Lyndsey Graham Who Was Directly Lied To Says House Benghazi Report Full of C R A P

[Camp]

Sen. Graham jumped on the partisan Benghazi conspiracy heap to attract support from the radical right and Tea Party in his state. The report makes him look like what he is, a partisan conspiracy hack who has been proven by a committee of his on party in the House to be a fool and a jerk. Anyone who watched him on the news today saw that the best he could do to defend himself was mumble, stumble, evade, deflect and voice his opinion that the committee was wrong. No facts to back up his allegation that the CIA lied to him. That is why the OP nor anyone else can not provide an example of a lie he was told by the CIA. Graham can't provide one himself.

Senator Lindsey Graham: My question is, did anybody leave any base anywhere to go to the aid of the people under attack in Benghazi, Libya, before the attack ended?

Secretary Leon Panetta: No

How is that a lie? Do you have information about a military base sending support while the attack was taking place?

 

[Dante]

Again "Ifthe law is not on your side, emphasize the facts. If the facts aren't on your side, bang on the table,”

Senator Lindsey Graham: My question is, did anybody leave any base anywhere to go to the aid of the people under attack in Benghazi, Libya, before the attack ended?

Secretary Leon Panetta: No

Just answer this question.

Why not?

Why didn't anybody leave any base anywhere to go to the aid of the people under attack in Benghazi, Libya, before the attack ended?

Why did conservative voters consistently send Lindsey The_of_the_Carolinas Graham to the US Senate?

 

[Dante]

The GOP House committee clears Obama Admin of all Conspiracy Theories and charges relating to Ben Ghazzi and Ben Gay and Ben Dover and what do right wingers do?

Na, Na, Na, Na, Na...

 

[NYcarbineer]

And nobody would ever mistake you for anyone who would have access to intelligence. Not even your psychotic Teaparty buddies. [/QUOTE

?

Really *****? You want to cough up a thousand dollars to back that claim up? Every time I tell you libs to back your lies up you either RUNNNNNNNNN or like Carbee the clerk you pretend you've made a bet based on nothing to do with what's being bet.

Now that I've slammed your bimbo face into the ground, I'm waiting for you to answer the very basic question about the CIA lying straight to Graham. Why are you not aware of that, idiot?

What's your security clearance?

And remember, I told you I was an S-2 clerk. Look up S-2 if you need to.

Another illegal post.

What's security clearance have to do with this topic?

What's relative is who has the information.

Are you currently a S-2???? If so, your employer needs to have a little talk with you.

"It must really make your dick go limp that I worked at the highest levels of intel"

that's what you said. If that were true then you had to have had a security clearance. So YOU brought it up.

btw, since you obviously don't really know anything about the military,

S-2 refers to section 2 in a battalion, which is the intelligence section, which is headed by an intelligence officer over several NCO and EM's.

You need to tune up your lies.

LOL, this is like shooting fish in a barrel. Man I gotta get into selling to you gullible stupid brainless libs. Wanna bridge, little clerk?

Since you get dumber by the day, shit for brains, let me school ya for about the 85th time.

I was the "2" you dumb ****. Starting at the squadron level, then the wing, then the NMCC where I was endorsed by THE J-2. Do you even know what that is, little clerk boy? LOL

Tell us all what THE J-2 is? and the J-3? You stupid worthless ******.

Now back to topic, people are coming out of the woodwork to call this report a whitewash. You know....like former Special Operator Colonels like Col Bauer. You know who that is, dumbfuck?????" I just listened to him an hour ago.

Tell me, who is it?

You won't answer.....you never CAN...neither can your Comrades, LOL.


By the time we're finished shooting you stupid fish in the barrel on this topic, you'll all be shitting your pants. LMAO.

Go back and get your GED so you can keep up with the discussion, little clerk.

You're in the number 2 alright.

Still waiting for you to prove what was inaccurate in the committee report.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The GOP House committee clears Obama Admin of all Conspiracy Theories and charges relating to Ben Ghazzi and Ben Gay and Ben Dover and what do right wingers do?

Na, Na, Na, Na, Na...

Which makes it the most unsurprising reaction of the month.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I wonder if Trey Gowdy knows that eventually he's destined for the rightwing guillotine...

 

[Siete]

the RW's could post vids of Hillary actually shooting the Ambassador and nobody would believe them ... 13 previous investigations and 25,000 pages of documents later and all of a sudden Magic Gowdy has proof ?

uh huh, suuuuuuuuuuuuure he does.

 

[Oldstyle]

You know what's amusing, Siete? You putting so much importance in the number of investigations that this Administration stonewalled on Benghazi and you thinking the 25,000 pages of nothing that they released while claiming Executive Privilege and refusing to release the 14,000 pages that were actually mundane to the Benghazi debacle.

Care to take a stab at explaining why Holder and Obama refused to release all of those documents?

 

[Faun]

You know what's amusing, Siete? You putting so much importance in the number of investigations that this Administration stonewalled on Benghazi and you thinking the 25,000 pages of nothing that they released while claiming Executive Privilege and refusing to release the 14,000 pages that were actually mundane to the Benghazi debacle.

