Love "wins"

[Seawytch]

Link to my support. Not giving a shit is not support. If RW nutters want to try to legalize incest and polygamy, I welcome them to it. They're the only ones talking about legalizing the two.

Geezus Seawytch. Post #234 at 2:16 p.m. today. You can't even remember what you said just over 4 hours ago?!? Here is the quote in case you or any of your fellow liberals find clicking on the link to be too challenging or too much like "work":

I'll support polygamy 100% as long as at least one of the multiple spouses is required to be over 40 and they all must be at least 18.

Oh you poor special puppy... that was a joke.

Nice try sweetie...

It wasn't a "try" it was a success and pretty funny...not to mention helpful. I will add to my support requirement that for men with multiple spouses, one of them has to be over 40, divorced and with kids. Better?

This is America - you're free to support whatever you want to support. I'm simply saying this proves that you were lying all along about "slippery slope". You're already pushing past gay marriage. I can guarantee in less than 10 years you and your fellow nutters will be pushing for incest. You'll use all of that absurd liberal "who are you to judge" and "love wins" nonsense. Liberals lack all morals. They've rejected God and have resorted to the "whatever feels good - do it" Neanderthal mindset. There is nothing more regressive than a progressive.

You're free to be a hyperbolic dingleberry, that doesn't mean you have to.

It's not liberals that can't stop talking about incest and polygamy, it's RW nutters like you and Sil.

 

[P@triot]

Geezus Seawytch. Post #234 at 2:16 p.m. today. You can't even remember what you said just over 4 hours ago?!? Here is the quote in case you or any of your fellow liberals find clicking on the link to be too challenging or too much like "work":

Oh you poor special puppy... that was a joke.

Nice try sweetie...

It wasn't a "try" it was a success and pretty funny...not to mention helpful. I will add to my support requirement that for men with multiple spouses, one of them has to be over 40, divorced and with kids. Better?

This is America - you're free to support whatever you want to support. I'm simply saying this proves that you were lying all along about "slippery slope". You're already pushing past gay marriage. I can guarantee in less than 10 years you and your fellow nutters will be pushing for incest. You'll use all of that absurd liberal "who are you to judge" and "love wins" nonsense. Liberals lack all morals. They've rejected God and have resorted to the "whatever feels good - do it" Neanderthal mindset. There is nothing more regressive than a progressive.

You're free to be a hyperbolic dingleberry, that doesn't mean you have to.

It's not liberals that can't stop talking about incest and polygamy, it's RW nutters like you and Sil.

Liberals get all angry every time they are proven wrong. I guess the realization that reality doesn't match up with their precious ideology is more than their fragile little pysche can handle.

Here's the thing cupcake - it's not conservatives writing articles about how wonderful being a pedophile is. It's not conservatives requesting the "right" to marry their own children. It's your side of the aisle.

 

[Seawytch]

Oh you poor special puppy... that was a joke.

Nice try sweetie...

It wasn't a "try" it was a success and pretty funny...not to mention helpful. I will add to my support requirement that for men with multiple spouses, one of them has to be over 40, divorced and with kids. Better?

This is America - you're free to support whatever you want to support. I'm simply saying this proves that you were lying all along about "slippery slope". You're already pushing past gay marriage. I can guarantee in less than 10 years you and your fellow nutters will be pushing for incest. You'll use all of that absurd liberal "who are you to judge" and "love wins" nonsense. Liberals lack all morals. They've rejected God and have resorted to the "whatever feels good - do it" Neanderthal mindset. There is nothing more regressive than a progressive.

You're free to be a hyperbolic dingleberry, that doesn't mean you have to.

It's not liberals that can't stop talking about incest and polygamy, it's RW nutters like you and Sil.

Liberals get all angry every time they are proven wrong. I guess the realization that reality doesn't match up with their precious ideology is more than their fragile little pysche can handle.

Here's the thing cupcake - it's not conservatives writing articles about how wonderful being a pedophile is. It's not conservatives requesting the "right" to marry their own children. It's your side of the aisle.

You have to actually prove someone wrong.

It's not liberals writing how "wonderful being a pedophile" is either, Private Hyperbole.

Hey "patriot", how about we revisit your fear 10 years from now and see if we've legalized polygamous or close familial marriages here in America. I guarantee we will not have.

