....Lotsa coverage today on the 3yr anniversary of the Capitol attack...

[j-mac]

I don't understand the post above by poster 'j-mac'.
My poor avatar ain't posting about a 'failed coup'.
Rather, the thread was about the Proud Boys' role in the January 6th attack on our elected Representatives.

How poster 'j-mac' got an attempted coup out of that, I do not know.

That's because when your arrogant ass reads something that is other than your masters predetermined talking points you fall apart....

Face it dude, all you got is arrogance....

 

[Chillicothe]

"Face it dude, all you got is arrogance...."

OK, you go with that.

'But, back to the thrust of the OP. The role of the Proud Boys on January 6th.

What I found so compelling was that the reportage opened with Joe Biggs looking us in the eye, and telling us what they planned to do. And then, the balance of the piece shows those blokes actually doing it.

Hard to argue they are ANTIFA or FBI .... when there is such a long history of their involvement in various 'kinetic actions' of Proud Boys fighting one group or another. Not to mention their voluminous selfies and online video chats with members that clearly implicated them in the violence of January 6th. They explicitly instructed their members what to do.....and then they all went and did it.

Watching the reportage in the OP makes it abundantly clear that the Proud Boys were instrumental in the violence, damage, and injury of January 6th.

Here is that famous picture by some New York Times news photographer that was the front page of their July 21, 2021 'special edition' -- "Day of Rage". And in that famous pic, published 2-1/2yrs ago, we can clearly see the very leaders, Joe Biggs, Ethan Nordean, and Zachary Rehl, all of who were featured in the reportage offered in the OP.

 

[j-mac]

OK, you go with that.

I will, I always go with the truth.

 

[The Duke]

And you once again demonstrate that you don't know my politics.

For you folks, anyone who doesn't bend over for your Orange God is evil vermin. And yet, people from across the spectrum can see this is a cult.

Your thought processes are completely calcified. You are anti-American.

Take a look here:

You are unhealthily obsessed with the Orange Man to where all rationality gets cut off like a switch in your brain.

That's reality.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Jan 6th, the only insurrection everyone forgot to bring a gun.
2. And it will go down historically in America, as the only one that was so.
3. The next insurrection will be with guns, and all types of armaments.
4. And this president can have his war planes, and nukes, we wont need either.
5. It will be hand to hand combat, and you on the other side of this insurrection, will only find hope if you are in the resurrection.
6. Just want to keep things real, real in reality, there was no first insurrection, but saying there was and throwing innocent people in jail, or hold them without trial, will lead to a real insurrection, and your resurrection if you are to be found in it.
7. This is being foretold right before your eyes, and will transpire as told.
8. Not today, not tomorrow, but soon enough.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Take a look here:

You are unhealthily obsessed with the Orange Man to where all rationality gets cut off like a switch in your brain.

That's reality.

This low IQ tactic doesn't work.

 

[Chillicothe]

there was no first insurrection, but saying there was and throwing innocent people in jail, or hold them without trial, will lead to a real insurrection,

----------------------------------------------------
??????
In the context of the J6 seditious attack on the Capitol, well, who are the jailed innocent people that poster Chesswar is referring to?

• Who is being held without trial?
• And why were they jailed?
• Which jail are they being held in?

Look, poster Chess, I ain't trying to pick on your avatar, rather, am merely trying to vet your claim so the forum can have a better grasp of your gravitas, intent, and seriousness of purpose.

 

[MagicMike]

3 years ago today....OP was a faggot and still is.

Duke you seem awfully obsessed with homosexuality.
Usually when people feel a need to project so strongly it is because they are struggling with some repressed homosexual feelings of their own.
It's ok dude. You can feel safe here to come out of that closet.
We are all inclusive around here.
Go ahead. Just be yourself.

 

[chesswarsnow]

----------------------------------------------------
??????
In the context of the J6 seditious attack on the Capitol, well, who are the jailed innocent people that poster Chesswar is referring to?

• Who is being held without trial?
• And why were they jailed?
• Which jail are they being held in?

Look, poster Chess, I ain't trying to pick on your avatar, rather, am merely trying to vet your claim so the forum can have a better grasp of your gravitas, intent, and seriousness of purpose.

Sorry bout that,

1. It's plainly found out to get the details you seek.
2. Google has what you seek, all seeing Google.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[BackAgain]

Today, January 6th, we will see a lot of coverage about the timeline, and the events of that day in 2021. Gateway Pundit recently has been promoting video of police launching flashbangs into the crowd....and attempting to persuade that that was when crowd violence started.

That suggestion is misleading and incorrect. Violence had been occurring since the Proud Boys attacked the police and tore down the initial barricade near Pennsylvania Ave. The same barricade where the female officer was pushed hard to the concrete steps and suffered a concussion. THEN the violent mob surged towards the Capitol with the Proud Boys in the lead and seeking an entry inside the building.

