Love "wins"

[bripat9643]

Some conservatives get obsessed about the most peculiar things.

Don't ask us to join in.

What could be more "peculiar" than gay marriage?

 

[bripat9643]

Where is this slippery slope? Where has incest become legal as a result of gays getting married? Gays have been marrying legally in some countries for a couple of decades now. Show me this slippery slope to whatever you're freaked out about now.

Um....ok. Here you go:

Oklahoma mother, daughter arrested after alleged incestuous marriage

The first same sex incestuous marriage

Sorry, still not seeing the slippery slope. They are not legally married nor can they be. Another "patriot" fail. Hear about this over at Alex Jones?

Today. They are not legally married today. But you bat-shit crazy progressives are working overtime to make sure they can be legally married tomorrow.

They won't be married tomorrow, or the next day or ten years from now. Keep buying your tinfoil in bulk, listening to Alex Jones and obsessing about pickle jars.

Why not? Don't you support their right to love who they want?

 

[bripat9643]

Who cares. Really, though, how is this anyone's business?

The queers have made it everyone's business.

 

[bripat9643]

It's called a slippery slope fallacy for a reason, but fallacies are all you have. You're welcome to them. Have fun tilting!

It's called a slippery slope reality for a reason. Sadly, you unhinged libtards prefer ideology over reality. You're too dumb to even realize that you people call yourselves "progressives" and preach "progress" while denying that you will progress past anything you implemented today (all while history has unequivocally proven that all you do is keep getting more and more radical, more and more unhinged, and pushing the envelope further and further).

You preach progress, you declare yourselves progressives, and here you sit claiming that nothing will "progress" past this point. Nobody knows how to contradict themselves like a libtard. Nobody knows how to take stupid to the next level quite like Seawytch.

Where is this slippery slope? Where has incest become legal as a result of gays getting married? Gays have been marrying legally in some countries for a couple of decades now. Show me this slippery slope to whatever you're freaked out about now.

You've admitted it several times already. Marriage was between one man and one woman. Then marriage became one man (of any race) and one woman (of any race). Then marriage became any gender and any gender. Soon it will be one person and multiple people. And after that, you libtards will move on to incest, bestiality, etc. All the sick shit you people love and support. You'll scream at the top of your lungs how we have no right to "judge" someone who wants to be legally intimate with their their own children. You'll proclaim it is beastilibernatiorphobic not to let someone be legally intimate with their goat.

This is just what you people do. You've already started a massive campaign attempting to "normalize" pedophilia. You bat-shit crazy people have an organization dedicated to it, Slate recently ran an article where a pedophile tried to play the victim, and instead of being shamed into his own suicide, liberals came out in droves to declare how proud they were of the sick S.O.B. and how they applaud him for "coming out".

Again Wytch - you people brag about being "progressives". You cannot show me a single example in history where you people drew the line and said "we 'progressed' to this point - but this is where we stop". It has never happened and it never will. The fact that you needed that much explained to you kind of illustrates how detached from reality you are.

Ah...so the "slippery slope" was letting blacks marry whites....got it!

Marriage was, and remains, between non familial consenting adults. That isn't changing.

Says who? If Adam and steve can get married, then why not Adam and his mom?

 

[bripat9643]

Yes - interracial marriage perfectly illustrates the "progressive" mentality. It doesn't make interracial marriage wrong as you ignorantly interpret. But it shows a progression that liberals are never satisfied and will continue to push the envelope from point A although way to point Z and then beyond even that.

When interracial marriage was first accepted - a homosexual marriage was considered an abomination. Through a relentless campaign (that includes anyone not accepting to to be painted as "evil", "intolerant", and "homophobic"), liberals have managed to garner enough support to get it tolerated in today's society.

You mean what happened was that we asked you guys to defend your position. Why was it an "Abomination"? And your answer came back that the Bible says it's wrong and you think it's icky. Those by themselves were not good enough reasons. That's why you lost that argument. Most people don't take the bible literally and the things you think are Icky straight people do all the time. So you really don't have an argument that was rational.

