Lutecia James won’t stop her vendetta against Trump

[BackAgain]

In determining whether the Attorney General’s proof has met the standard of a“capacity or tendency to deceive,” certain elements of a claim for common-law fraud may be relaxed. For example, it has been held that reliance is not an element of a claim under section 63(12) (e.g. Matter of People v Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC, 137AD3d 409, 417 [1st Dept 2016]). Relieving the Attorney General of the burden of proving reliance facilitates the use of the provision to reach schemes directed at the public markets for securities or consumer goods or services, where it may be difficult to prove that any particular victim of the scheme directly relied upon the defendant’s misstatement. It has also been held that, in an action under section 63(12), the Attorney General need not prove scienter (Trump Entrepreneur Initiative, 137 AD3d at417) or loss to victims (People v Ernst & Young, LLP, 114 AD3d 569, 569-570 [1st Dept2014])

From Judge Friedman's opinion.

Thanks again hack boi. I read the three decisions.

 

[dudmuck]

He paid it from his own business’s money, as legal fees. And falsifying business records is a misdemeanor, long expired.

its still a campaign finance violation, and because of that, the business records falsification is in furtherance of the crime of campaign finance violation.

 

[Winston]

The fraud is obvious and unquestioned.

The only actual argument being presented in court is that fraud shouldn’t be punished when it’s rich people.

That is the gist of Friedman's opinion.

 

[Marener]

They’re not politically motivated. They’re ousting the leftists who weaponized the government.

If it’s not politically motivated, why are they digging up ancient history about James’s mortgage?

 

[Marener]

You can't just make shit up. If Trump had to provide an appraisal, he had to provide one.

He had to provide as statement of financial condition which had lots of made up shit. Trump had appraisals but he didn’t use them, he made up his own numbers.

Is that okay?

 

[jc456]

It was discovered as part of then investigation.

sounds like incompetence and they should close their banks.

 

[Marener]

No it’s not. It was a non-disclosure contract to keep Melania from knowing.

I can’t believe anyone is gullible enough to think that. This didn’t happen in isolation. It was in the context of AMI buying stories before the election to protect his campaign.

AMI has to pay fines to the FEC for that.

 

[BackAgain]

its still a campaign finance violation, and because of that, the business records falsification is in furtherance of the crime of campaign finance violation.

It never was any such thing.

 

[jc456]

Who cares? This is about Trump. Not the bank.

that's incompetence and every load done by the bank is under scrutiny then.

 

[jc456]

If it’s not politically motivated, why are they digging up ancient history about James’s mortgage?

so Trump's loan just happened? Or, was that a historical record?

 

[dudmuck]

It never was any such thing.

its violations of federal campaign finance law under the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA); violations of New York Election Law § 17-152.
Its fully described here.

 

[jc456]

Yeah, right, and ******* pigs fly.

So you too feel the bank was incompetent?

 

[BackAgain]

its violations of federal campaign finance law under the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA); violations of New York Election Law § 17-152.
Its fully described here.

No. It sure doesn’t violate either. That claim has always been a ridiculous stretch. So, of course, you buy it.

 

[jc456]

Damn but you people are stupid. That didn't come from "Tish", it is a direct quote from the 300 plus page ruling issued by the Court of Appeals, ******* TODAY.

did they dismiss it?

 

[Marener]

No. It sure doesn’t violate either. That claim has always been a ridiculous stretch. So, of course, you buy it.

It was when AMI did it in coordination with a Trump at the same time.

FEC fines National Enquirer publisher over Trump hush-money payment | CNN Politics

The Federal Election Commission on Tuesday said it had fined the publisher of the National Enquirer for its role in a “hush-money” payment made to quiet a woman who alleged an affair with former President Donald Trump during the 2016 election cycle, according to documents made public by Common...

amp.cnn.com

 

[jc456]

Can we just stop with the stupid. That money was not tied up. Trump purchased a surety bond for 125 million. Probably cost him a whomping $375,000. And Jones didn't set the damn fine. Now, I know he struggled in getting that surety bond, perhaps he backed it up with 125 million in cash. If he did, HE GOT PAID ******* INTEREST.

You people are beyond stupid. No, Trump was not vindicated. No, the case was not dismissed with prejudice. Only one judge voted for dismissal, the ******* Republican, go figure. In any one was vindicated, it was Jones. The conviction was upheld, only the fines were overturned. Sure, it is going to the State Supreme Court, if for no other reason than to determine the amount of the fine. Trump has the right to take it to the State Supreme Court as well.

No, Trump does not have immunity in State courts, I would give you the case law but you shits haven't even open the damn decision yet, let alone at least scanned through it. I mean here is a thought, if you don't know jackshit as to what you are talking about, STFU.

you should talk to the appeals court.

 

[Winston]

Thanks again hack boi. I read the three decisions.

I highly doubt it. And if you can't tell Freidman's decision is completely off the rails you probably should spend what few brain cells you have reading something else, like a comic book. He twists himself into a pretzel, stunning that he would actually publish such a ruling. For instance,

There is a debate as to whether one of the chief causes of the failure in risk assessment that led to the 2008 financial crisis (assuming that such a failure occurred)

What does he mean, "assuming that such a a failure occurred? WTF, that was the very foundation of the 2008 financial crisis. You can't make chicken salad out of chicken shit, but that is what those Mortgage Backed Securities attempted to do. And in no small way, that is what Trump did with his financial statements to lenders and insurers. Like valuating Mar-A-Lago as if he could sell the entire property for use other than a social club. And then burying that valuation in a "tranche" with over 30 other properties.

Friedman does not argue that there was no fraud in the inducement. He argues that it was just fraud between big boys, they don't need no state to take care of them or look out for them.

 

[jc456]

Adam Schiff never defaulted. Why is he under investigation?

did trump?

 

[jc456]

So did Trump.

Supposedly, according to this very low information MAGA, it’s only a problem if you default.

where did trump lie on his application?

 

[22lcidw]

If it’s not politically motivated, why are they digging up ancient history about James’s mortgage?

Ancient history on Trump. In all realities, she is a pimple on the ass of power and yet she ruled like the whole ass treating Trump like the pimple. Progressive socialist women. The death of the west.