Maine’s radical abortion desires is now confirmed to be bringing back Eugenics

Because you're a Nazi-like piece of shit inhuman monster who wants to kill the disabled, yes, I know.
Says the person who emulates the Nazis on abortion policy.

We fight for liberty, so we will always oppose fascist filth such as yourself.

We do not kill human beings just because they have a disability or terminal disease - that's called murder, and people go to prison for that, and they should.
But nobody thinks fetuses are human beings. Especially you. That's a lie pro-lifers tell to justify being sick control freak pervs.
 
Says the person who emulates the Nazis on abortion policy.
Do you know what Mengele did to pregnant Jews?

Hitler practiced world conquering aggressive war and slaughtering anyone who opposed him - ah yes, the Nazis loved the human right to life. TOTES MCGOTES, you ABJECT RETARD.

You're full of shit, eat more shit, eat shit until you die.

We fight for liberty, so we will always oppose fascist filth such as yourself.
You fight for oppression, you fascist slaver piece of shit.

But nobody thinks fetuses are human beings.
That's just bigots like you, bigots who need to eat shit until you die.
 
Do you know what Mengele did to pregnant Jews?

Hitler practiced world conquering aggressive war and slaughtering anyone who opposed him - ah yes, the Nazis loved the human right to life. TOTES MCGOTES, you ABJECT RETARD.

You're full of shit, eat more shit, eat shit until you die.


You fight for oppression, you fascist slaver piece of shit.


That's just bigots like you, bigots who need to eat shit until you die.
Carsomyr needs to calm down
 
You don’t know that.


You’re the one wanting to allow 8 month children in the womb to be murdered. historically that would point to you as the monster, committing infanticide.

Normally I would say no to that, but this is also a very unusual case.

Dana Peirce was eight months pregnant when doctors told her the baby she was carrying – a second child that she and her husband had already named Cameron – had a rare genetic mutation called lethal skeletal dysplasia that would kill him, either inside her womb or shortly after his birth.

The intense grief of the loss and the painful details of Cameron’s condition rocked the Yarmouth veterinarian. His head was much larger than it should have been and his limbs much shorter. Though his heart was normal, his ribs had not grown and his lungs could not fill with air. If he survived birth, he would not be able to breathe. The scan also showed several broken bones. Despite all outward signs of a normal pregnancy, Cameron had obviously been suffering.

So my question is…is it life at all costs even the price is intense suffering for the fetus? The other aspect is that it is a high risk pregnancy for the mother. What would you do to manage what is clearly a painful condition in utero? And, if he didn’t die in utero, or birth, an immediate and painful death from suffocation?

Maine Governor Janet Mills, a Democrat, credited the case of Maine woman Dana Peirce as justification for the expanded legalization of abortion.

At eight months pregnant, Peirce wanted to abort her unborn son after he was diagnosed with a genetic mutation called lethal skeletal dysplasia, as reported by the Portland Press Herald. Peirce ultimately traveled to Colorado for an abortion because Maine law prohibits post-viability abortions where the mother’s life or health are not jeopardized. The law does allow elective abortions up to viability, generally recognized at 24 weeks.

“No Maine person should have to endure the same physical, emotional, psychological, and financial burden that Dana and her family had to in order to receive medical care,” stated Mills.


So, if a baby has skeletal dysplasia? Completely expendable.. kill it.. at 8 months. Save people/society from the “burden” of these monsters
The baby has congenital defects that are incompatible with life. He will die at birth if not before.


What’s next? Downs Syndrome? Wrong color? Wrong sex? Poor family? Depressed mother?

Margaret Sanger would be proud

There is a huge difference between defects that are incompatible with life and any of the above. Most abortion restrictions do allow for abortion in cases of severe fetal deformity.


Here’s a F*cking thought… think for a second before you partake in an act that is designed to produce children if you don’t want children (or take the widely available precautions)
This was very much a wanted baby. They had already picked out name. For them it is devastating. What does what you just said have to do with that?

And yes, that means taking whatever is created, this isn’t a menu. If you want a specific type of child and want to kill it if it’s not what you wanted.. you never really wanted children. You’d be a weak person falling short of the call of unconditional loving parenthood
This isn’t about a “specific type of child”. This about birth defects so severe they are incompatible with life and will cause immense suffering in the short time it lives. What parent would be able to put their child through that? It isn’t trivial and it doesn’t mean they are bad parents. Leave those decisions to them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top