonder who that leaves most of the guns with....

The same people that have the most weapons now.

 

[Richard-H]

Let’s face it America

Nothing beats an AR 15 with a 50 round magazine if you want to hunt small School Children

View attachment 489953

we can always count on you for showing us what an idiot you are,,

I’m an idiot?

You are the one fighting to make sure assassins and mass murderers have the firepower of their choice

no I'm not,, I'm fighting to make sure good people are allowed to defend themselves from guys your referring to and also governments intent on enslaving the people,,,

I know its hard for someone like you to understand,, but what can I do about your ignorance??

Save me your Red Dawn fantasies.

You don’t need a 50 round magazine to defend yourself. If you think you are capable of taking on a modern trained and equipped Army......I have sad news for you

Not needing it has nothing to do with the right to have it.

The 2nd amendment is not and never has come with shall not infringe. This is the BIG LIE.

There is no mention of guns, per se; the word is ARMS and no one has the absolute right to own all matter of ARMS. From Nuclear Weapons to push button & gravity knives there are limits to what can be owned, possess or in the custody and control of every person who is living within the border of the US.

Absolute nonsense.
"Arms" is whatever is needed to defend yourself from government oppression.....like the British, or our own abusive government.
If everyone has a musket....then you have the right to own one.
If everyone has an AR 15....then everyone has the right to own one...if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights.....then so be it.
If the call to take up arms against a Totalitarian government.....and the call for a militia is made to take the fight to the enemy, foreign or domestic, then that right shall not be infringed by the federal government.
It doesn't say anything about states.
There is where the great threat to security lies.

Sadly, this comment is out of touch with reality: "if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights.....then so be it" In context, the author believes every citizen no matter what shall have the right to have an AR -15 in their custody and control.

The solution in response to Mud-brain's absurd comment is this: DEMOCRACY.

Mud-Brain?
Kiss my ass.
If you go back to the original intent of the framers of the constitution....that's what they meant.
The only reason it's a problem is because leftists in our country are trying to totally disarm us, thus preventing us from defending ourselves.......from home-invasion (BLM & ANTIFA)....waves of illegals/drug-human traffickers pouring over the border onto ranches and farms......or keep the government from entering our homes illegally to take our food and our property.....which is what communists tend to do......and what the left WILL DO if we let them.

And when exactly has any of that ever happened to you?

Paranoid delusion much, Mud-Brain?

 

[danielpalos]

Let’s face it America

Nothing beats an AR 15 with a 50 round magazine if you want to hunt small School Children

View attachment 489953

we can always count on you for showing us what an idiot you are,,

I’m an idiot?

You are the one fighting to make sure assassins and mass murderers have the firepower of their choice

no I'm not,, I'm fighting to make sure good people are allowed to defend themselves from guys your referring to and also governments intent on enslaving the people,,,

I know its hard for someone like you to understand,, but what can I do about your ignorance??

Save me your Red Dawn fantasies.

You don’t need a 50 round magazine to defend yourself. If you think you are capable of taking on a modern trained and equipped Army......I have sad news for you

Not needing it has nothing to do with the right to have it.

The 2nd amendment is not and never has come with shall not infringe. This is the BIG LIE.

There is no mention of guns, per se; the word is ARMS and no one has the absolute right to own all matter of ARMS. From Nuclear Weapons to push button & gravity knives there are limits to what can be owned, possess or in the custody and control of every person who is living within the border of the US.

Absolute nonsense.
"Arms" is whatever is needed to defend yourself from government oppression.....like the British, or our own abusive government.
If everyone has a musket....then you have the right to own one.
If everyone has an AR 15....then everyone has the right to own one...if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights.....then so be it.
If the call to take up arms against a Totalitarian government.....and the call for a militia is made to take the fight to the enemy, foreign or domestic, then that right shall not be infringed by the federal government.
It doesn't say anything about states.
There is where the great threat to security lies.

Sadly, this comment is out of touch with reality: "if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights.....then so be it" In context, the author believes every citizen no matter what shall have the right to have an AR -15 in their custody and control.

The solution in response to Mud-brain's absurd comment is this: DEMOCRACY.

first thing Hitler did was take away the guns...every twisted paranoid government does that

Well, your post is a BIG LIE. No effort has yet been proffered to take away guns from any sober, sane and law abiding citizen. In fact any effort to do so will fail. The cost and outrage in doing so would be too expensive and a violation of the 4th Amendment and if so the people will speak out in an election.