Care to take a stab at explaining why Holder and Obama refused to release all of those documents?

Sounds like a good excuse to start up investigations 9, 10, & 11.

 

[Oldstyle]

It's just common sense...when you have nothing to hide you don't invoke Executive Privilege and refuse to release those 14,000 documents. Nixon didn't invoke EP because he had nothing to hide. He did so because he knew that he had a lot to hide.

 

[Dante]

You know what's amusing, Siete? You putting so much importance in the number of investigations that this Administration stonewalled on Benghazi and you thinking the 25,000 pages of nothing that they released while claiming Executive Privilege and refusing to release the 14,000 pages that were actually mundane to the Benghazi debacle.

Care to take a stab at explaining why Holder and Obama refused to release all of those documents?

Sounds like a good excuse to start up investigations 9, 10, & 11.

Why only 9, 10, and 11?

 

[Dante]

It's just common sense...when you have nothing to hide you don't invoke Executive Privilege and refuse to release those 14,000 documents. Nixon didn't invoke EP because he had nothing to hide. He did so because he knew that he had a lot to hide.

Unclear on the most basic of concepts?

 

[Siete]

Sounds like a good excuse to start up investigations 9, 10, & 11.


(shhhh, don't anyone tell fuzznuts 9 10 and 11 come before 13, it'll screw with his tiny little brain)

 

[bravoactual]

This is not same thread as the one claiming Benghazi completely debunked.

In fact, since it came out, many of us who know the report is FULL OF SHIT and that the House Committee was too stove piped to even properly investigate it have been refuting the FULL OF HOLES REPORT. But now people who were directly lied to or lied about are coming out of the woodwork and SLAMMING THE REPORT SO BADLY that the dancing in the end zones by Democrats will soon turn to more defeat and depression once Trey Gowdy sets them straight in December with the SENATE REPORT.

The Benghazi Report, for example, exonerates the CIA, yet Lyndsey Graham was personally lied to by the CIA on Benghazi. By the time Graham is done in coming days, Rogers won't want to show his face.

Trust me, this is about to boomerang in Democrats' faces, just like Gruber and Obamacare has.

This latest in a list of hearings and reports on the events of Benghazi, and with each hearing and each report it becomes even more clear that was no conspiracy and still you ConJobs refuse to accept the truth.

You ain't got shit to show for all your bluff and bluster and you know it.

That's the problem with the truth ain't it.....you don't have like it, not liking the truth does change the truth.

You want the lies.

You need the lies.

Without the lies your nothing.

 

[JWBooth]

This is not same thread as the one claiming Benghazi completely debunked.

In fact, since it came out, many of us who know the report is FULL OF SHIT and that the House Committee was too stove piped to even properly investigate it have been refuting the FULL OF HOLES REPORT. But now people who were directly lied to or lied about are coming out of the woodwork and SLAMMING THE REPORT SO BADLY that the dancing in the end zones by Democrats will soon turn to more defeat and depression once Trey Gowdy sets them straight in December with the SENATE REPORT.

The Benghazi Report, for example, exonerates the CIA, yet Lyndsey Graham was personally lied to by the CIA on Benghazi. By the time Graham is done in coming days, Rogers won't want to show his face.

Trust me, this is about to boomerang in Democrats' faces, just like Gruber and Obamacare has.

Lindsey Graham says it is full of crap. Report must be accurate.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Don't worry e-Chick. The delicate flower of South Carolina will come to your rescue and salvage the Ghazi for you and the other foxswillers.

Here he comes to save the day!

I'd trust Graham coming to my rescue before I would Hillary and Obama et al.

Senator Lindsey Graham: Was there any airplane launched anywhere in the world before the attack was concluded?

General Martin Dempsey: If you’re talking about a strike aircraft, no, Senator.

Senator Lindsey Graham: Okay. Was any soldier en route to help these people before the attack was concluded?

Secretary Leon Panetta: Well, we had deployed these FAST teams, and they were on orders to move.

Senator Lindsey Graham: Were they on – was anybody in motion before the attack concluded to help these people? Anybody?

General Martin Dempsey: Only the personnel that were in Tripoli.

Senator Lindsey Graham: Okay, was any DoD asset ever deployed to help these people before the end of the attack?

General Martin Dempsey: Would you rephrase – would you repeat -

Senator Lindsey Graham: Was any DoD asset, aircraft or individual soldier, ever sent, put in motion to help these people before the attack was over?

General Martin Dempsey: Let, if I could, the, as soon as we knew there was an attack, the National Mission Force and the FAST teams began preparing to deploy.

Senator Lindsey Graham: My question is, did anybody leave any base anywhere to go to the aid of the people under attack in Benghazi, Libya, before the attack ended?

Secretary Leon Panetta: No, because the attack ended before they could get off the ground.

Senator Lindsey Graham: Thank you, thank you. Okay, and we didn’t know how long it would last.​

Benghazi Testimony with Panetta and Dempsey - Shocking Revelations

No help was sent because they feared it wouldn't arrive in time.

