Love "wins"

[Seawytch]

The requirement ***** Puppy is that they be non familial consenting adults. Gay couples marrying meet those requirements.

Hey stupid - the requirement was one man and one woman. You changed it for your own agenda. So you've now illustrated your own hypocrisy ***** Puppy. You'll rewrite marriage for your own disturbed deviance but not for somebody else. So much for your "love wins" bullshit, uh?

Hey, non serving *****, the requirement was one black man and one black woman or one white woman and one white man...until it wasn't...bigots whined about that too.

So here is ***** Puppy moving the goalposts.

You make no sense ***** Puppy. You're basically admitting that the requirements have changed over and over. So why can't they change yet again for this mom and son? Because you're a selfish hypocrite?

Yes, they have. They aren't going to change to include; incest, polygamy, bestiality, necrophilia or any of your slippery slope fantasies. But feel free to keep sniveling about gays...who ARE marrying and will continue to marry. No amount of "patriot" pussyaching will change that.

Keep telling yourself that ***** Puppy. Your side of the aisle always attempts to "progress" to the next step (which in reality is to regress back to prehistoric man where any uncivilized activity was acceptable). You're the one preaching in another thread how a mentally disturbed man with sexual deviance should have the "right" to shower with a 6 year old girl or use the restrooms with her. As we speak - your side is working around the clock to "normalize" pedophilia. They have also begun the process to convince people that a mother should be able to "abort" her child up to 4 years old.

So don't tell me about "slippery slope" because that's the kind of sick shit your side of the aisle lives for. What did Nancy Pelosi say when asked about how awful Obamacare was? To paraphrase "At least we have something now that we can begin to build on". The libtards think we're too stupid to realize their entire game plan is to just get their foot in the door with something deviant and then build on it exponentially from there.

It's called a slippery slope fallacy for a reason, but fallacies are all you have. You're welcome to them. Have fun tilting!

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

If it was good enough for Adam and Eve's kids, it's good enough the rest..

Adam picked a winner.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Besides, I think public accommodation laws should curtailed. The government should not force people to do business with someone against their wishes. Let the fee market decide if people want to do business with those that refuse to serve X, Y, or Z.

He's saying that now because he knows where this is going in the Courts. He doesn't want the legal battery of Christians like the Kleins to give them standing (a defense) to walk the issue before the US Supreme Court. Because when they do, the right of them to politely refuse service will be upheld. And then the nature of religion vs deviant sex behaviors will have to be dissected under a microscope in an official USSC Opinion. That's the last thing mdk wants.

But it's going to happen. That ship has already sailed...or is sailing as we speak. Those two scheming lesbians who brought the hurt on the Kleins on purpose, just launched a missile with a boomerang attached to it.

Now!? lol. That has been my position for years. Sorry if that doesn't fit your narrative.

Silly's record is perfect. EVERY prediction she has made has been the exact OPPOSITE of what actually happened. She is basically a two-note human spambot.

 

[P@triot]

It's called a slippery slope fallacy for a reason, but fallacies are all you have. You're welcome to them. Have fun tilting!

It's called a slippery slope reality for a reason. Sadly, you unhinged libtards prefer ideology over reality. You're too dumb to even realize that you people call yourselves "progressives" and preach "progress" while denying that you will progress past anything you implemented today (all while history has unequivocally proven that all you do is keep getting more and more radical, more and more unhinged, and pushing the envelope further and further).

You preach progress, you declare yourselves progressives, and here you sit claiming that nothing will "progress" past this point. Nobody knows how to contradict themselves like a libtard. Nobody knows how to take stupid to the next level quite like Seawytch.

 

[P@triot]

Too bad science doesn't "win" with liberals. Because science once again proves that liberal are lying. Considering that liberals have completely rejected climate science, political science, economics, and history - there is no reason to believe they will accept this science either. We desperately need science to find a cure for liberalism. We have medications for schizophrenia and liberalism is very near to that as a mental disorder. I have to think they could alter those medications to help with liberalism.

What Media Get Wrong About Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity

 

[JoeB131]

Too bad science doesn't "win" with liberals. Because science once again proves that liberal are lying. Considering that liberals have completely rejected climate science, political science, economics, and history - there is no reason to believe they will accept this science either. We desperately need science to find a cure for liberalism. We have medications for schizophrenia and liberalism is very near to that as a mental disorder. I have to think they could alter those medications to help with liberalism.

What Media Get Wrong About Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity

hey, Poodle, not that I think you've ever gotten laid, but when did you decide to be straight?

 

[Moonglow]

If it was good enough for Adam and Eve's kids, it's good enough the rest..

Adam picked a winner.

Did he eat it?

 

[Moonglow]

Too bad science doesn't "win" with liberals. Because science once again proves that liberal are lying. Considering that liberals have completely rejected climate science, political science, economics, and history - there is no reason to believe they will accept this science either. We desperately need science to find a cure for liberalism. We have medications for schizophrenia and liberalism is very near to that as a mental disorder. I have to think they could alter those medications to help with liberalism.

What Media Get Wrong About Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity

hey, Poodle, not that I think you've ever gotten laid, but when did you decide to be straight?

He certainly acts like he has mental anguish problems and is always the victim looking for the multiple culprits...

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

If it was good enough for Adam and Eve's kids, it's good enough the rest..

Adam picked a winner.

Did he eat it?

Yes.

 

[Moonglow]

If it was good enough for Adam and Eve's kids, it's good enough the rest..

Adam picked a winner.