But I repeat again, the 2nd Amendment does not allow every person who is unfit and via due process of the law have the right to own, possess or have in his/her custody or control a deadly weapon; described in a legal document wherein the person is a danger to others or themselves.

IOW, existing law, properly enforced, will provide the kind of gun security everyone wants.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

 

[hadit]

Let’s face it America

Nothing beats an AR 15 with a 50 round magazine if you want to hunt small School Children

View attachment 489953

we can always count on you for showing us what an idiot you are,,

I’m an idiot?

You are the one fighting to make sure assassins and mass murderers have the firepower of their choice

no I'm not,, I'm fighting to make sure good people are allowed to defend themselves from guys your referring to and also governments intent on enslaving the people,,,

I know its hard for someone like you to understand,, but what can I do about your ignorance??

Save me your Red Dawn fantasies.

You don’t need a 50 round magazine to defend yourself. If you think you are capable of taking on a modern trained and equipped Army......I have sad news for you

Not needing it has nothing to do with the right to have it.

The 2nd amendment is not and never has come with shall not infringe. This is the BIG LIE.

There is no mention of guns, per se; the word is ARMS and no one has the absolute right to own all matter of ARMS. From Nuclear Weapons to push button & gravity knives there are limits to what can be owned, possess or in the custody and control of every person who is living within the border of the US.

Absolute nonsense.
"Arms" is whatever is needed to defend yourself from government oppression.....like the British, or our own abusive government.
If everyone has a musket....then you have the right to own one.
If everyone has an AR 15....then everyone has the right to own one...if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights.....then so be it.
If the call to take up arms against a Totalitarian government.....and the call for a militia is made to take the fight to the enemy, foreign or domestic, then that right shall not be infringed by the federal government.
It doesn't say anything about states.
There is where the great threat to security lies.

Sadly, this comment is out of touch with reality: "if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights.....then so be it" In context, the author believes every citizen no matter what shall have the right to have an AR -15 in their custody and control.

The solution in response to Mud-brain's absurd comment is this: DEMOCRACY.

first thing Hitler did was take away the guns...every twisted paranoid government does that

Well, your post is a BIG LIE. No effort has yet been proffered to take away guns from any sober, sane and law abiding citizen. In fact any effort to do so will fail. The cost and outrage in doing so would be too expensive and a violation of the 4th Amendment and if so the people will speak out in an election.

But I repeat again, the 2nd Amendment does not allow every person who is unfit and via due process of the law have the right to own, possess or have in his/her custody or control a deadly weapon; described in a legal document wherein the person is a danger to others or themselves.

IOW, existing law, properly enforced, will provide the kind of gun security everyone wants.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Do you have anything relevant to the discussion you'd like to share?

 

[mudwhistle]

Let’s face it America

Nothing beats an AR 15 with a 50 round magazine if you want to hunt small School Children

View attachment 489953

we can always count on you for showing us what an idiot you are,,

I’m an idiot?

You are the one fighting to make sure assassins and mass murderers have the firepower of their choice

no I'm not,, I'm fighting to make sure good people are allowed to defend themselves from guys your referring to and also governments intent on enslaving the people,,,

I know its hard for someone like you to understand,, but what can I do about your ignorance??

Save me your Red Dawn fantasies.

You don’t need a 50 round magazine to defend yourself. If you think you are capable of taking on a modern trained and equipped Army......I have sad news for you

Not needing it has nothing to do with the right to have it.

The 2nd amendment is not and never has come with shall not infringe. This is the BIG LIE.

There is no mention of guns, per se; the word is ARMS and no one has the absolute right to own all matter of ARMS. From Nuclear Weapons to push button & gravity knives there are limits to what can be owned, possess or in the custody and control of every person who is living within the border of the US.

Absolute nonsense.
"Arms" is whatever is needed to defend yourself from government oppression.....like the British, or our own abusive government.
If everyone has a musket....then you have the right to own one.
If everyone has an AR 15....then everyone has the right to own one...if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights.....then so be it.
If the call to take up arms against a Totalitarian government.....and the call for a militia is made to take the fight to the enemy, foreign or domestic, then that right shall not be infringed by the federal government.
It doesn't say anything about states.
There is where the great threat to security lies.

Sadly, this comment is out of touch with reality: "if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights.....then so be it" In context, the author believes every citizen no matter what shall have the right to have an AR -15 in their custody and control.

