Love "wins"

[Seawytch]

I do believe in equality and I believe you are equally able to fight for what you believe in as interracial couples, formerly divorced couples, couples in which one or more partners is incarcerated and gay couples did. File your case, I'm behind you 100%!

So to be clear - you 100% support polygyny and polyandry? You will vote for it on a ballot?

I said I support him in his fight. There actually can be found societal harm in polygamy. The same cannot be said for interracial or gay coupled marrying.

I'll support polygamy 100% as long as at least one of the multiple spouses is required to be over 40 and they all must be at least 18.

Well - you just proved that I was 100% correct on your "slippery slope" quip. Already we see support from the left to move beyond two people of "non familial" consenting adults and it's been - what - only a year. Can you imagine 10 years from now?

I promise that 10 years from now polygamists will not be allowed to legally marry, nor will siblings or other close familial ties. You also will not be able to marry an animal or inanimate object.

I don't give two shits if it is, I just know it will not be. You can put out your hair.

It's not a question of whether they will or will not be able to. Conservatives have managed to stop quit a bit of your bat-shit crazy liberalism over the years. The issue is that the left in this country will be supporting all of that (and worse) and fighting for it to come to fruition.

You've yet to provide even a single example of liberals putting their foot down and proclaiming "we will not 'progress' past this point". That's because it has never happened and it never will.

It's not "liberals" that has to say anything, society makes the determination of progress. Sure, liberal ideas are just mainstream ideas before their time, but since incest and polygamy aren't "liberal" ideals, you have no point.

Polygamy is legal in places around the world...gay marriage is not legal in those same places (and vice versa).

Slippery slope fallacy fail.

 

[P@triot]

So to be clear - you 100% support polygyny and polyandry? You will vote for it on a ballot?

I said I support him in his fight. There actually can be found societal harm in polygamy. The same cannot be said for interracial or gay coupled marrying.

I'll support polygamy 100% as long as at least one of the multiple spouses is required to be over 40 and they all must be at least 18.

Well - you just proved that I was 100% correct on your "slippery slope" quip. Already we see support from the left to move beyond two people of "non familial" consenting adults and it's been - what - only a year. Can you imagine 10 years from now?

I promise that 10 years from now polygamists will not be allowed to legally marry, nor will siblings or other close familial ties. You also will not be able to marry an animal or inanimate object.

I don't give two shits if it is, I just know it will not be. You can put out your hair.

It's not a question of whether they will or will not be able to. Conservatives have managed to stop quit a bit of your bat-shit crazy liberalism over the years. The issue is that the left in this country will be supporting all of that (and worse) and fighting for it to come to fruition.

You've yet to provide even a single example of liberals putting their foot down and proclaiming "we will not 'progress' past this point". That's because it has never happened and it never will.

Why do liberals need to? I don't hear them talking about legalizing incest, polygamy or whatever right wing perverts like to get into. Have a problem with polygamy? Talk to the really nutty Mormons about it.

That's because you hear what you want to hear. They are already working on legalizing pedophilia (and that's the most disgusting/disturbing of them all). I suspect that is the liberal agenda - if you can get that tolerated, then you can get anything tolerated.

 

[P@triot]

Slippery slope fallacy fail.

It's not fail - you already admitted you support it. Liberals are hilarious. They are the only people who could actually prove their opposition right and then claim the opposition "failed".

All anyone has to do is scroll up to see you admitting that you will support polygamy and polyandry.

 

[HappyJoy]

I said I support him in his fight. There actually can be found societal harm in polygamy. The same cannot be said for interracial or gay coupled marrying.

I'll support polygamy 100% as long as at least one of the multiple spouses is required to be over 40 and they all must be at least 18.

Well - you just proved that I was 100% correct on your "slippery slope" quip. Already we see support from the left to move beyond two people of "non familial" consenting adults and it's been - what - only a year. Can you imagine 10 years from now?

I promise that 10 years from now polygamists will not be allowed to legally marry, nor will siblings or other close familial ties. You also will not be able to marry an animal or inanimate object.

I don't give two shits if it is, I just know it will not be. You can put out your hair.

It's not a question of whether they will or will not be able to. Conservatives have managed to stop quit a bit of your bat-shit crazy liberalism over the years. The issue is that the left in this country will be supporting all of that (and worse) and fighting for it to come to fruition.

You've yet to provide even a single example of liberals putting their foot down and proclaiming "we will not 'progress' past this point". That's because it has never happened and it never will.

Why do liberals need to? I don't hear them talking about legalizing incest, polygamy or whatever right wing perverts like to get into. Have a problem with polygamy? Talk to the really nutty Mormons about it.

That's because you hear what you want to hear. They are already working on legalizing pedophilia (and that's the most disgusting/disturbing of them all). I suspect that is the liberal agenda - if you can get that tolerated, then you can get anything tolerated.