But when help is needed who in the hell thinks to themselves, "...gee, I think it's prolly gonna be too late to send help..." while that attack is still under way!!

You can't know how long an attack will last until it's concluded.

You send as much help as you can the moment you know it's needed!

They didn't.

Now, they are seeking to avoid accountability.

And if THEY get away with it a future Administration might seek to do the same someday.

Nope.

It stops right here.

If you'd trust Graham to rescue you....you'd better be in danger of getting the vapors. That dude is dainty.

Lindsey Olin Graham (born July 9, 1955) is an American politician and member of the Republican Partywho serves as the senior United States Senator from South Carolina, in office since 2003.

Born in Central, South Carolina, Graham graduated from theUniversity of South Carolina in 1977. He received his Juris Doctorfrom the University of South Carolina School of Law in 1981.

He served in the United States Air Force from 1982 to 1988 and served as a reservist in the South Carolina Air National Guard, attaining the rank of Colonel.

He worked as a lawyer in private practice before he was elected to the South Carolina House of Representatives in 1992, serving one term from 1993 to 1995. He then served in the United States House of Representatives, representing South Carolina's 3rd congressional district from 1995 to 2003. He was elected to four terms, receiving at least 60% of the vote each time.

Lindsey Graham - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

That's good enough for me.

Good enough for what?

 

[Oldstyle]

This is not same thread as the one claiming Benghazi completely debunked.

In fact, since it came out, many of us who know the report is FULL OF SHIT and that the House Committee was too stove piped to even properly investigate it have been refuting the FULL OF HOLES REPORT. But now people who were directly lied to or lied about are coming out of the woodwork and SLAMMING THE REPORT SO BADLY that the dancing in the end zones by Democrats will soon turn to more defeat and depression once Trey Gowdy sets them straight in December with the SENATE REPORT.

The Benghazi Report, for example, exonerates the CIA, yet Lyndsey Graham was personally lied to by the CIA on Benghazi. By the time Graham is done in coming days, Rogers won't want to show his face.

Trust me, this is about to boomerang in Democrats' faces, just like Gruber and Obamacare has.

This latest in a list of hearings and reports on the events of Benghazi, and with each hearing and each report it becomes even more clear that was no conspiracy and still you ConJobs refuse to accept the truth.

You ain't got shit to show for all your bluff and bluster and you know it.

That's the problem with the truth ain't it.....you don't have like it, not liking the truth does change the truth.

You want the lies.

You need the lies.

Without the lies your nothing.

Trust me, Bravo...if there is one thing that isn't lacking with this Administration...it's lies!
Benghazi was simply one more in a lonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnng string...

 

[Mojo2]

This is not same thread as the one claiming Benghazi completely debunked.

In fact, since it came out, many of us who know the report is FULL OF SHIT and that the House Committee was too stove piped to even properly investigate it have been refuting the FULL OF HOLES REPORT. But now people who were directly lied to or lied about are coming out of the woodwork and SLAMMING THE REPORT SO BADLY that the dancing in the end zones by Democrats will soon turn to more defeat and depression once Trey Gowdy sets them straight in December with the SENATE REPORT.

The Benghazi Report, for example, exonerates the CIA, yet Lyndsey Graham was personally lied to by the CIA on Benghazi. By the time Graham is done in coming days, Rogers won't want to show his face.

Trust me, this is about to boomerang in Democrats' faces, just like Gruber and Obamacare has.

This latest in a list of hearings and reports on the events of Benghazi, and with each hearing and each report it becomes even more clear that was no conspiracy and still you ConJobs refuse to accept the truth.

You ain't got shit to show for all your bluff and bluster and you know it.

That's the problem with the truth ain't it.....you don't have like it, not liking the truth does change the truth.

You want the lies.

You need the lies.

Without the lies your nothing.

"...did anybody leave any base anywhere to go to the aid of the people under attack in Benghazi, Libya, before the attack ended?"

WHY NOT?

Answer this honestly and correctly and you will be the first to do so.

 

[Syriusly]

This is not same thread as the one claiming Benghazi completely debunked.

In fact, since it came out, many of us who know the report is FULL OF SHIT and that the House Committee was too stove piped to even properly investigate it have been refuting the FULL OF HOLES REPORT. But now people who were directly lied to or lied about are coming out of the woodwork and SLAMMING THE REPORT SO BADLY that the dancing in the end zones by Democrats will soon turn to more defeat and depression once Trey Gowdy sets them straight in December with the SENATE REPORT.

The Benghazi Report, for example, exonerates the CIA, yet Lyndsey Graham was personally lied to by the CIA on Benghazi. By the time Graham is done in coming days, Rogers won't want to show his face.

Trust me, this is about to boomerang in Democrats' faces, just like Gruber and Obamacare has.

So to summarize- Lindsey Graham didn't say the Benghazi Report is full of crap- you just lied about him saying that.

 

[Plasmaball]

So it's going to be one of these threads....Okie dokie