Did he eat it?

Yes.

Did you see Popeye hitting her boob?

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

If it was good enough for Adam and Eve's kids, it's good enough the rest..

Adam picked a winner.

Did he eat it?

Yes.

Did you see Popeye hitting her boob?

No, but I believe in akashic records, and although the Garden of Eden is sort of taboo, it is possible.

 

[Moonglow]

If it was good enough for Adam and Eve's kids, it's good enough the rest..

Adam picked a winner.

Did he eat it?

Yes.

Did you see Popeye hitting her boob?

No, but I believe in akashic records, and although the Garden of Eden is sort of taboo, it is possible.

Yeah.....Anything is possible....Since other societies had tales that were similar..

 

[JoeB131]

It's called a slippery slope reality for a reason. Sadly, you unhinged libtards prefer ideology over reality. You're too dumb to even realize that you people call yourselves "progressives" and preach "progress" while denying that you will progress past anything you implemented today (all while history has unequivocally proven that all you do is keep getting more and more radical, more and more unhinged, and pushing the envelope further and further).

Yeah, funny that. The most cringeworthy thing I see is watching old movies and TV shows, and looking at the racial and gender attitudes and wonder how people could think this sort of thing was okay. I imagine it will be the same in 50 years when you homophobes are kind of an embarrassment.

 

[JoeB131]

He certainly acts like he has mental anguish problems and is always the victim looking for the multiple culprits...

My image of Poodle is that he's about 25 years old, probably took business administration in college, read a copy of Atlas Shrugged once and really thinks that's how the world works.

 

[Silhouette]

Yeah, funny that. The most cringeworthy thing I see is watching old movies and TV shows, and looking at the racial and gender attitudes and wonder how people could think this sort of thing was okay. I imagine it will be the same in 50 years when you homophobes are kind of an embarrassment.

I think your prognosis for the future is exactly the opposite. Depriving a child of a mother or father for life as a matter of a legally binding contract will be seen as "the dark ages" of our country's judicial history..

 

[Moonglow]

He certainly acts like he has mental anguish problems and is always the victim looking for the multiple culprits...

My image of Poodle is that he's about 25 years old, probably took business administration in college, read a copy of Atlas Shrugged once and really thinks that's how the world works.

And can't afford Patron...

 

[Skylar]

Yeah, funny that. The most cringeworthy thing I see is watching old movies and TV shows, and looking at the racial and gender attitudes and wonder how people could think this sort of thing was okay. I imagine it will be the same in 50 years when you homophobes are kind of an embarrassment.

I think your prognosis for the future is exactly the opposite. Depriving a child of a mother or father for life as a matter of a legally binding contract will be seen as "the dark ages" of our country's judicial history..

Except that it isn't. Remember, children aren't parties to the marriage of their parents. Nor have you ever accurately predicted the outcome of any case. Demonstrating the 'value' of your most recent legal predictions.

Sigh....its like pseudo-legal whack-a-mole with you, Sil.

 

[Silhouette]

Yeah, funny that. The most cringeworthy thing I see is watching old movies and TV shows, and looking at the racial and gender attitudes and wonder how people could think this sort of thing was okay. I imagine it will be the same in 50 years when you homophobes are kind of an embarrassment.

I think your prognosis for the future is exactly the opposite. Depriving a child of a mother or father for life as a matter of a legally binding contract will be seen as "the dark ages" of our country's judicial history..

Except that it isn't. Remember, children aren't parties to the marriage of their parents.

Unless YOU are arguing that polygamy marriage "would hurt the children involved"...then all of a sudden children are to be considered anticipated implicit partners to the marriage contract...lol... Hypocrite.

 

[Skylar]

Yeah, funny that. The most cringeworthy thing I see is watching old movies and TV shows, and looking at the racial and gender attitudes and wonder how people could think this sort of thing was okay. I imagine it will be the same in 50 years when you homophobes are kind of an embarrassment.

I think your prognosis for the future is exactly the opposite. Depriving a child of a mother or father for life as a matter of a legally binding contract will be seen as "the dark ages" of our country's judicial history..

Except that it isn't. Remember, children aren't parties to the marriage of their parents.

Unless YOU are arguing that polygamy marriage "would hurt the children involved"...then all of a sudden children are to be considered anticipated implicit partners to the marriage contract...lol... Hypocrite.

Children aren't 'implied partners' to the marriage of their parents, 'implied parties', 'parties', 'explicit parties' or any of the other blithering nonsense you've made up.

Nor is anyone's right to marry conditioned on their capacity or commitment to procreate.

Sorry Sil.....but you genuinely don't know what you're talking about.

 

[Seawytch]

It's called a slippery slope fallacy for a reason, but fallacies are all you have. You're welcome to them. Have fun tilting!

It's called a slippery slope reality for a reason. Sadly, you unhinged libtards prefer ideology over reality. You're too dumb to even realize that you people call yourselves "progressives" and preach "progress" while denying that you will progress past anything you implemented today (all while history has unequivocally proven that all you do is keep getting more and more radical, more and more unhinged, and pushing the envelope further and further).

You preach progress, you declare yourselves progressives, and here you sit claiming that nothing will "progress" past this point. Nobody knows how to contradict themselves like a libtard. Nobody knows how to take stupid to the next level quite like Seawytch.

Where is this slippery slope? Where has incest become legal as a result of gays getting married? Gays have been marrying legally in some countries for a couple of decades now. Show me this slippery slope to whatever you're freaked out about now.