They surged and attacked several entry points but were being stymied by police and locked doors, but they kept moving around the building in a hunt for an opening. Dominic Pezzola finally gave 'em the first big one when he battered through a window with a stolen police shield allowing attackers to enter and open doors from the inside.

Those depicted flashbangs that Gateway disingenuously asserts started the battling were after attacks were already occurring with site commanders aware via their earpieces of those simultaneous attacks and then taking crowd control measures to hinder more.

Here is a gripping video description of what was going on with the Proud Boys that tragic day for America.

You will see the involvement of Joe Biggs (17yr sentence to prison) Zachary Rehl (15yrs), Ethan Nordean (18yrs) Pezzola (10yrs). Their pics along with top leader Tarrio included.

Proud Boys Led Major Breaches of Capitol on Jan. 6, Video Investigation Finds (Published 2022)

A monthslong Times investigation using court documents, text messages and videos reveals how teams of Proud Boys instigated critical breaches of the Capitol on Jan. 6.

www.nytimes.com

Zzz

 

[Chillicothe]

"Zzz"

OK, cool, but.......
But, good poster Back Again, what did you think of the reportage on the role the Proud Boys played in the events of J6?
Did you think it was credible? Or not.
And why?
What did you like about it?
Or dislike?

After watching it (and, by the way, it was an assembly of videos shown at the trial of those 4 men, some of it by security cams, body cams, network cams, and cams of the perpetrators themselves).
So, was it good reportage?

And if you thought it was credible reportage do you then think that the trials and convictions of those men was warranted?
Why?
Or why not?

Thanks in advance, poster BackAgain.

 

[BackAgain]

OK, cool, but.......
But, good poster Back Again, what did you think of the reportage on the role the Proud Boys played in the events of J6?
Did you think it was credible? Or not.
And why?
What did you like about it?
Or dislike?

After watching it (and, by the way, it was an assembly of videos shown at the trial of those 4 men, some of it by security cams, body cams, network cams, and cams of the perpetrators themselves).
So, was it good reportage?

And if you thought it was credible reportage do you then think that the trials and convictions of those men was warranted?
Why?
Or why not?

Thanks in advance, poster BackAgain.

Hey Poseur Chilliconfuzed:

I don’t give a shit about the reporting.

You’re a fraud. Stop being such a pretentious posturing poseur.

Try this someday. Make a claim. Support it with alleged facts supported by appropriate links. Make a logical argument. Then maybe people can discuss some of these matters with you.

For now though, your phoniness gets in the way. As do your lack of verifiable factual contentions and your lack of logic.

 

[Arlette]

Of course they'll spend all day talking about J6,

They have to have something to talk about...

Biden hasn't done anything to make the news

Why do you pretend J6 wasn't a big deal?

 

[Chillicothe]

Try this someday. Make a claim.

------------------------------------------------------------------

Ah, that is a sad misread by the prolific poster Back Again. He/She attributes too much to my avatar.

We have no desire to make arguments here, to be an advocate, nor to be a proselytizer for any cause or issue.

Rather, we strive to only be honest and neutral reporters of the events of the day.
Hoping, that we can offer views that some folks.....well, folks like you, Back again.....would never see in your QAnon Great Awakening's news feeds, or Alex Jones's, or Jim Hoft's, or Steve Bannon's, or Michael Flynn's, or Roger Stone's.

In short, my poor avatar is attempting to help you, poster Back Again.

Trying to go where we are most needed, can do the most good.

Good luck to you.

 

[BackAgain]

------------------------------------------------------------------

Ah, that is a sad misread by the prolific poster Back Again. He/She attributes too much to my avatar.

First off, that’s a non sequitur.

Secondly, nobody is attributing anything to your avatar. I was talking about you, you fraudulent hack.

We have no desire to make arguments here, to be an advocate, nor to be a proselytizer for any cause or issue.

Obviously. Instead, you preen and posture. This makes you boring and otherwise of little value on a discussion board.

Rather, we strive to only be honest and neutral reporters of the events of the day.

More poseur speak. Chilli doesn’t mean “we.” The poseur means only himself. Also he has zero inclination to be neutral or honest. Obviously.

Hoping, that we can offer views that some folks.....well, folks like you, Back again.....would never see in your QAnon Great Awakening's news feeds, or Alex Jones's, or Jim Hoft's, or Steve Bannon's, or Michael Flynn's, or Roger Stone's.

Zzz

In short, my poor avatar is attempting to help you, poster Back Again.

No no. It’s neither your avatar nor you which seeks to help anybody, poseur Chilliconcrap.

Trying to go where we are most needed, can do the most good.

You're in the wrong place and doing the wrong job.

Good luck to you.

You’re the one that needs luck, poseur.