Yeah, on this board that's all the 'libtards' can talk about is pedophilia. But why is it you guys keep bringing it up?

 

[Seawytch]

Slippery slope fallacy fail.

It's not fail - you already admitted you support it. Liberals are hilarious. They are the only people who could actually prove their opposition right and then claim the opposition "failed".

All anyone has to do is scroll up to see you admitting that you will support polygamy and polyandry.

Link to my support. Not giving a shit is not support. If RW nutters want to try to legalize incest and polygamy, I welcome them to it. They're the only ones talking about legalizing the two.

 

[Silhouette]

Link to my support. Not giving a shit is not support. If RW nutters want to try to legalize incest and polygamy, I welcome them to it. They're the only ones talking about legalizing the two.

So to be clear, polyamorists' children can go pound sand when it comes to their mother and father marrying; but "gay marriage" is OK to legally strip a child of the hope of either a mother or father for life. Got any more profoundly hypocritical statements to make? Or are you done for the day?

 

[JoeB131]

Well - you just proved that I was 100% correct on your "slippery slope" quip. Already we see support from the left to move beyond two people of "non familial" consenting adults and it's been - what - only a year. Can you imagine 10 years from now?

Guy, we already have polygamy. One is called "The Wife" and the other is called "The Mistress".

 

[P@triot]

Well - you just proved that I was 100% correct on your "slippery slope" quip. Already we see support from the left to move beyond two people of "non familial" consenting adults and it's been - what - only a year. Can you imagine 10 years from now?

I promise that 10 years from now polygamists will not be allowed to legally marry, nor will siblings or other close familial ties. You also will not be able to marry an animal or inanimate object.

I don't give two shits if it is, I just know it will not be. You can put out your hair.

It's not a question of whether they will or will not be able to. Conservatives have managed to stop quit a bit of your bat-shit crazy liberalism over the years. The issue is that the left in this country will be supporting all of that (and worse) and fighting for it to come to fruition.

You've yet to provide even a single example of liberals putting their foot down and proclaiming "we will not 'progress' past this point". That's because it has never happened and it never will.

Why do liberals need to? I don't hear them talking about legalizing incest, polygamy or whatever right wing perverts like to get into. Have a problem with polygamy? Talk to the really nutty Mormons about it.

That's because you hear what you want to hear. They are already working on legalizing pedophilia (and that's the most disgusting/disturbing of them all). I suspect that is the liberal agenda - if you can get that tolerated, then you can get anything tolerated.

Yeah, on this board that's all the 'libtards' can talk about is pedophilia. But why is it you guys keep bringing it up?

Because it illustrates how disgusting you people are...

 

[P@triot]

All anyone has to do is scroll up to see you admitting that you will support polygamy and polyandry.

Link to my support. Not giving a shit is not support. If RW nutters want to try to legalize incest and polygamy, I welcome them to it. They're the only ones talking about legalizing the two.

Geezus Seawytch. Post #234 at 2:16 p.m. today. You can't even remember what you said just over 4 hours ago?!? Here is the quote in case you or any of your fellow liberals find clicking on the link to be too challenging or too much like "work":

I'll support polygamy 100% as long as at least one of the multiple spouses is required to be over 40 and they all must be at least 18.

 

[Silhouette]

^^ I don't support polygamy but am arguing FOR it's inclusion in marriage because doing so will show how illegal Obergefell is....and the states...and the voters won't be sitting on their hands anymore. The number one demographic to defect from the "it's all good" LGBT apologists will be straight women in committed relationships. The last thing on earth these grounded gals will want is to legally share their husband with another younger, prettier wife... The blind support will end abruptly at that point and suddenly we will find a huge surge against "marriage equality" on all fronts. The timing couldn't be better IMHO.

 

[Seawytch]

All anyone has to do is scroll up to see you admitting that you will support polygamy and polyandry.

Link to my support. Not giving a shit is not support. If RW nutters want to try to legalize incest and polygamy, I welcome them to it. They're the only ones talking about legalizing the two.

Geezus Seawytch. Post #234 at 2:16 p.m. today. You can't even remember what you said just over 4 hours ago?!? Here is the quote in case you or any of your fellow liberals find clicking on the link to be too challenging or too much like "work":

I'll support polygamy 100% as long as at least one of the multiple spouses is required to be over 40 and they all must be at least 18.

Oh you poor special puppy... that was a joke.

 

[HappyJoy]

I promise that 10 years from now polygamists will not be allowed to legally marry, nor will siblings or other close familial ties. You also will not be able to marry an animal or inanimate object.

I don't give two shits if it is, I just know it will not be. You can put out your hair.

It's not a question of whether they will or will not be able to. Conservatives have managed to stop quit a bit of your bat-shit crazy liberalism over the years. The issue is that the left in this country will be supporting all of that (and worse) and fighting for it to come to fruition.