 

[P@triot]

You have to actually prove someone wrong.

I did. With your own words. You are on record right here in this thread stating that you support polygamy and polyandry.

And the flip side, you've also been unable to cite a single instance where liberals put their foot down and said "we will not 'progress' past this point here". It's a constant push towards the more extreme and the more immoral with your side of the aisle. True story. Even if you can't bring yourself to accept it.

 

[P@triot]

It's not liberals writing how "wonderful being a pedophile" is either, Private Hyperbole.

Uh...yeah it is cupcake. It sure as hell isn't conservatives. This article was posted on a left-wing website and it was left-wing idiots who applauded and supported.

http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a_pedophile_but_not_a_monster/

 

[Silhouette]

Liberals get all angry every time they are proven wrong. I guess the realization that reality doesn't match up with their precious ideology is more than their fragile little pysche can handle.

Here's the thing cupcake - it's not conservatives writing articles about how wonderful being a pedophile is. It's not conservatives requesting the "right" to marry their own children. It's your side of the aisle.

Yep. And the sooner the GOP figures this out, the more votes their Senate and Congressional hopefuls will get this November.. It's a direct mathematical equation.

Only I disagree. Not all democrats follow the LGBT gestapo lockstep. Many privately know this slippery slope is getting slippery every day and it's scaring them. All those votes open for the taking as well. And the GOP sits silently waving goodbye to them as Cheney whispers in their ear...leading all of them off the edge of a cliff to extinction. Cheney's daughter is an open lesbian in favor of all the LGBT bullcrap. Pity the GOP is going to be a footnote in history because of her.

 

[P@triot]

Hey "patriot", how about we revisit your fear 10 years from now and see if we've legalized polygamous or close familial marriages here in America. I guarantee we will not have.

I've explained this multiple times and yet you continue to struggle with it. I'll try one more time. The issue is not whether it gets legalized. The issue is whether your side will support it and/or try to get it legalized.

Conservatives do an amazing job of stopping your immoral cavemen. If it were up to liberals, we would have had full communism in the early 1900's. Thanks to conservatives, it is more than 100 years later and we don't even have full socialism. Yes - we have partial socialism. And yes, it's destroyed our economy. But we've still managed to hold off the worst of it.

Thanks to moral and decent conservatives - we may be able to prevent legalizing incest and pedophilia. But it won't be from a lack of liberals trying. We were legally able to prevent gay marriage (even the people of the great libtard state of California told homosexuals to go fly a kite on Prop 8) but then liberals found an illegal way to get what they want anyway. Can't imagine the tactics you people will employ to legalize the rest of this stuff.

 

[Silhouette]

Thanks to moral and decent conservatives - we may be able to prevent legalizing incest and pedophilia. But it won't be from a lack of liberals trying. We were legally able to prevent gay marriage (even the people of the great libtard state of California told homosexuals to go fly a kite on Prop 8) but then liberals found an illegal way to get what they want anyway. Can't imagine the tactics you people will employ to legalize the rest of this stuff.

Since California is a liberal state and said no to gay marriage anyway, twice, maybe instead of gearing your excellent points towards "liberals", use "the LGBT Agenda/church/cult" etc. That way you can more accurately narrow down the problem; while at the same time exposing that millions of registered voters left of center DO NOT support gay marriage, tranny bathrooms...etc. etc. etc.. Would win over more people that way instead of lumping them in with the real problem.

 

[Seawytch]

You have to actually prove someone wrong.

I did. With your own words. You are on record right here in this thread stating that you support polygamy and polyandry.

And the flip side, you've also been unable to cite a single instance where liberals put their foot down and said "we will not 'progress' past this point here". It's a constant push towards the more extreme and the more immoral with your side of the aisle. True story. Even if you can't bring yourself to accept it.

No, I stated I supported someone else's support, then I went on to make a joke about how I would support Polygamy as long as one of some guy's multiple spouses was an over 40 single mother.

It's really too bad about your humor impairment. You miss so much joy in life.

 

[JoeB131]

Here's the thing cupcake - it's not conservatives writing articles about how wonderful being a pedophile is. It's not conservatives requesting the "right" to marry their own children. It's your side of the aisle.