They will simply use that same strategy for disturbing, deviant behaviors. The current one is for pedophiles. They have an organization promoting it, they had a pedophile write an article for Slate.com in which the author plays the victim (instead of the poor children), and liberals rallied behind the author instead of denouncing both him and the site for something so offensive.

Wow. One article? Really, Poodle? No one is advocating pedophilia and unlike homophobia, you can make a good argument against it. - Children aren't physically or mentally ready for sex, and therefor can't consent.

After pedophilia is tolerated, they will move on to incest and beastiality. It's just what they do. They have never drawn a line in the sand anywhere and they never will. The moment any liberal ever did that they would immediately be branded as an "intolerant conservative".

Okay, guy, here's the thing. Because I just LOVE showing you maps. Here's a map of where Cousin Marriage is tolerated.

Wow- Look, it's mostly the Red States where you can marry your cousin Betty Sue!

No one is really arguing to change these laws, either. Because again, you can make a rational argument that inbreeding is bad. (Again, just look at the Red States!)

New York and California are red states?

 

[Seawytch]

It's called a slippery slope fallacy for a reason, but fallacies are all you have. You're welcome to them. Have fun tilting!

It's called a slippery slope reality for a reason. Sadly, you unhinged libtards prefer ideology over reality. You're too dumb to even realize that you people call yourselves "progressives" and preach "progress" while denying that you will progress past anything you implemented today (all while history has unequivocally proven that all you do is keep getting more and more radical, more and more unhinged, and pushing the envelope further and further).

You preach progress, you declare yourselves progressives, and here you sit claiming that nothing will "progress" past this point. Nobody knows how to contradict themselves like a libtard. Nobody knows how to take stupid to the next level quite like Seawytch.

Where is this slippery slope? Where has incest become legal as a result of gays getting married? Gays have been marrying legally in some countries for a couple of decades now. Show me this slippery slope to whatever you're freaked out about now.

You've admitted it several times already. Marriage was between one man and one woman. Then marriage became one man (of any race) and one woman (of any race). Then marriage became any gender and any gender. Soon it will be one person and multiple people. And after that, you libtards will move on to incest, bestiality, etc. All the sick shit you people love and support. You'll scream at the top of your lungs how we have no right to "judge" someone who wants to be legally intimate with their their own children. You'll proclaim it is beastilibernatiorphobic not to let someone be legally intimate with their goat.

This is just what you people do. You've already started a massive campaign attempting to "normalize" pedophilia. You bat-shit crazy people have an organization dedicated to it, Slate recently ran an article where a pedophile tried to play the victim, and instead of being shamed into his own suicide, liberals came out in droves to declare how proud they were of the sick S.O.B. and how they applaud him for "coming out".

Again Wytch - you people brag about being "progressives". You cannot show me a single example in history where you people drew the line and said "we 'progressed' to this point - but this is where we stop". It has never happened and it never will. The fact that you needed that much explained to you kind of illustrates how detached from reality you are.

Ah...so the "slippery slope" was letting blacks marry whites....got it!

Marriage was, and remains, between non familial consenting adults. That isn't changing.

Says who? If Adam and steve can get married, then why not Adam and his mom?

Because it's not legal. Good luck with your battle to make it so. I don't think you'll be successful, but I encourage you to try.

 

[bripat9643]

[Ah...so the "slippery slope" was letting blacks marry whites....got it

Please illustrate for me even one single example where liberal's drew the line in their in their quest for "progress". Just one example Seawytch. We're waiting

Marriage was, and remains, between non familial consenting adults. That isn't changing.

Another day, another lie from Seawytch. Marriage was between one man and one woman. That is an indisputable fact.

Where is the lie, "Patriot"? Marriage was between one white man and one white woman. That is an indisputable fact...they were still non familial consenting adults, just like today. All the same rules still apply. Non familial consenting adult couples...blacks marrying whites, men marrying each other, women marrying each other, men marrying women. Non familial consenting adults, just like it's been since we stopped burning witches.