The solution in response to Mud-brain's absurd comment is this: DEMOCRACY.

first thing Hitler did was take away the guns...every twisted paranoid government does that

Well, your post is a BIG LIE. No effort has yet been proffered to take away guns from any sober, sane and law abiding citizen. In fact any effort to do so will fail. The cost and outrage in doing so would be too expensive and a violation of the 4th Amendment and if so the people will speak out in an election.

But I repeat again, the 2nd Amendment does not allow every person who is unfit and via due process of the law have the right to own, possess or have in his/her custody or control a deadly weapon; described in a legal document wherein the person is a danger to others or themselves.

IOW, existing law, properly enforced, will provide the kind of gun security everyone wants.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Do you have anything relevant to the discussion you'd like to share?

Looked pretty damned relevant to me....or anyone with half a brain.

 

[mudwhistle]

Let’s face it America

Nothing beats an AR 15 with a 50 round magazine if you want to hunt small School Children

View attachment 489953

we can always count on you for showing us what an idiot you are,,

I’m an idiot?

You are the one fighting to make sure assassins and mass murderers have the firepower of their choice

no I'm not,, I'm fighting to make sure good people are allowed to defend themselves from guys your referring to and also governments intent on enslaving the people,,,

I know its hard for someone like you to understand,, but what can I do about your ignorance??

Save me your Red Dawn fantasies.

You don’t need a 50 round magazine to defend yourself. If you think you are capable of taking on a modern trained and equipped Army......I have sad news for you

Not needing it has nothing to do with the right to have it.

The 2nd amendment is not and never has come with shall not infringe. This is the BIG LIE.

There is no mention of guns, per se; the word is ARMS and no one has the absolute right to own all matter of ARMS. From Nuclear Weapons to push button & gravity knives there are limits to what can be owned, possess or in the custody and control of every person who is living within the border of the US.

Absolute nonsense.
"Arms" is whatever is needed to defend yourself from government oppression.....like the British, or our own abusive government.
If everyone has a musket....then you have the right to own one.
If everyone has an AR 15....then everyone has the right to own one...if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights.....then so be it.
If the call to take up arms against a Totalitarian government.....and the call for a militia is made to take the fight to the enemy, foreign or domestic, then that right shall not be infringed by the federal government.
It doesn't say anything about states.
There is where the great threat to security lies.

Sadly, this comment is out of touch with reality: "if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights.....then so be it" In context, the author believes every citizen no matter what shall have the right to have an AR -15 in their custody and control.

The solution in response to Mud-brain's absurd comment is this: DEMOCRACY.

Mud-Brain?
Kiss my ass.
If you go back to the original intent of the framers of the constitution....that's what they meant.
The only reason it's a problem is because leftists in our country are trying to totally disarm us, thus preventing us from defending ourselves.......from home-invasion (BLM & ANTIFA)....waves of illegals/drug-human traffickers pouring over the border onto ranches and farms......or keep the government from entering our homes illegally to take our food and our property.....which is what communists tend to do......and what the left WILL DO if we let them.

And when exactly has any of that ever happened to you?

Paranoid delusion much, Mud-Brain?

Well......not everything has to effect me directly (unlike you) to be a threat to good people in this country.

You seem to be the typical self-centered, superficial low-life that only thinks about what's happening around them. If it isn't happening in their neighborhood..or on TV newcasts..it doesn't exist.

But unlike you.....I've been around the world and around this country.....and I know what it's like to be on an Island and have to fend for myself surrounded by hostile natives. Survival training taught me what to expect. The military taught me the rest. I figure in no time farmers are going to be getting butchered along the border by drug-cartels.....something Obama was hoping would happen thanks to his weapons programs like Fast & Furious. Obama Admin Caught Sending Guns to Drug Cartels

 

[rightwinger]

We need our AR 15s in case the terrorists or BLM attack us

Other than that, we need them to hunt squirrels

AR-15's are not assault rifles, they just look scary.

Best available weapon for slaughtering young children, shooting up shopping malls and movie theaters

 

[progressive hunter]

We need our AR 15s in case the terrorists or BLM attack us

Other than that, we need them to hunt squirrels

AR-15's are not assault rifles, they just look scary.

Best available weapon for slaughtering young children, shooting up shopping malls and movie theaters

just because thats what you would do doesnt mean the rest of us will,,

 

[rightwinger]

Bill of Rights doesn’t restrict any of that

.