Nobody on the left is saying those things, either, Poodle. Are your arguments so weak you have to create straw men?

 

[JoeB131]

Since California is a liberal state and said no to gay marriage anyway, twice, maybe instead of gearing your excellent points towards "liberals", use "the LGBT Agenda/church/cult" etc. That way you can more accurately narrow down the problem; while at the same time exposing that millions of registered voters left of center DO NOT support gay marriage, tranny bathrooms...etc. etc. etc.. Would win over more people that way instead of lumping them in with the real problem.

Actually, you guys have been in the minority for a while now... I mean, you can wish for the glory days when Bush road into the White House on a wave of homophobia, but the reality is, you homophobes are toxic now. Even Trump won't pander to you, and that's kind of sad.

 

[Silhouette]

Since California is a liberal state and said no to gay marriage anyway, twice, maybe instead of gearing your excellent points towards "liberals", use "the LGBT Agenda/church/cult" etc. That way you can more accurately narrow down the problem; while at the same time exposing that millions of registered voters left of center DO NOT support gay marriage, tranny bathrooms...etc. etc. etc.. Would win over more people that way instead of lumping them in with the real problem.

Actually, you guys have been in the minority for a while now... I mean, you can wish for the glory days when Bush road into the White House on a wave of homophobia, but the reality is, you homophobes are toxic now. Even Trump won't pander to you, and that's kind of sad.

Then why push the issue to the Supreme Court? Why not just let the states vote in gay/other marriage one by one? Surely a majority could get that done?

But no, you had your 5 pocket-fascists shove it down the throats of all 50 states at once "because it's so popular"...

The world was told that Prop 8 would fail too, for the same reasons. Yet it passed handily. So, once again, reality conflicts with your propaganda.

 

[JoeB131]

Then why push the issue to the Supreme Court? Why not just let the states vote in gay/other marriage one by one? Surely a majority could get that done?

But no, you had your 5 pocket-fascists shove it down the throats of all 50 states at once "because it's so popular"...

No, we did it because democracy doesn't work. Because most people don't vote and don't know who is representing them in their state capitals. That's why we have SCOTUS, to protect us from angry mobs of loudmouths.

The world was told that Prop 8 would fail too, for the same reasons. Yet it passed handily. So, once again, reality conflicts with your propaganda.

Prop 8 Barely scraped by because the Mormons lied their asses off about what the law would do. It wouldn't win today.

 

[P@triot]

You have to actually prove someone wrong.

I did. With your own words. You are on record right here in this thread stating that you support polygamy and polyandry.

And the flip side, you've also been unable to cite a single instance where liberals put their foot down and said "we will not 'progress' past this point here". It's a constant push towards the more extreme and the more immoral with your side of the aisle. True story. Even if you can't bring yourself to accept it.

No, I stated I supported someone else's support, then I went on to make a joke about how I would support Polygamy as long as one of some guy's multiple spouses was an over 40 single mother.

It's really too bad about your humor impairment. You miss so much joy in life.

Maybe you're just not funny? Did that ever occur to you? Of course not...

In any case - it's all there for everyone to see. Trying to backpedal now is a bit futile...

 

[Seawytch]

You have to actually prove someone wrong.

I did. With your own words. You are on record right here in this thread stating that you support polygamy and polyandry.

And the flip side, you've also been unable to cite a single instance where liberals put their foot down and said "we will not 'progress' past this point here". It's a constant push towards the more extreme and the more immoral with your side of the aisle. True story. Even if you can't bring yourself to accept it.

No, I stated I supported someone else's support, then I went on to make a joke about how I would support Polygamy as long as one of some guy's multiple spouses was an over 40 single mother.

It's really too bad about your humor impairment. You miss so much joy in life.

Maybe you're just not funny? Did that ever occur to you? Of course not...

In any case - it's all there for everyone to see. Trying to backpedal now is a bit futile...

There is nothing to "backpedal" from, "patriot". From "I don't give a shit", there is no where to pedal back to.

 

[Conservative65]

Let me guess...you think Obama has "destroyed" the economy don't you?

Well my dear - we have a record national debt (over $19 trillion), a record number of people out of the labor force, and a record number of people on food stamps. Any objective, reasonable, and rational person would consider that catastrophic and a monumental failure.