They were also all opposite sex couples until the queers got the law changed, so why is that a valid argument?

 

[bripat9643]

It's called a slippery slope reality for a reason. Sadly, you unhinged libtards prefer ideology over reality. You're too dumb to even realize that you people call yourselves "progressives" and preach "progress" while denying that you will progress past anything you implemented today (all while history has unequivocally proven that all you do is keep getting more and more radical, more and more unhinged, and pushing the envelope further and further).

You preach progress, you declare yourselves progressives, and here you sit claiming that nothing will "progress" past this point. Nobody knows how to contradict themselves like a libtard. Nobody knows how to take stupid to the next level quite like Seawytch.

Where is this slippery slope? Where has incest become legal as a result of gays getting married? Gays have been marrying legally in some countries for a couple of decades now. Show me this slippery slope to whatever you're freaked out about now.

You've admitted it several times already. Marriage was between one man and one woman. Then marriage became one man (of any race) and one woman (of any race). Then marriage became any gender and any gender. Soon it will be one person and multiple people. And after that, you libtards will move on to incest, bestiality, etc. All the sick shit you people love and support. You'll scream at the top of your lungs how we have no right to "judge" someone who wants to be legally intimate with their their own children. You'll proclaim it is beastilibernatiorphobic not to let someone be legally intimate with their goat.

This is just what you people do. You've already started a massive campaign attempting to "normalize" pedophilia. You bat-shit crazy people have an organization dedicated to it, Slate recently ran an article where a pedophile tried to play the victim, and instead of being shamed into his own suicide, liberals came out in droves to declare how proud they were of the sick S.O.B. and how they applaud him for "coming out".

Again Wytch - you people brag about being "progressives". You cannot show me a single example in history where you people drew the line and said "we 'progressed' to this point - but this is where we stop". It has never happened and it never will. The fact that you needed that much explained to you kind of illustrates how detached from reality you are.

Ah...so the "slippery slope" was letting blacks marry whites....got it!

Marriage was, and remains, between non familial consenting adults. That isn't changing.

Says who? If Adam and steve can get married, then why not Adam and his mom?

Because it's not legal. Good luck with your battle to make it so. I don't think you'll be successful, but I encourage you to try.

Gay marriage wasn't legal until the law was changed. You really have problems with this logic thing, don't you?

 

[Seawytch]

[Ah...so the "slippery slope" was letting blacks marry whites....got it

Please illustrate for me even one single example where liberal's drew the line in their in their quest for "progress". Just one example Seawytch. We're waiting

Marriage was, and remains, between non familial consenting adults. That isn't changing.

Another day, another lie from Seawytch. Marriage was between one man and one woman. That is an indisputable fact.

Where is the lie, "Patriot"? Marriage was between one white man and one white woman. That is an indisputable fact...they were still non familial consenting adults, just like today. All the same rules still apply. Non familial consenting adult couples...blacks marrying whites, men marrying each other, women marrying each other, men marrying women. Non familial consenting adults, just like it's been since we stopped burning witches.

They were also all opposite sex couples until the queers got the law changed, so why is that a valid argument?

I wasn't trying to "argue" with you. I support your right to pursue your goals in the exact same way that interracial couples, formerly divorced couples, incarcerated couples and gay couples did. Good luck with your fight to marry your mother.

 

[bripat9643]

[Ah...so the "slippery slope" was letting blacks marry whites....got it

Please illustrate for me even one single example where liberal's drew the line in their in their quest for "progress". Just one example Seawytch. We're waiting

Marriage was, and remains, between non familial consenting adults. That isn't changing.

Another day, another lie from Seawytch. Marriage was between one man and one woman. That is an indisputable fact.