Sweetie ... If you want the Bill of Rights to say something different, then do what is necessary to change it.
If you want it to mean whatever the fuck you desire, without changing it ... Go Pound Sand ...

That's why we can never compromise on this matter.
You have nothing to offer as a compromise other than infringing upon the rights of citizens.
If you want to do that, you can ... Just go through the process of getting it ratified by the States.

.​

Sorry Skippy

But Second Amendment has never provided unrestricted gun ownership

 

[rightwinger]

We need our AR 15s in case the terrorists or BLM attack us

Other than that, we need them to hunt squirrels

AR-15's are not assault rifles, they just look scary.

Best available weapon for slaughtering young children, shooting up shopping malls and movie theaters

just because thats what you would do doesnt mean the rest of us will,,

Four out of five mass killers prefer the AR15

 

[progressive hunter]

Bill of Rights doesn’t restrict any of that

.

Sweetie ... If you want the Bill of Rights to say something different, then do what is necessary to change it.
If you want it to mean whatever the fuck you desire, without changing it ... Go Pound Sand ...

That's why we can never compromise on this matter.
You have nothing to offer as a compromise other than infringing upon the rights of citizens.
If you want to do that, you can ... Just go through the process of getting it ratified by the States.

.​

Sorry Skippy

But Second Amendment has never provided unrestricted gun ownership

for the first 150 yrs it did,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

We need our AR 15s in case the terrorists or BLM attack us

Other than that, we need them to hunt squirrels

AR-15's are not assault rifles, they just look scary.

Best available weapon for slaughtering young children, shooting up shopping malls and movie theaters

just because thats what you would do doesnt mean the rest of us will,,

Four out of five mass killers prefer the AR15

do you have a point?? cause 99.999999% of ar owners never harm anyone with them,,,

 

[Lastamender]

Bill of Rights doesn’t restrict any of that

.

Sweetie ... If you want the Bill of Rights to say something different, then do what is necessary to change it.
If you want it to mean whatever the fuck you desire, without changing it ... Go Pound Sand ...

That's why we can never compromise on this matter.
You have nothing to offer as a compromise other than infringing upon the rights of citizens.
If you want to do that, you can ... Just go through the process of getting it ratified by the States.

.​

Sorry Skippy

But Second Amendment has never provided unrestricted gun ownership

It does not have to.

 

[BlackSand]

Sorry Skippy

But Second Amendment has never provided unrestricted gun ownership

.

Except when it was ratified by the States, and before people like you started pretending it didn't ...

.​

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights

This is as idiotic as it is ridiculous and wrong.

What are the criteria of ‘tyranny’ and ‘corruption’ – what’s the mechanism of consensus of all the people that government has become ‘tyrannical’ and ‘corrupt’; that a minority of disgruntled rightists subjectively and incorrectly perceive government to have become ‘tyrannical’ and ‘corrupt’ doesn’t warrant armed rebellion against that government.

As already correctly noted: it’s democracy, our democratic institutions, and Constitutional case law that safeguard the people from tyranny and corruption, not guns.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Let’s face it America

Nothing beats an AR 15 with a 50 round magazine if you want to hunt small School Children

View attachment 489953

we can always count on you for showing us what an idiot you are,,

I’m an idiot?

You are the one fighting to make sure assassins and mass murderers have the firepower of their choice

no I'm not,, I'm fighting to make sure good people are allowed to defend themselves from guys your referring to and also governments intent on enslaving the people,,,

I know its hard for someone like you to understand,, but what can I do about your ignorance??

Save me your Red Dawn fantasies.

You don’t need a 50 round magazine to defend yourself. If you think you are capable of taking on a modern trained and equipped Army......I have sad news for you

Not needing it has nothing to do with the right to have it.

The 2nd amendment is not and never has come with shall not infringe. This is the BIG LIE.

There is no mention of guns, per se; the word is ARMS and no one has the absolute right to own all matter of ARMS. From Nuclear Weapons to push button & gravity knives there are limits to what can be owned, possess or in the custody and control of every person who is living within the border of the US.

Absolute nonsense.
"Arms" is whatever is needed to defend yourself from government oppression.....like the British, or our own abusive government.
If everyone has a musket....then you have the right to own one.
If everyone has an AR 15....then everyone has the right to own one...if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights.....then so be it.
If the call to take up arms against a Totalitarian government.....and the call for a militia is made to take the fight to the enemy, foreign or domestic, then that right shall not be infringed by the federal government.
It doesn't say anything about states.
There is where the great threat to security lies.