You've yet to provide even a single example of liberals putting their foot down and proclaiming "we will not 'progress' past this point". That's because it has never happened and it never will.

Why do liberals need to? I don't hear them talking about legalizing incest, polygamy or whatever right wing perverts like to get into. Have a problem with polygamy? Talk to the really nutty Mormons about it.

That's because you hear what you want to hear. They are already working on legalizing pedophilia (and that's the most disgusting/disturbing of them all). I suspect that is the liberal agenda - if you can get that tolerated, then you can get anything tolerated.

Yeah, on this board that's all the 'libtards' can talk about is pedophilia. But why is it you guys keep bringing it up?

Because it illustrates how disgusting you people are...

Don't blame us for what you choose to talk about.

 

[P@triot]

All anyone has to do is scroll up to see you admitting that you will support polygamy and polyandry.

Link to my support. Not giving a shit is not support. If RW nutters want to try to legalize incest and polygamy, I welcome them to it. They're the only ones talking about legalizing the two.

Geezus Seawytch. Post #234 at 2:16 p.m. today. You can't even remember what you said just over 4 hours ago?!? Here is the quote in case you or any of your fellow liberals find clicking on the link to be too challenging or too much like "work":

I'll support polygamy 100% as long as at least one of the multiple spouses is required to be over 40 and they all must be at least 18.

Oh you poor special puppy... that was a joke.

Nice try sweetie...

 

[P@triot]

Don't blame us for what you choose to talk about.

If you people weren't pushing it...we wouldn't have anything to talk about.

 

[HappyJoy]

Don't blame us for what you choose to talk about.

If you people weren't pushing it...we wouldn't have anything to talk about.

You keep saying that.

 

[P@triot]

Don't blame us for what you choose to talk about.

If you people weren't pushing it...we wouldn't have anything to talk about.

You keep saying that.

That because I always keep saying things when they are the truth...

 

[HappyJoy]

Don't blame us for what you choose to talk about.

If you people weren't pushing it...we wouldn't have anything to talk about.

You keep saying that.

That because I always keep saying things when they are the truth...

Haven't noticed.

 

[Seawytch]

All anyone has to do is scroll up to see you admitting that you will support polygamy and polyandry.

Link to my support. Not giving a shit is not support. If RW nutters want to try to legalize incest and polygamy, I welcome them to it. They're the only ones talking about legalizing the two.

Geezus Seawytch. Post #234 at 2:16 p.m. today. You can't even remember what you said just over 4 hours ago?!? Here is the quote in case you or any of your fellow liberals find clicking on the link to be too challenging or too much like "work":

I'll support polygamy 100% as long as at least one of the multiple spouses is required to be over 40 and they all must be at least 18.

Oh you poor special puppy... that was a joke.

Nice try sweetie...

It wasn't a "try" it was a success and pretty funny...not to mention helpful. I will add to my support requirement that for men with multiple spouses, one of them has to be over 40, divorced and with kids. Better?

 

[P@triot]

All anyone has to do is scroll up to see you admitting that you will support polygamy and polyandry.

Link to my support. Not giving a shit is not support. If RW nutters want to try to legalize incest and polygamy, I welcome them to it. They're the only ones talking about legalizing the two.

Geezus Seawytch. Post #234 at 2:16 p.m. today. You can't even remember what you said just over 4 hours ago?!? Here is the quote in case you or any of your fellow liberals find clicking on the link to be too challenging or too much like "work":

I'll support polygamy 100% as long as at least one of the multiple spouses is required to be over 40 and they all must be at least 18.

Oh you poor special puppy... that was a joke.

Nice try sweetie...

It wasn't a "try" it was a success and pretty funny...not to mention helpful. I will add to my support requirement that for men with multiple spouses, one of them has to be over 40, divorced and with kids. Better?

This is America - you're free to support whatever you want to support. I'm simply saying this proves that you were lying all along about "slippery slope". You're already pushing past gay marriage. I can guarantee in less than 10 years you and your fellow nutters will be pushing for incest. You'll use all of that absurd liberal "who are you to judge" and "love wins" nonsense. Liberals lack all morals. They've rejected God and have resorted to the "whatever feels good - do it" Neanderthal mindset. There is nothing more regressive than a progressive.

 

[Silhouette]

This is America - you're free to support whatever you want to support. I'm simply saying this proves that you were lying all along about "slippery slope". You're already pushing past gay marriage. I can guarantee in less than 10 years you and your fellow nutters will be pushing for incest. You'll use all of that absurd liberal "who are you to judge" and "love wins" nonsense. Liberals lack all morals. They've rejected God and have resorted to the "whatever feels good - do it" Neanderthal mindset. There is nothing more regressive than a progressive.

Bingo. The courts are already moving to clean up the mess though. Undoing Obergefell is going to be a painful process for the judges involved pretending it is "law" right now...