Where is the lie, "Patriot"? Marriage was between one white man and one white woman. That is an indisputable fact...they were still non familial consenting adults, just like today. All the same rules still apply. Non familial consenting adult couples...blacks marrying whites, men marrying each other, women marrying each other, men marrying women. Non familial consenting adults, just like it's been since we stopped burning witches.

Because "non familial consenting adults" who were black and white could not marry. And "non familial consenting adults" who were of the same sex could not marry. So you were - and still are - lying. That was not the criteria. The criteria was one man and one woman.

That is correct, "patriot", they could not marry because there were laws prohibiting it. Those laws were ruled unconstitutional, violating the 14th Amendment. Here endeth the lesson.

So why can't the same laws against incestuous marriages be ruled unconstitutional? Don't you believe people should be allowed to love who they want? Are you trying to tell people who they can marry?

 

[bripat9643]

[Ah...so the "slippery slope" was letting blacks marry whites....got it

Please illustrate for me even one single example where liberal's drew the line in their in their quest for "progress". Just one example Seawytch. We're waiting

Marriage was, and remains, between non familial consenting adults. That isn't changing.

Another day, another lie from Seawytch. Marriage was between one man and one woman. That is an indisputable fact.

Where is the lie, "Patriot"? Marriage was between one white man and one white woman. That is an indisputable fact...they were still non familial consenting adults, just like today. All the same rules still apply. Non familial consenting adult couples...blacks marrying whites, men marrying each other, women marrying each other, men marrying women. Non familial consenting adults, just like it's been since we stopped burning witches.

They were also all opposite sex couples until the queers got the law changed, so why is that a valid argument?

I wasn't trying to "argue" with you. I support your right to pursue your goals in the exact same way that interracial couples, formerly divorced couples, incarcerated couples and gay couples did. Good luck with your fight to marry your mother.

Then you have no argument against incestuous marriage? Is that what you're saying?

 

[Iceweasel]

It's called a slippery slope reality for a reason. Sadly, you unhinged libtards prefer ideology over reality. You're too dumb to even realize that you people call yourselves "progressives" and preach "progress" while denying that you will progress past anything you implemented today (all while history has unequivocally proven that all you do is keep getting more and more radical, more and more unhinged, and pushing the envelope further and further).

You preach progress, you declare yourselves progressives, and here you sit claiming that nothing will "progress" past this point. Nobody knows how to contradict themselves like a libtard. Nobody knows how to take stupid to the next level quite like Seawytch.

Where is this slippery slope? Where has incest become legal as a result of gays getting married? Gays have been marrying legally in some countries for a couple of decades now. Show me this slippery slope to whatever you're freaked out about now.

You've admitted it several times already. Marriage was between one man and one woman. Then marriage became one man (of any race) and one woman (of any race). Then marriage became any gender and any gender. Soon it will be one person and multiple people. And after that, you libtards will move on to incest, bestiality, etc. All the sick shit you people love and support. You'll scream at the top of your lungs how we have no right to "judge" someone who wants to be legally intimate with their their own children. You'll proclaim it is beastilibernatiorphobic not to let someone be legally intimate with their goat.

This is just what you people do. You've already started a massive campaign attempting to "normalize" pedophilia. You bat-shit crazy people have an organization dedicated to it, Slate recently ran an article where a pedophile tried to play the victim, and instead of being shamed into his own suicide, liberals came out in droves to declare how proud they were of the sick S.O.B. and how they applaud him for "coming out".

Again Wytch - you people brag about being "progressives". You cannot show me a single example in history where you people drew the line and said "we 'progressed' to this point - but this is where we stop". It has never happened and it never will. The fact that you needed that much explained to you kind of illustrates how detached from reality you are.

Ah...so the "slippery slope" was letting blacks marry whites....got it!

Marriage was, and remains, between non familial consenting adults. That isn't changing.

Says who? If Adam and steve can get married, then why not Adam and his mom?

Because it's not legal. Good luck with your battle to make it so. I don't think you'll be successful, but I encourage you to try.