 

[Chillicothe]

"You’re a fraud."

It's disappointing to see the earnest poster Back Again so often.....so regularly....choose to employ ad hominems rather than responsibly participate in adult discussion.

Nonetheless, we are hopeful that he is able to re-calibrate and seek to be a positive contributor.
So, let's give he/she another opportunity.

Back in post number #71 Back Again was invited to offer his views...his thoughtful opinion.....on the reportage of the Proud Boy's key role in the violence of January 6th. He chose ad hominems, but let's turn that page.
Here, Back Again, share with the forum your thoughtful views on these: (from #71)
-----------------------------------------------------------

• "But, good poster Back Again, what did you think of the reportage on the role the Proud Boys played in the events of J6?
• Did you think it was credible? Or not. And why?
• What did you like about it? Or dislike?

After watching it (and, by the way, it was an assembly of videos shown at the trial of those 4 men, some of it by security cams, body cams, network cams, and cams of the perpetrators themselves).

• So, was it good reportage?
• And if you thought it was credible reportage do you then think that the trials and convictions of those men was warranted?
• Why?
• Or why not?

Join the forum, poster Back Again, in productive discussion.

 

[BackAgain]

It's disappointing to see the earnest poster Back Again so often.....so regularly....choose to employ ad hominems rather than responsibly participate in adult discussion.

Nonetheless, we are hopeful that he is able to re-calibrate and seek to be a positive contributor.
So, let's give he/she another opportunity.

Back in post number #71 Back Again was invited to offer his views...his thoughtful opinion.....on the reportage of the Proud Boy's key role in the violence of January 6th. He chose ad hominems, but let's turn that page.
Here, Back Again, share with the forum your thoughtful views on these: (from #71)
-----------------------------------------------------------

• "But, good poster Back Again, what did you think of the reportage on the role the Proud Boys played in the events of J6?
• Did you think it was credible? Or not. And why?
• What did you like about it? Or dislike?

After watching it (and, by the way, it was an assembly of videos shown at the trial of those 4 men, some of it by security cams, body cams, network cams, and cams of the perpetrators themselves).

• So, was it good reportage?
• And if you thought it was credible reportage do you then think that the trials and convictions of those men was warranted?
• Why?
• Or why not?

Join the forum, poster Back Again, in productive discussion.

Zzz.

Stop the blather, Poseur Chilliuncothe.

If and when the day ever comes when you have anything worth posting, send up a flare.

But, so far, you’re nothing but a baselessly self-important jackoff verbose gasbag.

I

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Then theres this.

'Inconvenient Facts' About January 6 - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. Today may be the day after January 6, but the battle for the freedom of the political prisoners currently being persecuted as well as the for the truth to be widely acknowledged continues. Every single day needs more attention paid to...

thelibertydaily.com

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Chillicothe]

"If and when the day ever comes when you have anything worth posting...."

---------------------------------------------------------------
Another sad read by the earnest poster, BackAgain.

We are serious poster, we are inviting you to be a positive value-added contributor.
Don't miss the opportunity.

So, once again, share with the forum your thoughtful perspective on the reportage about the crucial role the Proud Boys played in the January 6th seditious attack on our Representatives in Congress.

It is the reportage in the link below.

I personally found it informative. It gave me (and my avatar ) a useful perspective about those stiff sentences handed down to the convicted Proud Boys.

Proud Boys Led Major Breaches of Capitol on Jan. 6, Video Investigation Finds (Published 2022)

A monthslong Times investigation using court documents, text messages and videos reveals how teams of Proud Boys instigated critical breaches of the Capitol on Jan. 6.

www.nytimes.com

 

[22lcidw]

OK, you go with that.

'But, back to the thrust of the OP. The role of the Proud Boys on January 6th.

What I found so compelling was that the reportage opened with Joe Biggs looking us in the eye, and telling us what they planned to do. And then, the balance of the piece shows those blokes actually doing it.

Hard to argue they are ANTIFA or FBI .... when there is such a long history of their involvement in various 'kinetic actions' of Proud Boys fighting one group or another. Not to mention their voluminous selfies and online video chats with members that clearly implicated them in the violence of January 6th. They explicitly instructed their members what to do.....and then they all went and did it.

Watching the reportage in the OP makes it abundantly clear that the Proud Boys were instrumental in the violence, damage, and injury of January 6th.

Here is that famous picture by some New York Times news photographer that was the front page of their July 21, 2021 'special edition' -- "Day of Rage". And in that famous pic, published 2-1/2yrs ago, we can clearly see the very leaders, Joe Biggs, Ethan Nordean, and Zachary Rehl, all of who were featured in the reportage offered in the OP.

View attachment 884747

You Progs do a disservice to all the men and women who died for this nation. They understand what an insurrection is. Even if they do not know it.