Sadly, this comment is out of touch with reality: "if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights.....then so be it" In context, the author believes every citizen no matter what shall have the right to have an AR -15 in their custody and control.

The solution in response to Mud-brain's absurd comment is this: DEMOCRACY.

Correct.

Of course, conservatives oppose democracy.

They have nothing but contempt for the will of the people and are willing to do anything to overturn the will of the people – including through force of arms predicated on the idiotic notion that a lawfully, constitutionally elected government reflecting the will of the people should be ‘overthrown’ because conservatives have some wrongheaded idea that government has become ‘tyrannical.’

The 1/6 rightwing terrorist attack on America’s democracy is proof of that.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

first thing Hitler did was take away the guns...every twisted paranoid government does that

This is a lie – as moronic as it is wrong.

The Hitler gun control lie

Gun rights activists who cite the dictator as a reason against gun control have their history dangerously wrong

www.salon.com

 

[52ndStreet]

The Swiss were never invaded during WW I and during WWII. The Swiss government require all citizens to have assault rifles in their homes.

 

[surada]

Let’s face it America

Nothing beats an AR 15 with a 50 round magazine if you want to hunt small School Children

View attachment 489953

we can always count on you for showing us what an idiot you are,,

I’m an idiot?

You are the one fighting to make sure assassins and mass murderers have the firepower of their choice

no I'm not,, I'm fighting to make sure good people are allowed to defend themselves from guys your referring to and also governments intent on enslaving the people,,,

I know its hard for someone like you to understand,, but what can I do about your ignorance??

Save me your Red Dawn fantasies.

You don’t need a 50 round magazine to defend yourself. If you think you are capable of taking on a modern trained and equipped Army......I have sad news for you

Not needing it has nothing to do with the right to have it.

The 2nd amendment is not and never has come with shall not infringe. This is the BIG LIE.

There is no mention of guns, per se; the word is ARMS and no one has the absolute right to own all matter of ARMS. From Nuclear Weapons to push button & gravity knives there are limits to what can be owned, possess or in the custody and control of every person who is living within the border of the US.

Absolute nonsense.
"Arms" is whatever is needed to defend yourself from government oppression.....like the British, or our own abusive government.
If everyone has a musket....then you have the right to own one.
If everyone has an AR 15....then everyone has the right to own one...if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights.....then so be it.
If the call to take up arms against a Totalitarian government.....and the call for a militia is made to take the fight to the enemy, foreign or domestic, then that right shall not be infringed by the federal government.
It doesn't say anything about states.
There is where the great threat to security lies.

Sadly, this comment is out of touch with reality: "if that's what it takes to keep a corrupt government, federal, state, or local, from infringing on your rights.....then so be it" In context, the author believes every citizen no matter what shall have the right to have an AR -15 in their custody and control.

The solution in response to Mud-brain's absurd comment is this: DEMOCRACY.

Mud-Brain?
Kiss my ass.
If you go back to the original intent of the framers of the constitution....that's what they meant.
The only reason it's a problem is because leftists in our country are trying to totally disarm us, thus preventing us from defending ourselves.......from home-invasion (BLM & ANTIFA)....waves of illegals/drug-human traffickers pouring over the border onto ranches and farms......or keep the government from entering our homes illegally to take our food and our property.....which is what communists tend to do......and what the left WILL DO if we let them.

And when exactly has any of that ever happened to you?

Paranoid delusion much, Mud-Brain?

Well......not everything has to effect me directly (unlike you) to be a threat to good people in this country.

You seem to be the typical self-centered, superficial low-life that only thinks about what's happening around them. If it isn't happening in their neighborhood..or on TV newcasts..it doesn't exist.

But unlike you.....I've been around the world and around this country.....and I know what it's like to be on an Island and have to fend for myself surrounded by hostile natives. Survival training taught me what to expect. The military taught me the rest. I figure in no time farmers are going to be getting butchered along the border by drug-cartels.....something Obama was hoping would happen thanks to his weapons programs like Fast & Furious. Obama Admin Caught Sending Guns to Drug Cartels

You sound like a dottie old man.

 

[hadit]

We need our AR 15s in case the terrorists or BLM attack us

Other than that, we need them to hunt squirrels

AR-15's are not assault rifles, they just look scary.

Best available weapon for slaughtering young children, shooting up shopping malls and movie theaters

If that's what you imagine doing with a gun, you shouldn't have one.