LOL. And that is a perfect example of how disingenuous militant gays are. Gay marriage wasn't legal so the law was wrong. Incest isn't legal so the law is right.

Thanks!

 

[P@triot]

They won't be married tomorrow, or the next day or ten years from now. Keep buying your tinfoil in bulk, listening to Alex Jones and obsessing about pickle jars.

That's what you people said about gay marriage. And forcing people to take part in gay marriages (like hosting them, photographing them, and baking cakes for them). You've said that about everything you people have "progressed" passed.

I'm still waiting for you to provide even a single example of where progressives have put their foot down and refused to "progress" past a certain point. You can't do it. Which proves you are lying.

 

[P@triot]

Using "The black guy is president" math again, "Patriot"? What were the "real unemployment" numbers under President Obama's predecessor?

Typical progressive. All she sees is color. And sexual orientation. And anything else she can leverage to play the victim.

Actually, what I see is you dodging the question, "patriot". What were the "real" numbers under Bush?

I have no idea. That was 20 years ago. I'm not worried about 20 years ago. I don't ask about the numbers under Slick Willy Clinton either. I'm worried about today. You should be too - but that would require you to acknowledge that your precious little progressive ideology is a failed ideology and you just can't bring yourself to do that.

 

[Seawytch]

[Ah...so the "slippery slope" was letting blacks marry whites....got it

Please illustrate for me even one single example where liberal's drew the line in their in their quest for "progress". Just one example Seawytch. We're waiting

Marriage was, and remains, between non familial consenting adults. That isn't changing.

Another day, another lie from Seawytch. Marriage was between one man and one woman. That is an indisputable fact.

Where is the lie, "Patriot"? Marriage was between one white man and one white woman. That is an indisputable fact...they were still non familial consenting adults, just like today. All the same rules still apply. Non familial consenting adult couples...blacks marrying whites, men marrying each other, women marrying each other, men marrying women. Non familial consenting adults, just like it's been since we stopped burning witches.

They were also all opposite sex couples until the queers got the law changed, so why is that a valid argument?

I wasn't trying to "argue" with you. I support your right to pursue your goals in the exact same way that interracial couples, formerly divorced couples, incarcerated couples and gay couples did. Good luck with your fight to marry your mother.

Then you have no argument against incestuous marriage? Is that what you're saying?

Oh, I'm sure I could make quite a few...I don't care enough to do so. If you believe that there is a fundamental right for close familial relationships to marry, then I wish you luck in your legal battle. I don't think you'll be successful, but I support your support for an issue you seem to care deeply about.

 

[Seawytch]

Where is this slippery slope? Where has incest become legal as a result of gays getting married? Gays have been marrying legally in some countries for a couple of decades now. Show me this slippery slope to whatever you're freaked out about now.

You've admitted it several times already. Marriage was between one man and one woman. Then marriage became one man (of any race) and one woman (of any race). Then marriage became any gender and any gender. Soon it will be one person and multiple people. And after that, you libtards will move on to incest, bestiality, etc. All the sick shit you people love and support. You'll scream at the top of your lungs how we have no right to "judge" someone who wants to be legally intimate with their their own children. You'll proclaim it is beastilibernatiorphobic not to let someone be legally intimate with their goat.

This is just what you people do. You've already started a massive campaign attempting to "normalize" pedophilia. You bat-shit crazy people have an organization dedicated to it, Slate recently ran an article where a pedophile tried to play the victim, and instead of being shamed into his own suicide, liberals came out in droves to declare how proud they were of the sick S.O.B. and how they applaud him for "coming out".

Again Wytch - you people brag about being "progressives". You cannot show me a single example in history where you people drew the line and said "we 'progressed' to this point - but this is where we stop". It has never happened and it never will. The fact that you needed that much explained to you kind of illustrates how detached from reality you are.

Ah...so the "slippery slope" was letting blacks marry whites....got it!

Marriage was, and remains, between non familial consenting adults. That isn't changing.

