" Bias Of Affiliations Illustrating Definitive Lines "
* Legitimate Aggression And Creed Of Individualism Entitled Through Citizenship *
I know and do not care, as I am dealing with a bunch of religious fascist bastards who are denying women and gays equality.
Those promoting equality often confuse equal protection from government with equal endowment through government , as the two are not the same .
* Rigorous Rules Necessary For Discussion *
By definition , violence is illegitimate aggression , while self defense against violence is legitimate aggression .
According to theory for individualism , a definition of illegitimate aggression may be a valid threat to implement aggression , or an actual implementation of aggression , against the elements of self ownership ( free roam , free association , progeny ) or self determination ( private property , willful intents - contracts ) .
A negative wright is a law phrased as a proscription for authoritarian action by government , whereby one obtains a negative liberty from government to act freely without its interference .
A positive wright is a law phrased as a prescription for authoritarian action by government , whereby one may obtain a negative liberty from other individuals to act freely without their interference , or whereby one may obtain a positive liberty from other individuals to not act freely without their interference .
Thus individuals would be equally protected to privately practice behavior of creed within ethical constructs of non violence principles .
* Equal Protection Against Illegitimate Aggression *
All individual members of a collective state are entitled to equal protection against illegitimate aggression when its constitution includes non violence principles as part of the social civil contract .
One may exercise the self determination element of individualism by not being prohibited through government from free use of private property , by entering into valid contracts , or by exercising power of attorney , or by exercising writs of willful intent .
* Legitimate Aggression Against Equal Endowment *
A purpose for extending social security coverage to spouses is account for procreation in a traditional family where a female as a home maker does not enter the employment market and is consequently allowed to receive social security dispensations based upon contributions from the male spouse .
Why would a lexicon of bread winner and home maker apply to individuals whose social civil contract ( civil union ) is physically unfounded in procreation ?