We went from hemorrhaging 700,000 jobs a month to the longest period of private sector job growth in history. Corporate profits are up 166 percent and the Dow went from 7,949.09 and right now it is sitting at 18,547.30. Remember when Romney said he'd bring unemployment down to 6%? It's at 5 under Barack Obama. If President Obama were a Republican, you wouldn't be able to stop crowing about the economy.

And I'm still waiting for your link about Hillary's economic plans. I gave you the analysis of Don the Con's...it actually would be disasterous for our economy.

Complete and total lies as usual. For starters - we have a record number of people who have dropped out of the labor force (as I have already stated). That means the real unemployment is no where near 5%. It's double digits right now. At least 10%. But because Obama doesn't have to count those - he dances a jig and drops the unemployment rate every time another person gives up looking for a job.

Second - Barack Obama is the only president in U.S. history to not have at least one year of 3% GDP growth. The only one. That's failure sweetie.

If a Republican had these same economic numbers you'd be bitching up a storm. But you'll defend any failure by a liberal.

Unemployment is counted the same way it's always been counted. There are not magic Obama numbers. Unemployment is at 5%, half of what it was when he took office.

I know this will probably bother you for the rest of your life, but Obama will go down in history as one of America's greatest Presidents and Hillary will be the next President.

Food Stamp (SNAP) use is 15 million or more higher than when Bush had a 4.9% unemployment rate.

 

[Conservative65]

Then why push the issue to the Supreme Court? Why not just let the states vote in gay/other marriage one by one? Surely a majority could get that done?

But no, you had your 5 pocket-fascists shove it down the throats of all 50 states at once "because it's so popular"...

No, we did it because democracy doesn't work. Because most people don't vote and don't know who is representing them in their state capitals. That's why we have SCOTUS, to protect us from angry mobs of loudmouths.

The world was told that Prop 8 would fail too, for the same reasons. Yet it passed handily. So, once again, reality conflicts with your propaganda.

Prop 8 Barely scraped by because the Mormons lied their asses off about what the law would do. It wouldn't win today.

Whether or not something works has nothing to do with whether people use it. You're a retard.

It wouldn't win today? Prove it.

 

[JoeB131]

Whether or not something works has nothing to do with whether people use it. You're a retard.

It wouldn't win today? Prove it.

Guy, I don't have anything to prove to you. You just aren't that important.

 

[Silhouette]

Hey, is this thread about food stamps or a mother and son trying to get legally married together?

 

[Seawytch]

Let me guess...you think Obama has "destroyed" the economy don't you?

Well my dear - we have a record national debt (over $19 trillion), a record number of people out of the labor force, and a record number of people on food stamps. Any objective, reasonable, and rational person would consider that catastrophic and a monumental failure.

We went from hemorrhaging 700,000 jobs a month to the longest period of private sector job growth in history. Corporate profits are up 166 percent and the Dow went from 7,949.09 and right now it is sitting at 18,547.30. Remember when Romney said he'd bring unemployment down to 6%? It's at 5 under Barack Obama. If President Obama were a Republican, you wouldn't be able to stop crowing about the economy.

And I'm still waiting for your link about Hillary's economic plans. I gave you the analysis of Don the Con's...it actually would be disasterous for our economy.

Complete and total lies as usual. For starters - we have a record number of people who have dropped out of the labor force (as I have already stated). That means the real unemployment is no where near 5%. It's double digits right now. At least 10%. But because Obama doesn't have to count those - he dances a jig and drops the unemployment rate every time another person gives up looking for a job.

Second - Barack Obama is the only president in U.S. history to not have at least one year of 3% GDP growth. The only one. That's failure sweetie.

If a Republican had these same economic numbers you'd be bitching up a storm. But you'll defend any failure by a liberal.

Unemployment is counted the same way it's always been counted. There are not magic Obama numbers. Unemployment is at 5%, half of what it was when he took office.

I know this will probably bother you for the rest of your life, but Obama will go down in history as one of America's greatest Presidents and Hillary will be the next President.

Food Stamp (SNAP) use is 15 million or more higher than when Bush had a 4.9% unemployment rate.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/05/12/benefits-food-stamps-fewer/27175881/

And why are the rates dropping...because we have an improving economy. I'm really not sorry that America isn't the hellscape Trump wants it to be.