Says who? If Adam and steve can get married, then why not Adam and his mom?

Because it's not legal. Good luck with your battle to make it so. I don't think you'll be successful, but I encourage you to try.

LOL. And that is a perfect example of how disingenuous militant gays are. Gay marriage wasn't legal so the law was wrong. Incest isn't legal so the law is right.

Thanks!

Gays and interracial couples got the law changed. You are free to try to do the same so you can marry whatever close familial relationship you are attracted to. Good luck.

 

[Iceweasel]

If you believe that there is a fundamental right for close familial relationships to marry, then I wish you luck in your legal battle. I don't think you'll be successful, but I support your support for an issue you seem to care deeply about.

The so called right used to be left up to the states. Some allow first cousins to marry, others no closer than 2nd cousins. If they are like genders which rule do they follow and why?

 

[Seawytch]

Using "The black guy is president" math again, "Patriot"? What were the "real unemployment" numbers under President Obama's predecessor?

Typical progressive. All she sees is color. And sexual orientation. And anything else she can leverage to play the victim.

Actually, what I see is you dodging the question, "patriot". What were the "real" numbers under Bush?

I have no idea. That was 20 years ago. I'm not worried about 20 years ago. I don't ask about the numbers under Slick Willy Clinton either. I'm worried about today. You should be too - but that would require you to acknowledge that your precious little progressive ideology is a failed ideology and you just can't bring yourself to do that.

Of course not. You only want to count the "real" numbers under Obama. Tell Alex Jones "hi" for us when you're together shopping tin foil.

 

[Iceweasel]

You've admitted it several times already. Marriage was between one man and one woman. Then marriage became one man (of any race) and one woman (of any race). Then marriage became any gender and any gender. Soon it will be one person and multiple people. And after that, you libtards will move on to incest, bestiality, etc. All the sick shit you people love and support. You'll scream at the top of your lungs how we have no right to "judge" someone who wants to be legally intimate with their their own children. You'll proclaim it is beastilibernatiorphobic not to let someone be legally intimate with their goat.

This is just what you people do. You've already started a massive campaign attempting to "normalize" pedophilia. You bat-shit crazy people have an organization dedicated to it, Slate recently ran an article where a pedophile tried to play the victim, and instead of being shamed into his own suicide, liberals came out in droves to declare how proud they were of the sick S.O.B. and how they applaud him for "coming out".

Again Wytch - you people brag about being "progressives". You cannot show me a single example in history where you people drew the line and said "we 'progressed' to this point - but this is where we stop". It has never happened and it never will. The fact that you needed that much explained to you kind of illustrates how detached from reality you are.

Ah...so the "slippery slope" was letting blacks marry whites....got it!

Marriage was, and remains, between non familial consenting adults. That isn't changing.

Says who? If Adam and steve can get married, then why not Adam and his mom?

Because it's not legal. Good luck with your battle to make it so. I don't think you'll be successful, but I encourage you to try.

LOL. And that is a perfect example of how disingenuous militant gays are. Gay marriage wasn't legal so the law was wrong. Incest isn't legal so the law is right.

Thanks!

Gays and interracial couples got the law changed. You are free to try to do the same so you can marry whatever close familial relationship you are attracted to. Good luck.

Interracial? You think homosexuality is a race? WTF?

Black men were treated differently than white men by the government so it was unconstitutional. When was homosexuality declared a race, I missed it.

 

[Seawytch]

If you believe that there is a fundamental right for close familial relationships to marry, then I wish you luck in your legal battle. I don't think you'll be successful, but I support your support for an issue you seem to care deeply about.

The so called right used to be left up to the states. Some allow first cousins to marry, others no closer than 2nd cousins. If they are like genders which rule do they follow and why?

You're right...it changed for Loving v Virginia...then Zablocki v Redhail then Turner v Safley, then Obergefell v Hodges. Good luck with your Iceweasel v who the **** ever. Do you need money?